Thank you for joining the Greenlight Re Conference Call for Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2015 Earnings. Joining us on the call this morning are David Einhorn, Chairman; Bart Hedges, Chief Executive Officer; Tim Courtis, Chief Financial Officer; Brendan Barry, Chief Underwriting Officer; and Jim McNichols, Chief Actuarial Officer. The Company reminds you that forward-looking statements that may be made in this call are intended to be covered by the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical facts, but rather reflect the Company's current expectations, estimates and predictions about future results and events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those enumerated in the Company's Form 10-K dated February 22, 2016 and other documents filed by the Company with the SEC. If one or more risks or uncertainties materialize or if the Company's underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what the Company projects. The Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. I would now like to turn the conference over to Bart Hedges. Please go ahead sir.

Good morning and thank you for joining us today. In the fourth quarter of 2015 Greenlight Re generated an underwriting profit before general and administrative expenses of $6.8 million and $45.5 million loss on our investment portfolio. Overall, our fully diluted adjusted book value per share decreased by 4.8% in the quarter and decreased by 27.9% for the year to $22.17. In the earlier part of the year our 2015 underwriting results deteriorated primarily due to adverse reserve development on certain legacy general liability contracts and run-off. During the fourth quarter the claims emergence and settlement on these contract was in line with our expectations and no changes were made to these reserves. Our combined ratio for the full-year 2015 was a 111.8% compared to 103.6% for the prior year. Combined ratio for the fourth quarter of 2015 was 98.5%. Our written and earned premiums continued to increase due to a combination of growth in our renewal portfolio as well as business from new clients. During 2015 we redoubled our efforts to target new business, working with brokers to find appropriate opportunities that meet our return hurdles. Historically, we have focused on a small number of large deals in the portfolio and we continue to target large deals. However, throughout 2015 we also targeted new business with large carriers that purchase reinsurance across a wide range of lines of business. Initially, we focused on developing these new relationships and then on expanding them. This proved to be successful as a good deal on the new business growth came from multiple transactions with the new partner. Our premium is still heavily concentrated in a small number of large deals, but the portfolio is becoming more diversified and we intend to continue targeting new business in this fashion. Most of the underwriting…

Thanks Bart and good morning everyone. The Greenlight Re investment portfolio lost 4% in the fourth quarter bringing the full-year return in 2015 to negative 20.2%. The short portfolio was responsible for most of the loss in the quarter. The environment continue to be unfavorable for our value style, the sentiment seems to have shifted so far this year. In the fourth quarter we initiated new long positions in Macy's, Mylan and a European utility company E.ON all of which trade at single-digit PEs of expected earnings. Our notable exits include our long positions in Micron, Bank of New York and Applied Materials and we covered our short position in ARM Holdings. We lost 17.2% on our long portfolio last year. We had three long positions that cost over 3% each CONSOL Energy, Micron Technology and SunEdison which detracted a combined 14.9%. It's rare for us to have these three losers of this magnitude in a single year and this is only our second year along with 2008 when this has been the case. We also had a lack of winners to offset our losers and had our worst year by far in this regard. All of our winning positions in 2015 added up to a 19% gross investment return. The second worst year in our history was 31% and our 20-year average is 51%. Many of the stocks are portfolio had relatively solid fundamental performance last year, but went unrewarded. We hope this trend reverses in 2016. We believe that strong balance sheets and multiple of cash flow and earnings are ultimately appreciated by market participants over time. We maintained conservative positioning through the course of the year averaging 21% net long exposure. As the year progressed we saw that the environment was becoming increasingly unfavorable for our style.…

Thanks David. For the fourth quarter of 2015 Greenlight Re reported a net loss of $43.1 million or $1.17 per share compared to net income of $60.7 million or gain of $1.60 per share for the comparable period in 2014. For the full-year, we reported a net loss of $326.4 million and a loss per share of $8.90 compared to net income of $109.6 million and earnings per share of $2.89 in 2014. Gross premium written were $144.9 million during the fourth quarter of 2015 compared to $74.3 million for the fourth quarter of 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2015 gross written premiums increased by approximately 55% over 2014 to $502.1 million. This was driven by growing our renewal business from existing partners and successful addition of new client relationships. During the fourth quarter 2015 our composite ratio was 94.3%, which compares favorably with the composite ratio of 106.1% reported during the previous year. For the full-year, our frequency business reported a composite ratio of 110.6% compared to a composite ratio of 101.1% during 2014. Adverse development on prior-year reserves of 12.3 points was a primary reason for the increase in the frequency composite ratio. For Severity business, the composite ratio was 44.7% for 2015. Overall, our composite ratio was a 106.1% for 2015 compared to 96.7% for the prior year. Our total G&A expenses for the year totaled $23.4 million, which is approximately $1 million less than the prior year resulting in an expense ratio of 5.7% in 2015. As a result, the combined ratio for the full-year 2015 was 111.8% compared to 103.6% for 2014. We reported a net investment loss of $45.5 million during the fourth quarter of 2015 reflecting a net loss of 4% on our investment account. For the full-year we reported a net investment loss of $281.9 million reflecting a loss of 20.2%. The fully diluted adjusted book value per share as of December 31, 2015 was $22.17 a 27.9% decrease from $30.76 per share reported at December 31, 2014. I'd now like to turn the call back over to Bart for some concluding remarks.

Thanks Tim. Our goal is unchanged. We aim to build long-term shareholder value by writing a concentrated underwriting portfolio with the best risk adjusted returns we can find and to utilize the float generated from these contracts to invest in our value oriented, long-short investment program. This investment approach has historically generated superior returns with less volatility than the overall equity markets. We will continue to execute on the strategy and remain focused on driving our key yardstick increased fully diluted book value per share. We appreciate your continued confidence in Greenlight Re. We are looking forward to hosting our 5th Biennial Investment Day on Thursday, May 12 at the French Alliance located at 55 East, 59th Street in New York City at 4 PM. We will be sending our invitations shortly, anyone who is interested may RSVP to Laurie Moore at ICR at 203-682-8260. Thank you again for your time. And now we would like to open up the call to questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And the first question will come from Brian Meredith of UBS. Please go ahead.

Yes, thanks. Bart I was hoping you could give us kind of the latest updates for your discussions with rating agencies and potentially kind of resolution of the negative watch?

Sure. We’ve been – as always we’re tracking capital and capital usage internally based on our corporate model as well as rating agency capital models and we continue to feel like we’re more than adequately capitalized, we have been in fairly frequent dialogues with the rating agencies. And at this point feels like everything is in good shape. We were told by them [when we] put on negative outlook back in October that it would be – it would probably be the year and it might be a little bit more than a year. So we need to be patience. We need to continue to work the plan, improve our underwriting results and continue to monitor overall capital.

Gotcha. And I guess just curious because of the watch is that why you guys aren't in the market buying back stock assuming your stock was trading below net asset value for a while fourth quarter?

Well, there is certainly a certain aspect to that. We want to be careful, make sure we have enough capital to keep the rating agencies comfortable, but we also want to be watching in terms of all other constituencies such as clients, brokers et cetera, but that did play a big part in it.

Great. Thank you. End of Q&A