Hello, everyone. Welcome to today's call and webcast. The Q3 presentation was sent to our distribution list by e-mail and you can also find it on gsk.com. Please turn to Slide 2. This is the usual safe harbor statement. We will comment on our performance using constant exchange rates, or CER unless stated otherwise. Please turn to Slide 3. Today's call will last approximately 1 hour, with the presentation taking around 30 minutes and the remaining time for your questions. Our speakers today are Emma Walmsley, Luke Miels, Deb Waterhouse, and Julie Brown, with Tony Wood and David Redfern joining for Q&A. Please ask only one to two questions, so that everyone has a chance to participate. Turning to Slide 4. I will now hand the call to Emma.

Welcome to everybody joining us today. Please turn to the next slide. I'm pleased to report that despite some challenges, this has been a positive quarter for GSK, and we're delivering 9% sales growth, and 19% profit growth year-to-date. This growth reflects the accelerating momentum we have in Specialty Medicines and the overall resilience we have built in our portfolio, which underpins continued high confidence in our outlooks for 2026 and beyond. Importantly, we've made considerable progress in our pipeline this quarter. And with no admitted fault or failure, I'm delighted that we've also drawn a line under the vast majority of Zantac litigation, removing a clear perceived risk for the company and allowing us to focus on the future. Overall, excluding COVID, sales for the quarter grew 2%, 9% year-to-date, with Specialty Medicines up 19%, and double-digit growth reported in HIV, respiratory immunology, and oncology. We were particularly pleased to see the momentum now being established in our oncology business, and I'm delighted that we filed Blenrep in Europe, Japan, and the U.S. in the quarter. We also continue to see strong progress in the transition of our HIV portfolio to long acting medicines, now 18% of HIV sales and where we plan to continue to lead the way. General Medicines also performed strongly this quarter with growth up 7% led by another outstanding performance from Trelegy. Total vaccine sales were down due to lower sales of Arexvy and Shingrix. Recent guideline changes and prioritization of COVID vaccines in the U.S. were key factors, but market shares for both these vaccines remain very strong. Although, both vaccines face market circumstances that will limit their growth potential in the near-term, over the medium and longer-term, the fundamental benefits these two best-in-class vaccines offer to protect people from disease and to…

Thanks, Emma. Please turn to the next slide. Third quarter sales were up 2% to GBP8 billion and year-to-date sales were up 9%. As you can see from the chart here, Q3 sales growth reflected a tough comparison with strong growth from Specialty and Gen Meds offsetting the lower sales of vaccines. Specialty Medicines, the largest part of our business grew 19%, reflecting strong performance of new products and the investment we've put into recent launches, particularly in oncology and HIV. We expect this momentum to continue with growth from these assets and several material launch opportunities in respiratory, oncology, and other disease areas coming later next year. General Medicines, pleased to say, sales were up 7%, driven by strong performance of respiratory. And as already been mentioned, lower demand for Shingrix and Arexvy this quarter led to an overall sales decline of 15% for Vaccines, and I'll cover this in more detail in a minute. All of these dynamics were broadly reflected in the performance of our regions, with good growth internationally, and the U.S., unsurprisingly, was more impacted by the lower vaccine demand we saw this quarter. Please turn to Slide 11 to look at Vaccines in more detail. So I'll focus the commentary on Arexvy and Shingrix. Arexvy performance was impacted by three factors. Firstly, by changes in ACIP guidelines that restricted the recommended populations of older adults receiving RSV vaccinations. Secondly, by prioritisation of COVID vaccinations in the U.S. And thirdly, by a lower seasonal rate of RSV infections. In addition, it was a tough comparator given two-thirds of sales in Q3 last year were related to stocking. Despite these dynamics, we retained our strong leadership market share. Now we're still in the foothills of this vaccine's availability and usage. In the U.S., we continue to…

