Good afternoon, and welcome to Gerdau's conference call to discuss the results related to the first quarter 2019. [Operator Instructions]. We would like to emphasize that any forward-looking statement that might be made during this conference call related to Gerdau's business outlook, projections and financial and operating goals are mere assumptions based on the management's expectations related to the future of the company. Even though Gerdau believes that its comments are based on reasonable assumptions, there is no guarantee that future events will not affect this evaluation. Here today are Mr. Gustavo Werneck, Director, President and CEO; and Harley Scardoelli, Executive Vice President and CFO. Now I would like to give the floor to Mr. Gustavo Werneck. You may proceed, sir.

Good afternoon, everyone. As usual, I would like to begin by welcoming each one of you to Gerdau's earnings conference call to discuss the results for the first quarter 2019. Next to me is Scardoelli, our CFO and we're always pleased to talk to you about our performance and discuss and clarify questions you might have. I will initiate talking about our overall results in the quarter, and next Scardoelli will elaborate on the financial figures of the company. Next to that, I will talk about the outlook for the markets where we operate and also our investments. At the end, we will both be available to answer your questions. Let's move to Slide 2 to initiate our conversation on the main highlights of the quarter. We came to the end of the first quarter 2019 keeping the good results we posted on the same period of 2018. Net income was BRL453 million and a 5% EBITDA growth, mainly due to improved results coming from the North American operation that posted an EBITDA margin of 13.2%, and also lower SG&A. This is, therefore, the best EBITDA of the company in the first quarter in the last 12 months. Now I would like to emphasize that we are confident that we did a great job regarding the divestment plan carried out along the last few years and concluded in 2018. Even with the sale of several operations, which accounted for a 23% reduction in shipments this quarter when compared to the same quarter of the previous year, we were able to grow EBITDA by 5% and EBITDA margin by 1.2 percentage points. This successful divestment plan, which economic value amounted to approximately BRL7 billion resulted in a sharp reduction of our debt. When we look at the net debt over EBITDA…

Thank you, Gustavo, and good afternoon to you all. For those of you following us on the web, we are now on Slide #4 and I will talk about the results and the performance of the company in the first quarter of 2019. In consolidated terms, adjusted EBITDA in the first quarter of this year was BRL1.6 billion and this, as Gustavo said, was the best result for this quarter in the last 11 years. Looking at the chart on the upper part of the slide, if we compare to the first Q of '18, we notice that adjusted EBITDA went from BRL1.5 billion to BRL1.6 billion in absolute values. This increase was mainly due to the enhanced performance in the North America BD and lower SG&A. The significant improvement of the North America BD in the first quarter of '19 in relation to Q1 '18, as mentioned by Gustavo, was caused by the measures to stimulate production in the U.S. stemming from Section 232 and the all-time record of the metallic spread supported by favorable economic growth. So the 5% increase in consolidated EBITDA vis-à-vis the first quarter '18 even with the 23% reduction in shipments and in production volumes demonstrated the success of our divestment plan carried out in the last few years. Also when you look at EBITDA per tonne sold, we achieve impressive levels. When we compare to BRL373 in the same period of last year, meaning an increase of 33%. I would also like to highlight that at the end of the quarterly earnings results that was published today, we posted the main figures and results net of the effects from the divestment program for the entire year of 2018 and broken down by quarter. This is done in order to help you in your…

Thank you, Scardoelli. Now I would like to move to Slide #8 where we will talk about the outlook looking forward. We remain very optimistic in relation to the main markets we operate, mainly Brazil and the U.S. According the most recent figures for this year published by the World Steel Association, global steel demand should experience moderate growth of 1.3% over 2018 to 1.735 billion tonnes driven by the rebound of investments in developed countries and the enhanced performance from emerging economies. Also despite a scenario of commercial tensions and a possible deceleration of steel consumption in China, that should increase by only 1% in 2019. In Brazil, despite the fact that the steel consuming sectors posted a lower-than-expected performance in the first quarter, below expected particularly in the industrial segment, we believe in an effective rebound of the economy throughout the year. According to data from Instituto Aço Brasil, it's estimated that the apparent consumption of steel in the country should grow 4.6% in 2019, jumping to 22 million tonnes, driven by the recovery of the industry and civil construction sectors. The number was reviewed in line with the GDP projections for Brazil this year pointing to a growth of 1.49% against the previous forecast of 2.5% growth according to the Focus report from the Central Bank. I would also like to mention the strong performance of the retail segment in the quarter, and I'm referring to self construction in low income housing that was captured by over 75 branches of Commercial Gerdau located throughout the country and the growth of our new company Juntos Somos Mais, launched in the last quarter of 2018. It is the largest national loyalty program of the retail market for civil construction. And today, it has approximately 45,000 stores and 135,000 registered…

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Daniel Sasson from Itaú.

