Yes. James, again. Good question. In terms of margins, as you heard us talk about in the past, key metric for us that we continue to focus on, but not necessarily the almighty last decision. Otherwise, we probably wouldn't be doing some of the incremental events that, as we said in prepared remarks, a little bit more OpEx heavy, a little bit more labor heavy than some other things that we have done. So the 50 bps increase in the quarter was on a comparable basis, as comparable as any two years can be. I mean, macro factors of weathers of course and things like that always playing a role. Again, as we talked about in the past, margin is in large part often driven, when we talk about it, on an average process system by the performance of the individual parks within the system. And so when we see our largest parks, three of which are concentrated here in the Great Lakes region, between Cedar Point, Kings Island, Canada's Wonderland doing well, that helps out a lot. And so the 50 basis points, as I said, up on a comparable basis. As we go forward, we talked about last year, right, results from August 1 on, the comparisons get a little bit more challenging, and so that will make some of the margin upside be a little bit more challenging. Doesn't mean that it can't be beat against those mix of performance parks will play into that. But there's no doubt that the margin lift at -- for the quarter was helped dramatically by the strong performance over the last part of June at those big parks.