James Harmsworth
Analyst · JMP Securities
Thanks, Paresh. So as mentioned, diluted earnings per share in the third quarter were $1 on a GAAP basis and $1.02 on an adjusted basis. Year-to-date, fully diluted earnings per share are $3.03 on a GAAP basis and $3.30 on an adjusted basis. There are a few things that I wanted to point out from the income statement: first, while gross premiums earned were down 3% from the third quarter of last year, they were up slightly from the second quarter of this year. This is the second consecutive quarter where gross premiums earned were higher than the previous quarter. This is attributable, in part, to the increase in gross premiums earned in TypTap, which is obviously, a positive trend for us. Second, investment-related income of $6.3 million was $4 million higher than in the third quarter of last year, this was driven by higher limited partnership income and higher interest rates on fixed term securities, short-term investments and cash. We proactively repositioned our investment portfolio to take advantage of higher interest rates, and this is beginning to pay off. Third, I wanted to give a little bit of color on the loss expenses for the quarter, which are higher than the first and second quarters. This includes some development from prior periods, some development for Matthew, but, of course, nothing related to Irma. Lastly, our effective tax rate this quarter is slightly lower than normal at 24.5%. This reflects a return to provision adjustment of about $260,000, and our normal effective tax rate, going forward, should still be 26% to 27%. As you look at the balance sheet, a few quick things to notice: first, total investments are down somewhat from the start of the year. A number of securities matured on the last day of September and settled on the first day of October, so there's about $17 million that are showing in other assets rather than investments. Second, we have around $250 million in cash and cash equivalents, but most of this is invested in money markets and short-term paper. The increasing yield on cash and cash equivalents is helping to drive the higher investment income. For some time now, we've been talking about our strategy of reducing share count through our buyback plan. In the third quarter, we bought back 149,000 shares, bringing the total for the year to 508,000. Our basic share count is now 7.5% lower than it was a year ago. This means that each individual share continues to represent a higher percentage of ownership, and we can increase dividends without much increase in actual cash flows. The total cash paid out in dividends this quarter, for example, was less than what we paid in the same quarter last year despite a 7% increase in the dividend paid per share. Now I wanted to take a minute to talk about our capital structure. As you know, we have an $89.9 million convertible debt issue that is maturing in March of 2019. We have the cash set aside and are fully prepared to pay this obligation when it comes due. We are announcing today that we are electing the physical settlement method for any conversion of those notes occurring on or after January 1, 2019. Conversions, if any, will be settled by the delivery of shares and notes not converted, will be fully settled in cash. As you know, the conversion price - conversion price, I am sorry, is approximately $62. So how will this impact the company? Either outcome is a very - is very positive for us. If all notes were to be settled in stock, our book value per share will go up between $5 and $6 beyond what it otherwise would have been. If all notes were to be settled in cash, fully diluted earnings per share should increase by $0.08 to $0.12 per share per quarter or $0.32 to $0.48 per share per year from what it otherwise would have been. That's the impact on earnings per share and book value per share, but what about holding company liquidity? Let's assume for a minute that the notes are paid out in cash. If this were to happen, we should still have about $25 million of cash and investments left in the holding company after the notes are paid. We recently announced the range of losses for Hurricane Michael, but even a full retention loss should not change this liquidity picture. Both of our insurance companies are well-capitalized, and we will have very comfortable RBC ratios with no need for capital from the holding company. One last thing. For the past year or so, we've had a significant amount of dry powder at the holding company level to be able to take advantage of any strategic opportunities that may arise. While the holding company will still have significant liquidity after the notes are settled under either option, to further increase our strategic capacity, we have received a commitment from Fifth Third Bank for a $65 million revolving credit facility at a rate of LIBOR plus two. At today's rate, that means our borrowing rate would be a little over 4.25% if we were to draw on that facility. The great advantage of this type of facility is that we don't pay for it if we don't use it. And so this is a very efficient way to have access to additional source of capital should any opportunity arise. So to summarize. If the 2019 notes are settled in cash, we will still have about $25 million in cash and investments in the holding company plus access to a $65 million revolving credit facility and diluted earnings per share will go up. If, on the other hand, the notes are converted, we will still have - we will have significantly more cash and higher book value per share. And with that, I will turn it back to Paresh.