Good morning, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Genco Shipping & Trading Limited Fourth Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call and Presentation. Before we begin, please note that there will be a slide presentation accompanying today’s conference call. That presentation can be obtained from Genco’s website at www.gencoshipping.com. To inform everyone, today’s conference is being recorded and is now being webcast at the company’s website www.gencoshipping.com. We will conduct a question-and-answer session after the opening remarks. Instructions will follow at that time. A webcast replay will also be available via the link provided in today’s press release as well as on the company’s website. At this time, I will now turn the conference over to the company. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Before we begin our presentation, I note that in this conference call, we will be making certain forward-looking statements pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements use words such as anticipate, budget, estimate, expect, project, intend, plan, believe and other words in terms of similar meaning in connection with the discussion of potential future events, circumstances or future operating or financial performance. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and observations. For a discussion of factors that could cause results to differ, please see the company’s press release that was issued yesterday, materials relating to this call posted on the company’s website and the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 and the company’s reports on Form 10-Q and Form 8-K subsequently filed with the SEC. At this time, I would like to introduce John Wobensmith, Chief Executive Officer of Genco Shipping & Trading Limited.

Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Genco’s fourth quarter 2024 conference call. I will begin today’s call by reviewing our Q4 2024 and year-to-date highlights. Additionally, we will provide an update on our value strategy, discuss our financial results for the quarter, as well as the industry’s current fundamentals before opening the call up for questions. For additional information, please also refer to our earnings presentation posted on our website. Starting on Slide 5, Q4 2024 marked another solid quarter for Genco, capping off what was a very good year for the company as we grew earnings and advanced our comprehensive value strategy focused on three pillars: dividends, deleveraging, and growth. Specifically, during a time when we continue to provide shareholders with sizable returns and take additional steps to lower our financial risk, we are pleased to have acquired another high specification Capesize vessel. In October, we took delivery of the Genco Intrepid, our third Capesize acquisition over the last year, increasing our investment in modern high specification vessels to approximately $285 million since 2021. Importantly, the acquisition of the Genco Intrepid is part of our broader fleet renewal strategy. Earlier in the year, we completed our exit from the 4 smaller and older 169,000 deadweight ton vessels and have redeployed the sale proceeds and additional cash towards the acquisition of 3 2016 built Capesize vessels. Notably, these accretive transactions enhance our earnings power as we had premium high quality assets to the fleet and reduced drydocking CapEx in 2024 and 2025 by $13 million. Turning to Slide 6, we highlight what was a strong 2024 for Genco. Our EBITDA exceeded $150 million, a nearly 50% increase versus 2024 levels – 2023 levels, apologize, led by our success, increasing time charter equivalent rates to $19,107 per day from $14,766 the prior…

Thank you, John. On Slides 10 through 12, we highlight our fourth quarter financial results. Genco recorded net income of $12.7 million or $0.29 basic and diluted earnings per share. Adjusted EBITDA for Q4 totaled $32.7 million, bringing the yearly total to $151.2 million, an increase of 49% year-over-year. During Q4, our TCEs increased on a year-over-year basis led by our Capesize vessels, which earned a TCE rate of over $25,000 per day during the quarter or approximately $3,000 per day greater than the same period of last year, highlighting the significant operating leverage of the Capesize sector. On Slide 13, we showed the trajectory of our debt outstanding and our continued voluntary debt repayments. Over the last 4 years, we have paid down 80% of our debt for nearly $360 million, which has resulted in a net loan to value ratio of only 5%. In 2024 specifically, we voluntarily paid down $110 million of debt under our revolving credit facility and we estimate that this will reduce interest expense by approximately $6 million on an annualized basis or $400 per vessel per day on our cash flow breakeven rate. Voluntarily paying down debt highlights the importance and significant flexibility that our 100% revolving credit facility structure offers us and that we can pay down debt to actively manage interest expense without losing borrowing capacity to capture accretive growth opportunities. Turning to Slide 14, we have presented a current snapshot of Genco’s financial position as of December 31, 2024. We have a cash and debt balance of $44 million and $90 million respectively, resulting in a net debt position of $46 million and an industry low net loan to value ratio of approximately 5% on our 42 vessel fleet. Additionally, we have $337 million of undrawn revolver availability that we can utilize for growth opportunities, among other uses. Moving to Slide 15, we highlight our quarterly dividend policy, which targets a distribution based on 100% of quarterly cash flows plus a voluntary reserve. For the fourth quarter, our formula resulted in a $0.30 per share dividend or an annualized yield of 8%, nearly double the 2-year treasury rate of approximately 4%. Looking ahead to Q1 2025, we currently have 75% of our available days fixed at a rate of $12,366 per day as compared to our anticipated cash flow breakeven rate excluding drydocking related CapEx of $8,873 per vessel per day. We note that while Genco, like much of the industry, has a high drydocking year in 2025, we plan to frontload these drydockings during the first half of the year and seek to maximize fleet-wide utilization in the second half of the year, which tends to be seasonally stronger from a freight rate perspective. I will now turn the call over to Michael Orr, our dry bulk market analyst, to discuss industry fundamentals.

