Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to ZoomInfo First Quarter 2023 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Jerry Sisitsky, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thanks, Amy. Welcome to ZoomInfo's financial results conference call for the first quarter of 2023. With me on the call today are Henry Schuck, Founder and CEO of ZoomInfo; and Cameron Hyzer, our CFO. After their remarks, we will open the call to Q&A. During this call, any forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of U.S. securities laws. Expressions of future goals, including business outlook, expectations for future financial performance and similar items, including, without limitation, expressions using the terminology may, will, expect, anticipate and believe and expressions, which reflect something other than historical facts are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed in the Risk Factors sections of our SEC filings. Actual results may differ materially from any forward-looking statements. The company undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events that may arise after this conference call, except as required by law. For more information, please refer to the cautionary statement in the slides posted to our Investor Relations website at ir.zoominfo.com. All metrics on this call are non-GAAP, unless otherwise noted. A reconciliation can be found in the financial results press release or in the slides posted to our IR website. With that, I'll turn the call over to Henry.

Thank you, Jerry, and welcome, everyone. In Q1, we delivered 24% revenue growth, better-than-expected profitability with an adjusted operating income margin of 40% and more than $121 million in un-levered free cash flow. While we can't control the macroeconomic environment, we can control how we manage the business, and we are executing efficiently. Even when facing continued scrutiny on deals against the macro backdrop that we have not seen improved, our financial results demonstrate the value that our platform delivers to customers everywhere. With that backdrop, we continue to drive a leading combination of growth and profitability, while approximately 40% of our revenue comes from software companies. When you incorporate financial services, venture-backed companies and the broader technology space, the majority of our customers are being impacted by the current economic environment. We are confident that when there is a more stable and certain economic outlook, we will see even higher levels of growth accompanied by even stronger profitability. Until we get there, we are executing against our plans for the year with confidence and reaffirming our full year guidance, which calls for 17% revenue growth and more than $0.5 billion in unlevered free cash flow for the year. While we grew our $1 million cohort of customers materially quarter-over-quarter, our 100k cohort lost logos in Q1 as software companies down sold. We ended the first quarter with 1,905 customers that have more than 100K in ACV, up approximately 17% year-over-year. Gross churn remains consistent and the total ACV for that cohort continues to grow. We also continue to see bright spots in less effective end markets like manufacturing and transportation and logistics where we are seeing accelerating demand on the new business side and strong seat growth on the customer side. Given the incredibly large and growing addressable market,…

Thanks, Henry. In Q1, we delivered revenue of $301 million, up 24% year-over-year and up 1.9% sequentially on an annualized basis when factoring in the two fewer days of revenue recognition in the first quarter. Excluding the impact of products acquired within the last 12 months, our organic revenue growth for the quarter was 23%. Given that we completed our most recent acquisitions at the beginning of Q2 2022, we do not anticipate inorganic revenue contribution next quarter. Adjusted operating income in Q1 was $120 million, a margin of 40%. GAAP net income was $45 million, and GAAP EPS was $0.11 per share. Non-GAAP EPS was $0.24 per share. Overall, the environment degraded in the first quarter, similar to the assumptions upon which we built the guidance. The majority of our customers operate in industries meaningfully impacted by the current economic environment, including software, other technology and financial services. and all customers are scrutinizing spending across vendors. This backdrop makes the starting point for renewals and upsells more challenging, impacting overall sales efficiency and putting downward pressure on NRR. As contemplated in our guidance, net retention activity was incrementally worse than what we experienced in Q4, while new sales was roughly flat relative to Q1 2022, slightly better than what we contemplated in the guidance. This better sales performance was partially offset by increased revenue reserves related to write-offs among our S&P customers. With this performance and more visibility into the remainder of the year, we are reaffirming our previously provided full year guidance, which calls for 17% revenue growth at the midpoint and an implied adjusted operating margin of 41%. International revenue grew 32% relative to Q1 2022, and international customers contributed 13% of the revenue in the quarter. \ Turning to cash flow. Operating cash flow was in…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question is from Alex Zukin with Wolfe Research. Your line is open.