Thank you, Luke. Now turning to HIV. We continue to deliver strong performance and sustained double-digit growth with Q3 sales up 12%. This growth was driven by strong patient demand as well as favorable pricing dynamics. For 2025, we do not expect the favorable pricing dynamics to continue, in part due to the introduction of the Inflation Reduction Act. However, we are confident that the underlying demand for our medicines will remain strong. As leaders in oral 2-drug regimens and long acting injectables, it is positive to see this continued momentum delivering 2 percentage points of market share gain versus the previous year. Dovato grew 23% for the quarter. This positive growth was supported by results announced in July from the PASO DOBLE study, a large head-to-head randomized clinical trial of Dovato compared against the 3-drug regimen Biktarvy. This study demonstrates Dovato's non-inferior efficacy and significantly less weight gain versus Biktarvy. This is important because we know people living with HIV are concerned about taking more medicines as they age, as well as the long-term risk of metabolic diseases that can come with weight gain. The performance of our long-acting portfolio also remains positive, delivering GBP314 million of sales and representing more than 50% of total growth for the quarter and year-to-date. Cabenuva grew 40%, driven by patient preference and proven and durable efficacy. The medicine now holds a market share of 5% or more in the majority of our key markets, demonstrating sustained quarter-on-quarter growth. Apretude, the first and only approved long-acting option for HIV prevention, delivered 95% growth in the quarter. At the ID Week conference earlier this month, we shared real world evidence reinforcing the more than 99% effectiveness for Apretude, as well as an implementation study highlighting patient reported results with a reduction in stigma and anxiety. Looking further ahead, we are strongly focused on developing our ultra long-acting pipeline. This includes development of new regimens for four monthly dosing with ambitions to extend to six monthly dosing. The potential for the long-acting market remains significant. The total HIV market today for treatment and PrEP together is worth more than GBP22 billion with treatment accounting for around 90% of this. And we believe treatment will continue to be the larger market going forward. We are the leaders in long-acting innovation and are confident in our innovative pipeline for the future, as well as the competitive profile of our medicines today, offering strong safety, efficacy and overall tolerability for people living with HIV and those who could benefit from PrEP. With that, I will hand to Julie.

Thank you, Deborah, and good morning, everyone. Next slide, please. Building on the comments made by Luke and Deborah, this slide shows Specialty Medicines is an increasingly important growth driver for the Group, having delivered more than 70% of year-to-date growth. This is being supported by building scale and momentum in our respiratory, immunology and oncology businesses. And although, vaccine growth has been limited this year, as Luke outlined, longer-term, we are very confident in this opportunity. Next slide, please. Moving to the income statement for the third quarter with growth rates stated at CER. Sales increased 2%, reflecting continued strong momentum, especially from Specialty Medicines, but also General Medicines more than offsetting the decline in Vaccines. Core operating profit grew 5% despite the significant decrease in Gardasil royalties. Gross margin benefited from the outperformance of high margin Specialty Medicines, pricing benefits and the annualization of prior year inventory provisions. The decline in SG&A spend resulted from our disciplined approach to investment, the annualization of high prior year launch investments and the phasing of spend across half two. The Gardasil royalty loss impacted profit growth by minus 8% this quarter, meaning underlying operating profit was up 13%, demonstrating considerable productivity improvements in Q3. Core EPS grew 5%, excluding COVID, in line with the operating profit growth. And turning to the total results. Operating profit decreased materially year-on-year from GBP1.9 billion last year to GBP0.2 billion this year. The reduction predominantly reflected a GBP1.8 billion charge relating to the resolution of the Zantac litigation. Next slide, please. Moving to our margin bridge with commentary including COVID. Our Q3 core operating margin increased 100 basis points year-on-year at CER to 35%, despite a 180 basis point headwind from the loss of royalties, as we continue to deliver on our financial commitments and…

Thanks, Julie. So, to summarize, while Q3 has presented some challenges, our business has responded well, and we are on track to deliver our strong sales and profit guidance for 2024. Looking ahead, we have a best-in-class Vaccine business, an increasingly strong and growing Specialty Business and a very profitable Gen Meds business. Together and combined with the momentum we continue to see in our pipeline and our careful, but meaningful deployment of capital into business development, this means, we're well positioned to deliver and sustain profitable growth through the decade with scale health impact and attractive returns for shareholders. All of this by combining science, technology and the talent of GSK's people to get ahead of disease together. With that, let's now open up the call for Q&A with the team.

Okay. Thank you. For the Q&A portion of our call, please use the hand raise feature in the Zoom webcast, if you would like to ask a question. And as a reminder, we ask that you limit yourself to only one to two questions, so that we may accommodate as many participants as possible. For our first question, we will go to James Gordon. James, please unmute yourself.

Hello. James Gordon…

Good morning, James.

Hello. Thanks for taking the question. One question was on the pneumococcal vaccine, so for Affinivax. So, I think you did have a 24-valent adult and then I think that's been removed and you're switching to 30-valent. So just what is the latest in terms of when this Affinivax product could come along? And is this connected to -- I think Affinivax (ph) had some competitor data with the 31-valent. And is it -- is this for the pediatrics and the adults that you're both shifting into? That's the first question, please. The second question would be '25, a few comments on '25. If we're thinking about '25, should we think that maybe Shingrix and Arexvy might be down, but also you could have some further significant SG&A leverage because you had a good performance on SG&A today or might -- we need to think about your spending more on SG&A because you've got new launches next year?

Great. Well, let's come firstly to Tony on the new pneumococcal update, very much focused on getting to best-in-class vaccines as we have with our current portfolio. And then, myself and Julie will come back on guidance questions.

