Greetings. Welcome to the Gulfport Energy Corp Third Quarter 2021 Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I’ll now turn the conference over to your host, Tommy Renouard. You may begin.

Thank you, and good morning. Welcome to Gulfport Energy Corporation's third quarter of 2021 earnings conference call. I'm Tommy Renouard, Senior Analyst of Investor Relations. Speakers on today's call, include Tim Cutt, Chief Executive Officer; and Bill Buese, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. I would like to remind everybody that during this conference call, the participants may make certain forward-looking statements relating to the company's financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. We caution you that actual results could differ materially from those that are indicated in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Information concerning these factors can be found in the company's filings with the SEC. In addition, we may reference non-GAAP measures. Reconciliations to the comparable GAAP measures will be posted on our website. An updated Gulfport presentation was posted yesterday evening to our website in conjunction with the earnings announcement. Please review at your leisure. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Tim Cutt, CEO.

Thanks, Tommy and good morning, and thank you for joining the call. I'll begin this morning with a summary of the third quarter highlights followed by an operational update before turning the call over to Bill to discuss the financial and updates of our full year 2021 guidance. As you saw from our earnings release, we made steady progress on numerous fronts during the quarter. We put a new credit facility in place that increases our liquidity by 160 million and accelerates our ability to return capital to shareholders, as demonstrated by the announced $100 million share repurchase program. The six-well Angelo pad was completed in the Utica, which is currently flowing at a rate of 200 million cubic feet per day. Finally, the company fully resolved its largest post-bankruptcy litigation exposure with TC Energy and announced the Settlement Agreement relating to its own standing litigation with Stingray Pressure Pumping in September. I'm pleased to have this litigation behind us so that we can focus on the company's tremendous opportunities moving forward. Moving to our third quarter operational results. Production average 973 million cubic feet of gas equivalent per day during the quarter, slightly above expectations, driven by strong reservoir performance from both the Utica and the SCOOP development programs. We anticipate an increase in total production during the fourth quarter, driven by strong contribution from the Angelo pad. Gulfport invested $81 million of capital in the third quarter. We continue to identify opportunities to lower our total drilling and completion costs. However, we remained primarily focused on delivering peer-leading development cost per Mcfe produced. Moving forward, we continue to target a maintenance-level of capital spend of approximately $300 million per year, despite service cost inflation. This level of spend is expected results in roughly 1 Bcf equivalent per day…

Thank you, Tim, and good morning everyone. As Tim suggested in his remarks, we had another solid quarter, both operationally and from a financial perspective. I will spend my time this morning providing a brief overview of our third quarter financial results, some details surrounding our recent credit facility amendment, our improved liquidity position, share repurchase authorization, and updates to our 2021, guidance before opening a call up for Q&A. For the three-month period ending September 30th, 2021, we reported a net loss of $461 million and generated $171 million of adjusted EBITDA, driving the net loss of $529 million unrealized loss associated with our commodity derivatives portfolio. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $126 million during the quarter and we generated free cash flow of $70 million for the same period. To ensure our ability to fund our capital program and generate free cash flow going forward, we continue to enter into commodity derivative contracts during the quarter. For the remaining three months in 2021, we currently hold natural gas swap & collar contracts totaling approximately 800 million cubic feet per day with an average floor price of $2.65 per Mcf. We also have natural gas swap & collar contracts totaling approximately 550 million cubic feet per day at an average floor price of $2.66 for 2022 and contracts totaling approximately 65 million cubic feet per day at an average floor price of $3.39 per Mcf for 2023. Please see our Form 10-Q for additional details on our derivative portfolio. Turning to our balance sheet, at the end of the third quarter, total assets were approximately $2.1 billion, while total gross debt was approximately $750 million, consisting of $35 million outstanding under our revolver, $165 million outstanding under our term loan, and $550 million of outstanding senior notes.…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Neal Dingmann with Truist. You may proceed with your question.

Hi, good morning, all. Tim, Bill, appreciate all the early comments. I guess mine is kind of a blended question. When you talk -- think about both your growth and more particularly, maybe the shareholder return, I guess that's more important these days for most investors. When you think about off typically, may be the most efficient way to run, both when you think about the Utica and of course over the -- in the Midcon by -- is the plan to run one rig in each or -- I’m just wondering, I guess my question would be, how do you balance maybe running the most efficient plan, again, activity wise with that, which is the most efficient sort of shareholder return wise?

