Yes, hey, John, this is Ron, like Mike mentioned, I mean, we're not disclosing deal specifics, but this is the way I would think about it. I mean, ultimately, it's just like almost any asset class across any industry, there's a range dependent upon the benefits to the buyer, and the meaning the consolidation benefits, and the quality of the asset. So the opportunity that we see in Arizona, and clearly exists in other locations, is that there's a need, and unmet demand for the consolidation of what we call troubled utilities. So clearly, if the big water companies want to sit around and exchange their assets back and forth to each other, then that would demand the type of market valuations and premiums that you're talking about. But that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about Class C, D, and E now, doesn't mean we won't do some of the larger ones. And those will be based specifically on if we can get a financial structure in place that makes sense for us to the buyer, and then the seller, the deals just won't happen. But when you think about the opportunities on the smaller scale, which was the basis of your original question, C's DS, and E's aren't values like that. And so they are certainly cash flow to the owners, and that cash means something to them. And so there's a value to that but so you have to just get to a deal that works for them on the replacement of the cash flow that they're taken from the utilities. And obviously, there's risk there accident as they sell the regulatory asset that's got a high risk profile, just based on what we do. Verse, how that utility then looks inside of our consolidated utility. And when you look at it from those two paradigms, we believe, and have been no, we just announced the one in 2018. But we did three as a reminder, actually four as a reminder in 2018, and 2017. We have been able to get the deals done at a valuation that's very favorable and accretive to our shareholders, and we believe we can continue to do that. And that'll that's even on the just the acquisition cost. But then, as Chris mentioned, we get to invest to improve them, bring them up to our standards of quality and automation. And then ultimately, that's just more rate based investment that we get to put inside the rates that ultimately the customers pay. So, there is -- we try to get an immediate, valuation left or arbitrage against each deal by itself isn't going to make a step function increase in our stock today. But if we can do enough of them over time, that's the strategy. And we think we can do it. And we think there's a need, frankly, for us to do it.