Welcome to the 2016 First Quarter Conference Call for Genesis Energy. Genesis has five business segments. The Offshore Pipeline Transportation Division is engaged in providing the critical infrastructure to move oil produced from the long-lived, world-class reservoirs from the deepwater Gulf of Mexico to onshore refining centers. The Onshore Pipeline Transportation Division is principally engaged in the pipeline transportation of crude oil. The Refinery Services Division primarily processes sour gas streams to remove sulfur at refining operations. The Marine Transportation Division is engaged in the maritime transportation of primarily refined petroleum products. The Supply and Logistics Division is engaged in the transportation, handling, blending, storage and supply of energy products, including crude oil and refined products. Genesis' operations are primarily located in Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Wyoming and the Gulf of Mexico. During this conference call, management may be making forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The law provides safe harbor protection to encourage companies to provide forward-looking information. Genesis intends to avail itself of those safe harbor provisions and directs you to its most recently filed and future filings with the Securities Exchange Commission. We also encourage you to visit our website at genesisenergy.com where a copy of the press release we issued today is located. The press release also presents a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures. At this time, I would like to introduce Grant Sims, CEO of Genesis Energy, L.P. Mr. Sims will be joined by Bob Deere, Chief Financial Officer, and Karen Pape, Chief Accounting Officer.

Good morning and welcome to everyone. This morning, we reported Available Cash before Reserves of $97.8 million, providing 1.32 times coverage of the total distribution we will pay on May 13. That distribution of $67.25 cents per unit represents the 43rd consecutive increase in our quarterly distribution, 38 of which have been greater than 10% over the prior year's quarter and none of which has been less than 8.7%. As we stated in the earnings release, our diversified, and yet increasingly integrated, businesses continue to perform well in spite of the ongoing tumultuous energy environment. Even with a $3.3 million non-recurring charge reflecting certain cost initiatives, as well as previously discussed specific challenges, like significant turnarounds for some of our refinery customers and utilization and rate pressures on certain of our marine assets, we maintained a coverage ratio of 1.32 times of our increased distribution. Even in this environment, we would expect to see sequentially growing volumes in future quarters from the end of offshore turnarounds and continuing development drilling in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. We would also expect to see growing volumes from the initiation of service on some of our organic projects and the end of certain refinery turnarounds, in the third quarter and beyond. Additionally, we are seeing indications that the more recent rate and utilization challenges on our blue water, offshore marine assets have or are in the process of bottoming. As a result, we feel very comfortable about the continuing growth in our financial results in future periods. Last week we announced an expansion of our credit facility, adding additional committed liquidity of $200 million. We appreciate the support of our existing banks and the participation of two brand new banks, all of whom combined to commit more of their knowledgeable money to the…

Thank you, Grant In the first quarter of 2016, we generated total Available Cash before Reserves of $97.8 million, representing an increase of $33.8 million, or 53%, over the first quarter of 2015. Adjusted EBITDA increased $51.4 million over the prior year quarter to $133.8 million, representing 62% year over year growth. Net income attributable to Genesis for the quarter was $35.3 million, or $0.32 per unit, compared to $20.2 million, or $0.21 per unit, for the same period in 2015. Segment Margin from our Offshore Pipeline transportation segment increased $53.4 million, or 212%, between the first quarter periods. This increase is primarily due to our Enterprise acquisition, which closed in July 2015, in which we obtained approximately 2,350 miles of additional offshore natural gas and crude oil pipelines and six offshore hub platforms. Additionally, a portion of the increase in our Segment Margin is attributable to the SEKCO pipeline throughput exceeding its shippers' minimum volume commitments during the entirety of the 2016 quarter. Also, as a result of our Enterprise acquisition, our ownership interest in the SEKCO pipeline increased from 50% to 100%. Our SEKCO pipeline is connected to our Poseidon pipeline, so increases in throughput on our SEKCO pipeline also increase throughput on our Poseidon pipeline. Onshore Pipeline transportation segment margin increased $1.4 million, or 9%, between the first quarter periods. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in the volumes and tariff revenues mainly on our Louisiana and Wyoming pipeline systems. These increases were partially offset by decreases in volumes and revenues on our other offshore pipeline systems and a decrease in revenues generated from loss allowance volumes. Refinery services segment margin increased $2 million, or 11%, between the first quarter periods. That increase primarily resulted from our ability to realize benefits from our favorable…

Thanks Bob. As discussed, our businesses are performing well, and we would expect them to continue to do so in spite of challenges or headwinds that always seem to pop up. We expect to see volumes ramping up in the remainder of 2016 and beyond as turnarounds on certain of our offshore assets and refineries for whom work to wrapping up, along with some of our organic growth projects finalizing construction to begin operations. We expect to continue to be well-served by our business strategies, including being primarily refinery centric, after all the only consumer of crude oil is a refinery, and supporting long-lived, world-class oil developments of integrated and large independent energy companies, that have been around for decades and gone through and survived many commodity cycles. As always, we would like to recognize the efforts and commitment of all of those with whom we are fortunate enough to work, including their commitments to providing safe, responsible and reliable services. With that, I’ll turn it back to the moderator for any questions.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of John Edwards with Credit Suisse. Your line is open.