Neal, that’s a perfect question. I touched on it during the -- during my prepared comments. Right now, we have a program that was designed at a very low gas price. And it was designed to maximize cash flow and ultimately return to the shareholders with budget improvement. I think it opens up opportunities to look at a more efficient development program. For instance, in both the Utica and the SCOOP, we do stop drilling for periods of time and start drilling -- start to stop fracking. And that is -- that can be quite inefficient. And when you're in a market like we're in today, where supply costs are going up, services are hard to acquire, you build risk by doing that. So we're looking at what's the opportunity to potentially run a more consistent program, that’s part of the reason we didn't put the formal guidance out. We're going to talk about that as board, but obviously from our operating standpoint our preference is to be more consistent. So I think that's a great question.

And then, it just really got to where I wanted to go. And just on the follow-up. Now with the shareholder repurchase authorization, I mean, when -- how do you sort of blend that in thinking about that, maybe pushing even for bill? I mean, how do you think about that and versus -- the dividends?

Yes. I think. Neal, I'll take it first. I mean, the good news is going to a more consistent program does not cost a lot, it's probably a 20% to 25% increase in the program. And so, in the Utica, for instance, require three months. You fill that in, you stay on the same fracking schedule, you frack another pad. It's not like you're doubling up at all. So I think you can increase and still generate substantial cash flow. And if you think about right now $350 million is pretty attractive price. That number, obviously, if prices stay higher, will go higher, you still have a lot of headroom for dividend, shareholder buyback, and paying down debt, which is just extremely important to take us down to at least one-times levered. So I think there's room for all of that. We just want to make sure we're very measured in our decision making, I think. And we don't move to that too quickly. But I do think it's something it could be a positive thing. And also, by doing that, although we wouldn't see much of an increase in 2022 on production, we could see a more substantial increase in production in 2023, if prices sustain. So I think, we’re got -- I think there's plenty of room to consider this without worrying about, do we have to do one or the other. Anything to add, Bill?

Yes. No, I don’t think that's exactly right. I mean, we're going to take a measured approach, and there's room. These are mutually exclusive. We can certainly -- again, we just did this credit facility amendment two weeks ago, basically close. So, the board and management have been in active discussions about capital return, and we'll continue to have those discussions, Neal, and we can certainly do more than one thing and we know we plan on in the future.

No, I love the optionality. Thanks guys so much.

Yeah. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Zach Parham with JPMorgan. You may proceed with your question.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I guess first off, on the Angelo pad your well cost came in a bit below the Utica target. Could you talk a little bit about how you see well cost trending in 2022, given both the cost inflation pressures, but also positive trends on the upside including simul-fracked and doing things more efficiently?

Yes. I think. Right now we're kind of offsetting each other. We’re seeing, obviously, everybody’s different numbers, they're talking about inflation, but on any particular service or commodity, we’re seeing 0% to 40% change. So, on a blended basis, it maybe 10% to 15% pressure. So we're trying to basically hold our own and offset. I do think there are opportunities below the 750. But those things could get offset by inflationary effects. We don't have a big water disposal system, for instance, in the Utica. So we have big pads, and we're not fracking next door to use that water, doesn't cost a lot. So it can be a little bit lumpy. And that's why we're considering going to more consistent programs. So we are fracking more well while we're producing these new pads to try and have a better place for disposal of the water through the fracking operation. So I don't want to get ahead of our C Series as far as predicting where we'll be next year. But I do think the range around 300, if we stay with the same program is good, because we are going to be able to offset some of those inflationary effects. But I wouldn't be prepared yet to kind of quote what we're thinking we'll see on $1 per foot basis yet.

Thanks for that color. Just one follow-up for me. One of your natural gas focus peers recently announced restructuring some of their hedge book, is this something Gulfport could potentially look at something to do on some of your longer-dated hedges that were put in place in a very different gas price market? And maybe if you could talk about, if so what that potentially could look like?

Yes, Bill, take that.

