Good day, everyone and welcome to the Green Plains Inc., and Green Plains Partners LP Fourth Quarter 2015 Results Conference Call. Today’s call is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Jim Stark. Please go ahead, sir.

Thanks, April. Welcome to the Green Plains Inc., and Green Plains Partners fourth quarter and full year 2015 earnings call. Participants on today’s call are Todd Becker, President and Chief Executive Officer; Jerry Peters, our Chief Financial Officer, Jeff Briggs, our Chief Operating Officer and Steve Bleyl who is Executive Vice President of Ethanol Marketing. There is a slide presentation for you to follow along. You can find this presentation on the investor page under the events and presentations link on both corporate websites. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements, which are predictions, projections and other statements about future events. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could materially differ because of factors discussed in yesterday’s earnings press releases and the comments made during this conference call and in the risk factors section of our Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may also refer to page two of the website presentations for information about factors that could cause different outcomes. Any reported returns of Green Plains Asset Management are not intended as an offering of solicitation. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Todd Becker.

Thanks, Jim and thanks for joining our conference call this morning for Green Plains Inc., and Green Plains Partners. For the fourth quarter, Green Plains Inc., reported a net loss of $3.6 million or $0.09 a share and we generated $32.5 million of EBITDA for the quarter. As we had indicated on the last call, the tax expense for the quarter would be higher than normal to adjust for full year 2015 tax expense. If you look at that number, it drove a negative earnings per share which otherwise would have been positive for the quarter. If you take that effect out of our results, the company performed well in a tough market environment and Jerry will explain more in detail later in the call. The consolidated ethanol gross margin, which again is operating income before depreciation and amortization from the ethanol production segment including corn oil plus intercompany fees such as Green Plains Partners’ storage and transportation fees was 29.8 million or $0.11 a gallon. We indicated last quarter that we would report this number to give you insight to this total gross margin metric, which is common across the industry. Our portfolio of assets remain one of the lowest cost of production assets acquired or built and operates favorably along the cost curve as compared to the industry, which again I will illustrate later in the call. At Green Plains Partners, we generated $14.3 million of EBITDA, with distributable cash flow of 14.1 million, driven by approximately 249 million gallons of ethanol storage and throughput volume for the fourth quarter. Our coverage ratio was a solid 1.08 and we increased the quarterly cash distribution 40.25 cents per share. Remember, we did not complete the dropdown of the stores and transportation assets for the two ethanol plants acquired by…

Thanks, Todd. Good morning, everybody. For Green Plains, Inc., consolidated revenues were 740 million in the fourth quarter, which was down 90 million or about 11% from a year ago, driven mainly by lower commodity prices. Volumes of ethanol sold for the quarter were down 5.8% to 291 million gallons total, while the average realized price per gallon was 36% lower than last year's fourth quarter. Our consolidated operating income for the quarter was 12.7 million versus 73.9 million a year ago, as a result of the weaker ethanol margin environment and lower prices for corn oil in the fourth quarter 2015 compared to a year ago. We incurred an income tax expense of 4.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2015, compared to an expense of 22.4 million for the same period in 2014. Looking at the tax expense for the full year 2015, the effective tax rate was 29%, which reflects a benefit relating to the non-controlling interest as income allocated to our MLP unit holders is not subject to taxes at the corporate level. To those of you modelling, I would remind you to take our income before tax and net of income attributable to non-controlling interests and use the corporate tax rate of approximately 38% to 40%. Earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization or EBITDA was 32.5 million for the fourth quarter of 2015, compared to 91.1 million last year. We closed 2015 with total cash of $412 million, but within the first week of January, we added almost $63 million of cash as a result of the drop-down transaction with Green Plains Partners. Total capital expenditures in the fourth quarter were 19.4 million and for the year totaled 65.6 million. For 2016, our maintenance CapEx should be approximately $10 million to…

