Good morning. Thank you for joining the Greenlight Re first quarter 2011 earnings call. Joining us on this call this morning are, David Einhorn, Chairman; Len Goldberg, Chief Executive Officer, Bart Hedges, President and Chief Underwriting Officer, and Tim Courtis, Chief Financial Officer. The company reminds you that forward-looking statements that may be made on this call are intended to be covered by the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical facts, but rather reflect the company’s current expectations, estimates and predictions of our future results and events, and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are enumerated in the company’s Form 10-K dated February 22, 2011 and other documents filed by the company with the SEC. If one or more risks or uncertainties materialize, or if the company’s underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what the company projects. The company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Please note this event is under being recorded. I’d now like to turn the conference to Len Goldberg. Please go ahead.

Good morning. My name is Len Goldberg, Chief Executive Officer of Greenlight Re. Thank you for taking the time to join us today. In the first quarter of 2011, Greenlight Re reported loss in both our underwriting portfolio and our investment portfolio. Overall, our fully-diluted adjusted book value per share decreased by 5.4% in the quarter. Included in our 107.4 combined ratio for the first quarter of 2011, a $10 million in combined losses relating to the Christchurch earthquake in New Zealand and the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan. As we expected given our business model, we benefited from writing catastrophe retrocessional business on peak exposures. In addition, we had decreased our catastrophe risk to exposure in early 2011, due to a softening in market prices. Bart will discuss our underwriting results in greater detail later in this call. Our gross written premium increased more than 50% compared to the first quarter of 2010. At the same time, during the quarter, the frequency-oriented business we prefer grew by 76%, while severity business declined by 42%. This is a reflection of the continued progress in executing our strategy. Most of the increase in frequency premiums came from further successes in our Florida homeowners’ portfolio, which continues to perform well, particularly as we have seen significant and continued rate increases in the Florida insurance market. Whether the unfortunate events in Japan and New Zealand will lead to a strengthening in primary insurance pricing is too early to tell. However, we’ve built a strong and vivid team which is assessing the impact of these events and will allow us to identify and capitalize on any opportunities as the year progresses. Our investment portfolio lost 3.4% in the first quarter of 2010. During that time, we maintained a defensively positioned portfolio in what…

Thanks, Len and good morning, everyone. When we hired Len as the Greenlight Re’s CEO back in 2005, we gave him the task of developing an organization from scratch, assembling a first-class team and building Greenlight Re’s brand in the reinsurance industry. Lenny has accomplished these tasks with enthusiasm and diligence. He’s built a terrific reinsurance team, with a strong culture and a track record of success. Len moved from his home to New Jersey to the Cayman Islands six years ago. Len has decided it’s time to go home. And, although we’re sad to see him go, he will remain intimately involved with the future success of the company, the members of Board of Directors and as a valuable resource to the Greenlight Re team. We’re also pleased to announce that Bart Hedges, our President and Chief Underwriting Officer for the past five years, will assume the role of CEO when Lenny departs. Bart has been instrumental to Greenlight Re’s success since he joined the company. When we hired Bart, he had a wealth of experience managing the Bermuda subsidiary of a reinsurance company and we debated whether it was actually too senior for one of our first hires. We gave him the title, President, as well as Chief Underwriting Officer, to reflect his level of experience and he’s been Len’s partner successfully building Greenlight Re. With five years of experience at Greenlight Re, we know that what are getting with Bart and we’re confident that this transition will be nearly seamless and will not cause a change in our business model. We could not be more pleased with this choice as it is a natural evolution for Bart and the company. The board has also approved two well-deserved promotions to round out our senior management team. Brendan Barry…

