Welcome to the Geospace Technologies Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2024 Earnings Conference Call. Hosting the call today from Geospace is Mr. Rich Kelley, President and Chief Executive Officer. He is joined by Mr. Robert Curda, the Company's Chief Financial Officer. Today's call is being recorded and will be available on the Geospace Technologies Investor Relations website following this call. At this time, all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode and the floor will be open for your questions following the presentation. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to Rich Kelley. Sir, you may begin.

Good morning, and welcome to Geospace Technologies Conference Call for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2024. I am Rich Kelley, the Company's President and Chief Executive Officer, and I'm joined by Robert Curda, the Company's Chief Financial Officer. In our prepared remarks, I will first provide an overview of the fourth quarter, and Robert will then follow up with more in-depth commentary on our financial performance. I will then give some final comments before opening the line for questions. Today's commentary on markets, revenue, planned operations, and capital expenditures may be considered forward-looking as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on what we know now, but actual outcomes are affected by uncertainties beyond our control or prediction. Both known and unknown risks can lead to results that differ from what is said or implied today. Some of these risks and uncertainties are discussed in our SEC Form 10-K and 10-Q filings. For convenience, we will link a recording of this call on the Investor Relations page of our geospace.com website, which I invite everyone to browse through and learn more about Geospace, our subsidiaries, and our products and solutions. Note that today's recorded information is time-sensitive and may not be accurate at the time that one listens to the replay. Yesterday, after the market closed, we released our financial results for the fourth quarter and full-year fiscal year 2024, which ended September 30, 2024. We closed the year with $135.6 million in revenue. This represents the greatest revenue figure in 10 years. However, due to non-cash charges in the fourth quarter totaling $17.3 million, the year ended with a net loss of $6.5 million. These one-time charges are primarily associated with the divestiture of our Russian entity, but excluding these non-cash…

Thanks, Rich, and good morning. Before I begin, I'd like to remind everyone that we will not provide any specific revenue or earnings call -- earnings guidance during our call. In yesterday's press release for our fourth quarter ended September 30, 2024, we reported revenue of $35.4 million compared to last year's revenue of $29.3 million. The net loss for the quarter was $12.9 million or $1 per diluted share compared to last year's net income of $4.4 million or $0.33 per diluted share. For the 12 months ended September 30, 2024, we reported revenue of $135.6 million compared to revenue of $124.5 million last year. Our net loss for the 12-month period was $6.6 million or $0.50 per diluted share compared to last year's net income of $12.2 million or $0.92 per diluted share. In the fourth quarter ended September 30, 2024, we recorded non-cash charges totaling $17.3 million. To add additional detail to Rich's prior comments on this subject, $14.5 million was from the divestiture of our Russian legal entity, while another was a $2.8 million charge from the impairment of tangible assets from our Quantum Technology Sciences subsidiary. It's important to note that the divestiture of the Russian legal entity has virtually no effect on the Company's net assets as most of the charge came from cumulative unrealized foreign currency translation losses previously recorded within shareholders' equity. The oil and gas segment produced revenue of $17.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024. This compares with revenue of $17.8 million for the same period of the prior fiscal year. For the 12-month period, the segment contributed revenue of $77.5 million versus $74 million for the same prior year period. The 12-month increase in revenue is due to increased sales of ocean-bottom nodal products such as…

Thank you, Robert. As we announced in September, this will be the last time we will be reporting earnings with these business segments of oil and gas markets, adjacent markets and emerging markets. Beginning with our release in early February, we will provide financial information using our three new business segments, Smart Water, Energy Solutions and Intelligent Industrial. Other highlights of note this year included our company's addition to the Russell Stock Indexes, the Russell 2000, Russell 3000, and Russell Microcap Index. In a final note, we would like to thank Rick Wheeler, our outgoing CEO. Rick dedicated almost 30 years to Geospace. He led the company through successful and tumultuous times in the industry. His guidance and foresight provided stability and opportunities for growth through diversification. His management and leadership allowed Geospace to remain a strong presence in the seismic equipment market, while taking advantage of their engineering and manufacturing capabilities to explore new opportunities in adjacent markets. Rick will remain as a member of the Board of Directors, and we wish him all the best in his retirement. This concludes our prepared commentary, and I will now turn the call-back to the moderator for any questions for our listeners. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from [Martin Lorenzen] with Private Investor.

Hello, Texas.

Hello, Martin.

I'll start with what should be the primary focus of every public company, which is capital allocation. Given your strong balance sheet, what's your timeframe to increase the buyback program?

At this time, we don't have any intention in the short term of doing any more stock buybacks.

Got it. And on the Energy segment, several public companies note an uptick in exploration, particularly land exploration now. I guess that has to do with administrative changes that are about to be done. And when do you expect to capitalize on that? I know you had a product launch, but no sales yet.

Yes, I would say that while there may be excitement in the industry, we've not actually seen that translated into actual orders for equipment or rental contracts for equipment. We're well-positioned for that with the launch of our Pioneer product, which is now in manufacturing and with our OBN products with Mariner and Mariner Deep. So we're well-suited and we'll welcome any orders that come in the door. But as it stands right now, we are not seeing the excitement translating into orders for our equipment or services.