Thanks, Jerry. And so similar to last quarter's call, we have hedged very little on the forward ethanol curve, as margins and visibility is very limited and we will continue to lock in margins nearby opportunistically to minimize the impact of the current low margin environment in the spot market. Spot ethanol margins before corn oil contributions are currently around a breakeven EBITDA level per gallon, but we see a lot of volatility on a daily basis. Today, even though ethanol has traded - is trading at a premium to wholesale gas, it’s still the cheapest octane and oxygenate in the world for blending into sub-grade fuel produced by refiners. Also the renewal volume obligation of 14.5 billion gallons in 2016 will continue to help the fundamentals for the year. We feel that we’ve done good work around diversification of revenue and income streams, but as we continue to assess our strategic direction, our focus has crystallized around improving our cash flows to be more consistent and predictable. We are firmly entrenched ethanol producer and plan to remain in the ethanol industry as our growth plans to be a 2 billion gallon plus producer in the next three to five years have not changed. We'll also continue to opportunistically grow our grain storage capacity as we have achieved over 85% of storage utilization across the platform, proving we can compete with traditional grain storage companies for the first handle margins at a much lower cost of handle. If fact our new storage facility in Obion, Tennessee really changed the traditional way grain flows in that area of the country and the long term strategy is to do more of that. When and if the opportunity comes, we will add to our cattle feed lot business as the fundamentals are significantly…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We will first hear from Adam Samuelson of Goldman Sachs.

Yes, thanks. Good morning, everyone. Maybe, Todd, just to dig a bit deeper into the current market environment, since in your prepared remarks, you talked about current industry inventories being not as burdensome relative to demand as some might think, but I was wondering if you could talk about your view on production and industry capacity because - given the margin structure that you've seen in the last, call it, 60 days, it would seem that the - you've seen less production discipline at similar margin structures than you have in the past. And I was wondering - would just love to hear your thoughts about the amount of industry capacity you really think is out there today because some of the people are actually raining in their production at all given margins that are at or below breakeven.

Yeah, so we came out of the third and fourth quarter as you just saw and the results really from an industry perspective our view is it was not a great quarter, but it wasn’t a terrible quarter. I mean, negative EPS was driven a lot by the tax rate, yet we still have a $0.11 a gallon EBITDA margins all in. So when you look at that and when you look at your overall others results that have been reported, it really wasn’t any big reason to slow down in the fourth quarter. Since the beginning of the year, I think the industry is looking at it a little bit differently as we are. Industry margins have not gotten better since the first of the year and so I think the capability of industry on a consistent basis is to be able to produce 980,000 barrels a day consistently and possibly a little bit more. So if you look at it, it looks like there is a bit of slow down. We’ve slow down our plans a little over 10% overall at this point as a platform. And we’ve continued to evaluate that. We just haven’t seen the industry react yet in the weekly numbers, but they seem to be vacillating a bit, so hopefully as we kind of look for toward we will wait and see what other players in the industry do. Typically it’s a lagging indicator, because often times it takes a month or two for some players to realize the soft margin environment and wait to see what some of the results that come in and we saw margins improve from the lows of January into these levels today in February, but they still have plenty to go. So I think it’s going to a little bit longer. It typically does, it doesn’t happen right away. And if margins continue where they are at, I think the industry will continue to take out incremental supply until we get to point where we start to draw. And we are really coming, we need to get out of March, because - we need to get into a better demand area when we really start to see that pick up and we start to see inventories potentially draw starting kind of March April historically.

Yes, that's some helpful color. And along a similar line, are you - how has the discussion been in the industry in terms of potential M&A activity? I would imagine especially in the co-op sector with farm income being down heavily, grain storage income under some pressure that the co-op sector would be feeling a bit of stress these days. Are you seeing any new opportunities in that part of the market emerge or just the broader M&A landscape generally?

