Greetings and welcome to the Green Plains Renewable Energy Inc. third quarter 2009 financial results conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. (Operator Instructions). As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr. Jim Stark, Vice President, Investor Relations for Green Plains Renewable Energy. Thank you. Mr. Stark, you may begin.

Thanks Claudia. Good morning and welcome to our third quarter earnings call today. Todd Becker, President and CEO; and Jerry Peters, our Chief Financial Officer, are on the call today. We are here to discuss our third quarter 2009 financial results and the near-term outlook for Green Plains. Please remember that a number of forward-looking statements will be made during this presentation. Forward-looking statements are any statements that are not historical facts. These forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations of Green Plains' management and there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Because forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, Green Plains' actual results could differ materially from management’s expectations. Information about factors that could cause such differences can be found in yesterday's earnings press release on page two and in our 10-KT and other SEC filings. The information presented today is time sensitive and is accurate only at this time. If any portion of this presentation is rebroadcast, retransmitted or redistributed at a later date, Green Plains will not be reviewing or updating this material. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Todd Becker, our Chief Executive Officer.

Thanks, Jim, and good morning, everybody, and thanks for joining us today. In addition, we have Steve Bleyl on the call with us, who is our Executive Vice President of Ethanol Marketing, Steve will be available to answer any questions after the presentation on Ethanol Marketing overall. We hope you have had a chance to read our quarterly earnings issued yesterday after the market closed. Before we get started and for our first-time listeners, Green Plains is a vertically integrated ethanol producer based in Omaha, Nebraska. We currently have six ethanol production facilities throughout the Midwest with an annual operating capacity of 480 million gallons per year. We also operate an independent third-party ethanol marketing business, which markets all of the ethanol we produce along with 360 million gallons from four other producers in the Midwest, bringing our total ethanol marketed to 840 million gallons annually or about 8% of the U.S. ethanol produced in the U.S. today. We have a majority interest in a biofuels blending terminal operator - Blendstar, LLC, based in Houston, Texas. We also operate a full service Agribusiness segment providing agronomy services, grain storage, feed, fertilizer, and petroleum products to 1,800 farmers in Iowa in Minnesota. We also have a 25% interest in BioProcessAlgae, LLC, which is on the forefront of developing technology for capturing Carbon dioxide to grow and harvest algae, which can be used as a feedstock for biofuels, high-protein feed for livestock and a biomass energy source. Briefly, our consolidated revenues for the third quarter were $362 million. We reported net income of $5.5 million or $0.22 per share. I am pleased with our financial performance in the third quarter, particularly with our ethanol production segment. We were able to run at capacity in the quarter and started up two plants acquired…

Thanks, Todd and good morning, everybody. For the third quarter of 2009, we continue to compare our results on a sequential basis as we have done in the previous two quarters of this year. Prior to the fourth quarter of 2008, we had no significant operating history to compare to as a result of the VBV merger completed in October of 2008. We reported revenues of $362 million for the third quarter of 2009, that’s a 27% increase over the second quarter 2009 revenues of $285 million. For the first – for the full nine months period of 2009, revenues totaled $868 million. Consolidated gross profit was $21.4 million for the third quarter, which is a $6.5 million or a 44% improvement over the second quarter of 2009. The increase is attributable to margin improvements and additional volumes in the ethanol production segment. Total operating expenses were $10.6 million in the third quarter compared to $10.7 million for the second quarter of 2009. With a 39% increase in ethanol volumes quarter-over-quarter and flat operating expenses, we believe this illustrates the scalability and operating leverage of our production platform. Although the Agribusiness segments will typically have some seasonality to their expense levels, we believe this is basically the run rate for operating expenses we can expect going forward. Looking more specifically at our business segments, for the third quarter we reported revenue in the ethanol production segment of $206 million. That was an increase of more than 35% over the previous quarter. As I said a moment ago, ethanol volumes in this segment increased 39% over last quarter to 107 million gallons. The main driver for this increase was the addition of the two Nebraska ethanol plants, which we acquired in July. Our Agribusiness segment generated $44.6 million for – of…