Thanks, David. Given the events of the first quarter of 2011, it makes sense to start with our property cat retro book. We’ve been this portfolio without a loss since 2006. In the first quarter of 2011, we estimate losses of 10 million from all the events of the quarter, partially offset by $1.25 million of reinstatement premiums. $5 million comes from the full limit loss on the Christchurch earthquake from a client with significant exposure in New Zealand. We are also estimating another $5 million loss on an aggregate cat retro cover triggered by the Japan events. This particular contract protects our client against a string of bad events. The loss is our best estimate at this point. Additional new events in the first half of 2011 could increase our losses on this contract, although the maximum exposure to the Tohoku earthquake which cost us $5 million. We reviewed all our contracts and do not believe we’re exposed to other losses as a result of the events of the first quarter. The advantage of writing a small number of peak exposure accounts is that we can review each account in detail to estimate our ultimate liabilities. As Lenny mentioned, we were fortunate in the first quarter as we’ve begun to reduce our cat exposures as pricing came down and terms and conditions weakened in the cat retro market. We anticipate that some new private and hedge fund sponsored retro providers to experience severe losses. We have significant spare capacity, if the market for cat retro hardens. We’ve not yet seen solid signs of that happening. Currently, our maximum capacity exposure to any single event is $59.7 million, which is down from $69.5 in the fourth quarter of 2010. Our aggregate maximum exposure to all catastrophic events is $83 million,…

Thanks, Bart. Greenlight RE reported the net loss of $43.0 million for the first quarter of 2011, compared to a net loss of $12.4 million for the comparable period in 2010. On a per share basis, the net loss was $1.19 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to a net loss of $0.34 per share on a fully-diluted basis for the same period in 2010. Gross written premiums were $100.7 million, an increase of approximately 51% during the first quarter of 2011, compared to the first quarter of 2010. Net earned premiums for the three months ended March 31, 2011, were $105.2 million, an increase of approximately 90%, compared to the net earned premiums of $55.3 million reported in the first quarter of 2010. This increase is a reflection of the earnings on our frequency business, particularly our Florida homeowners’ quarter share book. We reported a net investment loss of $36.2 million for the first quarter of 2011, reflecting a net loss of 3.4% on our investment account. The composite ratio for our frequency business for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was 99.1% and it was 151.5% for severity business, resulting in an overall composite ratio of 102.6%. The composite ratio on our frequency business continues to be negatively affected by losses booked as a result of a final earning of premiums on a motor liability account, which was terminated in 2010. As we have previously discussed, composite ratios on severity business will be volatile depending upon the size and activity of worldwide natural catastrophes. The events in Japan and New Zealand accounted for the large increase in our severity composite ratio. Internal expenses were 4.8% of net earned premiums for the first quarter of 2011, compared to 9.3% reported for the comparable period in 2010. The decreased expensive ratio was primarily a result of higher earned premiums during the first quarter of 2011. The fully diluted adjusted book value per share as of March 31, 2011 was $20.23, an 8.8% from $18.60 per share reported on March 31, 2010. I am pleased to report that on April 27, 2011, we held our Annual General Meeting. All eight proposals contained in our proxy were approved by shareholders, including the reelection of all of our incumbent directors for additional one-year terms. I will now turn the call back to Lenny, who will provide some concluding remarks.

Thanks, Tim. The first quarter of 2011 included a number of large industry events; it did not heavily impact us due to our frequency-oriented underwriting philosophy. In addition, our investment portfolio is well-positioned in what is still somewhat an uncertain financial market. We believe we will generate above average risk adjusted returns over the long-term without making huge bets on unpredictable and unmeasurable weather and quake events. We have executed this strategy consistently since we started our operations in 2005 and we will continue to do so in future. Our objective is to write a concentrating underwriting portfolio with the best risk adjusted returns we can find, as we utilize the flow generated from these contracts to invest in our (inaudible) value long, short investment program, which has generated superior returns with less volatility than the overall equity markets. We will continue to execute on this strategy and remain focused underwriting our yardstick increased fully diluted book value per share. We appreciate your continued confidence in Greenlight Re. Thank you again for your time. And now, we would like to open the call up to questions.