Congratulations on your results. My first question refers to the U.S. We know that enhanced margins came from an all-time high metallic spreads and also the divestment of assets that you've conducted recently. Could you please elaborate on how metal spread levels are today, I mean, in the first quarter? And whether there is any further space for further cost reductions? And what would be a sustainable EBITDA margin in the U.S. BD from now on? Could we expect further improvements, something like 14% to 15%? And my second question relates to Brazil. We saw a 6% decline quarter-on-quarter of prices in the domestic market. Could you please elaborate and tell me a little bit more about what happened and whether there is any impact of lower sales of iron ore and slabs and maybe you decided to hold on to sales for the availability of market in the domestic market? And also whether you see any more room for further price increases in the Mexican market in the second quarter?

Daniel, this is Gustavo. I will start with the U.S. and metallic spreads. In fact, in the first three months, we saw high figures, high amounts, historically speaking, for the metallic spread. It's about $500, but this margin for metallic spread should be maintained in the second quarter. Now about the possibility of reducing costs, that's still a possibility. As we said, last year, we -- what we did in that operation, we are reducing unnecessary costs and we haven't yet factored in the entire cost reduction program. We may see still higher costs in the second quarter. So we do not believe that the EBITDA margin should evolve further in the second and third quarters. But in terms of what we were able to do in the first quarter, I think it's absolutely possible. Now in terms of Brazil, especially in relation to the drop in net revenue, it's important to remember that net revenue into the domestic market consists of the revenue from the sale of steel and also revenues from the sale of iron ore. The total revenue for steel production should have some changes in relation to a reduction in the sale of ore. More particularly, in the fourth quarter of last year, we had about 650,000 tonnes of ore, but in the first quarter of '19, there was 250,000 tonnes. Basically, because we maintain the inventory of strategic ore in our mills to be more comfortable and to be able to go through the current momentum. If we disregard that ore, our prices should be more flat in the second quarter. Now in terms of the possibility of any price increases in the second quarter, even though consumption is low, we see lower costs of scrap prices. And we're looking at imports for longs and flats, there it's negative. But in the next few months, we will have to see whether the scenario will be more favorable to price increases.

Next question from Leonardo Correa from BTG Pactual.

My first point, Werneck, still talking about Brazil and still talking about demand and how you see the evolution in the -- into the second quarter, I think it's very clear and all businessmen in Brazil are waiting for a stronger recovery in the second quarter. But looking at the second quarter, particularly with this base, which is higher, the market expected EBITDA of BRL1.4 billion in the fourth quarter and you went beyond that number. So now the question that remains is, I know, of course, you can answer in qualitative ways, but what about the evolution of the second quarter to you and whether you can make improvement? And in general, what kind of improvement should be expected? I think that there is an attempt to tamper with prices or maybe volume in Brazil. You already said that you expect a constant margin in the U.S. So with all of these variables, how do they -- how should they behave in the second quarter even before we talk about the second half of the year? And in addition, I have a question to Harley. The quarter is a bit polluted in regards to working capital. And when we look at the cash conversion cycle, the number is now 83 days. So it's clearly very different than the average, which has been around 75 days. So I just want to hear from you what could be expected in the coming quarters considering that you still have to do some inventory rearrangements to accommodate also Minas. And so how can this working capital behave in the following quarters?

In regards to the question on Brazil, in this current business environment in Brazil, the second quarter should be very similar to what we saw in the first quarter. But traditionally, we have seasonality in the first quarter, that's why the second quarter should be better than the first. But when we compare first Q of this year with first Q of last year, there -- steel sales in Brazil in first Q of '19 was over 400,000 tonnes, which was in keeping with the numbers from the first Q of last year, especially in the new Gerdau, we were able to make advances in retail. And so the segment has reflected the strategy adopted in the last quarters, especially from Commercial Gerdau. And we are seeing the different behavior from retail when compared to previous years. Therefore, I think we may evolve in terms of our volumes. In general, for the second quarter, in Brazil, we do not see major advances in the economy or even a move towards increasing demand. And in the second half of the year, after the approval of the reforms, we may see a more positive landscape.