Yeah. So, thanks for the question, James. Let me just start by sort of underscoring the platform in general. And I would say that, as we learn more about our platform, we become more and more confident in the fact that it presents a unique proposition to Emma's comment about best-in-class. And it does so, because it provides both coverage of antigens in particular serotype 3 because of the carrier protein proposition. And it does so without the diminishing immunogenicity that you see in the CRM-based platforms for which, as you add antigen coverage, immunogenicity diminishes. We have strong comparisons for our platform versus both the 20 and 30-valent PCB vaccines. You're right, we have shifted our prioritization in the adult vaccine towards a 30-plus proposition, and that is initially, you will recall, of course, the backsides are in a similar position. The Merck 21-valent vaccine, which carefully chose serotypes established vaccine efficacy sealing against those chosen serotypes in the adult population that we believe makes the 30-plus proposition the most effective one. I think you see that reflected in the Pfizer strategy, Tom, described yesterday as well. As I say, I remain confident in the properties of our platform based on the data that we're accruing, and I expect to be able to start a 30-plus adult first-in-human study next year. As far as the pediatric proposition is concerned, we remain developing both 24 and 30 plus vaccines in that context, and we're confident about the competitive setting for both the 24 and 30 plus vaccines with regards to ultimate launch date. Well we've not disclosed those in detail.

Thanks, Tony. So, in terms of looking into '25, I mean, obviously, we're going to guide for '25 in '25. But I'll ask Julie in a moment just to recap a little bit on some of the points we've made on the individual product areas to help you, but also our confidence in the shape of the P&L, too, because make no mistake, we expect '25 to be another year of profitable growth for the company. And we are very confident in our '26 outlooks and our '31 outlook of more than 7% top line growth, more than 11% bottom line growth, more than GBP38 billion. And again, that doesn't yet include Blenrep, where we've made great progress both on the data. We're looking forward to getting overall survival later on this year, too, and we filed in multi-regions this quarter. As we look into 2025, per the commentary, we expect the growth from our largest product area, Specialty to continue to lead the way. And we have, per Luke's comments, made assumptions to be conservative around any ACIP judgments and that there will be no change for next year. Obviously, we're dependent on them. But in terms of either revax or kind of we hope that we continue to bring data. We can comment more on that, if you like. But make no mistake, medium-term, whether it be in our confidence of growth both for Shingrix, ex-U.S. or for RSV, which is really in the very early days of its life cycle or because of the pipeline that's coming through per pneumococcal commentary or mRNA or very excitingly, all of that value unlocked we're seeing across Specialty Medicines with five, hopefully, approvals that are not about just coming through in '25, but driving more growth for that chapter beyond in the decade. So Julie, I think there are other specifics that's worth you recapping and particularly also, those lines in the P&L where we're starting to drive some powerful leverage.

Yeah. Sure. Thank you very much. Thanks for the question. So, I think Emma's articulated and Luke earlier the overall approach for vaccines. I would just like to draw attention to the Specialty Medicines business. It's now our biggest business. It's 37% of our business, and it drove more than 70% of our growth year-to-date. And it's been one of the major contributors to the point you raised about the leverage in leveraging the P&L. So, we've just delivered year-to-date 9% on the top line, 19% on the profit, and that is absorbing the Gardasil loss as well. And there are a number of important therapeutic areas driving that. Obviously, HIV, respiratory, immunology and oncology, as mentioned, our oncology business has more than doubled year-to-date to over GBP1 billion. So turning to 2025, we do see growth coming from Nucala, Benlysta. We've obviously got COPD to come for Nucala having just been submitted. And then we've got the oncology strength coming from Jemperli expanded population and Ojjaara and then, hopefully, Blenrep following the recent submission. In terms of the P&L leverage. As you can see year-to-date, we've delivered very strong gross margin leverage. Again, this has been benefited from Specialty Care, and we continue to see the gross margin being strong apart from this fourth quarter, where we're going to put these additional charges through to drive future supply chain efficiencies. And then, in terms of the launches next year, as Emma mentioned, we've got five regulatory approvals and launches coming across Vaccines, Specialty and General Medicines. They are in our four key therapeutic areas where we've already got a strong presence, be it respiratory, be it vaccines, or albeit also now in oncology. So therefore, you can expect us to continue to deliver profitable growth in 2025, as Emma clearly mentioned.

Thank you. Next question, please.

The next question is going to be from Kerry Holford. Please unmute yourself.

