Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) Q1 2026 Earnings Report, Transcript and Summary

Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Golar LNG Limited First Quarter 2026 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Karl Fredrik Staubo, CEO. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and good morning from our headquarters in Bermuda. Welcome to Golar's Q1 2026 Earnings Results Presentation. My name is Karl Fredrik Staubo, I'm the CEO of Golar and I'm accompanied today by our CFO, Eduardo Maranhao. Before we get into the presentation, please note the forward-looking statements on Slide 2. We start on Slide 3 and an overview of Golar today. Q1 was a record quarter for LNG production for Golar. Hilli continued its 100% economic uptime and Gimi produced 19% above the committed contractual capacity. The Mark II FLNG remains on budget and scheduled for delivery by year-end '27. Geopolitical risks during the quarter highlights the vulnerability of global energy markets and the need for energy diversification and security. This has driven strong development of our commercial pipeline for incremental FLNG units, and we're now expecting to order our fourth FLNG unit within this year. As you can see on the bottom part of the slide, this is our 3 growth designs available for the next units. During the quarter, we also announced that we have launched a strategic review to explore options to further accelerate our FLNG growth ambitions and to maximize shareholder returns. Turning to Slide 4. We will share some views on how we see the energy market development and the increasing demand for Golar's FLNG offering as the only proven service provider of FLNG. On Slide 4, we highlight the 3 key value drivers for Golar. Starting on the left, the NPV of our $17 billion base backlog is increasing every day, we get closer to all 3 units in operation. Gimi commenced its 20-year charter in June last year. Hilli will end her current charter in Cameroon in July, and then go via Singapore for vessel upgrades before starting her 20-year charter in Argentina in the summer of next year. The Mark II remains on schedule for delivery by year-end '27 and is expected to start her 20-year charter in the summer of '28. Our second value driver in the middle of the slide is the value of the attractive commodity upside embedded in our Argentina contracts. The significant increase in LNG price indices during Q1 increased the value of our commodities exposure by approximately $200 million to $500 million per year in the first 3 years of SESA operations. Once the remaining 4 million tonnes of offtake is secured, this commodity-linked earnings could be locked in through hedging activities. Beyond 2030, there isn't yet an efficient forward market, but recent events speak to significant upside potential in our commodity exposures in several years to come. Lastly, our third pillar of value creation is Golar's position as the only proven service provider of FLNG as a service. This enables us to open new markets to LNG exports and with our proven market-leading CapEx per ton, operational track record and retainage performance, FLNGs represent a compelling value proposition for gas monetization. On the back of the strong commercial development in the quarter, we are now focused on ordering our fourth FLNG within 2026. Turning to Slide 5, which provides an overview of our EBITDA backlog. As stated, all FLNGs have 20-year charters. The backlog stands at $17 billion before commodity upside and inflationary adjustments. And for all our long-term contracts, OpEx, maintenance CapEx and local taxes are covered by our charter counterparts. Turning to Slide 6 and translating our backlog into annual earnings. Starting on the far left, our 70% equity ownership in the FLNG Gimi translates into an annual EBITDA generation of $150 million to Golar. This is before utilization bonuses, which as mentioned, was 19% for Q1. Hilli once on her long-term contract in Argentina will generate $285 million and the Mark II, $400 million. As you can see on the commodity upside, Golar will generate approximately $100 million in excess earnings for FOB prices above $8. As mentioned, the lifting of the forward curves suggest an increased annual earnings in the front years of the -- in the range of $200 million to $500 million. This is represented by the pillar on the third one to the right on the slide. Turning to Slide 7 and looking at the developments of the global energy market. According to BP's energy market outlook, the world today consumes approximately 270 million barrels of oil equivalent. This is set to grow to 295 million barrels of oil by 2035. The two fastest-growing sources to cater for this increase in energy demand is not surprisingly renewables expected to grow at 80% from a relatively low base and LNG to be the second fastest source of energy with a 42% growth rate in the same period. To then shift to the right-hand side of the slide and drilling into where does this supply come from. As mentioned, the market is expected to grow 42% in this period. However, most of the growth is represented by the world's two largest exporters, the U.S. and Qatar. They are expected to increase their market share from 42% to 53% of global supply. Interestingly to note the U.S. is also the marginal producer, i.e., the most expensive producer of LNG globally. With their market share increasing to 33% of global supply, we see strong demand from LNG offtakers to further diversify the way from too much concentration risk on two suppliers. If you turn to Slide 8, this is a geographical map of where LNG export exists today. Interestingly, where Golar operates today in Cameroon, Mauritania, Senegal and soon, Argentina, we represent the only output of LNG in those countries. When we depart Cameroon with Hilli this summer, Cameroon will no longer be an LNG exporter. That's not only a loss to Cameroon, but it's a loss to the global energy market, which will then pay less output of energy. There are still several countries with abundant proven gas reserves awaiting monetization. We are in advanced commercial negotiations with both established LNG exporters now considering to build incremental floating capacity as opposed to land [ base ] as well as new entrants into the market, similar to what we have achieved in Cameroon, Mauritania, Senegal and Argentina. Turning to Slide 