Good morning. And welcome to the Green Plains Inc. and Green Plains Partners' Third Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. Following the Company’s prepared remarks, instructions will be provided for Q&A. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Jim Stark, Vice President of Investor and Media Relations. Mr. Stark, please go ahead.

Thanks Gigi. Welcome to the Green Plains, Inc. and Green Plains Partners' third quarter 2018 earnings call. Participants on today’s call are Todd Becker, President and Chief Executive Officer; John Neppl, our Chief Financial Officer; and Jeff Briggs, Chief Operating Officer. There is a slide presentation available and you can find the presentation on the Investor page under the Events & Presentations link on both corporate Web sites. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements, which are predictions, projections or other statements about future events. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could materially differ because of factors discussed in yesterday’s press releases and the comments made during this conference call and in the Risk Factors section of our Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Todd Becker.

Thanks, Jim, and good morning everyone, and thanks for joining our call today. We did record a net loss of $12.5 or $0.31 a share, and generated approximately $32 million of EBITDA for the third quarter. For the last 12 months, EBITDA has totaled $133 million. The consolidated gross margin was $0.11 a gallon for Q3, which was $0.02 better than Q2. Green Plains produced approximately 305 million gallons of ethanol in the third quarter. Year-to-date, we have exported 18.5% of our production and expect that Q4 will see nearly 20% of our production shipped out of the country. We continue to ramp up volumes at are JV terminal in Beaumont. And in the fourth quarter, we have one of the biggest sales books we are executing against since we opened the terminal. Exports remain a bright spot for the industry and we should see 5% to 10% growth in 2019 over the current year. We have seen very early interest in demand for 2019 as the price of ethanol is very attractive globally and more and more countries adopt pro ethanol policies. Green Plains Partners' reported $16.8 million of adjusted EBITDA and a coverage ratio of 0.96 times for the quarter and 1.02 times coverage ratio for the last four quarters. The agribusiness and energy segment experienced a bit of a dip in the quarter. Year-to-date, we have produced $24 million of EBITDA and we expect this segment to bounce back in Q4. And we anticipate ending the year with EBITDA in the range of $35 million to $40 million for the full year. We reported $12.2 million of EBITDA included an ingredient segment for Q3. Fleischmann’s performed well again and cattle performed as expected after such a strong second quarter. Cattle feeding margins averaged $40 EBITDA per head.…

Thank you, Todd. Green Plains Inc. consolidated revenues were $1 billion in the third quarter, up 11% from the third quarter a year ago. The increased revenue was attributed almost entirely to 160% increase in revenue for our cattle feeding operations from the acquisitions made in both 2018 and 2017. Revenue in our ethanol production segment declined 8%, driven by 10% decline in ethanol gallons sold, partially offset by 30% higher selling price for distillers' grains. Consolidated net loss for the quarter was $12.5 million versus net income of $34.4 million a year ago. During the quarter, the Company recognized a net tax benefit of $14.7 million with approximately $10 million attributed to the federal and state R&D credits relating to the quarter. Last year for the same quarter we recognized R&D tax credits at $48.8 million. EBITDA for the third quarter was $32 million compared to $15.4 million for the third quarter last year. For the quarter SG&A decrease $3.5 million, driven in part by our efforts to reduce controllable expenses. The third quarter included approximately $1 million of severance expense related to staff departures. I would note for you that once the asset sales are complete, our SG&A run rate will be reduced by about $2.5 million at quarter based on divestment of the assets. This is on top of our current expense reduction program. Interest expense decreased $8.5 million for the quarter compared to last year. In the third quarter 2017, we incurred $12.3 million in interest expense associated with the termination of previous credit facilities. Excluding that, interest expense increased about $4 million, driven equally by higher average borrowings, primarily for cattle inventory and roughly 90 basis points increase in our LIBOR based financing. For Green Plains, CapEx was about $14 million in the third quarter,…