Thanks, Jerry. We had a successful launch of our BioProcessAlgae Grower Harvester pilot project last month at our Shenandoah ethanol facility. The technology is deployed and we are looking to efficiently and effectively grow and harvest algae in a commercial environment. Our primary focus is to sequester the CO2 that is being emitted from the ethanol production process. The warm water and the waste heat from the plant, all provide perfect inputs that help the algae grow. The reactors that are deployed at the plant are directly linked to the carbon dioxide stream and we believe this is one of the first times this has happened in United States. When the algae are harvested, it could be used to produce advanced biofuels, high-quality animal feed, or be used as a biomass to create energy to help power our plant. Today, our ethanol plant produces one of the cleanest burning fuels available and if this technology proves successful, we will also do it one of the cleanest production processes for any motor fuel. While an ethanol plant is considered to be a worst carbon neutral, this process has the potential to take our plants to a carbon negative situation. We are quickly moving into Phase II of the pilot project and have plans to once again increase the size and scale of the Grower Harvester system. This evolution will hopefully lead us to a path to commercial scale projects that can be rolled out and used in several different applications from an ethanol plant to a coal-fired power plant to any industrial process that emits CO2 and is looking for a solution. We will keep everyone updated with the progress we make in the next stage of the pilot project. Our plants are producing at or near capacity. We firmly believe…

Thank you. (Operator Instructions). Our first question is coming from Matt Farlow [ph] with Imperial Capital. Please state your question. Matt Farwell – Imperial Capital: Good morning and congratulations on a successful quarter. I want to focus right now on Marketing and Distribution revenues. The way I calculate it, you had a 162 million total ethanol sold and a 170 million of internal production and that seems lower than the annual number, 360 million, which you mentioned earlier in the call. At what point in the year are we going to see the full 840 million gallons per year of ethanol sold?

Well, we produced a 107 million gallons of ethanol for the quarter internally and now we are ramping ourselves up to a 120 million gallons and then if we take that run rate, obviously that will get us to 480 million and so we are actually operating today at a full run rate on the production segment. In addition, we are starting – we added a plant in the last quarter, October 1st actually to take us up to 360 million gallons, and as well as some of the plants’ downtime that we market for as well. So we think in the next 12 months is really when we are going to see the full 840 million gallons as all of our plants that we have owned are operating and then the plants that we market for are operating as well. Matt Farwell – Imperial Capital: Okay. And I am looking at your ethanol realization of $1.59, which was in line with what we saw in the CBOT futures during the quarter. But it’s higher than I would have expected given the basis that we should have seen for transportation costs. Could you provide some color on how this metric outperformed?

Well, actually I think the average price is a little bit higher on CBOT for the quarter. I mean, we – what we do is when you kind of – we don't ever look at a price in a vacuum, we really just lock margins away. So when we see opportunities at $1.50 or $1.70, we just continue to lock – that’s basically turned out that the average was $1.59 against a corn price of – let me look here real –

$3.75.

Matt Farwell – Imperial Capital: Okay. Now, I am looking at the variance of distillers grains sales from what I was expecting. I see ethanol volumes increase 38%, but distillers grains only went up about 34%. So going forward, you – we should have ethanol ramp about 12% to get to 480 million gallons per year annual run rate. What – should we expect and then commence sort a 20 – 12% increase in distillers grains?

Yes, I would assume that that would be the case. I think one thing we have to remember is that as well we often times will look at the end of the quarter and what’s in transit and sometimes at the end of a quarter, when something is in transit, which we don't break out, we have to take them out of the earnings for a certain quarter from a revenue standpoint and so, it may have happened that at the end of the quarter, we had some distillers grains in transit that we actually had to remove from this quarter’s revenues, as well as the profits we get removed as well. But in general, I would say that you should see a like-for-like increase in our production – ethanol production of what you say about – of about 10%, 12% and then you would see the increase in the DDG production as well as we ramp up. Jerry, do you have any comments on that?

