Thank you, David. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. We reported net income of $29.6 million in Q1 2025, which equates to an increase in fully diluted book value per share of 5.1% in the quarter. Our net income was driven by strong investment performance with the Solasglas portfolio returning 7.2% in the quarter, tremendous outperformance during a volatile market downturn. We recorded an underwriting loss, however, of $7.8 million in the quarter, which equates to a combined ratio of 104.6%. Our underwriting result in the first quarter was dominated by our provision for the California wildfires in January. We booked a net wildfire loss of $23.6 million [ph], which equates to 14 combined ratio points. Our provision is based on an industry ultimate loss estimate of $50 billion and is consistent with the $15 million to $30 million range we disclosed on our fourth quarter 2024 earnings call. Our industry loss estimate is at the higher end of the industry range, in part because tariffs could drive higher reconstruction costs. Overall, we don't anticipate tariffs will cause a significant impact on our underwriting profitability in the near term. On the one hand, inflationary pressures tend to increase loss costs. On the other hand, an economic slowdown, for example, reduced shipping activity could reduce exposure. In the longer term, if tariffs trigger a major economic downturn, we believe our investment portfolio is well positioned. David Einhorn will touch on this later. The other material underwriting topic in the quarter is a change in our approach to open market casualty business. Historically, we access casualty MGA business through both our open market channel and our innovations channel. We’ve decided to going forward. We will access casualty MGA business primarily through our innovations channel, where we have better access to underlying data, a clear line of sight to the underlying economics of the business and therefore, more control. In the short-term, this will lead to some contraction of our casualty book as we non-renew some open market casualty business. In time, however, we expect to replace some of this volume with Innovation’s business. It is also worth noting that we indirectly write casualty business through our FAL participations. As part of our review of casualty business, we strengthened our historical casualty reserves by $22 million in the quarter, mainly relating to underwriting years 2014 to 2019. During our quarterly reserve review, we also released $11 million of specialty and $8 million of property reserves in the quarter. Therefore, our first quarter prior year development impact across all lines was $3.5 million or $2.1 million combined ratio points. While underwriting performance in the quarter was disappointing, excluding the 14 points related to California wildfires, our first quarter combined ratio was strong and consistent with expectations. In March, we highlighted a change to our financial statement disclosures where we broke out our Innovation segment for the first time. The performance of our innovations book in the first quarter was in line with the expectations, and we reported a combined ratio of 94.3% in that segment. On our Q4 2024 call, I provided an update on our 1/1 Renewal season and the market environment at that time. While April 1 renewals are considerably less material than January 1, overall market conditions remain attractive and similar to 1/1. Now I'd like to turn the call over to David Einhorn.