Welcome to Globus Medical's Third Quarter 2017 Earnings Call. At this time, all lines will be on mute and a Q&A session will be held after the prepared remarks. I will now turn the call over to Brian Kearns, Vice President of Business Development and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Josh, and thank you, everyone, for being with us today. Joining today's call from Globus Medical will be Dave Demski, CEO; Dan Scavilla, Senior Vice President and CFO; Anthony Williams, President; and David Paul, Executive Chairman. This review is being made available via webcast, accessible through the Investor Relations section of the Globus Medical website at www.globusmedical.com. Before we begin, let me remind you that some of the statements made during this review are or may be considered forward-looking statements. Our Form 10-K for the 2016 fiscal year and our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission identify certain factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements made today. Our SEC filings, including the 10-K, are available on our website. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments. Our discussion today will also include certain financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or GAAP. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide additional information pertinent to our business performance. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered replacements for and should be read together with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are available in the schedules accompanying the press release and on the Investor Relations section of the Globus Medical website. With that, I'll now turn the call over to David Demski, our CEO.

Thank you, Brian, and good evening, everyone. Worldwide sales for the third quarter of 2017 were $152 million, an increase of 11.9% over the third quarter of 2016. We also generated non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $0.30 and 35.2% in adjusted EBITDA. In the third quarter, we saw a further acceleration in our U.S. business, continued growth in the Japan market, FDA clearance of our ExcelsiusGPS robotic and navigation system, and industry-leading profitability and cash flow. As we've discussed on the last several calls, growth in our U.S. implant sales bottomed out in Q3 2016. Since that time, we have taken steps to ramp up our recruiting efforts, correct certain issues that led to unwanted attrition, and made investments into a long-term sales development program. The year-over-year growth has increased in each quarter since that time, reaching 6.2% in Q3 2017 on a days adjusted basis. The pace and trajectory of this improvement has been very encouraging and positions us well for a strong finish to 2017 and positive momentum heading into 2018. We remain highly focused on competitive recruiting and expect to begin seeing fruit from our development efforts in the back half of 2018. International sales grew by 70.1% in Q3, including the acquisition of the Alphatec international business. The business in Japan continues to grow and contribute meaningful profitability. Since the acquisition, we have made significant investments in sales reps and sets in Japan. We have launched our first two Globus systems in Japan, and the feedback from surgeons has been extremely positive. We expect the impact of our investments and the introduction of the new technology to produce strong growth into 2018. As we discussed on prior calls, our core international business has struggled in several key markets. While there was some improvement in the…

Thanks, Dave, and good evening, everyone. We're pleased with the strong financial results in Q3. The continued improvements in the U.S. business performance driven by record recruiting, the significant international growth and the progress in commercializing our Emerging Technologies opportunities in robotics and trauma, in-line with our long-range strategic plan. For Q3, sales were $151.7 million, growing 11.9% as reported with GAAP net income of $25.6 million and non-GAAP net income of $29.3 million, delivering $0.30 fully diluted non-GAAP earnings per share and adjusted EBITDA of 35.2%, and $22 million of cash flow. Focusing on sales, U.S. sales for the quarter were $125.9 million, 4.5% higher than Q3 2016 or 6.2% higher when adjusted for one less day in Q3 2017. We continue to see growth acceleration and sequential improvements in the U.S. business with year-over-year organic growth rates improving from negative 4.1% in Q3 2016 to positive 6.2% in Q3 2017 on a day adjusted basis. This is driven by stronger competitive rep recruiting and other structural improvements we have made to the business that we believe have and will drive continued momentum and quarterly improvements to revenue into 2018. While sales were impacted by hurricanes in Q3, we saw increased procedures in the subsequent weeks that netted the overall exposure to less than $1 million for the quarter. International sales for the quarter were $25.8 million, growing 70.1% as reported or 69.7% in constant currency, driven by continued market penetration in Japan, gains in key distributor markets and improved momentum in the core international business. September marked the anniversary of the Alphatec acquisition, and we remain pleased with the top line and bottom line contribution of this successful acquisition, and the long-term growth potential it offers in international markets. Disruptive technology sales for the quarter were $71.5 million…

Your first question comes from the line of Kaila Krum from William Blair. Your line is open. Kaila P. Krum - William Blair & Co. LLC: Hey, guys. Thanks for taking our questions. So, first, I know you guys have been making a lot of investments in your international business to reinvigorate growth there and stabilize Alphatec. So I guess, what do you think is a durable growth rate for that business longer term? And what sort of confounding factors should we be considering as we think about next steps to that integration into next year.

