Welcome to the Geospace Technologies Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Hosting the call today from Geospace is Mr. Rich Kelley, President and Chief Executive Officer. He is joined by Mr. Robert Curda, the company's Chief Financial Officer. Today's call is being recorded and will be available on the Geospace Technologies Investor Relations website following the call. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to Rich Kelley. Sir, you may begin.

Good morning, and welcome to Geospace Technologies conference call for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025. I am Rich Kelley, the company's Chief Executive Officer and President. I'm joined by Robert Curda, the company's Chief Financial Officer. In our prepared remarks, I will first provide an overview of the fourth quarter, and Robert will then follow up with more in-depth commentary on our financial performance as well as an overview of our financials. I will then give some final comments before opening the line for questions. Today's commentary on markets, revenue, planned operations and capital expenditures may be considered forward-looking as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on what we know now, but actual outcomes are affected by uncertainties beyond our control or prediction. Both known and unknown risks can lead to results that differ from what is said or implied today. Some of these risks and uncertainties are discussed in our SEC Form 10-K and 10-Q filings. For convenience, we will link a recording of this call on the Investor Relations page of our geospace.com website, which I invite everyone to browse through and learn more about Geospace, our subsidiaries and our products. Note that today's recorded information is time-sensitive, and may not be accurate at the time one listens to the replay. Yesterday, after the market closed, we released our financial results for the period ended September 30, our fourth quarter of fiscal year 2025. For the 3 months ended September 30, 2025, we reported revenue of $30.7 million with a net loss of $9.1 million. For the full 12 months of our fiscal year, we had $110.8 million in revenue, with a net loss of $9.7 million. The mixed fiscal year performance across the market segments continues to…

Thanks, Rich, and good morning. Before I begin, I'd like to remind everyone that we will not provide any specific revenue or earnings guidance during our call this morning. In yesterday's press release for our fourth quarter ended September 30, 2025, we reported revenue of $30.7 million compared to last year's revenue of $35.4 million. The net loss for the quarter was $9.1 million, or $0.71 per diluted share, compared to last year's net loss of $12.9 million, or $1 per diluted share. For the 12 months ended September 30, 2025, we reported revenue of $110.8 million compared to revenue of $135.6 million last year. Our net loss for the 12-month period was $9.7 million, or $0.76 per diluted share, compared to last year's net loss of $6.6 million or $0.50 per diluted share. Revenue for our Smart Water Segment totaled $8.5 million for the 3 months ended September 30, 2025. This compares to $11.9 million in revenue for the same period a year ago, a decrease of 28%. For the fiscal year, revenue for this segment totaled $35.8 million versus $32.4 million for the same prior year period for an increase of 10%. The decrease in revenue for the 3 months period is due to decreased demand for our Hydroconn universal AMI connectors. Typically, we expect a slight seasonal drop in demand for these products during the fall and winter months. The 12-month increase in revenue is due to the increased demand for our Hydroconn connectors. Fiscal year 2025 marks the fourth annual year with double-digit percentage revenue growth from these connectors. For the 3-month period ended September 30, 2025, revenue from our Energy Solutions segment totaled $15.7 million for a decrease of 11% when compared to $17.6 million from the same prior year period. Revenue from the 12-month…

Thank you, Robert. The ongoing trade disputes and related tariffs have impacted our material costs. We are working to mitigate the impact to our customers, but our product costs were higher in Q4, and we anticipate similar impacts in fiscal year 2026. The government shutdown resulted in delays related to our projects for the U.S. Navy as well as potential opportunities with the Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection. Now that Congress has passed the continuing resolution, we are working with our partners to better understand the new time lines for the relevant projects. This concludes our prepared commentary, and I'll now turn the call back to the moderator for any questions from our listeners.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Bill Dezellem with Tieton Capital.

You had mentioned the gross margin or cost of goods under pressure, specifically tied to tariffs. So Energy solutions segment was the one that had the greatest pressure and most noteworthy. Would you talk in more detail about that phenomenon given that you had higher revenues and lower profitability in that segment?

Bill, yes, specific to Energy Solutions, there was actually another weighing factor on that, which is the ongoing price pressure and commoditization of the -- in the land market. And so we did have a nice sale and revenue recognition on our Pioneer sales, but the margin results on that were lower. We also had higher-than-expected manufacturing costs because these were the first units that were built. We've since resolved some of those, and we expect better margins going forward. With regards to the tariff impact overall, we try to build and source as much from the U.S. as we can. However, there are certain components that we have to source overseas. Our procurement team and supply chain team have been working to try to mitigate that as much as possible. We've also been closely following the developments in the ongoing trade disputes. And we're hoping that some of that gets resolved now that it seems that there's a number of agreements in place now.