Thank you, Peter. Beginning on Slide 17, the dry bulk market experienced a strong 2024, led by the Baltic Capesize Index, which averaged $22,593 per day. Last year was atypical from a seasonality perspective in the sense that the market was strong from the start of the year and through Q3, but then eased into year end. So far in 2025 to-date, the market has seen traditional seasonal trends return in Q1, such as weather disruptions in both the Atlantic and Pacific basins impacting cargo availability, the frontloaded nature of the new building deliveries, particularly for minor bulk vessels, as well as the timing of the Chinese New Year. Specifically, as highlighted on Page 18, due to poor weather conditions and scheduled maintenance, Brazilian iron ore exports have pulled back since the highs of Q3, with January exports approximately 11% lower than the second half of 2024. These reduced long-haul iron ore trade volumes, together with an easing import congestion, have temporarily thrown off the supply and demand balance for the sector, impacting freight rates to the downside. Turning to Slide 19, 2024 marked another record year for both Chinese iron ore and coal imports. Iron ore imports grew by 5% year-over-year, some of which replenished inventories. While current Chinese stockpiles are below 2022 highs in absolute terms, these levels are approximately 19% higher than this time last year. China’s steel production declined in 2024, while steel exports increased by 25%, highlighting reduced domestic demand. China continues to export over 10% of the steel it produces, mostly going to other Asian nations, as well as the Middle East, with its proportion of exports to steel output growing over recent years. China’s excess steel has remained a point of contention, inducing protectionist measures globally. Turning to Pages 20 and 21, we…

Okay, thank you. [Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from the line of Omar Nokta with Jefferies. Omar, please go ahead.

Hi, good morning John, Peter, Michael. Good update.

Good morning.

Just on – morning, yes, just overall I think, just looking at the release and obviously the market is what it is. Just in terms of Genco, clearly you are in strong shape, maybe the strongest you’ve ever been. LTV is at just 5% as you highlight, liquidity is pushing close to $400 million. How do you think about where you are positioned right now? How the dry bulk market has developed here recently and how do you think Genco is going to be here in terms of opportunities that may be coming up, especially given the softer market of late?

Yes, thanks Omar. So look, this plays right into how we set this company up 2.5, almost 3 years ago with the value strategy. And what I mean by that is we have always – we wanted to put the company in a position where it can always play offense. And clearly you have seen that happen in 2024 with large dividend payouts due to the favorable cash flows, the fleet renewal that we were still able to do in 2024. And as we look at 2025, while it may be from a rate standpoint softer than 2024, we believe that that is going to allow us to acquire additional vessels at lower prices, particularly focusing on eco type capes and ultramaxes. So, again, I will just go back to this is what we set this company up for, to thrive in all freight environments, and while we maybe have a little softer situation in the first part of this year, we think that will be a great opportunity for the company to grow. And with a 5% net debt, we can do that extremely easy without sacrificing anything on the dividend side.

Okay. Thanks John. That’s nice to hear and obviously nice to be able to play offense in a market like this. And I guess maybe just on that, your last point on the dividend, your pay-out policy is pretty simple. You pay out operating cash flow less that $19 million reserve. How do you think about the setup here for the first quarter? Earnings may be slipping in the red, just given the low spot rates. How do you think about what the dividend would be in that – with that dynamic?