The only thing I would add to that is we also report all of our distillers grains on a dried equivalent basis. And so in that conversion of the wet distillers grains or the modified wet, there maybe some impact to the conversion that would have – that would create some of that distortion.

Yes, if you take a look at our plants and how they operate, we have the one plant in Nebraska ships just about everything modified, so there the conversion would be a little bit different. And then our Shenandoah plant as well ships a large portion of their product in a modified manner with the rest of our plants mainly shipping dry. So sometimes that may skew that number a little bit. Matt Farwell – Imperial Capital: My last question is regarding the Agribusiness segment. Could you provide some more color on what metrics will improve in that segment given that fourth quarter is going to be an important quarter, and also what would a strong margin look like in that business?

Well, in terms of the metrics, I mean – what happens that typically happens in the third quarter in a business like that is there is basically no handle revenue, no – and no fertilizer and chemical revenues. I mean, you will get revenues but no margins, because basically you’ve just cleared out your storage getting ready for harvest and so there is not really a lot of handle margin that’s left to take. Most of those are taken either in the first, second or the fourth quarter of last year and the second quarter of this year. On a go-forward basis, I mean – I think you can look at – we are going to – it should be a good quarter from the standpoint of the crop is wet, so this will be another year that we are going to have very good drying revenue, which again we don't break out, we just give indications of that. In addition, with the size of the crop and the location of those assets, within 100 miles of those assets there is over a billion bushels where the corn is grown. So we should have a good handle quarter once they get the crop out of field and we are having a very good start to the drying quarter as well. In addition, we are also starting to see very good applications of fall fertilizer once we are getting out of the field and as well as starting to get some stuff getting ready for winter. So in general, if you kind of take a look at the fourth quarter of last year and you will see that that was broken out separately; you will be able to kind of get a feel for what we are expecting for this quarter. The only thing I would caution you on is that the harvest is late this year and last year was very early, and so some of that might get pushed into first quarter of 2010. But in general, I think you can look at last year’s fourth quarter and get an understanding of what this quarter should again look like, not barring any continued challenges in getting the crop out of the field. Jerry, you want to comment on that?

No, I think that’s right. We had a good fourth quarter and that probably is indicative of what we can expect going forward for this coming fourth quarter. Matt Farwell – Imperial Capital: Well, thanks and congratulations again.

Thank you, Matt.

Our next question is coming from Ian Horowitz with Rafferty Capital Markets. Please state your question. Ian Horowitz – Rafferty Capital Markets: Good morning, guys. Congratulations.

Thanks, Ian. Ian Horowitz – Rafferty Capital Markets: Yes. Just a little bit of clarity, Todd. I think you mentioned overall, the fourth quarter is going to be better than expected – is going to be a continuation of positive trends. That is a sequential continuation of positive trends and is that going to be both top line, as well as bottom, and also throughout – would you say that the ethanol business and the Agribusiness should do well? So I assume that’s also through – it’s through the entire business line, is that true?

Yes, I think that is true. If we take a look at kind of a couple of metrics, we are going to produce more of – as was mentioned on the last question. So we are going to go for 107 million to 120 million gallons of production. And we’ve seen – and so we are going to increase our production in an expanding margin environment. In addition, when you add on the fact that we’ll have the Agribusiness quarter – again, start – or the Agribusiness segment again to start to contribute, I think you take a look at all of those things and you start to move to a higher top line and better bottom line for what we’ve seen in – from the third quarter to the fourth quarter and we are – and as well as when we’ve been able to lock in thus far, as we mentioned we had at the end of the quarter close to 79 million gallons of production locked in on the forward market. We've continued to do that where at this point most of our quarter is basically locked away and we still have some ethanol that we are selling, but in general we have a very good feeling for the quarter and I would tell you that the margins had improved again from third quarter to fourth quarter as they had gone from second quarter to the third quarter. Ian Horowitz – Rafferty Capital Markets: Great. And there is – I mean, if you look at kind of at the industry data services, there is a significant amount of capacity that sits idle, not to mention the several large plants from some of your larger competitors that will go online within the next six to 18 months. Do we get – are you concerned that we get back into an imbalance again? The – if you put the plants back online that are idle, we definitely can go past the RFS levels.