So walk us through how much of the impact, the margin impact this quarter was transitionary here this quarter versus what you would expect to last longer, if you would, please?

I don't really have a good feel for the -- if you're looking for percentages, Bill, I haven't taken as deep a dive as I need to on that. We are monitoring it. The procurement team, like I said, is trying to do their best to resolve some of that. The other thing, too, is I want to make a comment. We've talked about this in the past, which is the ongoing capacity and underutilization of the manufacturing. Okay. Anything else, Bill?

Yes. Did you have something more you wanted to add to that?

No, I was just looking at another note I had. I think we're okay.

So then the way to think about this is that you had inefficiencies with manufacturing of Pioneer given that it was your first order. And there is some commodity pricing, that probably sticks around, but your manufacturing inefficiencies, those will improve and tariffs, you're still trying to get your head wrapped around what the longer-term implications are of those.

That's a pretty good summary, Bill. Yes. I would say that now that we've built our first several runs of Pioneer, our manufacturing costs are much more in line with what we expected. So we do expect improved margins on that. Some of the tariffs have resolved since we bought those early -- because for those particular orders, we bought those components earlier in the year when the tariffs were actually higher, and we've mitigated some of that as well. So we do expect improved margins on that product line going forward.

So then in your opening remarks, you referenced that you had expected ongoing margin pressure. My initial read on interpreting those comments would have been that this level of gross margin for the Energy Solutions would continue, particularly with the PRM contract, but that is not at all what you're trying to communicate. It sounds like that you have mitigated a lot of those impacts and the margin will maybe be a bit less than historical, but much closer to normal margins than what you had this quarter.

I would parse that just slightly different. I would say that on PRM because there's not the same pricing pressure on that product line as we see on the land nodes and even on the ocean bottom nodes that we expect better margin performance on the PRM project going forward. So I think that will help balance out some of the lower margin performance on these other products.

Great. Have I taken up my time or may I ask a couple of additional questions?

You could ask one more question, Bill, how about that?

That's fair. So the government has a couple of different initiatives where they are looking at you all, I believe, the Customs Border Patrol, the military. Update us what you are seeing, hearing and thinking that there may be for a decision matrix with the government activities, please?

So I'll speak to the tunnel detection on Customs and Border Protection to start with. That has been very quiet from CBP since even before the government shutdown. We anticipate probably some feedback early next year. I don't anticipate with them just not coming back online and trying to understand where they're at with their projects and with the holidays coming up, I don't anticipate really hearing much more until the quarter after next, basically our Q2, Q1 calendar year. Specific to the Navy, we did continue to have informal conversations. We know that, that project is going to be delayed until probably our Q3 before we see any kind of movement on that, maybe even closer to Q4, so middle of the summer next year. Both projects are -- as far as we know are still anticipated, it's really a question of where on the time line it's going to be.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our next question from Sheldon Grodsky with Grodsky Associates.

Early this year, you announced 2 large projects, the Brazilian project and another sale of nodes. Have any of these been shipped yet? Or are you still waiting for these to be shipped?

Sheldon, I appreciate the question. So on the Permanent Reservoir Monitoring project for Petrobras, that is a long-term project for us. We have actually not shipped any of that. We will make our first shipment -- our planned first shipments on that probably the early to middle of next year. So let's say, spring/summer time will be some of the anticipated first revenue recognition on that. And then that revenue recognition will go into fiscal year 2027 for us. That project is expected to last between 12 and 18 months. with regards to the large contract we sold to Dawson Geophysical for -- I'm sorry.

I think he's talking about Mariner contract.

Yes. On the Mariner contract -- I'm sorry, let me defer it to Robert.

Yes. So earlier this year, we announced the Mariner contract. We have not shipped that contract yet. It's been deferred by our customer due to delays from their customer.

I do want to speak to the Pioneer sale that we had. That was a large channel count and those shipments were broken into smaller shipments between this quarter and next quarter. So we have shipped some of those units this year. We anticipate a majority of revenue recognition in Q1 with some of the revenue in Q2.

Thank you. And at this time, there are no further questions in queue. I'd like to now turn the meeting back to our presenters for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you, Stephanie, and thanks to all of you who joined our call today. We look forward to speaking with you again on our conference call for the first quarter of fiscal year 2026. Goodbye, and happy holidays.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This does conclude today's presentation. You may now disconnect.