Good morning everyone and welcome to the Greenlight Capital Re third quarter 2008 conference call. Joining us on the call this morning is David Einhorn, Chairman; Len Goldberg, Chief Executive Officer; Barton Hedges, President and Chief Underwriting Officer; and Tim Courtis, Chief Financial Officer. The company reminds you that forward-looking statements that may be made in this call are intended to be covered by the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, but rather reflect the company’s current expectations, estimates, and predictions about future results and events that are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions including risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are enumerated in the company’s annual report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and other documents filed by the company with the SEC. If one or more risks or uncertainties materialize or if the company’s underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what the company projects. The company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or the added result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Today’s call is being recorded. (Operator Instructions) I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Leonard Goldberg.

Thank you very much and good morning. My name is Leon Goldberg, Chief Executive Officer of Greenlight Re. Thank you for taking the time to join us this morning. The third quarter of 2008 was a good quarter for our underwriting portfolio and a difficult quarter for our investment portfolio. Our net loss for the quarter was $118.4 million or $3.29 per share. Our fully diluted book value per share was $14.22 as of September 30, 2008, a 9.9% decrease from $15.78 per share as of September 30, 2007. In addition, we had an October investment loss of 12.7% or approximately $79 million. While we are not pleased with our performance, we believe we have proven our ability to navigate through some of the most difficult obstacles we could ever imagine and remain in a strong position to capitalize on new opportunities. We believe that our premium to capital ratio is among the most conservative in the industry. This should serve us well in the near term, as we expect reinsurance pricing to improve, in some cases dramatically so. We intend to continue to pursue our strategy of maximizing risk adjusted returns on both sides of the balance sheet. Gross written premium increased for both the third quarter and the year-to-date, compared to the corresponding periods in 2007. In the second quarter, we told you that premiums were coming in lower than initially expected, as our clients were protecting their interests and ours in a softening market. Even at these lower than initially expected levels, our premiums have increases year-over-year, as we continue to expand and diversify our portfolio. As of September 30, 2008, frequency business makes up 79% of our premium volume compared to 59% as of September 30, 2007. These statistics reflect the implementation of our focus on expanding our frequency business. This focus served us well in the third quarter, as we did not suffer an insurance loss from Hurricanes Ike or Gustav. Our President and Chief Underwriting Officer, Barton Hedges, will talk in greater detail about our underwriting portfolio in a few minutes. Now, I would like to introduce our Chairman, David Einhorn, who will discuss our overall progress and recent investment results. David.

Thanks Lenny. We appreciate everyone taking the time to join us for the call this morning. As you know, Greenlight Re’s investment portfolio is managed by DME Advisors LP, an affiliate of Greenlight Capital. Greenlight Re’s third quarter investment portfolio results of -15.9% was the worst quarterly performance result in Greenlight Re’s history. We are extremely disappointed with this result. We have been cautious about the environment since last July. A more conservative net long portfolio exposure compared to our historical positioning helped us weather the financial crisis in the last half of 2007 and the first half of 2008. By adding additional short exposure, particularly in the financial sector, which was most directly responsible for the credit crisis, we believed that we positioned the portfolio to preserve capital, should the financial markets deteriorate further. We were wrong. Through the third quarter, Greenlight Re’s portfolio was approximately 17% net long. This is the lowest net long quarterly waiting we’ve maintained. We made the mistake of thinking that our significant short portfolio would protect a fairly fully invested long portfolio, that we estimated to be attractive and cheap. In hindsight, we should have been more conservatively positioned from a gross invested standpoint and we took measures to bring down overall exposures in September, as global financial markets deteriorated further. In September, the US Government took an unprecedented action by banning the short selling of approximately a thousand financial firms, in order to prevent the systemic collapse of the financial system. The stocks that Greenlight Re was short withstood the center of the problem from financial industry are the same stocks that investors believed to be direct beneficiaries of government actions. While the short selling ban failed to prevent a decline in the overall market, it did support the short term share…

Thanks, David. The third quarter 2008 was a continuation of the same underwriting strategy that we have employed since we began underwriting business in early 2006. We continue to find excellent partners in a number of lines of business, which has allowed us to diversify our portfolio. As Lenny previously mentioned, we have been building out the frequency portfolio, which is now significantly larger than the severity portfolio. While we have no targets and the mix of business will fluctuate from time to time, we believe our portfolio will always maintain a frequency orientation. There were two major hurricanes that made landfall in 2008, Gustav and Ike. There were also a number of smaller CAT events. We have taken no losses from these events. The major reason for this was a well-defined strategy in 2007 and 2008 to deploy our catastrophe capacity at higher layers mixed with a bit of luck. We took this high access approach for two reasons: First, we thought the pricing was better. And second, if we did take a loss, we wanted the event or events to be large enough to move pricing prospectively, so that we could be in a position to redeploy capital the following year at those higher rates. Even though Ike loss estimates continue to up, we believe our covers are far enough away from the action, that even significant increases to current estimates would not present an issue for us. As Lenny and David mentioned, September and October were volatile months for our investment program. However, we believe our premium to capital ratios are still amongst the lowest in the reinsurance industry. Since we focus on frequency business, we believe our underwriting program should also be less volatile over time than CAT focused reinsurers. We believe that our third quarter…