This is Harley, and I will now answer your question on working capital. The fact is that you have to factor in the seasonality of the first quarter. And in this quarter, it was an enhanced effect due to several effects. One is the shutdown of Ouro Branco when we are replenishing our inventory to be able to cope with the demand from the market and there is also the fact that we had to work to maintain our strategic inventory to keep our operation at adequate levels. If we look at the first quarter of last year, we also consumed CapEx of around BRL400,000. So in a way, it is justified. There is only one -- there's another thing that I would like to say, which is very important. If you look at inventory in accounts receivable, the bulk of it comes from accounts receivable. Our average term of receivable is just 30 days, and when we run a comparison quarter-on-quarter, we are comparing our December to March. December is usually a very weak month because there are many holidays, collective vacation and Christmas holidays. So it is difficult to run an equal comparison, a like-for-like comparison, it's clear. Maybe, I would just add like to add something to your question. In terms of cash conversion cycle, we have about 86 days, but once again, as we still have a very positive outlook for the next quarters, our outlook for the cash conversion cycle is to resume the levels of what we had in the past 70 to 75 days.

It's clear, Harley. If you allow me, I know we got a lot of questions this morning about the accounting changes. Many companies reported on accounting changes. I mean, all companies reported on changes. I would just like to hear from you whether there is anything that is worth knowing about this change to IFRS 16. I don't know, could you tell us whether anything changed that would merit our attention?

In fact, we started to apply this new norm in the mid of last year. We didn't abandon our final results, but there was an impact on the EBITDA, but this was not a heavy impact. It was around BRL50 million in the quarter. If we consider and we said that at the end of our quarterly results that the effect of divestments last year was around BRL74 million. So one thing offsets the other. Therefore, the comparison is valid, quarter-on-quarter. But in fact, we posted BRL50 million in the quarter and things may be different from now on.

Our next question is from Thiago Lofiego from Bradesco BBI.

Could you please revisit your North America BD. You said that there isn't a lot of room for margin improvement. But looking at the last 2 quarters with positive seasonality on volumes, the metallic spread may not change that much. And considering all the work you're doing in your U.S. operation, I just want to understand how come you don't see an upside on that 13% margin now towards the second quarter? So what's different here. My second question is on mining. After the request to expand iron ore in the [indiscernible] Valley, how much should you increase production? And along the same lines, whether you already started doing something in the upstream dam and what would you expect in terms of third parties and iron exports from Gerdau this year?

Thiago, in terms of the U.S., as I said, we had high metallic spreads when compared to the past few years. I think this high numbers for metallic spread should remain in the next quarters. In terms of third parties, there is a possibility of expand that number. With high spreads, there may be investments coming from civil construction and if we are capable of deploying our action plans in a consistent fashion in the months looking forward, we may post further growth. But the -- when we look at our planning, the comparison is difficult to do. In North America, even though GDP growth is about 2%, general steel demand in the U.S. when compared to last year should remain flat. In the first quarter of this year, more specifically, sales in general in the U.S. were a bit lower, around 5% in general, particularly because of the very heavy winter and heavy rains that affected most regions. In terms of our planning, we believe that next quarters in the U.S. should be very similar to what we experienced in this first quarter. Now in terms of Brazil, I would just like to say that more recently, we submitted to local authorities a request to expand our mine and the purpose of that is not even to increase production or to grow organic production. So it's part of our strategic plan. Since last year, we just want to increase the supply of iron ore to our own production. Some ore mines have been explored for some time. We just want to expand that area in order to increase supply. We may open a new mining deposit to increase our consumption by 1 million. So in Ouro Branco that should occur in about 5 to 6 years. Now about the other dams. There are two dams, two ore dams; one is Bocaina, more recently. We already have all the documentation for that dam. The dam is dry and is totally decommissioned. There is another dam called [indiscernible] that it's an upstream mining dam, 1.5 million cubic meters. And at the moment, we are designing a project that in the next 24 months, we may decharacterize that dam and we should introduce other processes. I just want to add another detail. Recently on March 12, we received a favorable opinion about that dam. So the dam today is totally complying to current legislation. It's been monitored complying -- following the legislation and we already received the approval from the regulating agencies.