Thanks, John. And I have to say that I'm pleased with our efforts and the results on our portfolio optimization plan. For certainly a lot of opinions on asset values and whether there would be a robust process, we received initial days from nine different parties with 16 distinct planted whether bundled or not. We narrowed it down in the next round and finally awarded the plants to invest overall bid. We had some individual plants bids at even higher values, but we wanted to sell the first phase as a bundle for ease and ability to close on a large meaningful transaction. This should also indicate to our stakeholders that we own quality assets that were attractive to multiple buyers. Our focus now in the near-term is to do all we can to lower breakeven costs on our platform. We plan to attack this on two fronts; continue to reduce controllable expenses, and eliminate inefficiencies across our business. We indicated that we will reduce controllable expenses by $10 million to $15 million, and we are already on a path to actually exceed that. Most of these savings will be realized in a full year 2019 results. In addition, we plan on continued investments in high protein feed technology, which we will refer to as high protein cornmeal in the future. So our expenses are coming down. And when to turn loan B is paid off that will significantly reduce our interest expense but there is more to be done. Our efforts to refocus our team and -- we also started to plan reduce operating expenses at our non-ICM plants. We will not make this investment now, but we believe we can narrow the spread and other $0.06 a gallon over time, and be within pennies of our best plants…

Please limit your questions to no more than two at this time. If you wish to ask additional questions, please rejoin the queue [Operator Instructions]. And our first question is from Adam Samuelson from Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.

So I guess the first question maybe digging a little bit on the portfolio optimization plan and where we are and where we go from here. Can you talk about the minimum cash balance that you want to maintain at the parent level. Just thinking about you're going to have a lot of cash come -- completion of these divestitures. You talked about potentially reexamining the repurchases and going after what's left under that authorization. But beyond that, especially if there are additional asset sales on the ethanol sides that are to come. How we should think about the deployment of those proceeds?

What we had said and indicated earlier that we would like to maintain at any given time between $100 million and $150 million minimum cash a month our debt is all paid off. And so once we get to that point and we see margins stabilize, we're sitting with over $300 million of cash as a starting point at the end of Q3 -- Q4. Then we will start to look at the alternatives of what we can do with that cash. And so I think what we'd like to see is over the next several weeks is as margins hopefully stabilize and recover, because we do believe the industry is starting to slow down and we should start to see some of that reaction in the weekly data, I think it will become much clear on the deployment of cash. I would say first and foremost obviously Shenandoah is the most important thing we can do for the platform in terms of increasing margins and lowering our breakeven. And as we get more confidence in that, we will start to look at the next couple of plants. But that really will not be much spent in 2019 and probably more like a 20-20 spend. So once all that is said and done, and our debt is paid off, and we have the access capital on to the balance sheet, I think we will move then into the next phase of the things that we talked about and look to either repurchase programs or other option for our cash.

And then maybe just a question on the margin environment that we’re in today, third quarter results actually came in -- margins up sequentially given -- it was actually surprising to us given the trajectory of margins in the quarter and the decision in late August to actually slow production. You talked about -- frame where margins are today we would look -- we would calculate in the last position. But just help us frame how you're thinking about the margin?

I think your calculation is correct. I think the industry broadly is in a negative position today. I wouldn’t say there is many plants that would be positive, even some of our best plants. And that’s something that I think what we’ll start to see is we have seen and identified across the industry at this point indications of somewhere between $700 million and $900 million gallons going offline or slowing extensively that we believe we’ll start to work through the numbers over the next several weeks. And while it certainly will take some time for the market to believe that, our view is sometime in the next 30 days we’ll start to see production levels come down and stock starts to get drawn out. What we’re seeing now is there are physical markets in United States that you cannot buy product, because of the tightness but it’s not reflective in the margins. And so there is a complete disconnect between what people are willing to pay for ethanol and what’s happening in the daily prices, which is why we indicated we believe is that that mechanism is broken and needs to be examined and look for alternatives as an industry. And again, we're big advocates of that. So, it’s just going to take some time but right now, margins are weak across the industry.

Our next question from Ken Zaslow from Bank of Montreal. Your line is now open.