Yes, I’ll answer that first and I’ll let Steve Bleyl do a comment. Basically, what we see is that supply and demand again has come – is starting to come back into balance. We are probably not producing at a 12 billion or we are not producing today at a 12 billion gallon rate. And I think if you look at the ethanol industry in general, historically we haven't operated at capacity. In fact, in average, we’ve been operating around 85% to 90% of capacity even when plants are running. That’s the first point. The second point is that I think we’ll see some of these plants come back online. I still think there would be some of the marginal production that won’t because the forward curve is not again telling you to come back online yet, but the nearby market is. And I think in general, besides we are fast increasing the 12 billion, we are seeing some export demand, imports are down, the Brazilians are not very active today and I’ll let Steve just kind of finish up with those kind of comments on the general market. But I think in general, I don't anticipate we are going to move to a very big oversupply position because of the way that the industry runs, the good demand for the product, blending margins are very good, and we seem to have a little bit of exports of going on. Go ahead, Steve.

Ian, good question. We do see some incremental production coming back online and newer plants with projects they’ve come online. But I think we see the offsetting demand, as Todd mentioned, with the RFS increase for 2010, you’ve got some incremental increase in California, you’ve got incremental blending based on blend economics for the Southeast, which we are seeing new markets coming online and then as Todd also mentioned, the export-import balance probably in our favor as the production. So with those four areas, we do see an offsetting demand increase against the new production coming online Q4 going into Q1 of next year. Ian Horowitz – Rafferty Capital Markets: Okay. Great, thanks guys.

Thanks, Ian.

(Operator Instructions). Our next question is coming from Paul Resnik with Olympia Asset Management. Please state your question. Paul Resnik – Olympia Asset Management: Good morning. I didn’t think I was going to make it. I was at a meeting and I just caught part of the presentation, but you do refer to export business into Brazil. Where is your export business? And is it ethanol and distillers grain and what is the prospect for this end of business?

Well, we are – I mean, we are a domestic production company. I mean, what we would do is that when somebody wants to buy our production, we have the capability at one or more of our plants to make export specs, but today, we are not a – we are not exporting ethanol, but there is some understanding in the market that that is going on. In addition, some of our distillers grain end up in the export channels, but again we are not a direct exporter of anything today out of the United States. But I think the point is that – again, it’s another demand source, Brazil exports are down with the sugar situation down there. What we are seeing is that a lot of those – that demand is starting to look at the United States. We are not really clear whether there is anything actually exported to Brazil out of the United States. I mean, there has been a lot of rumors of that, but again there is no clarification of that. But in general, I think what it’s doing is it just kind of lines up to say supply and demand is at – will be at an equilibrium and there will be some other sticking points whether it comes from export or lack of imports and then the way the production runs in the United States that I think that this situation will continue to stay in the ethanol margins for a little while longer here. Paul Resnik – Olympia Asset Management: Thank you.

Thank you.

Our next question is coming from Brett Conrad with Longboard Capital Advisors. Brett Conrad – Longboard Capital Advisors: Hello.

Hi, Brett. Brett Conrad – Longboard Capital Advisors: Hey, good morning. Great quarter, by the way. Thank you.

Thank you. Brett Conrad – Longboard Capital Advisors: Quick question on the algae side of your business. What’s the endgame in that in terms of margin and what you think ultimately the off-take will have to be per gallon on that business to make money?