9. The reason why this is possible is that the gas can be sourced very attractively because today, the gas is stranded. Hence, on current energy prices, several of these nations have billions of dollars literally stuck in the ground or even worse, in some cases, flared and if they can then deploy an FLNG and monetize that resource, that's the gain, both to the country, to the environment and to global energy. We have, on the middle graph on the top, we have a proven capability to build incremental capacity at the 30% to 40% cost advantage to land-based liquefaction solutions. Lastly, most of the projects we are in discussions with have a shipping advantage versus volumes out of the U.S. Hence, if you have a business with 3 cost drivers, the cost of gas, the liquefaction and the shipping distance and you're cheaper on all 3, we think you have a highly sustainable competitive advantage. In fact, we see this driving the demand and the build-out of the FLNG industry. We see a very similar development to what we saw on the FPSO industry, which started in 1985 and today comprise of more than 250 units. The FLNG industry started in 2018. We're today at 9 on the water and 5 in the construction, i.e., 14 units, and we do expect this industry to grow well north of 100 units over time. So as we say in the strapline here, we believe floating is the future, and we see a resembling development to that of the FPSOs. Turning to Slide 11, a focus on Q1. As explained, we have a continued operational excellence on the Gimi, which produced 19% above her contractual day rate and generated north of $700,000 a day during the quarter. Hilli maintained her 100% economic uptime and has now offloaded 152 cargoes. Because of the strengthening of the commercial pipeline, we are now actively securing slots for long lead items to secure the construction time that we are promising our clients in the commercial discussions which we reconfirm that on Mark I and II, we expect construction time of around 36 months and somewhat longer for Mark II. During the quarter, we also entered into a 10% investment in the San Matias pipeline. This is the pipeline that will bring gas from the Vaca Muerta field to the Gulf of San Matias to service both Hilli and the Mark II for year-round operations. In the shareholders agreement we have in Southern Energy, all of the shareholders have committed to invest pro rata in the San Matias pipeline. We estimate that we will invest a total of around $77 million in the pipeline of equity, and that $77 million will also generate an attractive infrastructure return once operational for 20 years. During the quarter, SESA and Securing Energy for Europe signed an 8-year sale and purchase agreement for 2 million tonnes of the LNG production that we will produce in Argentina. 1 million of the 2 million tonnes is linked to Brent indices, and 1 million tonnes is linked to Henry Hub indices. As mentioned, we also commenced strategic review to both maximize stakeholder value and to accelerate FLNG growth. Turning to Slide 12 and the Hilli. As already mentioned, this unit continues our market-leading performance of 100% economic uptime since we started operation in 2018. We have now produced 152 cargoes and generated $47 million in Q1. Our primary focus on the Hilli is now preparation work for the unit to disconnect from her current location at end of July and sails to Singapore for a vessel upgrade scope expected to last between 6 and 7 months before sailing to Argentina to start her 20-year contract. Turning to Gimi, which saw an all-time high production at 19% above contractual levels. Part of this outperformance is attributed to ambient temperature. Hence, when we see colder temperatures, both in the air and the sea, the units will perform better than what you can expect through summer months. Hence, the 19% should not be annualized, and we do expect a lower production as we enter the summer months. However, we do believe that over a year, we will produce meaningfully above the contractual amount, and we expect that to be reflected in our earnings on a pro rata basis. So the contractual amount brings $150 million to Golar's 70% equity stake. If you assume, let's say, 10% annualized overproduction, that's an extra $15 million of cash earnings to Golar with no associated cost attached. So that's straight to the bottom line. Turning to Slide 14. The Mark II remains on schedule and budget. You can see some of the pictures of the progress on the right-hand side. Most importantly, we have now concluded the midship fabrication, which will house the entire liquefaction plants. We're very pleased with the development and the quality of the work done at CIMC in Yantai, China. And this gives us comfort to also look to do more units at the same location. Turning to Slide 15. We're also progressing the infrastructure required to support our operations in Argentina. The primary work today is, as you can see from the pictures, we are constructing the compressor stations. We are trenching the both onshore and offshore to facilitate for the pipeline. There are two key pipeline activities Initially, Hilli will produce from a 19-kilometer connection to the existing gas rigs in Argentina. That construction is well underway and our very much on schedule to be in place when Hilli arrives. The second pipeline is a dedicated pipeline that will go all the way from Vaca Muerta down to Golfo to San Matias, which is north of 500 kilometers. During the quarter, SESA awarded both line pipes, compressor stations and the EPC to construct that pipeline to also ensure that, that's in place when the Mark II arrives. So far, everything is on schedule and better than originally anticipated on SESA's budgets. Turning to Slide 16. We are now actively working to order our fourth unit within '26. This is on the back of strong development of our commercial pipeline. We see three target regions for incremental business. It continues to be West Africa, Middle East and certainly South America. We are narrowing our scope as to which design we will build. We've taken active steps to secure long lead items. We're inspecting donor vessels as we speak. And we are confirming shipyard pricing, payment terms and delivery. We will update the market as this progresses, but this is now very high on our agenda. I'll now hand the call over to Eduardo to run us through group results for Q1.