Todd, you were on the board of a company that was -- closed the sale -- it's a company at a higher value than what the stock was implying. And over the last couple months, you actually have shown that the private value of your assets are higher than that -- that’s given by the market. Why don’t just take a step back and just sell all the assets and get -- realize the full value of your assets. What’s preventing you from doing that?

I think, from our standpoint, we didn’t build the company just to sell it. I think we’ll examine all opportunities that are in front of us and we’ll do the best thing for our shareholders. And I think from the perspective of when you look at a platform like ours and it has Vinegar, it has cattle, it has ethanol, it has terminals, it is a -- it may be confusing to some but we will do the best thing for our shareholders. And if that means our portfolio optimization plan is the plan, that’s what we’ll do. And if we can achieve greater values by doing something else, I don’t think anybody on our board would be against that as well. So from our standpoint, we’re always focused on the shareholder. And if the best outcome is doing what you mentioned then we’ll do whatever is best outcome is for shareholders in the long run.

My second question is you talked about evaluating your best options for share repurchases. What are your actions -- I mean, much more like what's the variation? It seems like you either buy the stock or don't buy the stock? What do you think that in terms of the variation?

Well, we would like margin. So first of all, we haven't closed anything. So we'd like to get all that closed. We'd like to pay off our debt, evaluate the balance sheet at that point, have margin stabilize a bit to make sure that our cash balance is strong in a period of inflection. And then from there make a decision very quickly. I don't think -- as we indicated that is one of the five things that we're going to do. We've talked about 10b5-1 versus open market purchases, and we're just evaluating what our best options are for a major stock repurchase when the time is right. Obviously, if you look at the economics -- and again, we're not going to spend all our money on that, so I think that can come through free cash flow in the future. But if you also look at the economics of this protein initiative, you can hedge off two to three years of this product at those type of margins to really stabilize and grow our earnings at this company as well. So it might be a bit of a battle, but at this point our focus is on getting everything done, getting the balance sheet where it should be on day 1 and at that point, evaluating how quickly to move on all the other aspects.

Thank you. Our next question is from Heather Jones from Vertical Group. Your line is now open.

So talking about the current margin environment. Todd, do you believe that a fair amount of the industry is at negative cash margins?

Yes. At this point, we believe that a fair amount of the industry is now at a negative cash margin.

Then a detailed question, could you give us -- on a pro forma basis, assuming everything closes your cost savings program, et cetera? Where should we expect SG&A to be at on a run rate basis in '19? And where are you anticipating interest expense to be?

I think from an SG&A standpoint, there's two buckets. One is, as I mentioned earlier, we're going to take out about $2.5 million just related to the divestments. And then we're also looking at potentially another -- hopefully about $4 million a quarter impact with other cost reductions. So somewhere around close to $6 million to $6.5 million a quarter of reduced SG&A on a going forward basis.

And so this year is -- if we were going to go the whole year on interest, we will be close to $90 million of total interest expense for the company. And we had indicated that just taking the term loan out was about $40 million less than that.

It will be a little bit higher probably in cattle next year. So I would say probably $55 million number to start might be about right, we're working on that right now.

As well as taking rates into consideration, because as you saw this quarter, the higher interest rates were a drag on our interest costs. That's why I think one of the key points for us was to get rid of some of this debt and continue to focus on that. And then addition to next year -- late next year -- just this lastly, late next year one of our converts will convert as well based on the way that we roll it forward, which will also reduce cash interest.

Given the improvements you're going to make at some of your plants, let's assume the industry slows. But just assume not a normal -- well, I'm not going to listen or assume anything. I'll just ask you. Based on what you think the ethanol business is going to do and the other businesses that you have left after these divestitures. Do you think your interest expense level will now be at a level where you can get rid of the tax rate disadvantage given the new tax code and would it limit tax interest deductibility?

Well, we still are a high working capital company, because of the cattle business, which is one of the things we mentioned to explore, at some point, whether that should go off balance sheet and some type of partnership. And then at that point, we'll pretty well take care of most of that liability that is there. John, you want to comment?