Yes. So yes, definitely, that was another reason we did – we did the credit facility, we needed to get some more counterparties to allow us to work on some of that, until a bit early to tell you exactly how that's going to play out. But it's something we're focused on, specifically the calls in 2023. And again, next quarter, we should have a better update on that, but it's definitely something we are focused on. Now, again, part of the reason for the credit facility amendment was to allow us to address some of that.

Thank you, guys. That's all for me.

All right. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Tarek Hamid with JPMorgan. You may proceed with your question.

Good morning, and thanks for taking my question. You certainly kept guidance online and capital sort of flat that go-forward plan at that 1 Bcf and $300 million of capital since emergence? I guess, and this sort of follows on Neal and Zach's questions, but given the productivity of the Angelo pad and just the broader drilling program so far this year, do you think there's upside to volume in 2022, I guess, how do you think about your productivity assumptions on a go-forward basis?

Yes, I think, we're obviously very close – we out there. And I think the 1 Bcf is probably still a good number. We had planned for these kind of rates. Everything we did and this year is performing about like it was expected to. Our basic line is doing about what we expect it to do. So we're not -- we don't have much ability to accelerate things. The permitting process in Utica has a pretty extended process. And so we don't have a lot of flexibility to bring much forward. I do think we could bring a pad earlier in the year, but that production again, comes on late in the year. So I don't think you should expect much upside. I think the level we have is kind of how we built towards 2023. I think we have much more flexibility on how we set the stage for that. But I think most of the plans, we looked at stay plus or minus around 1 Bcf.

I appreciate it. And just one follow-up for me. Just on the timing on the execution of the share repurchase program. How could you expect to start to execute on the program? I think you should point out pretty successfully in the slide deck you're going to generate a ton of cash in 2022. You could be out of pre-payable debt period and just a quarter or two. So, I guess, how do you think about timing to start tip your hand on that share purchases?

Yes. Its good question, I mean, yes, obviously not in our advantage to share exactly what will be on the market. But it's something -- we'll be doing opportunistically. We believe our shares are undervalued. So, it's a good investment to do so. But we're not going tip our hand necessarily, but it's something that we're definitely looking at and we're excited about.

Got it. Well, thanks for taking my questions.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Steven Dechert with KeyBanc. You may proceed with your question.

Hey, guys, I just want for me. I just wanted to see if you guys have given any consideration to raise the gas production this winter with the high prices right now? Thanks.

Yes. We don't have a lot of opportunities to do that. If you look in the slide deck carefully and you look at the Shannon and Hendershot wells, those wells have been on plateau for about eight months. About a month ago, we did turn those wells up and ran them for a while. Some of them I think, saved up, a few of them went dialed back. We're just trying to test what we can do without bringing basically frac sand formations, creating operational issues for us. And so we think we're producing these in our target rates on the Angelo pads are 235, we're pushing that a bit right now. We're at 250. Obviously, with some downtime, the 235 target is what we'd stick with. So, I don't think -- you'll see a lot of that. What we have done and you see it in that base decline and the decline of our new wells, in the SCOOP. We've been doing compression projects. We're doing a whole lot of projects on the base to get the decline flatter. We did move as fast as we possibly could to get the Angelo pad on, came on a bit early. But I wouldn't expect that we have unlimited ability to kind of turn things out. I mean, we're going to do what we can do within kind of confines of the walls we have and making sure we continue to produce those safely. It's great having big wells, you don't want to lose one of those. So, we want to be a bit cautious on that. But again, we're trying to push that as far as we can and take advantage of the prices and we understand the question completely. And -- but I think the kind of good guidance range we gave in the deck there is about what you should expect coming out of the fourth quarter.

Got it. Okay, great. Thanks.

At this time, we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. Now, I turn the floor back over to Tim Cutt for closing remarks. End of Q&A:

All right. Thanks very much. And thanks for calling in and asking the questions and also calling in to listen, we appreciate that. I mainly want to say once again, thanks for our organization, our employees, our contractors, who actually did a lot of since the beginning of this year and you've delivered against very well and we do appreciate that a lot. Again, appreciate your time today to join in. And if you have any additional questions, don't hesitate to call, Tommy and reach out to our Investor Relations team. So, with that, that concludes the call. Thank you.