We will now begin the question and answer session. (Operator instructions) Your first question comes from Brian Meredith of UBS. Please go ahead. Brian Meredith – UBS: Hi, good morning, everybody. Well, I was hopping if you can elaborate a little bit on your comments in the 10-Q that you are saying that you don’t expect any kind of broad based turn in the market till, at least, 2012, what do we need to see happen in order to better pricing out there? I mean, the market is – we are seeing some lift from some companies and some people out there talking about that you think we are verge of a current [ph] --?

Brian, thanks for the question. We’ve seen those comments as well. We just haven’t seen the evidence yet, a lot of other reinsurers have lost huge of capital, but what they’ve chosen to do is just stop buying that shares and if there is a clean windstorm season, we don’t think that that capital has been removed from the industry to make a significant difference. What could change that is obviously the bad windstorm season or that asset results from a number of our competitors that would produce the capital in those companies that – since we can’t predict the hurricanes, we just don’t see significant hardening on them. Brian Meredith – UBS: And it doesn’t sound like that you really want to increase your exposure all that much to the property, cat reinsurance area, which is the one area that there is some speculation and there is some better pricing?

Well, you would increase it and we certainly have the scope to increase it and we will increase it if we thought the opportunities will be significantly beneficial to our shareholders. And we haven’t seen a lot of opportunities, we are starting to see some people get a little bit interested in buying back covers and we are buying excess coverage for windstorm season, we’ve changed – the windstorm season, we’ve changed our MS model, but a lot of it is talk right now, there hasn’t been – we haven’t seen a lot of action. Brian Meredith – UBS: Great, thanks.

Your next question comes from Russell Mollen of Bares Capital Management, Inc. Please go ahead. Russell Mollen – Bares Capital Management: Hi, how are you doing? First question, kind of maybe you can elaborate a little bit on how the setup is with frequency Florida homeowners with the rate increases that have been going on in the Florida homeowners market? I would think that over the near to medium term, future, those P&C companies with those rate increases have lesser the need to reinsure their business with you guys or any other reinsurers?

Russell, thanks for the question. Actually, they need our reinsurance more. There are premium to capitals in the State of Florida and then just about every state that – in the US. Russell Mollen – Bares Capital Management: Yes.

And if your premium goes up by 20% because of your rate, it still goes up by 20% and it takes time to earn the money, earn the profits to your capital base. So, actually short term for the next couple of years, we actually expect people will increase – have increasingly for the quota share due to price and in addition, we’ve seen a number of our clients being able to put on some increased exposure to some of the smaller companies, and not particularly their income. Russell Mollen – Bares Capital Management: Got it. And then on the severity side, I think Bart had mentioned that you could see additional losses from the events in Japan, but could you say that that was smacked out an additional $5 million or at the current?

No, the price I was referring to you – the Japan event is just capped at the $5 million that we put up for the earthquake and tsunami, but it is part of an aggregate contract for a client. So, additional events that happen in the next quarter could add losses to that contract, but they wouldn’t be coming from the Japan earth. Russell Mollen – Bares Capital Management: Okay. And then, lastly on the investment side, David, you did mention that you had closed out some short positions on some for profit education companies and I was wondering if you could close those out, what the thought process was on the initial investments thesis and did you close it out that it played out as you had thought or where that kind of thought process is now?

Yes, we’ve insured the for profit education companies for a fare amount of time, certainly more than a year, maybe even two or three years. We covered one of them out or we’ve covered one of the short sometime last year, but we left most of the positions in place. And then early this year, there was a disappointment by one of the companies, I think it was Strayer and the whole sector traded down dramatically in view of the disappointing results, the slowing enrolment growth and ultimately, the regulatory risk and overhang that that industry continues to face, at that point, we felt that the stocks had gone down a lot and we took them all in at that point and we are just – and this points to kind of sitting on the side kind of waiting to see which way the regulatory reform plays itself out. Russell Mollen – Bares Capital Management: Got it. Thanks, guys.