Can you give me a production estimate for ore this year? Or it's still too soon to tell?

Thiago, it's difficult to give you figures on production. We are very conservative in terms of the volumes due to the volatile scenario. So we are still looking at the issue so that we will have a more comfortable year. We buy pellets from historic suppliers and that is to improve our raw material. So in that regards, we have been working with Instituto Aço Brasil and other agencies to sort that problem out.

Our next question from Thiago Ojea from Goldman Sachs.

I would like to revisit the margins for Brazil. And if you could comment on the fact that we saw a reduction in the scrap cost, it was almost BRL1,100 earlier this year and today, we see some traders trading at below BRL800. So this reduction in scrap prices combined with price increases that you announced for early April, do you think this should increase margins in the second quarter in Brazil? And so given that possible margin expansion, how could that be -- how could you -- how could that be offset by the shutdown in Ouro Branco in the second quarter? And my second question is whether you could comment on that margin increase in South America. We saw a good expansion of about more than 20%. What was the reason behind that, and what should we expect in the second quarter in relation to South America?

Thiago, first of all, scrap prices have been following for some time. We start buying scrap at lower prices and it goes to our inventory, and it does not reflect in price formation. So we believe that in the second quarter in terms of cost, in general production cost, our production cost will be better when compared to the first Q. In a scenario of low demand, we will be able to only grow margins if we -- what we see in the second quarter is still a market moving sideways, but we still have to wait and see whether there is room for growth in Brazil. In terms of imports, we are having negative import premium. We notice that imports have -- import premium have achieved the two negative digits on the other hand, with a reduction in scrap prices and low demand. There are some difficulties, therefore, we have to wait and see what will happen in June to see whether we will be able to improve production and enhance our margins in the second quarter. When we look at the margins of the Brazil BD as a whole, we are looking at export margins. If we look at the figures, we are still discounting 30% of the Brazilian production when we compare prices last year to today, prices are lower. It is a unique situation. The shutdown that is forecast for June is for 70 days, so we will shut down in July and August. And we have an inventory of rebars 378 tonnes probably will be put in inventory until July. This is assuming possible margin growth expected for the second quarter. I will give the floor to Scardoelli who will tell you a little bit about margins in South America.

Good afternoon, Thiago. In relation to South America, what we see is that margins will be like we had now. If we look -- well, another aspect to be considered is that here we consolidate [indiscernible] it's consumed as EBITDA and does not affect our revenue. For example, if you look 4Q and first Q, we had better results. There was only an effect on the margin of the fourth Q. Another aspect is SG&A. So things improved and this had an effect. And as the operation is large, there is an effect that is carried over to -- for us to reach that margin. That level is more normalized for that operation.

Next question from Caio Ribeiro from Crédit Suisse.

My first question is about prices of longs in the U.S. We've heard some news referring to recent price discounts. And I know you said that you expect a relatively flat margin in the second quarter, but I just want to hear from you whether these discounts could hamper the results in the quarter or you see a decline in scrap offsetting by that? And secondly, about Special Steels segment. Even though this segment had an increase in margins quarter-on-quarter, is this margin still below the margin that you have delivered in the past few years? Can you please elaborate on the main reasons behind this price margin and how do you see cost pressure? And whether you see any factor that could probably lead us to a recovery in the next quarter?

Caio, this is Gustavo. About the U.S., this is exactly what you said. Currently, there is a one-off price reduction in some product lines like being in commercial profiles. And this has been driven by scrap production. When I say that we will have a reduction in spreads, so as you have price reductions at the same time, you see an important reduction in the procurement of scrap. And in the U.S., this is very much related to exports into Turkey. In terms of Special Steels, I was saying, Caio, that due to the dynamic of that market that involves long-term contracts, there are also large cost operations even upwards and downwards. And this is felt in the margins in the following quarters because in long-term contracts, we cannot transfer that variations immediately. So last year, there was a significant cost pressure, especially of scrap, electrodes and metallic alloys and that cost pressure put pressure on the margins. And as we said last year, there is an expectation of those resuming margins as of the first quarter of this year. If we could transfer prices into the new contracts in the first quarter, we will be able to see the rebound of the margins. And as the contracts are maturing and impacting our revenues, we will see a growth in margin in the next coming quarters.

Next question from Gustavo Allevato from Santander Bank.