Yeah, I think this will be an interesting year for the US producer when he has lower grain income, lower ethanol plant income from the investments and potentially lower income on the grain handling side, so they haven’t seen a year like this for a while, so I don’t think that we are clear on their intent and what they want to do with their investment, but at this point, they delevered quite a bit at the famer owned plants if they have any developed at all. So I think they have the ability to withstand, but when you get into running or your variable cost and you get positive contribution margins you are still at the co-op level still burning cash, so I think that will be a new reality for them at some plant, some are still located - we have some plants that are more profitable than others on our platform, so really a lot of its depending on geographics as well. So I think from that perspective, the co-ops and the farmer-owned plants are probably not stressed enough to start to think about M&A at this point. On the other side, obviously you’ve seen a lot of stuff going on across many names in the industry. I am not sure what’s actionable yet today, but I think there will be M&A activity in 2016. I think plants will trade among bigger commercial types and we will have to wait and see what and if and when that happens. Obviously in a soft margin environment, you won’t get the premiums you thought you would get that have traded a few years ago, but I do believe that 2016 in the end will result into some consolidation, yet to be determined who goes where and what consolidates where, but I do believe in 2016 you will see consolidation in the industry.

All right, that’s helpful. I will pass the line. Thanks.

Thanks.

And next we will hear from Sandy Klugman of Vertical Research Partners.

Thank you. Good morning. So a question on how has tight grower retention of corn impacted your production costs across your network? Do you have any thoughts on whether farmers will become more willing sellers of grain at current prices going forward?

We have not had any trouble at all securing grain in our supply chain. Number one, the 50 million bushels plus of storage, that we had 85% capacity utilization filled nicely to earn the carry. We always have that at the back stop as we are grinding somewhere around 35 million bushels per month. So from our standpoint we haven’t had any problem. We haven’t filling our space and/or procuring our corn both commercially or from producers. We’ve seen as of late, really not the last week or two, but before that on this uptick from 350 to 370, the farmer did let go some corn and kind of let us have another tranche. The most interesting thing is, I am not sure the ethanol industry needed very much, because I think they had plenty in the supply chain. So that has not been a factor for us that has given us much worry of securing adequate supplies at more historical basis levels that we are looking across our platform. I mean, we are not - besides the eastern plants, we are buying at single to double digit under in a lot of our western plants today. So that’s even at lower prices in corn, the farmer or the hedger still has plenty of stocks available.

Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. And then how do you think about the long-term outlook for the export market if crude oil prices stay at current levels? I know ethanol continues to trade at a discount to competing octane enhancers, but that spread is compressed somewhat. I'm just wondering how you see things evolving going forward.

Yeah, if you look at in our K - when you look at our K, we said there is 30 mandates around the world and I think when you look at the EU and you break it out there is probably 60 mandates around the world. So we are not seeing any slowdown in inquiries at all for ethanol as a fuel extender or octane enhancer or oxygenate enhancer. So we continue to take calls every day. We continue to sell export every week. As we said, we have 18% of our production for the first quarter sold into the export markets. We can do more. We have most of our plants are now geared towards giving any spec depending on the country. So we haven’t really seen a $26 to $27 or $28 crude any real slow down in inquiries for the export markets and relatively speaking there is a report put out on I think University of Illinois put a report on octane last week and showed that while ethanol spread has narrowed between other octane replacers, ethanol still remains the cheapest octane in the United States. So when we look at it, and we also have new incremental foreign demand showing up as well. So I mean we are seeing demand from countries this year that we didn’t see over the last two years and so Steve you want to command that a little

And you are just seeing some expansion in certain markets. I mean everybody knows that China piece that came into Q4, but you are seeing other countries expand their usage, but you are seeing it’s not just new barrels people are fighting over, it is new incremental demand.

Great. Very helpful. Thank you very much.

And we will move next to Farha Aslam with Stephens Inc.

Hi, good morning.

Good morning.

Your appetite for additional ethanol assets in this market and has the price of ethanol assets dropped given the current profit environment?

So, I don’t know where the price of ethanol assets are, because really not that much out there today that - there is a lot of talk out there, but relatively speaking, there is not a lot to buy in the market today. I mean, I think kind of - that’s a hard question to answer, because there are really not active processes that I would say are taking place right now other than a few here and there that we are not that interested in. So, we have an appetite still, if there is - if the market continues to have the margin structure that it is, I'm not sure whether people will have the appetite to sell down to more historical distrust levels or not but at this point we're not seeing a big inflow of assets for sale that are actionable today, so we’ll just have to wait and see what transpires throughout the year.

