Great. So, thanks. I just want to start with, as Jon mentioned in his comments, for one-and-three-year periods, and frankly, even if you go look at the -- at a five-year period, our results are in line with or exceed client expectations. So, it's always important to remember what the investors are looking for when they make commitments, what that risk reward profile is. And then, how are we doing relative to that risk reward profile? And we're doing well in that regard. So, while those returns may look a bit lackluster compared to tremendous returns we've seen from the equity markets, they are needing -- actually exceeding the objectives of the client base, which is obviously, incredibly important. And I want to make sure to point that out generally, as we've said before, markets conditions, where there's a lot of volatility where the markets aren't one way, where there's more uncertainty, those tend to be better environments for alternative strategies, better environments for hedge portfolios. We tend to have less volatility in our returns than traditional portfolios do. And so, I think, that that's a decent backdrop for us and for the strategy set. The last thing I just want to remind everybody of is that within absolute return, we have different strategies. We have different offerings and some of our offerings, in particular, our Strategic Investments Group offering has performed quite well in tough markets and has really added value. And so, we are optimistic that we can see some growth in that offering, and you've all noticed that the fees in that that space has stayed stable for some time now. And obviously, this SIG group, the Strategic Investment Group, offering in the ARS space is a higher fee offering. So, we're not moving off our base case assumptions. We're obviously to your point, Ken, working all the time to drive flows and grow assets there through additions and new hires. But we -- we're staying with that base case assumption and we think we generate good growth with the base case assumption.