I have two questions. The first relates to the supply cost of pellets. And you mentioned the difficulty of obtaining the product. Does that involve additional transportation cost in Brazil and whether this is impacting you and other players or other vendors? And the second question relates to working capital, especially in terms of accounts receivable. How do you see the financial health of your customers giving a more challenging scenario internally?

Gustavo, to answer your first question on the pellets, basically, is the kind of ore that we've been buying in the market in the past few years. In our 2 blast furnaces of Ouro Branco, we can produce steel without pellets. So if we do not find pellets in the market, we can continue to produce. Pellets can help us to increase productivity. We are now looking at volumes of pellets, logistic costs, productivity of the blast furnace and export prices. We're running a calculation that will allow us to find an appropriate balance for the Ouro Branco Mill. So in terms of the continuity of the operations of Ouro Branco, the pellets are not that significant, but certainly the pellets allow us to increase productivity, especially when we increase the production of the two blast furnaces. I will now turn the floor to Harley to talk about working capital, delinquency and other topics.

Gustavo, in terms of working capital and accounts receivable, it has to do with the revenues that I mentioned before when you compare December to March. In terms of financial health of our customers, this is very much under control. Delinquency is below 10% and much lower when compared to other years like 2015, '16 and '17. So delinquency has declined and we do not see any major problem with our customers.

Next question comes from [indiscernible] from Bank of America.

I just have a follow-up about Brazil. Harley or Werneck, if you could tell me a bit more about demand and your price attempt in the first and second quarter, how much were you able to increase? You said that you have a negative parity. So what is the main issue for you to transfer that even with parity at the current levels?

Let me tell you a bit about the figures of the first quarter. We thought and we anticipated demand growth for Brazil in the first quarter when compared to last Q of last year, but that did materialize. Now when you compare first Q of '18 to '19, sales in Brazil were very much the same. I mean, for flats, there was some growth and it's been growing since last year in the first quarter. There was a growth of about 1% and longs was down by 2.5%. Longs also caters to some subsegments. There is nothing in infrastructure taking place in Brazil right now. The deliveries are very low. Commercial or non-residential construction is still slow. But I'm sure that we will see growing volumes in the second quarter because of the construction. Even though construction does not consume as much, it still continues to grow. But when you put everything in the same basket, the numbers were down by 1.4% when compared to the first quarter of last year. We do not give details about that, but we hope to optimize our margins considering a scenario of low demand and repressed economy. So if you ask me whether we see a momentum to increase prices in the next few months, I would say, yes, even though we are pursuing our commercial policy.

Our next question is in English from Carlos De Alba.

Apologies if this question has been asked before. But in terms of working capital, do you still see a negative impact in the second quarter as you get probably for that repair for the shutdown of Ouro Branco in the third quarter? Or we saw the most significant and negative contribution to cash flow -- to cash from operations this year from higher inventories, particularly. And then second, coming back to the question about import parity, I'm surprised to hear that it is as high as you suggested of double-digit. Could you provide a little bit more details as to whether these double-digit discount is across the board or are there a couple of specific products that are dragging or influencing these big discounts?

Carlos, your two questions about working capital, I will give the floor to Scardoelli to give you further information about that.

Hey, you're asking us whether in the second quarter, there is any projection in terms of increased consumption of working capital because of the shutdown in Ouro Branco. We are currently forming our inventory of about 350,000 tonnes especially of plate so that we can cope with market demand during the shutdown. Most part of that inventory is being generated through our own production. We are buying 15% of that inventory in the domestic market. So that inventory that is produced in-house, we already have a lot of things in stock. So the bulk of cash consumption will be in the second quarter because of the shutdown of Ouro Branco. And could you repeat the question?

About the second part of Carlos' question, he referred to a premium in the Brazilian market and whether there was any split of products.

In fact, yes, there is. We see a plant close to 0 when it comes to the production of longs. This has been positive some time ago. And in the case of flats, it's negative. Negative between minus 8 or 10%. So, in fact, when we said minus 10, it's 0 for longs, and there was a 10% discount for the flat line.

Our next question in English from Petr Grishchenko.

I guess, just speaking on North America given it's been a sweet spot in the quarter, can you maybe talk a little bit more about your realized price dynamics? I listened to the conference calls of your competitors and they cited slightly different dynamics, basically steel prices coming off hard and pulling spreads lower, given scrap did not decrease as significantly. So I'm just wondering what do you think is the difference and also, I'm wondering how far of a lag we should expect for the second quarter?