Well, basically the way that we’ve – we set the business up, our endgame is – might be a little bit different than what others are out there. I mean, we are basically right now scaling up a Grower Harvester system. And if you think about a production process, we are going to act almost as a farmer acts in agriculture. We are going to produce and sell the algae to multiple streams whether there would be somebody that’s working on advanced biofuels, whether there is somebody that needs to get – use it in a high quality animal feed or whether we can dry it and actually take the biomass and burn it as energy. But there is – for us, how we look at the business is that there is kind of two phases here. One is the technology side of it and one could possibly be a project development side of it. What we are going is hopefully ramp this up to commercial scale to provide people with a solution that they can capture their CO2 and grow a high value downstream input. And that’s basically our strategy. It’s still very early stage, we are moving from stage one pilot, which is now working in Shenandoah and has been rolled out in the month of October. We are going to, hopefully, in the first quarter get stage two pilot, which will be a much larger scale of what we have in Shenandoah and that’s going to be moving outside of the plant in its own enclosed structure. And then from there, we will move quickly to look at the possibility of commercialization to – our first goal is to sequester all of the CO2 from Shenandoah and grow algae at our ethanol plant in Shenandoah. And then take that scale and move it to other applications. So the endgame is still a long way away, but I think what we have today is one of the – we’ve invested in one of the leading technologies out there on growing and harvesting and one of the only processes that are going on to date that is actually sequestering CO2 from an industrial plant we think in the United States or maybe beyond. Brett Conrad – Longboard Capital Advisors: Okay, great. Thank you. I think it’s a good – firstly, I think it’s a good use of the carbon and the heat from the plant.

Yes, thanks for calling. Brett Conrad – Longboard Capital Advisors: Yes, you’re welcome.

(Operator Instructions). Our next question is coming from Andrew Hayne with Broadpoint Capital. Please state your question. Andrew Hain – Broadpoint Capital: Hi guys, nice quarter.

Thank you. Andrew Hain – Broadpoint Capital: I just was wondering if you guys could comment on any further opportunities or acquisitions you see at ethanol plants out there right now and would you guys be interested in – and I guess secondly was curious if you could give any general color on valuations you are seeing out there for plants that are for sale. I presume there is quite a few plants up for sale, I don't know if you can give that color on sort of per gallon basis or not, but that would be helpful.

All right. Well, let’s talk a little bit about Green Plains first. We are actively looking to expand our platform in all three segments. We are looking to potentially buy more grain elevators in Agribusiness operations where we would – for fertilizer, chemical, seed and we are actively looking at opportunities there. Downstream, we are starting – we continue to expand Blendstar. They are opening up to a seventh terminal; we have several other terminals under development. And in Steve’s segment, where we are doing ethanol marketing, we are actively looking to do – to market other ethanol for other plants. So when we get to the ethanol segment, for us it’s all about the right technology in the right location at the right price. And obviously, what we’ve seen is we had opportunities to get the couple of assets in Nebraska, but if you look back, that was in a much different environment. The margins were much tighter and actually the industry really didn’t know where the direction of that was going to go at that time. And so when we bought those, obviously valuations were much different. Do I think we could repeat those plants in a location like that with the technology of ICM? I don't believe today that we could repeat that in the market today. There are still a lot of plants for sale, but again it’s going to come down to where do you want to buy it and what technology do you want. We've got five ICM plants and one Delta-T plant. And so we see the operational data in terms of the cost of – our cost of production and we are very focused solely on ICM today in the right location, which for us would be middle of the country in Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana and in that region, probably wouldn't look at any plants in the outlying marginal production like Texas, Kansas, California, Colorado, Oregon and Washington, probably doesn't interest our platform very well because we are really focused on more of the origin plant model. Andrew Hain – Broadpoint Capital: Sure.