Got it. And now that the Russian segment is gone, what's the cost-savings associated with that?

The Russian entity was pretty much self-sustaining. They generated enough cash flow to support themselves. In the end, the cost from them was very insignificant to us as a whole.

And on the OBX rental fleet, could you update us on how many nodes you currently own?

We don't normally give that information.

And would it be fair to say that you're currently utilized your fleet at around 40%?

We also don't provide that information. Sorry, Martin.

And on the carbon capture, that sector seems to be already industrially scaled. I think the U.S. Department of Energy just approved a $2.4 billion commitment to apply CCUS to an Indiana coal mine. And I think just recently just yesterday BP greenlighted the $7 billion Indonesian greenfield gas project that also includes carbon capture and storage. Do you expect to be involved there given your ongoing relationship with BP?

I mean, we've had ongoing conversations with several different contractors, several different entities. But as it stands right now, we don't have anything specific to report or comment on.

And is the margin profile within the carbon capture and storage application comparable to the reservoir monitoring business?

It's hard to say. I mean, there's not enough historical business there to say if that's really -- if you can really do a comparison between the two?

And on anything water-related, could you give us a rough sense of how many customers you currently serve?

On the Hydroconn water meter connector, we have within our customer base, the majority of the major water meter manufacturer OEMs that we do business with. And on the Aquana side, as you know, that product just launched this year, but we are in communications with a number of the suppliers in that industry or customers in the industry, I should just say.

Okay. And on the expense side, anything tangible you're working on currently?

Nothing of note.

Thanks and good luck.

Thank you, Martin.

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We'll take our next question from Jeffrey Feldman with Primary Succession Capital. Your line is open.

Hi, gentlemen, and thanks for taking the call -- the questions. Yes, I see a reasonably good outcome in the quarter, so good luck with that and looking-forward to the future here. My question was really simple, how to do with the changes with the Russian -- the Russian facility, let's say? And I wondered why the last few years you hadn't taken that action sooner? I was interested on the operating impact. Do you have any capability issues or anything there that you'd want to share given that you don't have access to that resource any longer?

Yes. Sure, Jeffrey. I'll start with why the action wasn't taken sooner. The reality is that we were still able to operate in Russia for the last several years even with the sanctions. But what's happened recently is several of the large Russian oil seismic contractors ended up on the sanctioned list, which means that we would not -- our Russian entity would not have been able to do business with them, but the Russian government could have forced our hand and then we would have been in violation of the U.S. sanctions. So it was a difficult decision, but one more politically driven than anything else. And so we decided it was the best thing to do is just to divest ourselves of the entity. From an operation standpoint, we had already been working, knowing that potential could happen in standing up a manufacturing facility in Malaysia with a third-party contractor as well as improving our operations here in Houston. So I think we're well-suited to continue to meet the needs of the market for our equipment even with that change in ownership. That's not to say that we cannot still have some sort of relationship through a third party going forward.

Okay. So just to clarify, there's minimal operational impact from that change?

Very minimal impact.

Excellent. That's great. Thank you.

You're welcome, Jeffrey. Thank you.

Thank you. We'll take our next question from Scott Bundy with Moors & Cabot. Your line is open.

Good morning, guys. Just a question regarding the Russian subsidiary. We had cash over there. Is that cash retrievable or is it lost?

We've retrieved some of that cash, but we're not going to be able to get all of it.

So Robert with the 17 acres for sale next to the plant, what's the status of that?

We're still working through that contract with the buyer, but we expect we'll see that to the end.

The expected impact is early next year, Scott.

So first quarter of next -- first calendar quarter, correct?

Yes, sir.

Yes, somewhere in that timeframe.

And there are -- on your report here, you've got assets for sale, something in the vicinity of about $1.8 million. What is that?

It's a facility we have in Colombia.

That we -- that's been for sale for some time, correct?

Yes, it was on -- it was for sale in the past and then we leased it out to someone who could use the warehouse and now we've decided to put it up for sale again.

And are we reasonably optimistic of a sale within six months?

We're just beginning the process. I don't see why that's going to be a problem, but this is early in that search for a buyer.

We're still waiting on our broker to give us an opinion, what's going to happen with the Colombian market.

Okay. And so, Rich, just seasonality associated with the water business, the run rate in the fourth quarter was really good. Aquana, are you willing to tell us how much revenues Aquana or some percentage of revenues that Aquana contributed?

I mean, as you know, Scott, we don't provide that kind of guidance. So unfortunately, I won't be able to share that. But as far as seasonality in the -- in general for the Hydroconn water meter connector, we do see a slight slowdown in the calendar fourth quarter and we are seeing that. But we still expect to have -- and we do have strong backlog in that for calendar year 2025. So we expect them to be on track for another strong year in the water space.

And finally, Robert, I assume because you didn't put anything in the release that there were zero shares bought back in the current quarter?

That's correct.

Okay. Thanks, guys.

Thank you, Scott.

Thank you. And it appears that we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the program back over to our presenters for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you, Shelby, and thanks to all of you who joined our call today. We look forward to speaking to you again on our conference call for the first quarter of fiscal year 2025 in February. Goodbye and have a good day.

That concludes today's teleconference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.