Thank you, Karl, and good morning, everyone. I'm pleased to provide an overview of another quarter of strong operational execution, earnings growth and continued balance sheet progress for Golar. Moving to Slide 18. Q1 further demonstrates the earnings power of our FLNG platform, as Gimi continues to ramp up and operational optimization translates into higher cash flow generation. Total operating revenues increased to $138 million in the quarter, while EBITDA increased 16% quarter-over-quarter to $106 million. Gimi continues to perform exceptionally well delivering 19% above contractual day rates during the quarter, supported by strong production performance, favorable ambient conditions and continued operational optimization. At the same time, Hilli once again maintained 100% commercial uptime continuing its outstanding operational track record. Net income increased significantly to $102 million in Q1 highlighting the operating upside embedded within our business model. And importantly, this performance was achieved with only two FLNG units operating today and before any contribution from Mark II. Lastly, consistent with our capital allocation framework, we're pleased to declare another quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share for Q1 2026. Moving to Slide 19. We continue to maintain a strong balance sheet with substantial flexibility to support future FLNG growth. At quarter end, total cash stood at just over $1 billion while net interest-bearing debt was around $1.7 billion. As mentioned before, on a fully delivered basis once all three units are in operation, we expect annual run rate EBITDA to exceed $800 million before commodity upside. Based on our current capital structure, this would imply leverage reducing to around 3.4x, fully supported by long-term contracted cash flows. Mark II remains fully unencumbered today despite $1.2 billion having been invested to date, creating significant embedded flexibility for future financing. Combined with the potential optimization of the Hilli financing structure, we continue to see meaningful opportunities to unlock additional liquidity to support further FLNG growth. Turning to Slide 20. Our capital allocation framework remains clear, disciplined and highly aligned with our long-term shareholder value creation. We continue to prioritize three key objectives: maintaining balance sheet flexibility, funding accretive FLNG growth and increasing shareholder returns over time. During Q1, we deployed approximately $200 million across dividends and growth investments. We returned approximately $25 million to shareholders through dividends in the quarter, while investing more than $134 million across our FLNG growth projects. Importantly, the $1.2 billion invested into Mark II has been fully equity funded highlighting both the strength of our existing cash flow platform and the substantial flexibility still available going forward. Looking ahead, we continue to target the ordering of fourth FLNG units during 2026, as alluded by Karl. Based on our contracted earnings profile, we continue to see a clear pathway towards approximately $5 per share of annual free cash flow generation before commodity upside. This provides substantial flexibility between increasing shareholder returns and funding future growth opportunities. Importantly, we believe the increasing scale of our platform in financing flexibility positions Golar to evolve from a 3-unit company into a repeatable FLNG infrastructure platform over time. Moving to Slide 21. What this slide really shows is the scale and visibility of the next phase of earnings for us. So today, our platform generating $274 million of last 12 months EBITDA with only 2 units in operation. Once all 3 units are fully operational, we expect run rate EBITDA to exceed $800 million before commodity upside and before additional FLNG growth units. We expect the first major step-up in earnings during 2027, once Hilli starts operation, followed by another significant increase once the Mark II enters operation in '28. Importantly, this EBITDA growth is expected to materially outpace incremental debt service, resulting in substantial increase in free cash flow and shareholder return capacity. As previously discussed, our current dividend run rate is approximately $1 per share annually and could grow to over $5 per share based on contracted EBITDA. In addition, our contract with SESA provide attractive upside linked to LNG prices. With every $1 per million BTU increase in LNG prices above [ $8 ] estimated to generate approximately $100 million of incremental annual upside. Combined with around 20 years of average remaining contract duration, we believe this provides exceptional visibility into long-term earnings and cash flow generation. Lastly, on Slide 22. We continue to see increasing scale, liquidity and institutional participation across our capital markets presence. Our market cap has now grown to approximately $5.7 billion while average daily trading volume exceeds $100 million per day. In addition, we now have approximately $800 million outstanding across two senior unsecured bonds alongside our $575 million convertible bond maturing in 2030. Today, investors can gain exposure to Golar through multiple ways. From our growing equity cash flow profile and increasing shareholder returns to our unsecured bonds and convertible instruments, all supported by long-term contracted FLNG infrastructure cash flows and visible future growth. With that, I'll hand the call back to you, Karl.