Thank you, Bart. Greenlight Re reported a net loss of $118.4 million for the third quarter of 2008, compared to a net loss of $2.1 million for the comparable period in 2007. On a per share basis, the loss for the three months ended September 30, 2008, was $3.29 per share, compared to a loss of $0.06 per share for the third quarter of 2007. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2008, the net loss was $89.6 million compared to net income of $6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. On a per share basis, the net loss was $2.49 per share, compared to net earnings of $0.21 per share on a fully diluted basis for the comparable period in 2007. Premium written during the third quarter of $37.7 million was higher than the 19.8 million of premium written during the third quarter of 2007. This increase is primarily the manifestation of the additional quota share frequency business that we have written during the latter part of 2007 and continuing into 2008. As mentioned in previous quarters, it takes longer for the ultimate premium on the quarter share contracts to be reported. The composite ratio for our frequency business for the first nine months of 2008 was 88.9%. This compares to the reported composite ratio of 93.7 % for our frequency business for the comparable period in 2007. The improved composite ratio on the frequency business is primarily a result of favorable loss development on certain 2006 and 2007 frequency contracts. The composite ratio for our severity business for the first nine months of 2008 increased to 73.1 % compared to 39.9% for the comparable period in 2007. The increased composite ratio on our severity business is a combination of writing a more diverse line…

Thanks, Tim. While the third quarter of 2008 was difficult across all financial markets, we believe that we have weathered the storm and are positioned to take advantage of an increasingly hardening market in 2009 and beyond. We will continue our strategy of maximizing risk adjusted returns on both sides of our balance sheet and will continue to proceed cautiously. Finally, as part of our ongoing ratings process, we continue to maintain close communication with A & Best. As is our normal practice, we have kept A & Best fully informed of all developments on both our underwriting and investment portfolios up through the present. A & Best has confirmed to us that the events through the end of October will not create any issues related to our rating and that we are currently more than adequately capitalized, even under significant stress testing of our capital base. And now, we’d like to open the call up to questions.

(Operator Instructions) Your first question comes from the line of Jim Bradshaw, of Bares Capital Management. Jim Bradshaw – Bares Capital Management: Good morning. I wonder if you could just speak briefly about your credit facility with Citi and whether or not you are seeing any tightening of that at all?

Hi, it’s Tim Courtis, we do have a $400 million letter of credit facility with Citi Bank. It is annually renewable and currently runs to the fall of 2009. We have not had any discussions with them otherwise. Jim Bradshaw – Bares Capital Management: Okay. Great. I think you guys already answered most of my other questions, so, appreciate it!

Thanks, Jim

(Operator instructions) At this time, there are no further questions. We now have a question from a line of Marvin Kline, of Logan Capital. Marvin Kline – Logan Capital: My question has to do with the recent price of the stock. Do you have any reason to suspect that there’s been a lot of dumping of the stock by hedge funds who are trying to improve their liquidity?

Hey, Marvin. We really have no insight into whether that’s the case or not. Marvin Kline – Logan Capital: Okay. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Ian Macover (ph 00:20:20), of BlackHawk Capital [Ian Macover] – BlackHawk Capital: Hi, good morning. David, I was wondering if you comment on the extent to which currency movements may have contributed to investment losses in recent quarter?

Um, I don’t have that in front of me, but my instinct is that currency movements, believe it or not, were actually probably a positive. [Ian Macover] – BlackHawk Capital: I know they were a positive in October.

Thank you, but that was not a question. [Ian Macover] – BlackHawk Capital: Sure.

(Operator Instructions) Your next question comes from the line of Andrew Sole of Esopus Creek Advisors. Andrew Sole – Esopus Creek Advisors: Good morning and I apologize if this question- if you’ve already addressed this issue, I got on the call a little late. Can you tell me if the company still has exposure to this Porsche VW trade.

Yes, I can address the question. Um, we do not have a practice of disclosing exactly what our current positions are or our current trading strategies relating to particular names. So, it’s something we’re probably not going to answer at this time.

Your next question comes from the line of Mark Salem of Mount Capital. Mark Salem – Mount Capital: My question for David, I guess in relation to the previous question, but with what we’ve seen in Porsche/VW, at any time did you have any issues regarding, you know, margin calls or um, you know, uh any kind of prime brokerage issues with that position?

We did not have any prime brokerage issues with that position and we did not have specific margin calls. We rerun the fund on the account on an online bird basis. And as such, we have significant ability not to have to worry about haircuts and things such as this. Mark Salem – Mount Capital: Just a followup, could you give an idea of just, you know you mentioned this two positions that contributed to the loss, can you give us a rough idea of how much they contributed to October’s performance?

Helix was the bigger of the two. And the two of them combined were much of the loss. Mark Salem – Mount Capital: Thank you.

(Operator Instructions) There are no further questions. Should you have any followup questions, please direct them to Alex Stanton of Stanton, Crenshaw Communications at 212-780-1900 and he will be happy to assist you. This concludes today’s conference call.