Hi, guys, thanks for taking the question, and I appreciate a lot of the detail on the underlying business. I guess -- maybe start for Henry. It looks like kind of a tale of two businesses, right? You have the business that the underlying customers are impacted and you're doing really well with the new business, obviously some headwinds on retention and upsell. Just maybe if you split those two out and you look at them separately, what would the non-impacted business look like versus the impact of business? And as you talk to customers, as you talk to other CEOs, kind of where are we on that timeline where we kind of start to rebase into a new normal sales cycle on the impacted side?

Look, I think the way to think about this, Alex is it's a little bit less like there is a group of companies that are doing really like well and then a group of companies that are more challenged. Even within the tech and software vertical, a number of the companies that moved into our million-dollar cohort this quarter were from software or tech companies. What we've said in the past, which is still true is that there is a lot of demand for our products and services. And so we continue to add headcount -- quota-carrying headcount into our account management and account executive organization because as we are out there trying to upsell in our customer base, trying to cross-sell in our customer base, we're also affected on the other side by renewals taking longer, general sales cycles elongating for those same deals, and so we're not able to get to as much of it that's out there. So we're continuing to hire there and continue to hire those quota-carrying reps could even in the industries that are impacted, we are seeing opportunity and demand. And as far as the sales cycles coming back to a more normal state, what -- I'll say or iterate what Cameron said, which is April as compared to January is off to a much better start than January was.

Perfect. And then maybe just on the -- any comments on the competitive environment? We keep hearing anecdotes of there's kind of fierce price competition, a lot of overlapping offerings increasingly coming out-of-the space. As you look over the next 12 months and beyond, and you think about the incremental competitive differentiation of the offering, where are you seeing a show through right now?

Yes. So what I'll tell you first is the competitive landscape has not changed. Our win rates have not changed as they relate to our competitors. If anything, we feel ourselves moving further and further away from the competitors in our space. And ACV per customer was roughly flat and discounting was consistent to what we saw in Q4, and so we haven't been pressured in that way. I think when you think about differentiation in the space, I think there's two things. One, we're continuing to invest in our data and our data asset, so we're very obviously, the leader when it comes to data coverage, breadth and accuracy, and want to pull further and further ahead of anybody in the market there. And then second, as we bring everything together in an integrated experience, as you saw us really start doing this quarter by bringing in sales engagement into the core SalesOS platform, we think that interconnectivity between platforms and systems creates a long-term differentiation when put together with our best-in-class data assets.

Perfect. Thank you, guys.

One moment for our next question. And our next question is from Elizabeth Porter with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Great. Thank you so much. I just wanted to ask a bit on NRR first. Directionally, it sounds like NRR got a little bit worse in Q1 versus Q4, which is what you'd expected in your guidance. Directionally, what's the risk that we could see incremental weakness, either through the year in NRR from that Q1 rate as the macro gets a little bit more difficult? And on the offset, while it's still early and there's a lot of uncertainty, is there an opportunity to improve upsell as we just lap some of the tough comps in the coming quarters. Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, Elizabeth. So, yes, we are starting to see upsell opportunities among many of our clients, and even in Q1, but more so as we move into Q2. Yes. I think there is a really significant opportunity for upsell and gross retention continues to hang in pretty well. That being said, there is the potential for down-sell, and I think we're seeing a little bit more down-sell as well, particularly in the software sector where we are -- there a number of layoffs. But as we start to lap, many of the harder renewals that -- and we really started to see pressure even in Q2 of last year. As we start to lap those renewals, we feel that many of those renewals in the software space may actually start to go better as we get further and further into the year.

Great. And then just as a follow-up. Given the recent leadership announcements, did you guys see any disruption from the changes in Q1? And if so, was it any better or worse than what you expected? And how should we think about the impact for the remainder of the year?

Yes. Look, we've seen a real positive impact from Dave and Ally's entering the Company. And so we didn't see any disruption in Q1 from them coming in. I think if anything we feel their impact was increasingly positive on the organization, and they're both focused on improving productivity and org design, and for Dave, up-market execution. And so we feel really good about their contribution so far.

Okay. Thank you.

One moment for our next question. And our next question comes from Koji Ikeda with Bank of America. Your line is open.