Yes. And certainly this question comes up. I think – so first of all, we are very much committed to the value strategy, which includes quarterly dividends. As you pointed out, that formula is very straightforward and there is a very, again, straightforward strategy on that. Definitely downward volatility in the first quarter, but I think all you have to do is go back and look at our track record of dividends during previous periods of softness, even when at the time the formula would have produced a zero dividend, Q1, 2023, Q3, 2023. The formula spit out a zero during those quarters, but we still elected to pay $0.15 a share. So, I think there is a very defined track record now in terms of what the Board and the management team and the company, their commitment to the value strategy. You pointed out the quarterly reserve. It actually works out to about $0.45 a share. So, there is quite a bit of reserve on a short-term basis to tap as needed. It doesn’t mean we are going to pay out the whole reserve, but it certainly gives us a lot of flexibility to counteract short-term volatility in the freight markets, which is exactly what we believe is happening right now. So, it’s again, I will just go back to the same thing. It’s about playing offense. Omar, we have set this company up to continue paying decent sized dividends, even in periods where we have softness in rates, and growth is very much a factor still for us.

Got it. Great. Thanks John. Very helpful. I will turn it over.

Thanks Omar.

And your next question comes from the line of Chris Robertson with Deutsche Bank. Chris, please go ahead.

Good morning guys and thank you for taking my questions. Just with regards to pulling the drydocking forward, you are not the only public player that’s trying to front load this year just due to the rate environment. And I am assuming other private players are doing so as well. Additionally, there is a large portion of the fleet that was built in 2010 that has to do special surveys and undergo drydocking this year. So, do you see any potential for, I guess upside as effective capacity of the fleet is reduced because everyone is trying to rush to the yard?

Maybe a little bit. I actually think that’s being made. It’s being made a little bigger than it actually is. I believe actually next year is an even larger drydocking year, if you look at the fleet overall. In terms of what Genco is doing, we are not necessarily pulling things forward in 2025, and we obviously have a set regulatory schedule in terms of when we need to do our drydockings. But we certainly try to pull things forward as much as we can in the earlier part of the year to make opportunity cost as low as possible on drydockings, particularly this quarter when we are having the normal seasonal softness. But I am not so sure how much of a factor it is this year, but again, next year is even heavier, so maybe we will start to see it as we get into next year.

Okay. Got it. Alright. My second question is, just as it relates to the Suez Canal transit, John, could you talk about which segment of the dry bulk sector is impacted the most, and what do you think normalization in the Suez means for overall decrease in ton-mile demand, if that were to normalize?

I don’t think it’s very much in dry bulk, maybe it’s 1%. I can tell you Genco as a company has no plans at this point to transit the Red Sea area. We will continue to go around Africa for at least the near-term as we see it. We still think it’s a very volatile situation there. And the last thing you want is to have ship and crew, everything looks good one day, and all of a sudden you are in the middle of the Red Sea and you can’t turn around, and the world blows up again, and you have attacks. So, for the time being, we are staying away. I think a lot of other ship owners are, clearly not everyone, but it’s not a risk that we want to take with our ship and crew.

Yes. It’s smart for the crew’s safety especially. Alright. Guys, thank you for the time. I will turn it over.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from the line of Sherif Elmaghrabi with BTIG. Sherif, please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. So, a couple on the market, when we look at the time charter market, recent pictures by some other owners are showing a bit of a bifurcation between vessel classes. Capes aren’t too far below where the liberty and the endeavor are fixed, but smaller vessels are a bit lower. So, I am wondering what’s behind the relative strength in capes even as the spot market goes through this sort of seasonal and weather-impacted slump.

So, I am a little confused because 1-year TC rates on capes are definitely below 20 at this point. So, they have been pushed down just like every other market on the smaller ships as well as the larger ships. So, they have definitely seen that downward pressure because of where spot rates are. And a lot of times that cape 1-year TC gets priced somewhat off of the daily FFA curve, because I think in that market, those FFAs are being used more so than in the mid-size vessels.

