Mark T. Frost
Analyst · KeyBanc
Thank you, Taylor. Before discussing our results, I'd like to welcome John, our recently appointed President and CEO. John has significant experience in leading and growing businesses in the life science industry, and I along with the entire Harvard Bioscience team, look forward to working with him to achieve our goals. I will turn it over to him after my remarks, so he can walk through his initial observations and the key priorities that we are focused on. I'll now move to our second quarter 2025 financial results, the details of which can be found on Slide 3 of the earnings presentation that we posted to our IR site. On Slide 3, revenue was $20.5 million, below $23.1 million in the prior year, but ahead of our guidance of $18 million to $20 million, primarily because of higher Chinese shipments. Gross margin was 56.4% versus 57.2% in 2024 and was towards the high end of our guidance of 55% to 57%. Operating expenses declined $2 million from prior year, driven by actions taken in 2024 and the first quarter of 2025 to one move to, one, U.S. ERP system, two, lean out our SG&A organization; and three, reprioritize our NPI projects. This led to an improvement in adjusted operating income of $1 million versus $0.8 million in quarter 2 '24. Quarter 2 adjusted EBITDA was $1.5 million versus $1.3 million in quarter 2 '24 with the major driver being the reduction in operating expenses, which more than offset the volume impact from the lower year-over-year revenue. Now looking at Slide 4, I will outline the revenue results for the quarter by product family and region. Overall revenues in the second quarter showed a slight decline from quarter 1, finishing at $20.5 million compared to $21.8 million in the prior quarter. Now turning to the geographical results, starting with the Americas. Revenue in the second quarter declined sequentially by 5.4% and were down 11.7% versus revenues in the second quarter of last year. As shown in the light blue on the slide, CMT had sequential growth driven by MEA's organoids. The year-over-year decreases were caused primarily by a lack of budget clarity for academics and NIH. Our preclinical sales declined sequentially and year-over-year due to lower academic sales related to the aforementioned budget clarity challenge for NIH academics. Now moving on to Europe. Overall revenue in Europe in the second quarter increased 9% sequentially, reflecting stronger academic shipments. Compared to last year's Q2, European revenues were largely flat. Cellular and Molecular sales increased sequentially and was flat year-over-year. Our quarter 2 preclinical sales increased sequentially and year-over-year, driven by higher pharma sales. Now moving to China and the Asia Pacific, which has been negatively impacted by macro uncertainty over tariffs. Overall, in the second quarter, APAC revenue was down both sequentially and year-over-year by over 25% due in large part to the tariff situation with China. Orders and shipments halted in April, but gradually returned to more normal behavior after the tentative agreement of a 10% tariff level. Cellular and Molecular APAC products declined sequentially and year-over-year. Preclinical APAC products also declined sequentially and year-over-year due to tariffs. Now I'll move to Slide 5 to discuss further financial metrics. Looking at gross margin first. Gross margin during quarter 2, 2025 was 56.4% compared to 57.2% in quarter 2, 2024, but up 40 basis points from the 56% in the prior quarter despite the lower revenue. The gross margin decline compared to last year quarter 2 was mainly due to lower absorption of fixed manufacturing overhead costs on a reduction in volume. The sequential margin expansion was due to actions we took to reduce the manufacturing organization for the expected lower revenue volume. Now if you refer to the top right graph, our adjusted EBITDA during quarter 2 increased to $1.5 million versus $1.3 million in last year's second quarter. Compared to the prior year quarter 2, reduced gross profit of $1.7 million was fully offset by lower operating expenses of $2 million. Now moving to the bottom left, where we both show -- where we show both reported and adjusted loss earnings per share. As mentioned in the past, I'll remind you that typically, the differences between GAAP EPS and adjusted EPS is the impact of stock compensation, amortization and depreciation. These differences between net loss and adjusted EBITDA are highlighted in the reconciliation tables on Slide 10 and are all noncash items. Now moving to the bottom middle graph. Year-to-date cash flow operations were strong at $5.7 million compared to $0.6 million in the same period with $2.8 million of operating cash generated in the second quarter. The primary driver for improved cash flow from operations was working capital management progress from both AR and inventory as well as operating expense reductions. Net debt was down over $4 million from year-end to $27.9 million from $32 million. This reflects our quarterly principal payment of $1 million and improved operating cash flow. Now with respect to our credit facility, we negotiated an amendment with our bank group. Key elements of the agreement are: first, an extension of refinance timing to December 5, close to the maturity date of the facility. Waiver default on refinancing milestones and financial covenants relating to leverage, fixed interest coverage. Thirdly, elimination of testing of financial covenants for quarter 3, except for liquidity, which is now $3 million; and fourth, an increase in the SOFR adder to 700 basis points and an amendment fee of 100 basis points, which is primarily paid once debt is repaid. We believe the extension provides us with sufficient time to identify and execute a transaction to refinance and pay down the existing debt. More detail is provided in the 10-Q, which will be filed after market today. I'll now move to Slide 7 to discuss our outlook for quarter 3. Now supported by our second quarter revenue performance as well as a strong start on orders in the third quarter, we are guiding to a range of $19 million to $21 million of revenue. With that, we expect a corresponding improvement in gross margin from the higher volume and are guiding to a gross margin range of 56% to 58%. This guidance shows our continuous progress in stabilizing our business as well as our prudent financial discipline. I'll now turn the call over to John. John?