I think we'll be in a much better position. We haven't done the detailed math. But up to this point any amount that we have been able to deduct we've been able to carry forward through the deferred item. But I think our expectation would be that we should be in a very close position to be able to deduct all the interest going forward. Obviously, that's going to pinch largely on the margin environment in ethanol but we certainly will be much closer than we have been.

Thank you. Our next question is from Eric Stine from Craig-Hallum. Your line is now open.

So just curious, I mean I can appreciate the thoughts about ethanol pricing and there is not really great transparency in local markets, and it doesn't give a true indication of what's going on. But just curious, and I know you're taking steps. But maybe what some of those steps could look like, because that seems to be like -- it might be a bit challenging just to add more transparency to the industry.

Well, in terms of the daily pricing, if you look at the window that prices every day had a small amount of volume that prices almost a million barrels of daily pricing that sales that are at the industry has on. And we don't believe that fairly reflects the actual market that's out there. And that sometimes it even trades under the physical prices available in the Chicago market. And so when we look at that we would like, obviously, the first thing is; if we get our customers to buy more product from us without the use of the daily pricing market; in addition, work with other exchanges to come up with alternatives and other opportunities to do something; and see if we can get away from a very small amount of volume trading or pricing a lot of volume every single day. And we believe that that has caused margins to remain under pressure, even when physical markets are trading and convergence is not happening; and then when you look around the United States, when you take a place like Hawaii and Tennessee that we trade at $0.05 to $0.07 higher than historical, because you can't buy products or whether Huston, it's trading at $0.05 premium to historical, because there isn’t product available. And you look at all of those factors yet you see the Chicago market under pressure trading below physical at times. And that's the thing that we believe is holding back this industry at this point and we're going to see if we can look at other options to work with our customers to price our product.

So whether it's on a company basis or industry wide and getting -- whether it's growth energy or RFA behind it, I mean it sounds like, fair to say, that's the plan?

There have been discussions across some industry players to see if there is other options that we can use that makes a more transparent and more liquid, and something that has a more meaningful relationship to the actual value that are taking place out there.

And maybe second one from me, just on export markets and growth next year. And obviously, China did have a big impact if it were to come back. But beyond some of the obvious ones, maybe just talk about some of the other markets that you are looking at to contribute to that growth, and will become increasingly important next year.

Canada is a very strong marker right now for U.S. ethanol. And in 2019, we expect that to continue to grow. We expect renewable bio to have a very positive impact on our relationship with Brazil and places like that; India continues to grow. And if you saw the recent discussions by their leader talking about the need for more alternative sources and to clean up their air and the increase in motorized vehicles that are happening, the renaissance that’s happening in India; Mexico is still on our radar screen; although, it takes longer -- that it's taking longer than we thought but it is still something that that we look at. The Philippines continues to be a strong market; Peru, Oman, Colombia, Jamaica. I mean, when we look at all of that, we still feel like even without China in we'll be in at 1.75 billion gallon range. And then hopefully we start to see movement out of the G20 and the President on China and get ethanol squarely on the table. And if you look at their support for ethanol with the E15 initiative, we’re working very hard with the administration to make sure that ethanol is front and center in any China negotiations as the tariff needs to go away and they want to buy the product. We would be wide open right now from a price perspective into China right now if it was available.

Our next question is from Craig Irwin from ROTH Capital Partners. Your line is now open.

So Todd, one of the things we’re hearing is that Wheeler has told Grassley and Ernst and a few other senators that he’s not going to submit the Noper, notice of procedure rulemaking at EPA to implement year round E15 until February. Can you confirm whether or not this is something that you’re hearing? And do you think it’s feasible to see the Noper approved and for us to see fully approved E15 year round before the summer driving season in ’19 if we do start in February?