That's helpful. And just two more follow-ups. Your Hopewell plant that you just started up, what type of run rates do you anticipate that plant to achieve and kind of the cost structure of that Hopewell plant versus your other GPRE plants?

So we’re just grinding corn there today, we are obligated to start that plant up for several reasons. So we got the plant started up but as all of our plants, they are always all under review at run rates that we’re going to operator at. We announced - I just said in the call today that we are operating more like 90% of capacity today maybe a little bit higher than that. Hopewell will always be looked at from that perspective but we don't we want to get that plant started up so we have a good understanding of their margin structure and kind of the new reality of what that plant is number one, making a distillers grain that’s worth a lot more than it used to be worth before we improved the quality there. We have corn oil production that should start-up in the second quarter as well or may be third quarter at latest. We are buying our corn basis cheaper and we are selling ethanol higher. So it’s still yet to be - but we just - since we just started we don’t have a very good view just yet on our operational expenses per gallon until we get that thing running. And at that point we can make some determinations. But overall everything in our platform is being looked at. We have - we do have positive contribution margins across basically the whole platform today which often would tell you that you make more running than you do not running. But, you also have to look at the fundamentals of the size and scope of what we do and much like we looked at in the April, May and June quarter of last year where we slowed down significantly in a very high stocks low margin environment and we believe that was impactful. So when it's glaringly obvious and it steers you in the eyes you have to make the right decision and we will do so. But we are not going to give guidance specifically on an individual plant run rate at this point. It's too early for Hopewell as well.

Okay. And then my final question relates to EBITDA. Kind of what are you seeing in terms of profit per gallon right now compared to the fourth quarter, and kind of how do you think that progressed - that will progress throughout the year?

So right now, I mean obviously margins are under pressure as we indicated they are close to a breakeven EBITDA before corn oil. And so when you look at that - if you can kind of get $0.00 to $0.05 EBITDA with corn oil all in that's what we're seeing right now but they're moving around $0.02 to $0.03 a day depending on whether its stocks or whether it’s corn or whether it’s something else. So, again we are across the whole platform is what we're seeing but I mean we have plans right now that somewhere in the West that it's high as $0.07 or $0.08 a gallon in places like Southwest Iowa and we have plans in the East that don’t have anything near that. So it just really depends on location more so than anything and so we’ll just make again we make our decisions accordingly but when you look at margins like that, you have positive contribution margins and you just continue to run. I think the industry overall though will need to figure out where is the bottom quartile running at, where is the mid half running at and where is the top quartile going to run at. And we’ll have to wait and see how they transpires through numbers, I mean I don't think anybody likes to just run for positive margin but that seems to be the right thing to do right at this point. So, I don't think it's not like 2012, in 2012, we were staring at each other at minus $0.25 a gallon EBITDA margins wondering if we should close everything down. So, this is not a 2012 repeat at this point and I think that has to be highlighted.

Next we’ll hear from Heather Jones of BB&T Capital Markets.

I have a few questions. So going to the whole why is the industry not slowing down production and you mentioning that it's not as bad as 2012, I'm wondering if another factor is that more production is consolidating in the hands of a fewer larger companies that could arguably have deeper pockets. I mean do you think that's a factor as well, or is it a situation of where we actually need to get uglier before we’ll get a meaningful response?