Thanks, Jeff. Yes. Kerry Holford from Berenberg. A couple of questions from me, please. Firstly, in Shingrix in China. I wonder, if you can comment there on the sales contribution in [indiscernible] in Q3. And also just remind us, the details of that contract with Zhifei in that market. And there, those numbers that you've mentioned previously for year one, two to three, are they set in the stone or is there some degree of flex within that gap? Then secondly, on respiratory, specifically in COPD, when might we get to see the detailed Phase III Nucala data? And previously, you had noted that if you get a positive result here, you would swiftly move depemokimab into Phase III. Is that still your current thinking or now is the TCEP opportunity going to take a more important role in that space also? Many thanks.

Well, I’ll come to Tony first on the IL-5 pipeline, which we are very excited about. And then we'll come to Luke to comment on where we're at with China. Remembering that there are a degree of macro pressures here. So obviously, we've got a great partnership there, and we're trying to take a long-term view on it. But Luke, it would be good if you could update on where we're at, and the view forward. First, Tony, to you.

Yeah. Thanks for the question, Kerry. Let me just begin by reminding everyone that Nucala is the first and only biologic approved in four different ER (ph) mediated diseases. What we showed with the MATINEE headline data or we will show with the MATINEE headline and broader data is that it reduces exacerbations across the full spectrum of COPD patients. You'll get more detail on that, Kerry, in the first half of next year at an appropriate conference, obviously, until we've had approvals of the abstract, so I can't give you details on that. But the important point to stress there is that, it is the broader performance of Nucala illustrated in MATINEE across the COPD population. I might also take the opportunity just to remind everyone that what we said in the past is that in comparison with dupi (ph), it's important to consider that the population studied in metrics, [indiscernible] and MATINEE are different to the dupi populations, who are taking the broader COPD population, including emphysemic patients. And of course, that's important when one considers that COPD is the third leading cause of death worldwide and 300 million people have COPD, and a significant proportion of those, high 30%, if I remember correctly, are emphysemic. So more from us on Nucala and the details of that at the beginning or the middle of next year, so as I indicated. And then what I would highlight in terms of what follows from that with regard the next wave portfolio plans. Obviously, it positions depe (ph) very favorably on what we know from asthma, of course, already is that offers a significant advantage in two injections per year versus ‘26 in the comparison with dupi. But I'm also very pleased, and you'll hear more about this in the Meet the Management, that we have long-acting options in both TSLP and IL33. So what we'll disclose to you there is how we think about positioning those three long-acting options into an emerging understanding of the subgroups of COPD disease.

Thanks, Tony.

Thanks, Kerry. So on the Q2 call, I did flag that we're concerned about and would watch closely what's occurring in China, particularly in terms of the tighter POB (ph) budgets and just some of the flow of funding around those. And of course, the macro, which is very broadly covered across many industries. And so, we're actually seeing that it definitely impacts a broader slowdown in the economy definitely impacts us all, pay market, and also just the capacity of local governments to then restock, purchase vaccines, which are then subsequently purchased by individuals. So these are having an effect on our volumes. We're working closely with Zhifei. Again, if we look at the medium to long-term, I mean the partnership has started extremely well. These are impressive operators. They've got to a far number of points of vaccination than we could ever hope to get to with our infrastructure. You asked what we've sold, we've sold around 240 million out of the 0.4 that we had in the contract. There is flex in the contract I’ll call a spade to spade. So our intent is to be practical here and work through this with Zhifei, but we have our eyes on the long-term opportunity of about 0.5 million people in China who are 50-plus, that's where the focus is at this point.

Thanks, Luke. Next question, please.

Great. Our next question is from Jo Walton. Jo?

Hi, Jo.

Thank you. I'm going to just ask a broader question about IRA and the pressures that we might experience next year. Some of the pushes and pulls here. We've already seen some companies show higher prescription growth as they go through the year. And it's notable for Benlysta going up 6%, 9% and then 14%. Is any of that to do with already experiencing lower -- people already experiencing lower co-pays? Could that be a benefit to you going forward? You've talked about pressures in the past for respiratory where the authorized generics are and you've done so well, presumably, payers are not getting the rebates that they want. Are you seeing more pressures for rebates elsewhere? You must be a long way through your negotiations for next year, so you should be able to tell us how your expectations are for access going forward? And a second question, if I could, please. Could you just tell us a little bit about RSV ex-U.S.? Is that really not an opportunity at all until the dosing has been sorted out? Thank you.

Thanks. So Luke, let's come to you. And we did flag 400 to 500 overall on IRA and then RSV ex-U.S.