Hey, Kaila. This is Dave. I didn't hear the second part of your question. Could you repeat it? Kaila P. Krum - William Blair & Co. LLC: So just as far as kind of confounding factors into next year, what should we be considering as we think about next steps to the Alphatec integration?

Sure. So, overall I think the growth rate in our international business should be higher than our overall growth rate. We're still underpenetrated in several markets so I think the upside potential is much stronger there. As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we're doing really well in Japan. Some of the offsets to that would be we are still working through the integration of overlapping distribution in certain markets, and we expect to see some drag next year for that, but most of the major markets at least are on a good path towards – we're not finalized, but we're on a good path towards that. Kaila P. Krum - William Blair & Co. LLC: Okay that's helpful. And then kind of a two-part question as it relates to robotics, obviously, I mean, there's a lot of excitement there. As we look at the fourth quarter and then into next year, I mean, first, how are we thinking about robotics' contribution in the fourth quarter, included in your guidance? And then the second part to the question would be just related to the pipeline. I mean, how are we thinking about the robotics systems sort of evolving over time? Because I know we've talked about this a little bit in the past. But through KB Medical, you've talked on some rod bending patents, perhaps you opt to go into a few other areas there, just what would be the process to incorporate additional capabilities over time? Thank you.

Sure, I'll answer the second part first, and then I'll ask Dan to address the guidance and revenue expectations. But we consider the Excelsius to be a platform technology. So today it's assisting in navigating and placing pedicle screws. But we are actively working on projects to expand that to work in cranial applications. We also anticipate a rod bending process that would be associated with the machine. We have a standalone navigation project on the books. And then we see further on down the line that beyond pedicle screws, we think there's opportunities to really expand the utility of the platform and go into discectomies, decompression, rod placement, really encompassing the entire procedure. Dan?

Kaila, for the first part of your question with guidance, as we get to the $625 million, we feel pretty good about that in many respects. Certainly we see the anticipated seasonality lift that we're already experiencing as we had planned for Q4 in the spine. Dave had mentioned we see a lot of activity with robotic quoting. We think that we will have some meaningful revenues there. In general, we feel strongly that we can achieve that $625 million. I think I'll refrain from anything going forward. Your question was more about the outer years of 2018, and we'll provide some of that guidance in January as we normally do as to how that looks. Kaila P. Krum - William Blair & Co. LLC: Okay. Thank you, guys.

Your next question comes from Matthew O'Brien from Piper Jaffray. Your line is open. Matt O'Brien - Piper Jaffray & Co.: Great. Thanks so much for taking the questions, and great to hear David Paul on the call as well. Just one quick clarification question before I get to my two, I guess, real questions, but, Dan, can you just give us the Alphatec revenues in the quarter? By my math, it was about $16 million of Alphatec revenues and about $11.2 million of incremental revenue contribution versus this time last year?

Yeah, Matt, I think you're in a ballpark. Keep in mind, what I did in Q2, as I'd said that that would be the last quarter we split those out for a couple of reasons. One was the anniversarying of the acquisition, the second was that we had gotten enough cross-channel activity that looking at international core separately from Alphatec started to become misleading. So I think as you do those assumptions and Dave had called out the one number you're getting close, but in general I'm going to refrain from this and look at it as just one international business at this point. Matt O'Brien - Piper Jaffray & Co.: Fair enough. Okay. So then the couple of questions that I do have, and I don't want to throw you know too much water on this, but the two-year stack U.S. performance, and I get that on a day adjusted basis, it grew nicely. But that was still the lowest level we've seen in that metric I believe over the last couple of years, so less seven quarters or so quarters. So I know it's good. It was easier comp that you guys had, so just talking about as we get into Q4 and the next year, how that business should kind of progress, should this be a low or a mid-single-digit adjusted kind of growth business for you going forward? And then maybe in the quarter, what did you see as far as getting new surgeons or getting existing surgeons back that you'd worked with previously?