Well summer driving is what we’re focusing on. And this week or late last week, he quoted -- it was quoted and he said we will be able to go to year around E15 by next summer. And he said they are working on it. They’re putting out they want to get out the proposal, to get out the comments and finalize it before the driving season. That’s what we have to go with. And I think the retailers are taking that statement along with the fact that they believe that the President Trump is fully committed as we move from the mid-term elections to go right into the -- probably into the presidential elections cycle. And I was still up for grants in our opinion with the republican governor, even though some of the democrats went to the Congress people. So in general, we’re going to take the administration’s word for it. We think they’re committed to it. We think it’s something that is not a very hard thing to do. And while certainly there might be lawsuits when rules start to get made, retailers have reacted historically in the past and we’re starting to see that with several announcements coming out from major retailers around the United States that are making major transitions to E15.

My second question is really a clarification. So I believe I heard you say earlier that if exiting the fourth quarter you have a cash balance that exceeds $300 million, you would look much more seriously at really your activity on your buybacks. Can you say whether or not you currently expect positive cash flows based on operating conditions in the market? Or would this has to be something that would be a residual cash balance after closing all the transactions you're supposed to close this quarter?

I mean, basically how we're looking at is everything should close this quarter. We're on the path to do that. We will add that cash to the balance sheet at our ending balance in Q3. At that point, we will easily have over $300 million. If you take a look at what we said, plus the $230 million, we'll wait to see how the operating environment finally closes out. But we should have no problem exceeding well over $300 million or over $300 million in the fourth quarter. And at that point, we'll examine all the options once everything is closed. I mean, we're not going to do something today until we get everything done, paid off close, because we still have restrictions, even based on our term loan, that’s outstanding today that we can't actually start the buyback -- any type of buyback program at all until we payoff that term loan without asking for a waiver. But since we're within 30 days of everything happening, we're not going to go ask for that and pay for that. So it's just a matter of time that we have to get through all of the things that we're trying to accomplish. We have a lot of work going on to do that. And once that's all complete, then it will be part of our normal portfolio optimization plan that we have outlined.

And just as a follow up, there is no need specifically for free cash flow to boost the cash position either in the fourth quarter or the first quarter for you to initiate once the term loan is fully paid down. Is that accurate?

We would like to see a more positive operating environment, I will tell you that. I mean, that's something that we've talked about. But we also believe that the industry is slowing down and it's just start be reflective in those numbers and may take a little longer than expected. But in general, I think we would like to see a more stable operating environment. When you -- and again, it won't take this long but when you go look out on the curve, your best margins right now are on the curve are in Q3 of next year. So we don't really -- we've never had quite a curve like this before where you hedge out -- you could hedge out actually three quarters away and get the best margin. But even out there it's not something that you wanted to invest a lot of capital on your hedges other than having to make margin calls if the market recovers. So again, we just want to make sure in the stable operating environment where margin starts to recover, at that point, we can make better decisions on the timing and the speed of what we want to do.

Thank you. Our next question is from Pavel Molchanov from Raymond James. Your line is now open.

Given that we're 48 hours from Election Day, I thought I would post this. While we're waiting for the EPA to work its magic, hopefully, with E15. Is there anything on the legislative side in the new congressional session that is relevant, or that you would like to see coming from the hill?

I mean, I think, no, there's nothing really relevant. But if you look at the outcome of what's happened here status quo over the next couple of years into an election cycle going to Iowa, I would say the chance that legislation to alter the RFS or Renewable Fuel Standard would be hard press to make it through anywhere in the divided house and divided senate and then a President that is fully supportive about the ethanol industry in agriculture. So I would say the next couple years you may hear some things but it's probably going to be some of the most stable years that's related to the renewable fuel standard that we've seen, because there really isn’t a path to get any changes through other than what the EPA is doing with E15 and some rebalancing.

And any sense of -- assuming that E15 doesn’t materialize as a regulatory matter by next summer. How many gallons of incremental demand could be realistically count on a year-over-year comparison basis?