Yeah. I mean look, there is increased pressure there. I think PBMs (ph) will go looking for offsetting that amount. I think we're starting to see tactical decisions by physicians in terms of trying to push people through that coverage. And I think that's across the whole portfolio. Specifically, for us, I mean, with 340B, we've got about nine states that have got legislation. There's another 10 which are working on it. So that impacts Specialty. There's also some impact on Vaccines, of course, but they tend to benefit in aggregate because of the removal of the co-pay. The other thing, the fact that particularly with Trelegy, well, it is a Trelegy driven element, which is this $35 co-pay, which will have an effect next year. And then longer term with Trelegy, we expect it to be listed next year. I think the government has learned through the first round, particularly around the influence and dynamics of the coverage gap. So, we expect more pressure on pricing, and that will flow through with Trelegy in '26 and '27, but we think we can start to return to growth after that with Trelegy. And of course, ex-U.S., it continues to do well. The areas where we tend to see pressure with 340B products like Zejula and Nucala. Specifically, on Nucala, I think it's more driven by -- we're starting to pivot and to look at nasal polyps. It's been very successful in Europe. We've been a little bit slower in the U.S. to pivot to that. And now we're really aggressively looking at that and seeing very good feedback. And the EMTs are certainly -- they're willing to experiment with this molecule. And we've seen, I mean, we tested it in markets like Italy and saw a fantastic surge in Nucala. So that's what we're now ramping up in all the key markets globally with Nucala.

And RSV ex-U.S.

Sure. I think now we know enough about this vaccine that we need to move forward. The feedback we're getting is very encouraging. STECO (ph) just did a broad RSV vaccine contract in Germany at about EUR180 for both us and the other guys, so that's encouraging. We should see good adoption there. And then the rest of the world, the basic elements of RSV, the morbidity, mortality, these are very apparent. I think one thing that we're watching is just different geographies emphasizing older adults, other ones are more focused on maternal. So, for example, [indiscernible] in Latin America is more focused on maternal as is Australia, whereas the European markets are more focused on older adults, including Japan. So early days, but I think we've got a pretty good idea of the pricing point. As I said earlier, we did set out the U.K. tender. Canada was very, very price intensive. So our whole strategy here is, as I said in Q2, we want to play the longer-term game. We have the best-in-class vaccine. We've accumulated a very clear picture on the benefit risk and the potency and the duration of effect. So now we're moving to contract.

Thanks, Luke. I mean, I think as you can see in our reported sales, international RSV sales are still a very small fraction. And in fact, in the U.S., I think we -- there's still 80% of those that ACIP, have said this vaccine is available to, who are not yet vaccinated. Obviously, for the reasons that we've run through, it's a tougher year this year. But fundamentally, the benefit of this vaccine, all the data that surrounds it, the fact revax will come when you look at the waning that comes through by year three, that's for ACIP to decide when, all of that means we're -- when you look at where Shingrix is, with nearly 60% of the business coming internationally, there is plenty of room for penetration of this high performing vaccine over time. Next question, please.

The next question is from Simon Baker. Simon?

Thank you, Jeff. Thanks for the call, everyone. Two questions, if I may, please. Firstly, on depemokimab. Could you remind us what assumptions in terms of severity of asthma is assumed within the peak sales number, how far down the continuum of severity do you expect to go to get that number? And then secondly, a question on RSV, which may be a slightly naive one. But if we have more tunnel (ph) congestion in pharmacies, and we have a vaccine that has multiyear efficacy, what is the feasibility of shifting the time of vaccination from the autumn to earlier in the year to at least mitigate that issue that you've run into at the moment? Thanks a lot.

Thanks. So Luke, to you on deseasonalizing, if that's the word. By the way, I think when we get to combo vaccines, which obviously GSK wants to compete in that would also help in terms of share of arm space. But Luke, perhaps you can comment on that. And then Tony, we'll come to you in terms of the profile of asthmatics. With that, Luke?

Yeah. I mean, I think you've hit the nail on the head there. It's tough right now with Arexvy and the class for the reasons we know, I mean, primarily because of the direction that ACIP has given in terms of narrowing the class on the basis of benefit of risk. But again, we think this will adjust over time for reasons that I'll go through in a minute. And I mean, Tony and I were texting each other as we watch the FDA presentation at ACIP, and the benefit risk slide I think it was Slide 10, which said that for every million people that you vaccinate over a three year period, in the existing 75 plus, 60 to 74 at risk, it's about 2,000 less deaths, 15,000 less hospitalizations, and the trade-off is zero to 18 or about nine GBS cases. So I think that will start to assert itself over time. When we look at co-administration with RSV, even just recently, it's really quite striking. In August, if you -- Arexvy 56% of the time was given with another vaccine, that jumped to 71% in September. And what is remarkable, if you look at what it was given with in August, it was flu 24% at the time, in September, that was 12%. And what really moved was -- it was 3% with COVID in August, and that jumped to 10% in September of '24. What is really interesting is the triplet, COVID, flu combination, that went from 5% of Arexvy shots in August to 27% in September. So, what that tells me is, there is an opportunity, as we did with Shingrix, and we've got more work to do with Shingrix, but as we did with Shingrix to deseasonalize this vaccine and because of this longer…

Yeah. Tony, I don't know, if you've got anything to add to that?