Thanks. So I'll go at that a couple of different ways. The first thing is we're really pleased with the results on a day adjusted basis. It's exactly where we would have called it for Q3. I'm not looking at a stack comp because we're going from a negative inflection point in Q3 of 2016 to a positive in this Q3. So, just a general almost 10.5-point spread between those two factors. I think that shows momentum, which is more important. I think that is driven by us doing competitive recruiting, surging conversions, going deeper into existing businesses in the U.S. that are the main driver that way. As we signaled, we thought that we would get through Q4 and the rest of this year exiting around that same rate and bring that forward. That was always the plan of 2017 being the recovery year. And we would hit the high points in Q3, Q4 and carry that into what we think would be 2018 based on what we know. Matt O'Brien - Piper Jaffray & Co.: Fair enough. And then lastly on the adjusted EBITDA number again, I get all the investment, it is the lowest level we've seen in the last eight quarters. And as I look at the Street numbers for next year, the Street's modeling more like 36.5%. So the number that we're seeing here in Q3, is that essentially what we should be thinking about for the business going forward as you make these investments until we get on the other side when you start to get more and more revenue?

So two things, we had always signaled that Q2 and Q3 would be the heavier investments as we carry both robotics and trauma pre-revenue. I would never shy away from a 35% EBITDA. I think I'm pretty proud of that being market leading by anyone's standards, nothing else comes close, to be honest. And as always, we would encourage the Street to look at that mid-30s EBITDA between 33% and 37% at any given time as we continue to invest and grow for future. Matt O'Brien - Piper Jaffray & Co.: Got it. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Jonathan Demchick at Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Jonathan Demchick - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Hello. Thanks for taking the questions. I wanted to start off on robotics and I guess the interest really that you've been getting it massed, obviously there was a lot of attention they've given to robotics at mass. I think there is a number of key differentiators, but I guess from talking to a lot of physicians, it sounded like the navigation aspect of your platform is one that they really liked compared to other robotics platform out there. Can you just kind of talk about how that really can help in the sale of the robot? And then also if that attribute gets added on to more competitive systems, how does that you know change the viewpoint on robotics?

Thanks, Jonathan. In terms of the impact, I think it's a safety and a comfort factor. So the other pure robotic systems out there, you're essentially driving the screw and are driving the k-wire blindly. And the navigation, the integrated navigation enables you to visualize at least digitally where the instruments are and where the implants are throughout the procedure. And we've gotten a great feedback from surgeons that that's really essential to a lot of them adopting robotic technology so the integration there. And to your question about what the competition will do, I think it's highly informative that we are aware that they're planning to add that feature to their offering, so we clearly think we're on the right path. And as I mentioned in Kaila's question, we're working on ways to enhance the functionality of the platform moving forward, so we're not going to stand still. Jonathan Demchick - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: When you think of the physicians that have been looking at the system, are they typically more physicians that are already used to using navigation or those that are doing more traditional, like, fluoro procedures?

It's both. It's certainly the ones that use computer-assisted technology today are already believers that that can improve their ability to treat patients. But I think the functionality that we've built into Excelsius has attracted an entirely new group of potential users who are considering using technology to help them treat their patients as well. Jonathan Demchick - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Understood. And just a quick follow-up for I think it's either Dave or Dan, when you were answering the previous question about I guess the U.S. growth rate at around 6%, as we kind of move forward, I mean, is the expectation that this is kind of the right growth rate of the business kind of in that mid to upper-single-digit range for the core business? Is that the expectations for this business moving forward at this point?

Jon, yeah, we'll fine-tune obviously guidance for 2018 in January as we said before. But the way I would look at this is depending on what you see or read. You're looking at a spine market that's currently considered between 0% and 2%. And I think what we're signaling is that we are 2 times to 3 times growth rate of that. And as you always know, we strive to be a share taker. So we think that we're still going to look at that mid to upper-single digits as a main driver for us to capture share in the market. Jonathan Demchick - Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Very clear. Thank you very much.

Your next question comes from the line of Rich Newitter from Leerink. Your line is open.

Hi. Thanks for taking the questions. Dan, I want to follow up on your answer to that last one and then a comment you made earlier about some of the trends with respect to the fourth quarter. So when you say mid-single-digit to high-single-digit, that is about 2 times to 3 times a 0% to 2% market. Is it right to think that there's acceleration potential off of that given the trauma and robotics? Those are totally incremental. Or are you committed to mid-single-digit to high-single digits and you need robots and trauma to get there?