Actually I think it's the opposite I think the well-heeled companies with strong balance sheet and the ability to stay the course make the decision quicker to lower production than the other parts of the industry that aren’t consolidated into these players though it's run longer waiting to see if and hoping that the results will improve. And if you look at history, they are the last ones to slow down versus the big guys. So, the disciplined producer as we say we’ve already slowed down a little bit. I don't know what others have done, we obviously don’t talk about that with them but I think the disciplined producer is the one that makes those decisions. So it takes a long lot longer for - so if 40% is owned by five of the top producers of the industry today, it takes a lot longer for the other 60% to make the decision to slow down. And they continue to run through. Now, the difference is, this time around if you’re you know they distributed a lot of cash from ‘14 and ‘15 back out and if you continue to run and burn cash, burn even small amounts at these farmer owned plants, the question is how much cash do they have on the balance sheet and will they need to go back to the well and get money from the farmer. At that point is when they start to make decisions to slow. So that that might happen quicker than we think in past years because I believe that there has been a lot of money distributed out to their owners. So we'll have to wait and see on that but I do believe we will see run rates at some point here. Have to make the decision unless we can get out of this - get out of this winter doldrums into a very high robust demand for ethanol starting in kind of March, April.

So do you think other large, well-heeled produces, maybe they are in a wait and see to see what April brings before they make any decisions to slow, or do you think we could see slowing before then?

I can’t speak for them. I can only speak for ourselves that we slow down a little bit we haven’t slowed down as hard we did in the second quarter - late second quarter of last year. But if we believe that it's impactful or it has impactful relationship to what's going on in the markets then we will - we can make those decisions accordingly but I don't you know today I can't speak for them.

Okay. I have two more questions. First on DDGs, they are holding in relatively well relative to the value of corn given what we've - the slowing demand out of China, ample meal supplies. I guess I was just wondering if you could give us a sense of - I mean we're showing close to 100%, 105% of corn values in some of the key markets. I'm just wondering if you could give us a sense of what do you think is providing that support, and if we continue to have sluggish demand out of China, where do you think that relative value could go later this year?

Yes, so whenever China goes away, we always overshoot the downside because everybody thinks the world is going to end. But at the end of the day we produced 40 million tons of replacement protein as an industry roughly. And so what happens is, as the market stabilizes and they figure out where do they - how can they put them and how does the feeder put it back into inclusion rates at better levels at lower prices and there is always a realization that DDGs got lot farther than price will often dictate. So what we’ve seen recently is with some of the small slowdowns we’re seeing in the Nebraska, Iowa area, we’ve seen those values come back up towards the numbers that you’ve mentioned and continue to remain firm. We are still doing export business and we continue our container program continues to go to all the non-China countries. And we still compete very well with proteins. So overall I think we are stabilized here. I don't think it's going to be a big run up, and I don't think China is going to come back in anytime soon but where we’ve come off the lows at slower to 80% of the price of corn in Nebraska and Iowa to today we are what you mentioned 100% to 105% those are helping the margin structure we just I don't think there is a big up from here unless corn goes higher. But in general I think we are very stable at these prices. So the market always figures out what to do with the cheap replace protein and it got cheap enough for it to in fact it overshot the downside from a value standpoint in the ration.

Okay. And my final question is on the RIN market. We've read studies that talks to just the D6 RINs could - that market could become very tight by the end of this year, and we've also heard a number of companies and competing fuels and other competing biofuels talk about how the supply of those RINs could become potentially tight this year and you need D4s or D5s to actually fill it. And so I was just wondering if you could give us a sense of what you see the RIN market for D6 is doing towards the end of 2016?

So D6 RINs have tallied off of their recent lows surround $0.60 back into the low 70s. So it just tells you that I think people are concerned of a production slowdown and they don't want to get behind that if that's the case. It still incents a lot of blending that we see from the non-obligated parties, so that’s very helpful as well. So that's a helpful factor to us and we continue to see E15 initiative even with the gas price and against ethanol and especially starting in April when that spread narrows up significantly that $0.70 really helps motivate expanded blends in the US and continue along with that initiative. So overall, our view is that our RINs will remain firm throughout the year and it's mainly driven by the fact that people are worried about production slowdowns but I don't think there will be any shortages that we'll have to worry about in 2016 where you’ll have to replace it with other RINs or trade to spread. Steve, any other comments on that.

I mean, it's all big slowdown and you might see some tightening but right now we don't see that happen.

Next we’ll hear from Craig Irwin of ROTH Capital Partners.