Okay. Yes. It could be that some of the fixtures I saw were for more than a year or so. Maybe that’s a driver. But shifting to my second question, the iron ore and bauxite expansions you highlighted on Slide 20.

Yes.

For context, the tanker trade in the last couple of years, we have seen some important refineries come online, but the ramp of full production has taken a year or more. So, for these three iron ore and bauxite projects, do you have a sense of how the cadence of those 167 million tons should start making an impact in the dry bulk trade?

Sure. So, I would call it an educated guess. I would tell you, you will see full ramp up as we get into 2027 and ‘28. They certainly have indicated shipments by the end of this year. I don’t believe those are going to be large shipments that might – I think they will be more symbolic that it’s up and going more than anything else. And then a real ramp up should begin as you get into the second half of ‘26 and then ‘27. As I have said, by the time we get into early ‘28, you should have that full run rate of 120 million tons.

That’s helpful. Thanks very much for the color.

Yes. You’re welcome. And don’t lose sight of the fact as well that you have got growth from valet as well that’s going to come a little sooner. That’s obviously still a long haul trade. And we still have growth on the bauxite side, at least through ‘26 and probably into ‘27 as well coming out of West Africa and going east.

And your next question comes from the line of Poe Fratt with Alliance Global Partners. Poe, please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning John. Comprehensive presentation as always. Can you just talk about the play between buying assets, you are talking about growth, you are clearly emphasizing growth, buying modern tonnage, and would you compare that to buying your own stock? In the market, you are probably not going to be able to get a huge discount to NAV. You are going to pay market prices for all intents and purposes. But conversely, you can go into the open market and buy your own stock at a pretty good discount to NAV. Can you just talk about how you assess those different opportunities?

Sure. First is we are a shipping company, and we make money by buying ships and operating them and using those cash flows to continue to pay down debt, generate ROIC, and most importantly, return dividends to shareholders. So, I think it comes down to a question of is it dividends or share buybacks. We have done a tremendous amount of work on share buybacks. We have not seen them work in shipping in any sector as a whole. We do believe returning money to shareholders in the form of dividends is a better way to go. And when I look at share buyback programs that have been done this year, with the exception of one company, our TSR is actually better than the companies that have performed share buybacks. So, we fundamentally believe the best way to generate shareholder returns is through dividends. The shipping side, again, Poe, we are a shipping company. We need to continue to grow our fleet and cash flows to generate ROIC.

It sounds good. So, no change in your previous, your historic opinion on stock buybacks. Can you just talk about the reserve, in the presentation, you still have for the first quarter that full reserve? Where – does it make sense at this point in time, you are already 72% covered, call it 12,000. Clearly, you are not going to generate a significant dividend in the first quarter, at least the quarter in, my calculation. So, why not flex down the reserve right now instead of waiting until next quarter when you report?

Look, I think it’s – again, I think it’s just about being consistent, Poe. We give the guidance a quarter forward. And I agree, I am not sure what the actual formula will spit out, but we definitely had a soft first quarter across the industry. But again, we have that reserve that we can flex and use to smooth out quarterly dividends as we have done in the past. And I can’t say it enough. We are committed to the quarterly dividends and the value strategy and I think it’s working extremely well. I am not sure if most companies will even have the ability to do that in the first quarter and pay a dividend.

Understood. And John, you implied, based on your history, that the minimum level of the dividend should at least I heard $0.15 a quarter, is that something we should sort of build into expectations or is that, did you not mean that?

Well, I didn’t address it though. I addressed that we had $0.45 of per share of reserve to have as optionality in terms of what the Board and the management team put forward as the dividend. I have certainly pointed to past history, but in terms of a decision that’s been made yet, no, we want to get through the first quarter. We want to see what the cash flows are. We have obviously as well, this is, as I have said earlier on the call, it’s a heavy drydocking year, which is why we took out the CapEx minus out of the formula going forward, because we have such a very, very strong balance sheet and we still have positive fundamentals on the market.

It sounds good. Thanks for taking my questions, John.

Thank you, Poe.

As there are no further questions at this time, this concludes your conference call for today. Thank you for participating and ask you to please disconnect your lines.