So, Rich, when I was using that number to answer Jon's question, I was referring to core spine. In addition to that would be, of course, the trauma business and the robotic business. They would come as additional growth beyond that number.

Okay. Thanks for that clarification. I thought so. And just you mentioned that you're already starting to experience some typical seasonality. Can you elaborate on that a little bit? And is it coming back stronger than even the end of September kind of snapback that you had from the hurricanes? And what are you seeing kind of for this year compared to prior years of seasonality? Thanks.

Yeah, so too early to make a call like that, Rich. What I would tell you is you know, there tends to always be a lift as you get into Q4, and I'm just saying that as we're sitting here in November, we're seeing what appears to be normal for year-end right now in the spine, and again that's positive. It's something we would bank on. But I would tell you we're not seeing or experiencing anything outside of the usual historical norm.

Okay. And if I could, just one more the robot, can you give us a sense as to what kind of strategies you plan to implement in order to potentially secure more sticky kind of implant revenue market share as the robot installed base expands? And are there certain types of – I don't want to say discounts, but are there certain types of volume arrangements that you're engaging in with customers to kind of go after that share? Thanks.

Thanks, Rich. I mean, we're not going to get into all of our intricacies of our selling strategy, but I think the most obvious impact to our implant business is that the robot works much more efficiently if you use our implants. It's fully integrated with about 10 of our implant systems right now. So there's a natural inclination for surgeons to want to utilize our implants because their procedures are going to go better and faster.

Thank you.

Sure.

Your next question comes from the line of Kyle Rose at Canaccord. Your line is open.

Great. Thank you very much for taking the questions. Can you hear me all right?

Yes.

Yeah, so I wanted to ask the robotics question a different way. Two years ago at the Analyst Day, I think it was this time two years ago, you talked about Emerging Technologies as a whole looking like about 15% of that $1 billion revenue number from a long-term perspective. So when we think about that being a $150 million potential revenue line for you guys, I just wanted to see, one, a lot's happened over the past two years. Does that still kind of long-term view hold? And then when you think about that and just the overall mix of robotics versus trauma within there, can you kind of just walk us through how you think about the next several years playing out from an Emerging Technologies standpoint relative to that guidance?

Sure, Kyle, thanks. So the first thing is, you're right, it's about two years ago that we had had that Analyst Day and we had declared about $1 billion as we got to 2020. I would tell you everything we look at now we still see that as a realistic approach and certainly feasible. In that, the key signal was we are a spine company and would remain a spine company even then. So back to your point, 80% to 85% of our sales in that $1 billion would remain as the core spine, and we had had about $150 million that would be Emerging Technologies. During that meeting, we simply cut it in half, having had no real data, just to say this is what we think. If you ask me today, I'm still guessing, but I would tell you that I would be heavier on the robotics side than the trauma that way. The number is truly a guess, but I would probably be more in the $100 million to $125 million for the robotics, and the difference being trauma right now. But it's really more of a gut feel than any data or science there.

Terrific. Thank you for the additional color there. And then just a follow-up on the robotics. I know you're hesitant to give guidance specifically for the Q4. But in the press release about the first cases you did call out cases at two different facilities, and just want to see, is it fair to think that those are the first two robots placed? I guess were there any different types of value, selling agreements, or anything along those lines? Or should we think about that as being two initial placements?

Kyle, we're really not prepared to discuss anything regarding the fourth quarter or any details of our sales on this call.

Okay. And then one more on trauma, just obviously you had the initial cases, you talked about continuing to build out the commercial team. Can you just kind of give us a good understanding of how you'd expect the hiring of the trauma sales force to take place over the course of the next six months, as you build out those to steps to prepare for the broader commercial launch in 2018?

We're hiring right now. We've got our field sales management team in place and we're hiring reps as we speak. They're coming through here every day. Was that answering your question, Kyle?

Yes, sorry, I was on mute. Thanks for taking my questions.

Your next question comes from the line of Ryan Zimmerman at BTIG. Your line is open.

Great. Thank you for taking the questions. So just you talked about your product introductions into Japan, I'm just curious, if you could spend a little bit on kind of the cadence of product introductions into Japan and what we should think about for what's coming in that market? That is my first question.