So Todd, I guess it would be really helpful if maybe you could talk a little bit more about the corn crop and what you see as different factors affecting the outlook. And then a second part of that question - historically, a lot of people think there's about a third of costs of corn in energy. I know this is a really unusual environment, but do you see that that - would you imagine that that would continue to hold and that we would see the continuing sort of lagging reset on corn prices potentially provide an uplift in the back half of the year?

So when we think about the corn crop, obviously it was a big one this year and we believe and all of our studies are telling us and all of our intelligence at the farm gate level is telling us we could be pushing towards a 91 million acre number again. So, it looks like the farmer is going to plant lots of corn this year again, feels that way if you start looking at and talking to guys that are ready to start planting within 30 days in the mid-South, they’re planting corn again. We talked to our Tennessee asset, they’re planting corn more And you kind of it seems to be the same story it is still going to be the vintage of choice if they continue to plant corn and we believe that will lead into a potential expansion to 91 million acre starting point and we'll see where we go from there. So, it does still feel like we will have another big corn crop. We’ve had three years of below trend, two years of trend and we haven't an above trend year yet. So we'll have to wait and see but the start out of subsoil moistures and conditions to get this crop planted are as good as we can expect or good as we want actually. I mean it doesn't get much better than what we have right now in the ground. And I think we have good opportunities to expand the corn acres next year from even these levels. So we’ll have to wait and see on that. Secondly, as corn compares to an energy and sourcing competes as an energy source, it's obviously not doing its job yet. We’ll have to look at things like palm prices around the world and other…

Thank you for that. Second thing I wanted to ask about is, okay now that we have ethanol pricing really more on the value of ethanol as an oxygenate, can you discuss the factors you think that will impact the pricing into the aromatics like - I think toluene is the one you called out in your presentation, but benzene, xylene the other alternative oxygenates, and whether or not you think potentially if oil was to remain particularly weak, we could see pricing through the oxygenates given the fact that corn is environmentally superior, it's not a petroleum product, and along those lines, EPA's own benefits analysis for the Clean Air Act shows a 30X multiplier on corn or corn ethanol as a benefit for the environment. So how would you frame this out?

Steve, do you want to start with that and I will finish.

The one thing is there is just not a lot behind the other oxygen opportunities, if you really put a lot of demand behind it, you put the 14 billion gallons or even a portion of that behind it, the value shoots up higher than it is now. So it’s not a realistic replacement for it right out of the chute. There is the Clean Air benefit to it, which obviously that’s what article that come out last week talked about that.

But the system is set up right now to blend ethanol, I mean and I think that with the RIN values where they are at, even if we are - we are going to get out of this March ethanol or about spread and get into April where we will get into a much narrower spread today, and at that point, it’s within the margin of error and then you get - if you’re not an obligated party, you get the RIN $0.70 blending credit. So there is a lot of - there is still a lot of incentive that continue to blend ethanol even at these spreads and even at lower oxygenate replacements as well. So when you kind of add all that in together, it just doesn’t look like you will get kicked out of the field supply anytime soon, both domestically and globally.

Thanks again for taking my questions.

Thanks, Craig.

Next, we will hear from Ed Westlake of Credit Suisse.

Two questions. Good morning and the first question is just a follow-on to that. How much room do you think there is, say, in the summer for ethanol to maintain the premium to gasoline if demand for gasoline is robust?

Yes, I think ethanol will trade - it all depends a little bit on corn right now and oil, but ethanol trading a $0.15, $0.17 premium for the summer right is kind of what it looks like on the board. That’s narrower actually than we have seen as of late in the winter month. So I think you can still maintain a small premium and a really just spend - if corn catches a break here, ethanol goes down it and just narrows the spread. So it’s going to be a little function of that. We see any oil increase at all, I believe that’s good for our value in terms of a replacer. So overall, I think we’ll stay at these levels, but we do have work to do on the margins, so it either has to come from corn or it has to come from ethanol. So if we can get any kind of uplift in prices for other energy alternatives like gasoline and oil, I think that’s - that will give us an opportunity then to narrow that spread or expand our margin structure as well. So I don’t believe we will trade - unless corn breaks real hard here, I don’t believe we will trade at a discount for the current curve.