Well, just sort of, Simon, the way to think about it was on the SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2 studies, of course, we're designed to look at reduction of exacerbations on top of standard of care. The primary endpoint across both of those was method of 54% reduction, that's what we should have expected. Remember, we were matching exposure relative to Nucala, but just a few tidbits to dig into the details a little further to emphasize the quality of depemokimab in terms of administration frequency, to build on Luke's point. What we also see from, for example, in the prespecified analysis of in secondaries through exacerbations requiring hospitalization or an ER visit is a 72% reduction. And actually, if you look across, both SWIFT-1 and SWIFT-2, it's important to realize that in those studies, 68% of the patients on that the experience, no exacerbations at all.

Luke, I think -- and then we'll move on to the next question. But this demonstration of capability from GSK on the value to patients and health care professionals of a long-acting medicine, as we see in our HIV business, to keep people out of hospital and improve compliance, as well as just being more user friendly is, I think, a very exciting field for us to continue to pursue and will contribute meaningful growth. Next question, please.

Great. The next question is from Graham Perry from Bank of America. Graham?

Great. Thanks for taking my question. So just on Arexvy, looking into 2025, with no booster. Just wondering what your sort of cadence should expect on first dose penetration. So, should we be thinking increases like the 6% to 7% that we saw with Shingrix into the addressable populations, assuming the expansion of that? And would that, therefore, lead to a drop in the U.S. next year? And then the extent to which you think international can offset this, if you're going to start going sort of full for launch into international territories, which I assume, but if you could confirm, would be based on pricing or at least three seasons duration given you have that data now? And then secondly, on Shingrix, could you just help us to understand what level of inventories Zhifei is holding now, and whether you expect to sell any more into Zhifei inventory in 2024 or is the 400 essentially not going to be -- minimum contracted volume not going to be achieved? And then your confidence in achieving the GBP800 million and GBP1.2 billion going forward? Thank you.

So thanks, Graham. I'll just repeat what we've said on China in terms of -- and then Luke said, in terms of the contracts that we have, but our commitment to take a long-term view of a very ambitious partnership here. And then Luke, perhaps you can comment more on Arexvy in terms of ambitions ahead. We're still in the early foot fields, both of international and frankly, U.S. penetration. And don't forget, Graham, this is an unusually slow season. And I'm not sure we're going to be forecasting that as a long-term standard projection, considering when you look at the last 15 years. But Luke, do you want to comment on penetration?

Yeah. I mean I think, Graham, the unpredictable component here is what ACIP does. And they remain cautious. I won't requote the FDA figures, but I think that they are important. The question is, what happens with the rest of this year's season? I mean, typically, it's November is the classical RSV peak, that has changed since COVID, but I think that's informative. Also just, can ACIP get comfortable about the benefit risk here as they get more data from this season and look at the overall benefit risk? Now if you look at the penetration rates by group in December '23, 75-plus was 17% as of August, which is our most recent data, that's up 21%. So, you've got the effects of the June ACIP there and that 29 million people population. And if you look at the 60 to 74, that is definitely slowing. So that was 10% at the end of last year, and it's about 14% in August '23. So that's the population to watch. We were pretty clear in quarter two that, that was not good news in terms of what ACIP has said around that population. There were other views on that, but we felt that, that would return. The uptake and I think the evidence is there. Then the other swing factor is the 50 to 59 and the 18 plus population. So I think it's really -- it's quite difficult to forecast 2025 with Arexvy because of that component, I feel a lot more confident about the mid to long term because of all the elements that we've covered. But I think '25 is going to be challenging until ACIP normalize. There's a clear signal set there, and I think HCPs have heard it. And let's hope over time, the evidence in terms of benefit risk is seen for what it is, and uptake starts to recover. I don't know, Tony, if you want to add anything else?

No. I mean just to build on that, and that sort of impact some of the headline conclusions from the ACIP conversations. And let me start where you finished. What they concluded in the approved and recommended population is that the benefit risk is proven and clear. I think it was, in fact, a commentary that the confidence interval [indiscernible] didn't overlap in assessing benefit versus risk. The FDA themselves conclude that the GPS (ph) signal, although becoming statistically significant is rare, less than 10 cases in a million. And so that population, I think, continues to be clearly justified. And as we mentioned earlier, one in which there are still a need to see an opportunity for further penetration to protect individuals. There is an opportunity to see expansion of the label into the originally indicated 60 plus population, we have data in the 50 to 59 population and in the 18 plus population and the position on revaccination will become clearer as well.

