David Hibbert Watson
Analyst · Ladenburg
Thank you, and good morning, everyone. As one would expect with a quiet quarter on the production front during the 3 months ended June 30, 2014, numbers and ratios remain pretty even at a good level and will remain poised to grow still. There are a few things I want to highlight before getting into the details, and the first one is, we were able to extend the maturity date of our $105 million line of credit approximately 14 months to June 2017 or 3 years out. If it is not renewed or extended by the maturity date, all principal and interest will be due and payable on or before June 2019 or 5 years out. In addition, there are 2 1-year extension options to be agreed upon by all parties which, if exercised, could, in effect, push this facility out 7 years. We were also able to reduce the interest rate from LIBOR plus 3.75% to LIBOR plus 3.25%.
Other highlights include $5.5 million of appreciation on our investments, not having to purchase T-Bills in order to comply with RIC size requirements for the second straight quarter and earning our dividend, as net investment income, or NII, of $0.18 per share equaled our distributions for the quarter.
So regarding our balance sheet position, at the end of the June quarter, we had $338 million in assets, consisting of $322 million in investments at fair value, with a cost basis of $385 million. At our cost basis, 73% of our portfolio assets consist of debt investments of approximately $280 million and 27%, or $105 million, consist of equity securities, which we hope will produce capital gains. As for our liabilities and equities at June 30, 2014, we had $63 million in borrowings outstanding on our renewed 3-year $105 million credit facility, $40 million in term preferred stock, $9 million in other liabilities and $227 million in common stock. Our net asset value per share was $8.57, which is up $0.23 from March 31, 2014.
Moving over to the income statement, for the June quarter end, total investment income was $9.8 million versus $8.8 million in the prior quarter. Total expenses, including credits, were $5 million versus $4.2 million in the prior quarter, leaving net investment income, which is before appreciation, depreciation, gains or losses, up $4.9 million versus $4.6 million for the prior quarter, an increase of 4.6%.
Regarding our revenue, the increase in our investment income was due to an increase of $0.4 million in interest income, which is from holding a larger portfolio on a weighted average basis over the entire quarter and an increase of $0.6 million over the prior quarter to a total of $1.4 million in other income, which primarily resulted from $1.3 million in dividend income from Mathey Investments, Inc. Over the last 2 quarters, other income has accounted for 14.6% and 9.4% respectively, of our total investment income.
Our net expenses increased quarter-over-quarter, primarily due to a $0.3 million decrease in fee credits resulting from higher amounts in the prior quarter from new deals, and a $0.2 million increase in other expenses, which is primarily a reflection of the prior quarter being below our historical average and small increases in the remaining expense line items, resulting from a larger weighted average portfolio quarter-over-quarter. In total, our net investment income, which was $0.18 per common share, remained flat on a rounded basis when compared to the prior quarter.
Our debt investments drive our current income and we believe they have favorable attributes in the market today, and are well-positioned for the future. 83% of our loans have variable rates but they all have a minimum or floor in the rate charged. The remaining 17% are fixed. The weighted average yield on our interest-bearing debt investments remained flat quarter-over-quarter at 12.6%. While we believe 12.6% is a great yield, we also often have success fees as a component of our debt investments, which are excluded from our reported yields. As a reminder, success fees are contractually due upon the sale of a portfolio company, although the portfolio company can pay it earlier. So for comparison purposes, if we had accrued the success fees as we would pick, our weighted average yield on interest-bearing assets would approximate 15.6% during the June quarter. From a credit priority standpoint, 70% of our loans are senior and priority, with the remaining 30% being senior subordinated in the capital structure of the respective portfolio companies. So overall, we believe we are well-positioned for the future, and with the income we are able to generate, which is reflective of the fact that we were able to increase our dividend rate on our common stock by 20% during the prior fiscal year.
Let's turn to realized and unrealized changes in our assets. Realized gains and losses come from actual sales or disposals of investments. Unrealized appreciation and depreciation come from our requirement to mark our investments at fair value on our balance sheet, with the change in fair value from 1 period to the next recognized in our income statement. Again, unrealized appreciation and depreciation is a noncash event. So we did not record any realized gains or losses in the 3 months ended June 30, 2014. During the prior quarter, we realized a capital loss of $3.4 million in the restructuring of 1 of our companies.
As for our unrealized activity during the quarter, we had net unrealized appreciation of $5.5 million, which was due to increased debt and equity valuations in several of our portfolio companies, primarily due to increases in certain comparable multiples used to estimate the fair value of our investment and, to a lesser extent, an increase in the performance in some of our portfolio companies.
Turning to the prior quarter, the net unrealized appreciation of our entire portfolio was approximately $0.2 million. So given our long term view related to our investment, we have been pleased with the realized values for which we have exited our investments over the years and are generally less concerned about the inherent quarter-to-quarter fluctuations in our valuations. So for the June quarter end, our entire remaining portfolio was fair valued at 83.5% of cost, which is up from 82% of cost last quarter.
So let's turn to our net increase and net assets from operations. This term is a combination of net investment income, unrealized net appreciation or depreciation and our realized gains and losses. So for the June 2014 quarter end, this number was an increase of $10.8 million or $0.41 per share versus an increase of $0.9 million or $0.04 per share in the March quarter. The quarter-over-quarter change is primarily due to the aforementioned unrealized amount over the 2 quarters.
All of our portfolio companies are current in payment, except for 1, which continues to remain on nonaccrual, which represents 0% of the fair value and 4.5% of the cost basis of our total debt investments as of June 30, 2014.
And now I'll turn the program back over to Mr. Gladstone.