Yes. Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. I just wanted to ask a couple here. First one being about just kind of going back to the sales linearity, April being a better month than maybe the March and February or even better than January like you stated. So could you talk about that a little bit more? And what exactly does that mean? Does that mean that the pipeline generation is better? I know there's more sales capacity in the sales department today versus the beginning of the year, so that kind of makes sense. If that's the case, or is it sales productivity? I mean, I guess, maybe a little bit more color on how April is being better than kind of the previous months.

Yes. So in terms of linearity, specifically, April was better than January. Yes, typically we do have some level of linearity within the month, so the first month is oftentimes a little less than the second month, which has been less than the third month. But we do feel that momentum and on an adjusted basis comparing it to January gives us good confidence in where Q2 is going. And certainly from a -- and that's actual sales -- close sales. From a pipeline perspective, I think we're seeing a similar dynamic of improvement in Q2.

Got it, got it. No, thanks for that, Cameron. And then I wanted to ask a follow-up question here on RPO. Just the current RPO and RPO, the growth slowed in the first quarter to the high-teens from the mid-to-high 20s last quarter, and even it was a bit down sequentially in the first quarter. So could you walk us through maybe some of the underlying mechanics there? Anything to call out specifically maybe on duration or co-terming? Or anything that caught on the ARPU to help us understand that metric a little bit better? Thanks, guys.

Sure. Well, certainly, we are seeing fewer long-term contracts and that you can kind of see the difference in RPO versus current RPO, when you're looking at that. The other I think that does impact RPO is we mentioned that we had a greater number of write-offs in the quarter related to small-business clients and that flows through RPO more dramatically than some because those are often contracts that haven't been built yet.

Got it. Thanks for taking my questions.

One moment for our next question. Our next question is from Mark Murphy with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Thank you very much. In the last week and a half, we've noticed some incremental layoff announcements and Cameron, I think you alluded to it. But we've seen it from Dropbox and Alteryx and Red Hat and Lenovo and F5. If you look at that trend, would you expect the over 100K customer cohort to continue contracting in the near term? Or is it based on the kind of pipeline comments and how April started, is it possible that, that was more of a one-time event?

So I think our expectation is that we're going to continue to focus on driving more value for our largest clients, and as a result, focused on driving the 100K customer cohort higher. That being said, most of the degradation or all the degradation came from software companies which still comprise a good portion of 100K customers. So to the extent that those layoffs are largely concentrated in software companies, particularly, kind of the degradation for us is, those companies that are close to that 100K number, so a small down sell ends up pushing them under. So it's the kind of small and mid-size software companies that we actually have the most risk if you're purely focused on that $100,000 level.

Okay, that makes sense. And then as a follow-up. Henry, you mentioned a couple of Fortune 50 companies selected TalentOS for recruiting, I think you said and that surprised me a little bit. Can you dimensionalize those transactions just in terms of either how many seats or just are they needle movers if you compare it to some of the core marketing and sales products?

Yes. I mean these are -- you should think of them as sort of high-five figure transactions or mid-five figure transactions, but they're not a million dollar transactions, or they wouldn't enter the 100K cohort, mainly because when you go into the talent acquisition team, they're often smaller -- much smaller than a sales team and an organization, but those are also good starting point for us to continue to grow inside of those organizations. So you get -- that's -- those are contracts where you get the talent acquisition folks who are acquiring talent for IT or for pharmacists, and then we have an opportunity to spread out from there.

Understood. Thank you very much.

And one moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Kash Rangan with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Hi, thank you, guys, for the color. Cameron, I think you talked about net-new business being flat in Q1. Can you compare that to how net new business was in Q4 of last year? I'm trying to understand the trajectory. Did it -- was it negative going to flat, or flat staying flat? And also when I look at the numbers on a go-forward basis, the question on amount of new dollars to be added, we need to see some sequential acceleration in Q2, Q3 and Q4 to hit your guidance. So what are the things that drive the numbers in such a way that we can get to that accelerating revenue growth in the second half versus the annualized growth rate that you put up based on a sequential subscription revenue growth rate in Q1? Thank you so much.

Sure. So Q4 new sales were modestly up in Q4 of '22 relative to '21, so that's a kind of modest deceleration being flat. We are continuing to add sales capacity in both the new and the existing customer side in order to continue to drive that. As we look forward and we develop our guidance and assumptions, we are focusing on what does the shape of expirations and renewals look like as well as what our sales capacity looks like in terms of new sales and upsell possibilities. And so with added sales capacity and the shape of expirations that start to give us a little bit more support as we're going forward, that gives us good confidence in our ability to see that accelerating sequential revenue growth in order to hit the guidance. And certainly, where we have obviously, very good visibility into Q2, we're already seeing that in April compared to January as well.

