Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the First Quarter 2015 Lakes Entertainment Incorporated Earnings Conference Call. My name is Chrystal and I will be the operator for today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the call over to your host for today, Mr. Tim Cope, President and Chief Financial Officer. Please proceed.

Thank you, Chrystal. Good afternoon and welcome to Lakes Entertainment’s First Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call. On the call with me today is Lyle Berman, Lakes’ Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. As we begin our prepared remarks, I would like to remind everyone that this call is being recorded and that the call contains forward-looking statements, including statements concerning business strategies and their intended results, statements related to the pending merger with Sartini Gaming, Inc., and other statements concerning anticipated future events. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those factors described in the press release we issued this morning and in our filings with the SEC and actual results may differ materially. Lyle will begin our discussion today with a general overview and update on our casino projects. I will then discuss the first quarter financial results and recent business events and then we’ll conduct a question-and-answer session. Now I will turn the call over to Lyle Berman.

Thank you, Tim, and welcome, everyone, to Lakes’ first quarter 2015 earnings call. During January of 2015, we announced that we had entered into a merger agreement with Sartini Gaming, which owns and operates Golden Gaming, a leading owner and operator of distributed gaming, taverns and casinos all of which are focused on the Nevada local gaming market. At the time of the merger agreement, it was executed under the terms of the merger agreement, Lakes’ current shareholders on a fully diluted basis were estimated to retain approximately 64.3% of the total post-merger shares of Lakes’ common stock, with the legacy Golden Gaming shareholder been issued approximately 35.7% of the total fully diluted post-merger shares of Lakes’ common stock. These percentages are subject to adjustment for actual results at the time the merger closes, which is expected to occur later this year. This deal values Lakes at approximately $0.957 per share. Together the combined company will operate approximately 9,250 slot machines and video lottery terminals in Nevada and Maryland across 4 casino properties, 48 taverns and over 600 route locations. Lakes and Golden Gaming estimate that on a combined pro forma basis, 2015 annual net revenues and adjusted EBITDA will be approximately $348 million and $42.5 million respectively, including $3 million of anticipated cost synergies. Additionally, it is estimated that the combined pro forma 2015 operating free cash flow and adjusted net income will be $33.7 million and $13.3 million respectively, including a full year of the anticipated benefits of refinancing the company’s indebtedness. Although previously written off our books, Lakes has a $60 million note receivable from the Jamul Indian Village. Penn National Gaming, the developer of a gaming facility on the Jamul Tribe’s Land, has announced that construction of the gaming facility is scheduled to be completed in…

Thank you, Lyle. Lakes Entertainment reported first quarter 2015 net revenues of $12.8 million compared to prior year quarter net revenues of $12.3 million. Net revenues were related to the operation of our Rocky Gap Casino Resort. The increase in net revenues was primarily related to an increase in gaming revenues during the first quarter of 2015 compared to the first quarter of 2014. Net losses for the first quarter of 2015 were approximately $1.7 million, compared to net losses of approximately $1.8 million for the first quarter of 2014. Losses from operations were $1.3 million for the first quarter of 2015, compared to losses from operations of $1.6 million for the first quarter of 2014. Basic and diluted losses per share were $0.13 for each of the first quarters of 2015 and 2014. During the first quarter of 2015, property operating expenses for Rock Gap was $7.5 million compared to $7.3 million during the first quarter of 2014, and were primarily related to gaming operations, rooms, food and beverage and golf. The increase in property operating expenses resulted primarily from an increase in gaming-related expenses most notably gaming taxes, due to the increase in gaming related revenue in the current year quarter. For the first quarter of 2015, selling, general and administrative expenses were $6.1 million compared to $5.7 million during the first quarter of 2014. Included in these amounts were Lakes corporate selling, general and administrative expenses of $2.4 million and $2 million during the first quarters of 2015 and 2014 respectively. Lakes corporate selling, general and administrative expenses consists primarily of payroll and related expenses and professional fees. First quarter 2015 professional fees included $0.8 million associated with the merger agreement with Golden Gaming. Rocky Gap selling, general and administrative expenses, which consists primarily of payroll and…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from the line of [Steven Cheng from Red Gear Capital] [ph]. Please proceed.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. I apologize if you’ve mentioned this on previous conference calls. But will there be any lockup restrictions on either former shareholders of Golden Entertainment or anyone else once the merger is complete?

This is Lyle answering. The Golden Gaming is completely owned by Blake Sartini, and there are no lockup restrictions on his stock. On my stock, there is essentially a lockup for three years. It has to do with not wanting to violate the 50% rule, so we maintain our NOL status for the three years.

Fabulous. And if I understand that sports betting currently is not allowed in taverns in Las Vegas, if it were to be approved, would that be a dramatic boost to Golden Gaming?

I don’t - I think it would certainly help and certainly it’s profitable. It would be profitable, I don’t think, it’s legal there today except I think there’s terminals in some - there were terminals in some of the bars that could accept bets. I would presume if we did it - we may outsource that that betting, but it’s certainly would be good and would bring people into our units.

Great. And finally, I believe Golden Gaming has mentioned plans to enter into Illinois. Do they need to apply for a license and would they - would this be Greenfield opportunities, or would they need to displace competitors to get placement?

I think what they’ve announced is, they’re looking at the opportunities in Illinois. If they did it, number one, they certainly would have to be go through the licensing process; and number two, there are no more Greenfield opportunities in Illinois, a very few. If they went into an Illinois, it would be through the acquisition of one or more of the current route operators.

Great. Thank you very much. I appreciate that.

Our next question will come from the line of Thomas Pierce from Van Clemens. Please proceed.

Hey, guys, just quick question for you. Now that when this merger is done, you are going to have, I think around $80 million in cash?