Hey, Ryan. This is Anthony Williams. So we started – as Dave mentioned, we've got a handful of systems cleared for sale in Japan. Obviously, we started initially with the products that target the biggest segments there, so primarily for pedicle screws at this point, but we are in the process of looking at the entire portfolio and figuring out what makes sense to launch in Japan and are working with the regulatory team there to get products submitted and registered as quickly as we can.

Okay. I Appreciate that. And then just on the trauma build-out, there's a lot of steps that need to get done and build and produce for this production. Just from a capital expenditure standpoint, I mean, your capital expense is tracking in-line I think to where you've gone historically, but should we expect any additional increases going forward on the capital expense side for those trade build-outs or should it track fairly in-line with what we're seeing thus far?

Hey, Ryan. It's Dan, it's a great question. And I would tell you that it probably is going to track in-line so far. There's a couple of reasons for that. We have been investing in our in-house manufacturing capabilities in order to produce trauma as well as grow spine. And so this year you're carrying a lot of machine expenditures that would probably diminish somewhat into next year and be replaced with that build of trauma sets. Keep in mind, we're sitting with $396 million of cash, so converting that into profit-generating sets is something we're quick to do.

All right. Thanks so much for the questions and I appreciate it.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Matson at Needham & Company. Your line is open. David Saxon - Needham & Co. LLC: Hi. This is David Saxon on for Mike today. Thanks for taking our questions. So I just wanted to start first with 3D printing. So I was wondering if you've noticed any impact from competitors' 3D printed and expandable spacers. And then previously, I think it sounded like you weren't quite convinced. So I was curious if that's changed or if that's still the case.

Thanks, David. We have seen a modest impact. It's more anecdotal at this point where a few surgeons have utilized some of our competitors' products in 3D printing. And we are actively developing products in that space at this point. David Saxon - Needham & Co. LLC: Okay. Thank you. And then as a follow-up, can you give any update on how the sales force hiring is going and I guess if you're targeting more experienced hires?

It's going quite well. I think as we mentioned, last quarter we had already exceeded our previous record in terms of the number of competitive reps that we've hired and our pipeline is very full and very active at this point. There is a lot of buzz about the robotics opportunity and the impact that may have on the implant business, and we continue to see people that are interested in carrying our portfolio. So we've got a extensive pipeline and looking forward to continue to build the sales force in that way. David Saxon - Needham & Co. LLC: Great. Well, thank you very much.

Sure.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Matt Taylor at Barclays. Your line is open.

Thanks for taking the question, and let us start there just piggybacking off your last comment. I wanted to know how you thought the robot could help drive that implant business. I guess from what we've seen from the market leader with their partnership with the Medtronic, it hasn't really driven a lot of that implant business yet. So how are you going to approach that differently and how do you think you can really get a halo effect from the robot?

Thanks, Matt. Well, the difference is our competitors, you need to use a k-wire which means you're agnostic to the implant that you're going to use. As long as it's a cannulated screw, you can use anybody's implant. Ours also offers that option. You can use a k-wire and other folks' implants, but the system itself functions much better if you integrate it with our technology. So we think there'll be a natural pull-through as surgeons want to do the cases as efficiently and as safely as possible if they use our implants.

Just to follow up, it seems like you're doing much better on the hiring engine front. And I was wondering if you could give us any kind of hard metrics other than talking about record-high. As you mentioned earlier in the comments, you expected some additional positive impact, I guess, late next year. Is that just pull-through from the guys that are already onboard or is that a harbinger of more hires to come?

Yeah. We traditionally don't disclose actual numbers of hires and that sort of thing. But just to clarify my comments, I was referring to the developmental program that we had instituted late last year, early this year. We're bringing folks who don't have experience in the industry up to speed, getting them comfortable, confident, and confident in the spine world. They will start becoming ready to take over territories towards the back half of next year.

Okay. All right. Thanks a lot.

Sure.

There are no further questions at the time. I turn the call back over to the presenters.

Thanks, Josh. I'd like to thank everyone for joining us for the Globus Medical third quarter conference call. Feel free to reach out if you have any additional questions. I would be happy to help you out. And at this time, please disconnect. The call has ended. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.