Could you say easier net new business comps in second half of this year relative to last year What seems like it is?

Sorry. Can you repeat that? I didn't quite hear you.

It would seem like you have easier net new ACV comps in second half of this year versus last year.

Yes, absolutely. We started to see obviously pressure when we talked about net retention and so forth in Q2, but that got -- that pressure more materially impacted Q3 and Q4 last year, which obviously creates an easier comparable to achieve that.

Brilliant. Thank you so much.

One moment for our next question. Our next question is from Taylor McGinnis with UBS. Your line is open.

Yes. Hi. Thanks so much for taking my question. Maybe just to piggyback off the last question with the guide implying your sequential growth to accelerate throughout the year. Cameron, can you break that down maybe a little bit further into new versus existing? And what gives you comfort on those two different variables? And I guess more specifically, NRR came down a little bit further in this last quarter. How does that compare to maybe what is embedded in the full-year guide? And is there any risk there if the macro deteriorates further?

Yes. So we do expect that as we continue to grow the sales team throughout the course of the year, that will support growth in terms of the new sales as well as potential upsells. We do have -- we do actually also have some seasonality historically, which is based on that shape of renewals and explorations that are coming in, that actually support higher net retention activity as you move through the year. And so that all help that as well.

Great. Thank you so much.

One moment for our next question. And our next question is from Raimo Lenschow with Barclays. Your line is open.

Thank you. Thanks for squeezing me. Team, can you talk a little bit about the -- what you're seeing in terms of pipeline quality? What I'm referring to is, at the beginning of the crisis, people kind of down-sell their seats, et cetera. But you have obviously like quite a few of extra offerings out there like what are you seeing in terms of people's appetite to kind of go into kind of the higher-value add solutions from you guys? And then I have one follow-on. Thank you.

Raimo, I think we're -- thanks, Raimo. I think where we're seeing really great results is in our mid-market and higher customers. So enterprise, mid-market our strategic customers, they are coupling together numerous of our platforms and products. And so when I think about the big deals that closed in Q1, almost all of them were multi-platform deals. And so they brought our data as a service offering and our OpsOS offering together with our SalesOS offering. They added TalentOS and SalesOS. They leverage our company and contact brick data inside of Snowflake. And so when we saw the deals that we're seeing are combining multiple of our platforms together. And we think that is a strategy that we're executing against and employing throughout our account base. And I think as we continue to iterate on that strategy, we'll see more and more of that happening.

Okay, perfect. And then as we kind of think about second-half easier comps, et cetera, Cameron, what is your thinking in terms of buyback and maybe remind us the situation that you're in at the moment? Because like -- and obviously, the shares under pressure or were under pressure, but it looks like you're stabilizing. How you're thinking about buybacks at this level? Thank you.

Sure. So in mid-March, we authorized a $100 million buyback through the end of the quarter. We repurchased about $24 million and we did continue to repurchase in April as well. Our expectation is to continue to be in market and opportunistically repurchase shares here in the second quarter. And we have not agreed with the Board or had kind of further conversations about additional buybacks after the $100 million.

Okay. Thank you.

One moment for our next question. Our next question is from Michael Turrin with Wells Fargo. Your line is open.

Hi, good afternoon, and thanks for taking the question, and just for all the detail in terms of what's assumed. Maybe one on margin, Cameron, if I may. Any update around how you're thinking through trade-offs given it sounds like some mixed signals between macro and what you're seeing in terms of ramping productivity on the sales side? How quickly are you able to dial up or dial down the need for sales capacity based on what you're seeing? And anything else we should be mindful of in thinking through margin and free cash flow impacts for the coming year? Thanks.

Yes. So our expectation is that we're going to add roughly 50 basis points of margin in 2023 relative to where we were in 2022. Yes, I think our ability to dial up and dial down sales capacity is slightly different, dialing down relatively easy, dialing up. We do need to go out and hire folks, and we're very focused on hiring the highest-quality folks that we can or moving people up through our training programs and into high-quality sales folks. But I think we -- this is something that we've done for a long-time and are focused on being efficient, not just with the sales capacity, but also how we build those teams over time. And I think we feel very comfortable that we'll be able to continue to add capacity as we move through the year.