I don't want to get too gloomy here at the end of the call, but recession risks are clearly front and center of market participants. You are in a good position because of the cash you have on the balance sheet. But maybe just talk a little bit about the game plan in terms of maybe cash burn on the capital side, SG&A, stuff that's obviously below the gross margin line.

Cash burn on the cattle side did you say, or capital side.

Well, both CapEx - ability to flex CapEx down, any aims to obviously lower SG&A, those types of things that you could offset the margins if we did go into a severe economic shock?

So, as our capital spend program as outlined, it’s - for growth capital this year was somewhere between kind of $50 million and $70 million of which all could be - a lot of it could be flexed down very quickly. The only thing that we have going on right now is some of the project at the ethanol plants where we’re kind of half way through it already, so we are going to - we will continue on through that. Anything beyond that, we have the ability to drop $30 million or $40 million out of that program very easily. Our ethanol maintenance CapEx at $0.01 a gallon which is about $12 million. We believe we can - we don’t have to spend all of that if we needed to get into that mode. If we ever needed to get into that mode, we have got plenty of areas that if we needed to contract, we can certainly do that, utilize our cash better. When we are sitting close to $500 million of - $450 million plus of cash in this current margin environment, we would end 2016 still in a very strong position, both at corporate and the subsidiaries even meeting all of our covenants under the current situation by dropping some cash in the subsidiaries under the Term Loan B and there is levers to fall as well. So we’re not - this is not a huge cash burn bases the current curve for us, and we can make it even less very quickly by looking at some of the projects that we have out there and pulling those back much like you have seen in other areas of the energy market. So we have looked at all of that and we continue to look at all of that, but we came into the year with a very strong balance. We can always look at continued debt pay downs as well to take some of that pressure off of us. But at this point, I think we are in a very good position to –if we need to pull levers, we certainly can, but it doesn’t look like we’re going to end the year in 2016 all being equal to today, though in a strong position to continue to run and look at growth opportunities.

Thanks very much.

Next, we will hear from Brett Wong of Piper Jaffray.

Thanks for taking my questions, guys. I was just wondering if, Todd, you can talk about the Brazil US window right now.

I mean, it looks like - to the north, it looks like we are open, but they are not buying very much right now. We are starting to get people sniff around. Some of it’s going to be a function of what the real demand down there and what real need is and I still think we are going to - that’s under development. It doesn’t look like it’s open coming in this direction at all, so it looks like it’s advantage US, but we will have to wait and see where kind of sugar prices go and ethanol prices go down there, but they are not long ethanol in Brazil and in fact, our view is that they will need to import in April-May, the question is will they do it or not? So from our standpoint that window still favors US.

Great. Thanks. And just wondering your thoughts on the RFS lifts and if that's kind of factoring into the - your rational behavior, if you will, in the industry?

The RFS, what was the word after that lift?

Yes.

Oh. I am sorry. Okay, got it. So through 14.5 [ph], listen I think there is some interesting point there, right, because last week’s blending was like 13.8, 13.9 just because of the winter, but we have blended as high as 14.5 to 15 over the summer of last year. So it’s going to take time for that to develop and see where the overall year ends up, which is why I don’t think RINs will be significantly short at the end of the year, because I think you’ll still blend, because you can pay blend, relative for –either from octane or from a RIN standpoint, so I think it’s a good base program that we have for 2016 and we will have to see what transpires for the rest of the year.

Great. Thanks for the color, Todd.

Thank you.

Selman Akyol of Stifel.

Thank you. Two quick ones for me. When you said 90% of utilization, was that a quarter to date or year to date utilization rate, or is that just where you are at currently right now?

We reduced in early February, late January, so it’s not a quarter to date, it’s not a year to date, it’s none of the above, just where we are running today and we make decisions accordingly. So it’s really not a - it doesn’t pinpoint where we are going to be per year or for quarter at this point.