And just to reiterate in terms of what is behind your question. We have taken a conservative view on our '25 outlook for vaccines overall i.e., no revax, no expansion of cohorts. Obviously, that will be in the hands of ACIP. We'll continue to share data. We remain very confident in the medium and long-term contribution of vaccines. The performance of our bigger business, Specialty, as evident this year in our delivery, we'll continue to lead strong profitable growth in '25 and underpins high confidence, alongside the five approvals we're expecting and hoping to get by the end of the year, underpins our serious confidence in all of the long-term outlooks we've been -- we committed to and increase at the beginning of this year. So a short-term challenge to digest, but fundamentally, the strength of the portfolio that we have been building alongside the progress in the pipeline always more to do means that we see both Specialty and our Vaccines business, continuing to drive a transformation in the shape of GSK and also is performance. Next question, please.

Thanks. The next question is from Emmanuel Papadakis. Emmanuel?

Thank you, sir. I'm sorry, I'm going to ask another question on Arexvy. How are you going to get to 3 billion peak? I mean, even with a modest degree of late revaccination in the U.S., it doesn't seem like we'll return to blockbuster territory in the U.S.A. So, is this really a statement about international potential or are we missing something on the U.S.? Or what are the assumptions that lead should you think we can get to 3 billion? And perhaps a question on Blenrep, maybe a more favorable topic. Just talk to us about the timelines in the U.S., Are you anticipating priority review either out of the FDA's generosity or use of a voucher. Can you comment on the relaunch expectations commercially for next year? We've got a relatively modest set of consensus expectations. We'd love to hear what you think about those? Thank you.

Thanks, Emmanuel. So Luke, I think you can pick on both of these. But I'm just going to reiterate very briefly, there are 64 million people that suffer from RSV on a seasonal basis, 14,000,15,000 people die every year in America. This is a brand-new vaccine with a cautious ACIP, but we are in their hands in terms of how and when they come back on revaccination, which we are very confident they will be considering the waning to below 50% in season 3 over time and extension in cohorts and the penetration because as Luke said, there isn't really good reason to expect this to be very different from flu over time, and we're still in the early days of that and international expansion. So Luke, I don't know if there's anything else you'd like to repeat on that one. But we are being cautious in the near term, right? We're not banking that near term. But Luke, I don't know if you want to add anything and then obviously, very ambitious for Blenrep.

No. On Blenrep, I mean I think the -- because we've said it all. I don't think it's any new. I mean one thing I think that's important is there's this focus on the peak sales, but the difference between a multiyear vaccine and an annual vaccine is the volatility is much higher. And I think what we need to concentrate on is the area under the curve, which has changed. In terms of Blenrep, I mean I think the market research, the expert feedback that we've got, I think there's an increasing respect for the profile of the product. I think there's also a broader understanding of some of the challenges employing biospecifics, particularly around infection risk, concomitant infusions, admission, CRS, neurotox, etc. And the DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 studies have been well received. I think the critical thing here is really supporting physicians on those first five patients around the infusion strategy, dose holds and also educating them to reassure the patient that efficacy is not sacrificed if they do have the whole dose. So this trade-off, again, just being realistic about the [indiscernible] and those elements and the actual impact on the patient, the flexibility around the dosing. We know a lot more about this product now. And the opening opportunity in second line with the progression of CD38 into the first line. So, you add all those things up, plus we've gained a huge amount of experience clinically and also commercially as an organization over the years. I think the DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 designs are evidence of that as is the launch of [indiscernible]. So we're humble about it. We're careful. We're working with the experts, but I think we are increasingly well placed to do this product justice, subject to the FDA approving it. And I think also at the end of the year, if we're able to achieve survival as well, that will obviously support the product in that second-line setting.

Next question, please.

The next question is from Richard Parkes. Richard.

Hi, Richard.

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. Firstly, I just like to push a little bit on the confidence in the Arexvy revaccination market because you seem very confident about that. But it looks like the decline in vaccine efficacy somewhat stabilized in the third year? And it sounds like ACIP wasn't fully convinced by your revaccination immunogenicity data. So just can you just underline why you're so confident about that? And maybe what impact that would have on your peak sales assumption if that didn't materialize? And then secondly, on Apretude and that launch looks like it's lost a little bit of momentum. And could you just discuss what drives it from here and what the current PrEP market penetration is? And are you thinking has evolved over contribution of PrEP deal long-acting sales target? Thank you very much.

So Tony, on revax and then Deborah please.