I'll leave at one. Thanks, guys.

Thank you.

One moment for our next question. Our next question is from Brad Zelnick with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.

Great. Thank you very much for taking the question. Henry, you've talked about generative AI capabilities related to Chorus. I was wondering if you could maybe speak about the broader opportunities across the portfolio, and perhaps as well, direct to ZoomInfo from generative AI and other perhaps new breed of competitors that are out there.

Hi, thanks, Brian. Look, I think when we think about what ZoomInfo is doing, we are in the business of making go-to-market more productive, and we really do expect these large language models to accelerate our leadership in intelligence and automation in kind of two big ways. First, for our own products, we're going to be able to automate manual and mundane steps for our users. So for example, instead of finding the next best customer on your own, trying to triangulate signals to figure out who you should be engaging with and then what you should be same to those companies, we're going to be able to use AI to parse those signals, select the highest conversion opportunity, pick the best channel and then actually create personalized content to engage because of all the context we know about companies and people. And we're already have multiple teams working on incorporating this technology into our platform. The other thing that, I would tell you is. For our customers, we've always been saying is that bad CRM data, creates all sorts of downstream issues. And where we highlight those, those tend to be around territory planning, rep efficiency, segmentation, getting insights out of your CRM system. But generative AI coming into the market just shies a really big like on the problems that bad data creates inside of your CRM. And so the awareness of that issue is increasing exponentially as companies realize that they can't rely on their CRM data to put into these models and get the efficiency and the upside that you're expected to get from incorporating generative AI into your offering. So I'll share you a quote that I recently read in Forbes about generative AI coming to go-to-market. And this quote, it's coming. It's going to elevate the importance of your CRM system because for all of this to work, AI needs data. And companies that are expecting to get that data out of their CRM system are going to need to have that data fully enriched, fully intended, constantly cleansed. And we are by far the leading provider to help them do that, and then, by helping them do that, helping them see the benefits of generative AI in the future.

Really helpful color. Maybe just a quick housekeeping item for Cameron. Any changes to full-year headcount plans and where you are tracking year-to-date? Thanks.

And we're obviously focused on continuing to support all the investments that we're making. And at this point, we are still below where we had ended in September of '22, but we're going to tactically hire where we feel that it's most important, mostly in the sales and capacity areas within sales, and we'll focus on efficiency throughout the rest of the organization and hiring where we think the investments are well warranted, but also looking for areas where we can drive efficiencies going forward.

All right. Thanks for taking the questions guys.

One moment for our next question. Our next question is from Brian Peterson with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hi, thanks for taking the question. This is [Jonathan McCarry] on for Brian. We'll just keep it to one. So I think you guys mentioned, the 40% exposure to software, but you've also seen some traction in some other verticals recently. Can you talk about how you think about potential go-to-market investments or new partnerships necessary to further build on that expansion into newer verticals? Thanks.

Yes. Sure. So the -- I think a couple of ways that we're looking to tech sort of these new verticals. One, we've talked about new pricing calculators that we're putting out to the field so that they understand based on usage, based on usage and data consumption, and the types of companies, industries, sizes, growth rate, where we have opportunities to up-sell and cross-sell, and that's going to show up most of the time in these non-affected industries. And so we're prescribing plays based on our own data, based on product data, based on the Company's growth data to the field to run cross-sell, upsell and pricing activities. I think the second thing is, we continue to invest in our product-led growth motion to be able to unlock efficiencies in the down-market, to unlock efficiencies in industries that we historically sell to. And so we're building the ability for new customers to transact and become customers with us without ever having to interact with a direct seller, and then and then the ability for them to onboard an efficient in contact in platform way. And so those are a couple of the initiatives we're using to sort of drive our growth in the other industries.

Great. Thanks.

One moment for our next question. Our next question is from Brent Bracelin with Piper Sandler. Your line is open.