Thank you, Eduardo. Turning to Slide 24 and a summary of our focus on continued value creation. Near term, we see increasing commodity prices, boosting both earnings on Hilli's remaining commodity exposure of Cameroon and for the front years of our SESA contracts. The increased utilization on Gimi results in a pro rata increase in adjusted EBITDA -- and as explained, we don't think it's fair to assume 19% annualized, but we do expect a meaningful overproduction of our committed contractual volume. We have several levers, as Eduardo explained, for further debt optimization, in particular, on asset level financing on Hilli and the Mark II, where any significant liquidity release will be used for growth and directed to our fourth FLNG. The startup of the 20-year contract for Hilli in Argentina will be at a much higher base versus the unit's current earnings in Cameroon. Hence, the reset of the contract will strongly benefit our cash flow. As explained a couple of times during this presentation, we are targeting to order our fourth FLNG within '26, and this is even further strengthened by the global energy market disruptions, which builds momentum in our commercial discussion. Longer term, we see a continued strong development of the FLNG market. As we laid out, we see a similar trajectory to that of the FPSO industry, and we remain by our policy to add at least one FLNG per year going forward. We see, as Eduardo say, a capacity for multiple increase in shareholder returns just based on our existing three assets once they start the long-term contracts. And we see strong demand for further energy diversification and security and thereby opening new markets to LNG exports. As a matter of fact, the NPV of Golar is increasing daily until both Hilli and the Mark II are operational in Argentina. To summarize on Slide 25, we are the only proven service provider of FLNG, and we've now delivered more than 185 LNG cargoes with no unplanned downtime. We have a backlog of $17 billion. Our adjusted EBITDA will grow to $800 million a year. As Eduardo explained, we have balance sheet flexibility with a fully delivered net debt to adjusted EBITDA of just over 3x and quickly deleveraging thereafter. We're positioned for growth, and we're now focused on ordering #4, and we're equally focused on shareholder returns, which is evident both from our capital allocation policy and our ongoing strategic review. That concludes our prepared remarks for the quarter. But before turning it over to the operator for questions, we would like to remind you that as stated in the press release announcing our strategic review, which was released on March 25, we will not provide any commentary on the strategic review process until the review is complete. With that, we will now open up for questions.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of John Mackay from Goldman Sachs.

I appreciate all the color in the prepared remarks. I'd love just to hear a little bit more from you in terms of the commercial progress, specifically maybe how these conversations have changed or accelerated over the past 2 months since the Iran war started and whether that's brought in kind of new geographies, new types of customers, et cetera. Maybe walk us through that.