All right. And then just as it relates to the LP, I heard your comments focusing on balance sheet improvement coverage ratio. Can you just talk about your outlook for distributions in 2016?

Well, first of all, remember the Hopewell and Hereford assets, the transportation assets have now come in and so we will start to see that incremental cash flow come online in the first quarter of this year. I don’t want to get ahead of my board as far as distribution strategy, but again, our plan is to continue to increase coverage as we were doing the IPO, we talked a 1.1 times coverage and I would like to get us very comfortably into that range, particularly given the low level of debt leverage that we have inside the partnership, gives us a lot of flexibility and really positions us well for the future. So I think a 1.1 times coverage is a number to be thinking about and I think in this environment, a pretty conservative approach to increasing distributions is appropriate as well, just because basically MLPs aren’t getting paid for increasing distributions. It’s really all about maintaining balance sheet, maintaining coverage and being very conservative and sustainable.

All right. Thanks very much.

Next, we will hear from Visher Vanhandle of Robert W. Baird.

Hi, guys, most of my questions were answered. But just quickly reflect on the split between maintenance capital at the Inc. level and at the Partners level, any clarity there for 2016, that would be helpful?

Yes, for 2016, I think as I said, the $10 million to $12 million of maintenance CapEx, that is really at the Inc. level that’s on our - primarily on our plants as well as agri business assets. At the Partners’ level, I think we are still in a mode of about $500,000 per year as a reasonable maintenance CapEx level for partners. If you look in the numbers in the release, we are well below that, but I think we’ll probably end up somewhere in the $500,000 level for Partners’ maintenance CapEx going forward.

It sounds good. Thank you.

And our final question for today will come from Pavel Molchanov of Raymond James.

First, one kind of follow-up on the RFS. We are still in the midst of a hotly contested political season, and the RFS maybe has gotten more than its fair share of headlines. Just kind of your latest thoughts are on how you perceive support for maintaining the policy as a matter of congressional action.

Yes, I think - look, I think the house is certainly an interesting place that would - is an unknown of what would happen there. I think the Senate will still hold the RFS, but at the end of the day, it’s got to go through the President anyways and the President today, the current President is a supporter. And I think if you look on the Democratic side, we don’t know about Bernie Sanders, but I think Clinton is a supporter and then on the Republican side Trump has been a supporter, a vocal supporter of the RFS. So we know what’s Cruz’s opinion is. So other than that I think we have wait and see. And we will kind of have to watch the season as it progresses, but I don’t think there is any dramatic changes or shifts that are coming anytime soon.

Okay. And then back to the earlier question about distribution growth, at the time of the Partnership's IPO last summer, the target was to grow 8% to 10% a year. This first distribution increase obviously running well below that trend. Are you comfortable reaffirming that 8% to 10% growth target?

Well, I guess, I would think of it in terms of growth in underlying distributable cash flow. I would gladly reaffirm 8% to 10% growth in distributable cash flow, that’s our target. That’s what we are trying to achieve, but my point is simply that in this market environment, we are not going to be rewarded for increasing the distributions aggressively and so we want to make sure that we have very strong coverage ratios - coverage and leverage rations and so I wouldn’t reaffirm the idea that 8% to 10% distribution growth. It’s more about distributable cash flow growth at this point.

That's useful clarification. Thanks, guys.

Okay, thanks.

And that does conclude the question-and-answer session for today. Todd, I will turn the conference back over to you for any additional or closing comments.

Yeah, thanks everybody and thanks for coming on the call today. Obviously we wish for better markets, but we’ve been here before. We’ve seen cyclical lows in this industry many times over the last several years. It provides us opportunities, especially with our strategy that we’ve maintained really since day one of maintaining strong balances and strong balance sheet to withstand cyclical downturns. And we think we set ourselves up very well to flex that opportunity and to some growth opportunities potentially in 2016. And certainly we believe that we certainly have the ability to withstand this current downturn with some positive fundamentals out on the curve that could rear its head as well. So looking forward to next quarter and hopefully we have some good things to report and we will talk to you then. Thanks.