Good afternoon. Cameron, I wanted to go back to the discussion on renewals, particularly given the exposure to software. If we were to double-click into the seasonality of the software renewal expiry base, is there a big chunk that expires here in Q2 that you have visibility into? Is it still more second half of the year, Q4 weighted? Any color there and then talk a little about the puts and takes. I clearly understand the risk to renewals, but you also talked a little bit about some upside to optimism that you could actually start to see some expansion upsell opportunities in the renewals as well too. So any more color there would be helpful. Thanks.

Sure. So with respect to the seasonality, software is a little bit more heavily weighted towards Q4 than the rest of our business, and certainly, most of our business from a renewal perspective is weighted to Q4 relative to the other quarters. Q1 is another big quarter for software as well. So when we think about having gone through the last two quarters, they were more materially impacted than perhaps Q2 or Q3 might be if you're focusing on software and the pressure that's placed upon the business as a result of software being more impacted by the macroeconomic environment.

And then just to clarify the optimism on potential upside was getting better. Is that more of a commentary for segments and renewals outside of software that you're a little more optimistic on upsells?

I think we see it -- we definitely see it outside of software. I think what we're starting to see is even within software for larger customers that are focusing on where they can be more efficient and do more with less. We are starting to see more of a sales opportunity there relative to on Q4. I think people were more running for cover and looking for ways to cut costs where now I think people are focused a little bit more on where can they start to optimize their go-to-market infrastructure. And as Henry mentioned, particularly, in places where there are data opportunities, Data-as-a-Service and OperationsOS, as well as MarketingOS, we do see some bigger opportunities that are both in the pipeline and things that we're really starting to execute against.

Very clear. Thank you.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question is from Rishi Jaluria with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Wonderful. Thanks so much for taking my questions. I appreciate the time. Just one question from me. Wanted to ask in terms of what are you seeing in terms of advanced functionality uptake. If I'm not mistaken, I think you disclosed on the prepared remarks, but just wondering if you give us some color in terms of what adoption there looks like, and how we should be thinking about future adoption from here, just given the uncertainty in the macro and kind of additional scrutiny on budgets. Thanks.

Yes. So the advanced functionality continues to be a bigger and bigger portion of the overall revenue stream, so continues to grow faster than the overall business. And there -- that's an area where we are seeing those upsells and upsell opportunities. But we're, yes, executing against those and are excited about the value that we're able to provide to customers in those scenarios.

All right, perfect. Thank you.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Parker Lane with Stifel. Your line is open.

Yes. Hi, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. Henry, you called out a material improvement in the $1 million cohort of customers quarter-over-quarter. So I'm wondering if you can give us a sense of the composition of those customers from a vertical perspective, a product perspective. And then just on average, how long have they been working with ZoomInfo? Are you starting to see more opportunities present themselves in that $1 million plus range from the onset, or are these longstanding customers?

Yes. So these are longer-standing customers, and that is strategically we want to bring customers -- we want to bring prospects into being customers and then expand them from there. And it's a pretty diverse group of companies that moved in. They are the textile rental company, a tech company, a number of financial services companies, a couple of fintech companies, that's kind of how to think about that cohort. And look, I think one of the things that we are really excited about is bringing Dave Justice in as Chief Revenue Officer to help us really build the methodology, the process to go up market, to go up-market in a higher velocity more predictable way. And so we expect that motion to continue to increase and that we'll continue to find companies to move into that cohort.

Got it. And then, Cameron, one quick follow-up for you, just a housekeeping question here. I mean in the context of your unlevered free cash flow guidance, any change to the underlying assumption of $450 million plus reported free cash flow.

No. That there remains unchanged.

Got it. Thank you.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Siti Panigrahi with Mizuho. Your line is open.

Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to ask your confidence level in new business sales that you embedded in your 2023 guidance. So what's your - what are your expectation in terms of self-sufficiency? And what sort of changes you are doing to improve your top-down selling motion?

So we continue to have good confidence in the new sales assumption. In fact, given that we outperformed in Q1, I think that gives us even greater confidence with respect to that. Certainly, we've always been very focused on ensuring high efficiency with respect to that team, and we're continuing to invest in more capacity. One of the things that I think is a really good underlying fact with respect to the new sales motion is that, it is more of a diversified customer set that we can go after. If you think about any business that sells to another business, we can really focus on those businesses that are investing in their go-to-market motions and where they can drive benefits for their company, which means they were not really constrained by one industry or another being more impacted by the macroeconomic environment. And we've seen that in different stages of the economic environment that's happening. We've seen that's rotated around a little and we've been able to take advantage of continued new sales activity in different industries.