So I think one very clear effect of the disruptions in the Middle East is the bombing and fire of Ras Laffan, which has taken out at least 7 million tonnes for 3 to 5 years according to Qatargas themselves. So obviously, that impacts the forward supply-demand dynamics and also the price expectations that people can foresee in the front months of an FLNG charter. That has caused a drive for urgency and try to get as early delivery as possible. This is why we feel strongly about securing long-lead items to ensure that we can deliver an FLNG in 36 months, which the way we see it will be the earliest available liquefaction capacity globally. When you then have more -- several parties interested to secure that capacity at much higher offtake prices than they originally subscribed to you can translate that into the commercial discussions. So instead of having sort of a price war with the counterpart, it's who gets the first delivery, and that's a much better dynamic for us than to discuss tariff details. So that's the key impact the way we see it.

Maybe just a follow-up for me. Clear on boat 4, has any of this started to pick up your conversations around a potential fifth boat if you're working through a couple of customers that several might end up wanting some capacity here?

Absolutely. So as we've said, the reason for launching the strategic review is to see how we can further accelerate growth, and that's on the back of the commercial discussions. So for us, the short answer is yes.

Our next question comes from the line of Chris Robertson from Deutsche Bank.

Just staying on the topic of the fourth asset here. When you're looking at a donor type vessel, which in my mind, indicates that it will be either a Mark I or Mark II. So when you're looking at a donor vessel here, does it matter the type could it be converted to either type of project or when you're selecting the vessel, is it specific to whether it will be a Mark I or Mark II. Just trying to get your thoughts around expectations around the size, the specification of this fourth asset? And maybe any commentary you could give around expectations of whether or not terms might be similar or even improved from the last Argentinian contracts?

So your point that a donor vessel suggests Mark I or II, we fully agree with. The answer is yes. We don't see the next one being either of the two. The second part of the question, whatever donor vessel we secure can be used for both. The donor vessel is not what dictates Mark I or 2. The magnitude of long leads will impact Mark I and II. And for now, we are ensuring that at least we can do a Mark II. So that's where we probably see the next one coming. In terms of the commercial terms, we have previously guided that we target long-term contracts of 15 to 20 years at a CapEx to EBITDA between 5 and 6x. And then obviously, we try to also build in inflationary adjustments as well as commodity upside. The commercial discussions we are in is within that guidance. However, they differ from geography and counterpart as to the level of fixed versus commodity exposure. Some clients, big IOCs are less inclined to pay a significant commodity upside, but are in line to pay the long-term infrastructure charter rates in the 5 to 6 CapEx to EBITDA range.

Okay. That's clear. Just turning to the dedicated gas pipeline. Can you talk a little bit more about the regulatory or any environmental approvals that are remaining, if any, and what does the construction timeline look from today until completion?

Sure. So the pipeline that will go from Vaca Muerta to Golfo San Matias will be go alongside the oil pipeline that was started in December '24. So all of the right-of-way and regulatory approvals is in place. We do expect a separate [indiscernible] protection to be awarded to the pipeline company. There are 3 key components to the construction of the pipeline. One is line pipes that has been awarded and is under construction. The second is compressor station that was awarded back in December and is under construction. And then the third and last part is the EPC, the actual work of putting it all together. And that's also been awarded. The construction time is well within 2 years. So we should be very much ready for when the Mark II arrives.

And our next question comes from the line of Sherif Elmaghrabi from BTIG.

Starting with the sale agreement that you signed for the Hilli is -- for both Hilli and Mark II, is there an amount of LNG capacity that SESA aims to have under long-term contract versus spot, especially since you've taken some commodity exposure on your contract with SESA.

So If you take Hilli and the Mark II, Hilli has a capacity of approximately 2.5. Mark II of approximately 3.5. So we are in total because we guarantee 90% uptime we have just shy of 6 million tonnes to market. SESA has already sold the first 2 that leaves us another 4 to sell. We are actively discussing amongst the SESA shareholders to reserve around 1 million tonnes for spot cargoes. There is currently no significant outlet of LNG in South America. Hence, with the establishment of the operations of Hilli and the Mark II in Argentina, we expect to open new local demand with a massive shipping advantage versus where they are sourcing gas today. A natural example for such spot volumes should be Brazil, which recently awarded another 30 gigawatts of PPAs where a majority of that will be gas-fired. Hence, we see significant potential local demand for that capacity that should dictate a higher FOB price than what we can obtain on long-term contracts. However, we want to have a measured approach to it. So we will start off with around -- well, probably around 1 million tonnes, subject to the SESA partnership agreement. And then we will see how that develops over time. And that's why the SESA contract, for example, is 8 years, so we can optimize as we finish.