Somewhere around $75 million, I think it is, yes.

Okay, $75 million, okay. Now, you talk about doing refinancing for Golden, do you have any idea where the rate could go to from where it is now?

At this point, we certainly anticipate a substantial savings from what it is today. But we - I think we intend to pay down a significant amount of our capital to reduce the leverage, so that we can get the better rate. We’re out there right now. Our Golden Gaming is out with proposals to banks. We believe it will be bank debt, it certainly won’t be high-yield debt, and we think it will be very attractive compared to where we’re at today.

Okay. Well, thank you very much.

There are no more questions. [Operator Instructions] Our next question will come from the line of Greg Nelson [ph]. Please proceed.

Hi. I was just wondering we came out with the merger talks and the agreement we had, you guys had put in a press release saying that the shareholder value of the stock would be $9.57 or nine-point-something. Do you know why it’s not moving any higher per se?

I really don’t - we don’t, of course, have any coverage at this point. We expect to get - once the merger is complete, we think we’re a large enough company. We’re certainly in the micro-cap still but we are small cap company, but I think with the statistics that I just mentioned there, we’re certainly going to get more than one analyst to cover us. And I think once we’re covered people will maybe understand our business and our story a little bit better. I also don’t think that people have factored into the price of the value of Jamul note that we have that is going strictly to our shareholders, not Blake Sartini’s. Other than that, we’ve been had a number of enquiries of people who have been looking to buy large blocks of stock at this point. There we haven’t been able to - they haven’t been able to find any, but it seems like there are people out there acquiring it on a regular basis. I think as the vote for the merger passes on June 17, which I’m sure it will, I think you might start seeing it getting more closer to that number or higher.

Okay, great. Thanks a lot, Lyle.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Adam Joseph, West Main Partners. Please proceed.

Hey, guys. Two questions on the timing, if I could. It seems like the August date is a little closer than maybe you would - if we’re correct in understanding, maybe you had anticipated. Can you offer any potential road blocks that would allow that not to happen, let’s say, it might go out into Q4? Then secondly, on that timing question to finish off the previous caller’s question. As relates to the Golden debt, how do you anticipate, we will understand what that debt looks like in the restructuring from a kind of release timing standpoint? If you could comment on those, I’d appreciate it. Thank you both.

Repeat the first part of the question was?

On the timing aspect, Lyle, it seems like August…

Road blocks, road blocks, basically once the shareholders vote in favor of the merger on June 17, the only road blocks to completing the - or the primary road blocks are the Blake Sartini being licensed in Maryland and myself being licensed in Nevada. It’s our understanding that Nevada, the earliest Nevada will license meet will be their meeting in July - at the end of July. And I believe Maryland, highly probable that Maryland would complete their investigation with Blake prior to that. So those are the two major stumbling blocks. Regarding the - and they’re not stumbling blocks, it’s just the timing issue. So if those things happen the way we think they will and assuming that Nevada and Maryland don’t have any issues that they delay the licensing, then we should be able to complete it by August. One of the terms of the merger agreement, because we think that the refinancing is so instrumental in this merger, is that Lakes has the right to approve it. We expect the refinancing to occur simultaneously with the closing. And at that time, or even prior to that time but probably at that time, we will disclose and we’ll be in a position to disclose the banker - banks that are doing it, and all the terms and conditions of it.

Okay, great. And then has the Gaming Control Board, Lyle, given you said data or maybe put you on the docket per se for that July meeting, has that…

I not - yes, the way it works is now, of course, I have been licensed in the past in Nevada, I think twice, once we stratosphere and once we were distributing gaming things. But it’s my understanding that I’m meeting on June - July 8, with the gaming - I don’t know what’s the gaming…

Control Board?

…the Gaming Commission. And then once they recommend it, then it goes to the Control Board of Vice President, maybe. And so they won’t be recommending need for licensing in the late July meeting until after I’ve had my meeting in July 8. I’m also meeting with investigators here in Minneapolis on June 18 - 19.

Yes, I think it goes enforcement first and…

No, May 19, in the next 10 days.

Okay, great. I appreciate the color. Best of luck moving forward. Thank you.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Michael Melby from Gate City Capital Management. Please proceed.

Good afternoon, gentlemen. Thanks for taking my question. Lyle, you mentioned the Jamul note, and I’m just curious if you maybe, you could give us a little insight, as you think about your strategy and potential timing in monetizing that note? Thanks.

Yes. The note is for $60 million. The terms of the note are, it doesn’t accrue any interest until the casino opens. Once the casino opens, it carries of 4.25% cash pay coupon. But the principal essentially is not doing payable until at the end of seven years. So when you look at that, once the casino opens and, of course, we think very highly that it will be successful. I think it’s basically a financial buyer who is going to buy it. And it’s just really a question of present value of, what is the buyer want anywhere from 10% coupon to a 20% coupon. If you ran the numbers at about a 15% coupon, I think it comes out around $32 million or $33 million.

Got it. And from a strategy standpoint you probably want to wait till the casinos up and running and the full $60 million is doing payable and then values off of that?

Well, yes, it’s doing - remember that’s doing payable for seven years after that. The one thing we don’t thing we want to do, we could possibly sell it before conditioned on opening. We don’t want anybody to take the risk be a time value of money or the risk of the casino open, because they’ll just discount it too much. But we might enter into an agreement prior to that, where it says this - we have a firm agreement if and when the casino opens. So we take away the time value of money goes to us, not to them.

It makes sense. Thank you.

There are no more questions.

Well, I want to thank everyone for listening to our call. We are very excited about this merger. We think it’s a great opportunity for shareholders. And on our next conference call, it will be Blake Sartini talking about Golden Entertainment. Thank you very much. Bye now.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today’s presentation. You may now disconnect. Have a great day.