Thanks, Cameron.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from DJ Hynes with Canaccord Genuity. Your line is open.

Hi, guys. Cameron, can you talk about what you're seeing in terms of pricing on like-for-like renewals? I'm just curious if the threat of kind of lower-priced lower-quality alternatives is creating any pressure on the renewal cycle.

We don't tend to see that in the renewal cycle except for at the very low-end of customers. So small businesses that are cash-strapped or having issues or whatever else if they're willing to downgrade the quality of product that they're getting, and in some cases, they can go out and find another provider that could give them lower-price. But for many of our customers and particularly the larger customers, they aren't willing to take that quality hit in order to pay less. So while there is some pressure, particularly at the lower end, most of the, call it, change in renewal on the downside comes from people either taking out seats or taking out functionality or reducing the value that they're getting from us. And -- yes, that tends to happen a little bit more today and kind of the software world where we're seeing layoffs. But we don't see kind of a typical down-sell where people are just coming in and asking for more price because the alternative just isn't there from a quality perspective,

Yes. Okay, that's good to hear. And then, Henry, one for you. So you talked a little bit about PLG in an answer to an earlier question. I saw ZoomInfo Lite in the earnings deck. Is that product intended to be kind of more of a foot in the door that leads to a more formal sales process? Or is that a product that can kind of standalone at the low end of the market? How are you thinking about it strategically?

Yes. Thanks for the question. I think we're thinking about it in both ways. There are small businesses that can come in and transact and get a limited version of ZoomInfo Lite through the ZoomInfo Lite offering, and then we're also using it as an opportunity to see where multiple people like companies come in sign-up for ZoomInfo Lite at maybe a mid-market or an enterprise company, that gives us an opportunity to get into a direct sales cycle with their leadership and then sell a broader agreement to the full ZoomInfo advanced or elite packages And then in addition to that, the underlying technology that we're building to be able to drive ZoomInfo Lite will also give us the ability to auto provision enterprise users to be able to charge enterprise customers in a seamless way directly within the platform. And so we get multiple benefits from the technology that we're building. And then in the actual PLG motion, I think we're going to capture both down market customers that we wouldn't get to international customers that we wouldn't get through to with our regular demand funnel and then also mid-market and enterprise companies that we can -- users that we can then leverage into larger agreement.

Got it. Helpful color. Thank you, guys.

One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from Terry Tillman with Truist Securities. Your line is open.

Great. This is Joe Maeres on for Terry Tillman. I appreciate you taking the questions. You just mentioned that most of the change on the renewals and the downside is coming from customers taking out seats or removing functionality. I'm just curious if there are any pieces of functionality that are more resilient or ones that are more likely to be taken out?

Well, I would say, look, in a time where customers are actually laying off members of their sales teams, then the user seats tend to be more influx from a downsell perspective. So if I like go up 10% of my go-to-market sales force, then that 10%, I'm not going to want to pay licenses for going forward. And so you've seen that happen during the renewal cycles. I would say that where a customer is leveraging advanced functionality where a customer is leveraging our workflow solution, using our DAS solution plugged into their systems of record. Those are very, very difficult to unplug, and they're not user-based. So...

Super helpful answer. Just as a follow-up, I think you recently introduced the ability to bring in outside intent sources onto the platform from G2. And then similarly, you've updated the platform's ability to engage customers intent from websites. So I'm just curious of any usage that you may have seen here, like early customer successes. Thanks so much.

Yes. I think the first integration with G2 was one of our fastest adopting integrations. But really, it sets the stage for where we see the platform going which is a platform that can plug in data sort, unique data or niche data sources from anywhere, marry that with ZoomInfo's third-party data, allow you to marry that with your first-party data that we're pulling in through your CRM and marketing automation systems and then build workflow across the intersection of that data, which we think is really exciting. And we think that, that is the future of what modernized go-to-market will look like?

Thanks.

I am showing no -

Thank you, everyone, for joining us tonight. We look forward to seeing you at one of our many upcoming in-person or virtual investor events. Thank you.

And this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.