And again, the valuations – we haven't seen anything for what we would be looking for. We haven't seen any new valuation, but I would tell you that I don't think we can repeat the transaction that we completed, which as obviously margins are better, times are a little bit better, there isn’t – I think the industry is getting healthier, I think their balance sheets are getting stronger, I think they are generating free cash flow and overall, I think to repeat anything like we have in the past would – and we are very picky in choosing on what we would want to buy. I think in order to repeat that today would be almost impossible. And so I would say in general, valuations are higher, if not much higher, from that point. Andrew Hain – Broadpoint Capital: Okay, great. I appreciate that, thank you. And lastly, any color or information, updates on the legislation activity with the move from 10% to 15% of ethanol per gallon? I think it was December where you were waiting for something with Congress. Is that still the case or are you guys closed with that?

Yes, I mean basically we are hoping that we’ll get some kind of ruling in early December. They are talking, they may get pushed back now, but we are not – we have no confirmation of that. We are asking for the waiver, we are not asking for a mandate, allow people to blend higher blends if it’s number one, profitable to do so and if they desire to do so and if the demand is there. I think the science is – it backs up the fact that we can blend higher rates of ethanol without causing any damage to an automobile. We have several blender pumps that we operate through our Agribusiness segment as well and we are seeing a good attraction to those pumps as well. I think overall, though we are optimistic that we are going to get a positive ruling, but I think today we are really just not sure what’s going to come out or if it’s going to get delayed. The 15% is what we have asked for through growth energy. There are people that are talking that it might come in a little bit lower and ramp up to 15%. Again, I don't think today we have a very good clear understanding what the decision will be and whether it will be December 1st or not, but we are hoping it will. Andrew Hain – Broadpoint Capital: Okay. Thank you very much and best of luck to you guys next year.

Thank you.

Our next question is coming from Joe Lambrick [ph] with RBC Capital Markets. Please state your question. Joe Lambrick – RBC Capital Markets: Good morning, gentlemen.

Good morning. Joe Lambrick – RBC Capital Markets: When I have you comment on corn costs, throughout the quarter corn moved on the CBOT from $3 to $4 a bushel. You generally buy below those costs. The harvest is late this year generally speaking. You did reduce your average cost from about $4 to $3.75 a bushel. Can you comment on how the quarter went for acquisition and considering a late harvest?

Well, the quarter – the third quarter is what we can comment on today in terms of price and obviously that was a while ago. I would say though that we – more of our plants buy under CBOT and two of our plants actually buy – have a basis over CBOT because they are on the East Coast and they are in Indiana and Tennessee. And again, if you look at that, the ethanol is about the same. I mean, basically ethanol in Iowa and Nebraska trade under the Chicago ethanol market and Indiana and Tennessee typically trade over the Chicago market. In general again and I don't look at price in a vacuum, we just – we look at our price $3.75 corn against $1.60 ethanol and what margin does that provide us and it provided us a margin that was acceptable where we could drive net income to the bottom line and I think that’s how we look at it. So – again, we – it would be hard for us to ever comment on price in a vacuum because we don't ever look at a single price component of anything that we do and say it’s the right price or the wrong price. We just lock margins away. So – so I think and again, going forward I think you’ll see the same thing. I mean, that’s why we are trying to get away from just looking at a single price component to say that we – that was a good or a bad quarter in terms of what we bought or what we sold. We are going to – we are moving more towards the same that was from a margin standpoint, we are able to lock EBITDA. We focus on everything and we've said this many times in all of our presentations and I’m – and what I want to stress as here, we really focus on EBITDA per gallon. That’s our whole – all of our models are based on that and as Jerry mentioned, it’s $0.11 a gallon EBITDA to service our debt and anything above that will start to drive bottom line net income and free cash flow. And that’s how we focus everyday. So if you look at the quarter, we produced 107 million gallons of production at around $20 million of EBITDA for the ethanol production segment, more than enough to service our debt for the quarter and to drive income to the bottom line. And we are enthusiastic that margins have expanded and in some places, considerably expanded since the end of the quarter and since we locked those margins in. So I’m not eluding your question, but again it’s hard for us to comment specifically on an individual price. Joe Lambrick – RBC Capital Markets: So let me – can I ask a follow-up?