Yes, good morning everybody and congrats on a nice quarter in spite of the difficult conditions. Bob, maybe you could just help us out with the effect of the distribution from your equity method investees. I realize it's a detailed item but it was a little bit lower than what we are expecting. Are there just some timing issues there?

John, I'm not sure what your expectations were built on but I suspect that it has to do with the changing and composition. As we acquired additional interest in some of our joint ventures, they now have become consolidated entities.

At this point, Poseidon and Odyssey are the only two joint ventures that are accounted for on equity basis. CHOPS as well as SEKCO are now consolidated entities, John, so there is less of, in essence, a tie back of backing out equity and earnings and replacing with distributions out of the joint ventures.

We can follow up on that but I'm confident that that's through to the issue there.

Yes, that makes sense. I appreciate that clarification there. And then maybe - I know in past quarters you've talked a little bit about what’s been going on - on the rail terminal front. I think at Walnut Hill you indicated that maybe you are expecting volumes to be a little bit like, given the conditions that we are in, and then the offset was going to be - some of these volumes that you are getting from - I've seen station ramp up and some of the other new projects ramp up. So may be if you could talk about those would be helpful.

I mean, we’ve been talking about it for probably 12 months now but with significant collapse in differentials some of our smaller facilities like Wink and Walnut Hill are seeing almost zero activity at this point and again that's part of what - as we've described some of the plus or minus $15 million of quarterly EBITDA that was in our numbers when times were different, they are not there now. So virtually almost all the real barrels and real activity now are still in the Louisiana corridor, Mississippi port, Natchez and Scenic at this point.

Okay. And then you had mentioned also there was some - in the past there were some lease gathering volumes that were being an effect taken by competitors that found themselves in challenged positions. Any update as far as how those volumes are coming out?

That's continuing and as you can see on a sequential quarterly basis relative to the fourth quarter total crude oil and petroleum products gathered this quarter was about 70,000 barrels a day versus barrels 80,000 barrels a day, or 81,000 in prior quarter. So we're continuing to see the effects of - but our perspective would be irrational, but it's not irrational given the fixed cost or MVCs or take-or-pay commitments that other people have on other things, but we don't have the same downstream either liability or asset. So we're not going to play that game.

Okay. Are you expecting that - if you seen a change there, or other things about the same, getting worse from your perspective, better from your perspective.

It's not getting significantly worse but we're still seeing it. And so it's still reflective of the - again targeting go back this - the challenge is that we had segment, margin contribution in previous periods is not there anymore because of the current market conditions.

Okay, and then just lastly, if you can just update us on the kind of the expected ramp-up now on your new projects?

I think that for a variety of reasons primarily some weather related delays and stuff or really significant turnaround especially over in the Louisiana at the anchor customer refinery facility in Baton Rouge that we were looking for ramps starting in the third quarter and accelerating into 2017. So we're running a little bit behind in terms of starting to see the contribution for that.

Okay. All right, great, thanks. That's it for me.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line Gabe Moreen with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning, everyone. Grant, I want to ask question on your - lying around the ATM and the Shell, and seeing opportunities around M&A, and in other projects. Are you seeing more or just single projects, is this corporate M&A, is this joint ventures, is this from producers. I'm just wondering if you can give some more color since the language seems a little bit different from prior.

Gabe I don't know there is anything specifically identified I think that - we had actually filed the S3 as I said and it’s been reviewed and approved by the SEC probably a year and a half ago but because of the kind of conventional market at equity deal that we did to manage a capital structure and I think it was April, May of 2015. And then obviously the enterprise, acquisition and the conventional issuance of equity associated with that in July of 2015. We had not actually put it in place, and we just think that is - it’s a prudent tool in our capital market square were to have in place. We have as I said in the prepared remarks, we have no identified use whatsoever for it, we're de-levering naturally because of our excess coverage but have the ability to go ahead and activate it. And on an opportunistic basis, we can quote unquote quicken the equity account with conventional equity and that kind of hybrid securities with a lot of other people forced to go to.

And then, but I mean, following up on that, why not use the ATM at least somewhat given I guess some of the recovery in your unit price in the market to delever maybe accelerate that process, would be adverse to that if your unit prices started recovering even more than it has already.

I'm sure nobody – we’re probably not thrilled with where our current unit price is even though it has recovered substantially of the bottom. But given that we are still in a - what is it plus or minus 8% yield current paid basis, it's not a really rational from our perspective to issue equity to pay down L+275 debt when L is basically close to zero. So, we have no concerns because of our coverage and because of the growth and stability and if things get better it gets really good as I said on the call last quarter, instead of 1.3, 1.4, we go back to 1.5, 1.6 coverage we could delever even quicker while still be unable to grow the distribution. So, it doesn’t concern us given the resiliency in our businesses and a bad environment and a growth that we can have a clear path of growth that we are going to delever overtime with excess cash use to pay down the debt.

Got it. And then I don't know if John asked this question around the offshore marine assets. So from your perspective is 2Q sort of a bottom here in terms of that segment?

What it's feeling like, there is other people involved in this business that have reported it already and I think it generally consistent with their commentary around the coastwise market or the ocean-going barge market that it seems to if - is trying to bottom out, so to speak.

We have no further questions at this time. I'll turn the call back over to our presenters for any closing remarks.

Okay. Well, thanks everybody for participating this morning. And we will talk to you in other three months or so if not sooner. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.