For 2019, our view and as we indicated in the call already today is that the stations that we'll be implementing along with the other stations that we don't even know of yet, we believe it will be a potential 300 million gallon increase in domestic demand in 2019. And that's over the couple of thousand stations that we know of, but there are definitely more stations that are doing it outside of the growth -- or trying to pump initiative that was started few years ago. So the other exciting thing is that we are hearing from our retailers that we do business with that the cost of retrofit is coming down very, very fast. In fact, they believe that there will be potentially have kits available to retrofit pumps very fast and at the -- any regulation around that will be very clean. So that's very exciting as well. And then if you look at the new stations that are being built by retailers, you will see that the three blends of gas are unleaded, the E15, which they're calling unleaded plus, but it is E15 and obviously, premium and then diesel -- unleaded ADA. So a lot of retailers have rebranded E15 to be unleaded ADA. And you're actually seeing in some markets, it could trade at a premium to unlead it, because of the octane value. So people are experimenting with the price spreads right now, but it trades anywhere from a discount to a premium all based on what the consumer is willing to day but they view unleaded ADA as a very positive outcome for them.

Thank you. Our last caller is Laurence Alexander from Jefferies. Your line is now open.

This is Nick Cecero on for Laurence. I was wondering if you could provide just at bit more color on the cattle feed margins. I mean what's been driving some of the quarter-over-quarter swings that we've been seeing?

So what we said in the second quarter where we achieved over $80 to $90 a head margin is that we pulled forward some of our marketings from Q3 to Q2, because of the strong environment. So we sped and look less days but made bigger margins on them and then keeping them into Q3. And in Q3, we are obviously impacted by a very short marketing cycle of the new cattle that we have brought in, and so that took our margin down on average overall. But on the cattle we owned at our own plants, we achieved pretty well standard average type margins. When you look forward into Q4, right now, margins on the cattle that we have on feed that we'll be market in Q4 right now should achieve our baseline $55 a head that we announced when we look at our minimum feeding margin. But what we have seen here recently with the positive basis and better returns, there is a chance we will outperform that. I think the most interesting thing right now is you could actually buy cattle today put them on feed for marketing in six months from now and the margins stays somewhere between $60 and $70 a head depending on what you buy and the forward curve as well. So I think we’re in pretty stable feeding margin environment right now that achieves the returns, which we talked about which is 15% to 20% return on equity and 7% to 10% return on invested capital. And we’re able to achieve those returns, although, obviously, it takes a lot of working capital to do that.

Thank you. Our next question is from Selman Akyol from Stifel. Your line is now open.

First question was with your specific reason for the extension on the offer period regarding your guys JD with Jefferson?

Yes. What we want to do, again, because of the uncertainty around China and exports, it’s taken longer to get long term contracts through there. Although, the terminal was basically sold out in October and continues to be sold out in November. So while we’re running a lot of volume through, it’s a long term contracting that we need to get one more stable piece into our export metrics, which is China. And I think the uncertainty around that has caused people to hold off on long-term contracting. But the performance of the terminal has continued to get better since we started it up. The execution is better. The unload times are better. The load times are brother. And the rates in terms of the costs are coming down. So I think from the standpoint of getting the best value for our shareholders that own it, but also making sure that it’s set up well for the stakeholders and the unitholders' GPP, we wanted to make sure that we have it in the best place to drop it down at a later date than today.

And then one last question. What’s the status of the remaining rail cars after that asset sales?

Well, we'll still run all the cars -- all the cars will remain that is for the fleet of Green Plains that GPP manages and leases. And there should be no major impact other than what we are letting go with the ethanol plants that we sold. But that was all calculated in how the unit price and exchange was calculated. So it should not be any negative hit to GPP unitholders.

At this time, I’m showing no further question. I would like to turn the call back over to Todd Becker for closing remarks.

Thank you everybody for coming on the call today. We know it was another long run but we had a lot to cover. And we’re in the final stages of closing some of these transactions, which we think long-term for our shareholders can create a lot of value. And we’ll continue to work on your behalf in the future and keep you updated and give you the dates for our Investor and Analysts Day that will be coming up in the next quarter or so. So thanks for everybody coming on the call today and we’ll see you next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today’s conference. This concludes the program. You may now disconnect.