Sure. Joe Lambrick – RBC Capital Markets: Let me ask about margins specifically when competitors that are looking at $0.25, $0.26 per gallon range. What point do you guys feel that’s satisfactory margin to lock up a gallon of future production versus handling it on the spot market? And what’s your philosophy of locking it up versus taking it on the spot? Of course, you can’t over-commit contracts if you can’t deliver in case there was a problem. So do you lock up half of your production, three-quarters of it and what sense per gallon margin is good?

Yes, I mean I’ll comment a little bit on that. What I can say is that in an expanding margin environment, we may lag a little bit because we are going to – we might be a quarter behind because we’ve locked in a lot of the – typically, we are very front-end weighted on locking margins away, but we’ll catch up very quickly and in a contracting margin environment, our model will outperform for several quarters because we have locked in forward margins as well. What we look at is we are basically margin agnostic, we don't say that $0.25 is right or $0.35 is right because we have so much to sell on a daily basis – we produce around 1.4 million gallons or more a day, because we have so much to sell on a daily basis, we actually don't – we are kind of – I would say we are margin agnostic. If it’s $0.20 we'll sell it that day and if it’s $0.40 we’ll sell it the next day. And every day we need to lock production away. We know what it takes to service our debt, we know what it takes to generate free cash flow and if we could have a large portion of say the next six months locked away at the number that generates free cash flow, pays our debt, and makes us stronger on a balance sheet, getting us ready for – commodity markets are cyclical and they will always be cyclical and I think what we are – we have a cyclical upturn in the ethanol market, but we've had a – we’ve probably just gone through a very bad cyclical downturn in the ethanol market and I think the one thing we need to be very careful of is nothing left forever and as when opportunities present themselves on a daily basis, we are going to lock margins. So from a standpoint of answering your question, I’ll just repeat again, we are basically margin agnostic, we will lock margins in every day what they – whatever they are. It may reach a point where at $0.11 a gallon we may just say, “Well, hold on a second, we don't believe that you can operate much below a break-even debt service for very long,” and I think the industry has proven itself. I think the one thing that happened is that the industry got in trouble because margins were negative for a long time. The industry got in trouble for looking at price in a vacuum and got longhorned and I think the industry is much smarter today, starting to get better capitalized and looking at margins instead of just looking at price of one component. And so I think whenever the opportunities present themselves, they move – the industry is trying to lock margins away and I think that’s very healthy for us. Joe Lambrick – RBC Capital Markets: Thanks.

Thank you very much for calling.

There are no further questions at this time. I’d like to turn the floor back over to Todd Becker for any closing comments.

Thank you and thank you, everybody for calling in today. We are optimistic about the future of our company, we’ve come through a significant growth over the last 18 months in a challenging environment and I think again, as I can stress, our model continues to prove itself over and over again. We are building a vertically integrated value chain with multiple income streams that complement each other, as you can see, while we continually lower our cost of production with the acquisition of the Nebraska plants. I think we have one of the lowest costs of production in the industry today and we will continue to focus on that. We try to drive efficiencies through our – through all of our plants on a daily basis. And again, part of succeeding in a commodity business is being a low-cost provider with our low cost – corporate costs of under $0.03 a gallon and we continue to focus on that. We are optimistic about the next quarter and the next 12 months and hopefully, you’ll continue to follow our story. I think it’s very exciting times again in our industry, but again, we want to be cautiously optimistic that things can change rather quickly. But at this point, we are focused on continuing to grow our company, grow our earnings, grow our balance sheet, and provide a very good company for you to invest in. And I’d like to thank everybody for calling in today. Have a nice day.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time and we thank you for your participation.