That's very helpful. And then I want to bring it back to the pipeline. It sounds like things are humming along, right? Stuff under construction, everything has been awarded. Are there any key milestones we should be looking at for this year? And then perhaps more importantly, I'm curious if that pipeline would be fully utilized by the Mark II? Or is there any other spare capacity over the long term?

So milestones of this year. I think this year, we are awaiting progress. There's nothing that will be fully complete this year. So the milestones will be, I guess, on the quarterly calls, we will provide updates on where we sit versus the schedule. When it comes to the -- I guess you are referring to the dedicated pipeline. So when you talk about pipeline, there are two key things. It's the -- how big is the pipeline in inches and the other thing is compressor stations. You can boost the throughput of the pipeline beyond just Hilli and Mark II, if you add compression, but there's a limit to how much you can grow it by the size of the actual pipeline in inches. So to answer the question, yes, you can boost it beyond the 2 units, but there's certainly a restriction at some point, just given the size of the pipe.

Our next question comes from the line of Alexander Bidwell from Webber Research and Advisory.

Appreciate the time. So with the Argentina project running on or slightly ahead of schedule, are there any upside mechanisms in the contracts if the project starts up early?

Sure. Then we're going to produce hydrocarbons earlier. So hydrocarbons earlier is more money earlier and the contracts starts whenever we're ready. However, that said, there's a lot of infrastructure that should line up to the start-up of the arrival of the FLNGs and there is no upside. If the pipeline is ready and the FLNG is not, then obviously, there's no upside. So everything needs to be in place more than looking for the upside, we are just wanting to ensure that we are according to the schedule that we have put forward. And for now, we're tracking very well to achieve that.

All right. Appreciate the color there. And then I guess, just kind of piggybacking off that. So you mentioned about 90% of the FLNG infrastructure CapEx is awarded. Can you walk us through what remains outstanding?

When you do this type of work, there's always some additional contracting that will happen. For example, some of the costs you don't pay upfront, but you pay when you actually conduct the work. So -- as I mentioned, the line pipes, the compressor station and the EPC has been awarded, but there will be other costs that will come alongside when we do construction, such as roads, warehouse and certain other things that there's no reason why it should be awarded now, but it will be sort of, call it, pay-as-you-go closer in time to the delivery of the FLNG.

Our next question comes from the line of Liam Burke from B. Riley Securities.

Karl as you move Hilli from the coast of Africa to South America, are there any significant changes in geography that would affect the modification of the FLNG as it goes from one geography to another?

So our units are generic, but there are certain adjustments you need to make. So the short answer is for the big impact, not much. The key changes, however, are One of them, it's a different met-ocean condition in Argentina versus Cameroon. So we'll do relatively large modifications to the anchoring points on the Hilli, like physically where the vessel is connected to the mooring system. That's one big scope. The other one is that during winter in Argentina, you can see negative temperatures, which is not the case in Cameroon. Hence, we need to do a limited winterization scope of key components that will be exposed to such temperatures. Those are the two key modifications, but other than that, none.

Okay. Great. And this is sort of a nitpicking item. On corporate and other, there is a mention of an FSRU operation and maintenance agreements. You don't have any other legacy operations related to some of the past either carrier -- LNG carrier or FSRU operations anymore, do you?

Today, no. When we started this quarter, yes. So Golar has been around for 80 years this year. We actually celebrated 80 this year. So there are always some legacy stuff, and we have done a lot of work to sort of get rid of all of it because it takes -- some of it we're making modest money on, but it takes a lot of organization time. So we have basically terminated most, if not all of them, and we no longer have any exposure to any FSRU nor LNG carrier operations.

There are no further questions at this time. I'll hand the call back to Karl for closing remarks.

Thank you all for dialing in and listening to our Q1 presentation. We wish you all a good day. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect. Speakers, please stand by.