Yeah. So just quickly on revax, as you see the data particularly in the lower respiratory tract disease population show that there is a decline from Season 1 to Season 3 of 83%. In Season 1 and 2, I think, 48%, in Season 3, importantly, and to answer your question with regards to trajectory, Richard, we also know that natural infection does not cause lifetime immunity for these mucosal infections. You don't see that. And so, we think that the available evidence that data would suggest that revax will be required, and it will be between three and five years. Additionally, take the opportunity to stress what we also see through that, and you'll see more data from us next year on boosting, but there is a clear trend. As again, is commonly the case in vaccines that as the time from prime to boost extends, the significance of the boost increases.

Thank you. Deborah?

Thank you, Richard. So just to start by saying we're absolutely delighted by our performance in the quarter with the HIV franchise, 12% growth. And we've been double-digit growth each quarter throughout the year so far. So really, happy with the way our trajectory on particularly our long-acting injectables is progressing. But obviously, our own two drug regimens are also doing extremely well. Let's focus just on Apretude. So I think it's worth remembering that the GBP22 billion plus market value in HIV is about GBP20 billion for treatment and GBP2 billion for PrEP. So you normally expect big numbers in HIV because we are usually operating in the treatment space, but actually you've got to remember that this is a GBP2 billion market, which is growing relatively rapidly. So between 10% and 15% at the moment in the U.S. So the growth is strong. The market is robust. And Apretude is doing well. So we're seeing share continue to grow. We saw 95% growth in the quarter. And actually, it's in line with our expectations. We are building a market here. So we're ensuring that physicians understand the safety, efficacy, tolerability of this exceptional prevention medicine. But at the same time, we're having to teach physicians as we develop the market around how to navigate specialty pharmacy, buy and bill and the other kind of barriers that you find with injectables in the U.S. health care market. And we are investing very strongly, and we're seeing really good breadth of prescribing increases, not just in Apretude actually but with Cabenuva as well. So my summary would be, there's still a long way to go in this market, both PrEP and treatment. Long-acting injectables are really growing rapidly, are gaining share and driving our growth in a very positive way, which is why we've been able to deliver three quarters of double-digit growth this year. And obviously, we had a very strong performance, driven by the same things in '22 and '23 as well. So real confidence in our long-acting injectables, both this year and actually for next year as well.

And the pipeline coming forward.

And the pipeline coming forward, so obviously, we've got Q4 PrEP and treatment coming up. And then we've got every six months, which is progressing absolutely in line with our expectations, and we'll obviously come to talk more about that as data emerges.

Thank you. I think one last question.

And we have time for final question. And we are going to go to Peter Welford from Jefferies, and Peter, we really have to limit this to just one question instead of two. So if you can pick your best one, that would be great.

Got it. I wouldn't just sorry, if we can just go back to Arexvy, I'm afraid. Could we just talk a little bit about the ACIP decision? I'm just trying to understand here on the safety side of things. Because I guess the -- it seems like it's a little difficult situation in the -- obviously, the population to be able to make a better characterization of the GBS risk is relatively low given the low number of vaccinations. And obviously, FDA already has the data with regards to the risk side of the equation, i.e., the number of deaths and hospitalizations for the 60 to 74. So it seems the only likely conclusion potentially is that there is a significant GBS risk eventually for that population, too. So I guess I'm curious what you think -- how you think more data for that population will potentially make a difference and what you can, I guess, provide incrementally to that to say, sway them on that population? Thank you.

So I think we'll finish up then with Tony's response on that. But just to reiterate, our confidence has been -- as has been said by all of the team in the benefit/risk ratio of this vaccine considering the burden of disease, hospitalization and death at global scale. Tony?

Yeah. And Peter, let me just -- so for me, the headline, as I said, for ACIP, it was, first of all, the clear conclusion that the benefit risk for vaccination in the currently approved and recommended population was substantiated and it was substantiated by increasingly clear data on both the benefit and the risk associated with that population. In terms of -- and again, let me stress that the FDA conclusion of GBS was it was rare with one and less case for -- less than 10 cases, sorry, for 1 million individuals vaccinated. In the broader cases, since what you will see is us bringing additional data related to vaccine effectiveness for the 60-plus population and immunogenicity in the 18-plus immunocompromised populations, particularly in those constitute the populations that are at greater risk of hospitalization.

Thanks. And is it also right to say, Tony, that if you account for frequency of vaccination, there's no difference here versus...

Yeah. There was a comparison made on IRRs (ph) for flu, for example. And if you account for the frequency of vaccination and the fact that flu itself causes GBS, there's no significant difference in risk across those vaccinations.

Thank you very much. So thanks, everyone, for joining the call. As you heard, we're delighted to be reconfirming our guidance for the year, another year of strong operating performance, and also our confidence in the outlook for '26 and '31. Look forward to catching up with you over coming days. Thank you. Bye-bye.