Petr's question was about the spread dynamics in the U.S. market. Some other players are referring to a higher price decline in terms of scrap prices. In our market, what we are seeing right now are declines in prices and scrap prices because of the metal spread. Metal spread is still very strong. It's close to $500 per short tonne. And some months ago, it was slightly higher than that, but it's still very robust and very strong, that's what we're saying. And the expectation looking forward is to increase those levels in a short run.

Our next question in English is from [indiscernible] Bradesco.

Could we just have an update on your plan to reduce gross debt to BRL12 billion, just what the timing is and if that's going to be funded just with cash flow generation or do you think more asset sales could be in the pipeline? And then just related to that, what part of the capital structure do you think you'll target for the debt reduction? Should we expect working capital financing lines to come down, maybe not be rolled or do you think you'd look at some of the bond maturities and possibly liability management?

His question has to do with our financial policy and that figure of BRL12 billion what would be the timing for us to remain at that level. And to arrive at that level, what time of financial instruments we would use, whether we would look at issuance of bonus or other credit lines, et cetera.

We don't have a fixed period of time to reach that. But if I can give you an idea on how to calculate that, all of our generation of free cash flow is geared towards payment of debt. And historically, we've been generating something around $500 million, $600 million a year. That difference from BRL15 billion to BRL12 billion. So you can run an approximate calculation depending on your -- our expectation to generate free cash flow and when we get there. So this is our -- these are the assumptions, but I would say mid- to long-term. So when are we going to reduce our debt? 60% to 70% of our debt is still based on issuance of bonds in the international market. So possibly, at some point in the future, we may work again with debt management or the replacement of syndicated debt or debt with the banking market. But there will be a reduction further on.

Our next question from Milton Sullyvan from XP Asset Management.

My first question is about export volumes in Brazil. We -- when I breakdown that volume between flats and longs, longs volume was relatively strong even similar to the volumes we had in the beginning of 2018 when prices were more robust. So what is the level that should be expected looking forward? And at the same time, we saw more stability due to a drop in the volume of exports of flats. Is that due to the inventory formation of Ouro Branco, and so what should we expect looking forward and what do you intend to have as total volume of exports for the year? And going back to working capital, and I do apologize for revisiting that topic once again, I do understand the issue of seasonality. But if I look at the number of days looking year-on-year, we still notice that the main impact of bringing working capital in the quarter was both in the receivables line and even in the supplier's line, there was also an impact. So could you tell me what was behind that? And given the fact that you do not intend to bring cash and working capital this year, I would just like to get a better understanding of what is behind it.

In terms of your first question, in fact the share of longs in exports increased because we are exporting less to have inventory in Ouro Branco. The second quarter position should be similar to that of the first and the second quarter we will have the shutdown of Ouro Branco. And then after that, we should resume normal levels when it comes to exports and that would be -- I can tell you more towards the fourth quarter. Now in relation to working capital, you're right. We call the attention to accounts receivable because it was the most important factor, but there was also a reduction in the suppliers line if we compare this quarter to the end of the last year. And we had a level of activities in December that was recovered in March. This is one aspect. Another aspect refers to the suppliers and inventory. We make an adjustment. So sometimes the effect is a bit lower. The number in a way is the same in total is about BRL1.2 billion. There is also some exchange variation, but we make adjustments for foreign exchange. So from 670, that number goes to 920. So the level is about the same, but the vendor effect goes from 170 to 110. So the bulk of that related to accounts receivable. But in terms of cash environment, we want to maintain our inventory position and we continue to believe that throughout the year, we will be able to resume our normal levels of the cash conversion cycle to 75 days. We could even go below 70 days, this is feasible. But because of the inventory formation of Ouro Branco, we want to leave that prediction for the forecast for later on. But for the year, working capital shouldn't be a very significant item in our cash position.

We now conclude the Q&A session. I would like to turn the floor back to Mr. Gustavo Werneck for his final remarks.

I would like to thank you very much for joining us. It's always a pleasure to talk to you. Also I would like to invite you all to join us again in our next quarterly results related to the second quarter 2019 that will take place on August 7. Thank you very much, and have a very good day.

Gerdau's conference call is now concluded. Thank you very much for participating, and have a very good afternoon.