Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the Fulton Financial Corporation’s First Quarter Earnings Call. This call is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to Laura Wakeley, Senior Vice President of Corporate Communications. Please go ahead, ma’am.

Thank you. Good morning everyone and thanks for joining us for Fulton's Financial’s conference call and webcast to discuss our earnings for the first quarter of 2014. Your host for today's conference call is Phil Wenger, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Fulton Financial, and joining him is Pat Barrett, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Our comments today will refer to the financial information included with our earnings announcement, which we released at 4:30 yesterday afternoon. These documents can be found on our website at fult.com by clicking on Investor Relations and then on News. On this call, representatives of Fulton may make forward-looking statements with respect to Fulton's financial condition, results of operations and business. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond Fulton's control and difficult to predict and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. Fulton undertakes no obligation, other than required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In our earnings release, we've included our Safe Harbor statement on forward-looking statements, and we refer you to this section, and we incorporate it into today's presentation. For a more complete discussion of certain risks and uncertainties affecting Fulton, please see the sections entitled Risk Factors and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in Fulton's filings with the SEC. in discussing Fulton’s performance, representatives of the company may refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the supplemental financial information included with Fulton’s earnings announcement released yesterday for a reconciliation of those non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measures. Now, I would like to turn the call over to your host, Phil Wenger.

Thank you, Laura. Good morning, everyone and thanks for joining us to review our first quarter progress. After my prepared remarks, our Chief Financial Officer, Pat Barrett will give you more color on our financials. Then we will both respond to your questions. We were pleased to report $0.22 diluted earnings per share for the quarter. These earnings were 10% or $0.02 greater than the same period last year and matched the prior quarter. Our return on average assets increased 1.01% and our return on average shareholders’ equity increased to 8.21%. Return on tangible equity was 11.13%. We saw continued improvement in our asset quality. Total delinquencies decreased $6 million from $232 million to 4226 million. Net charge-offs decreased by $2 million. Classified and criticized loans decreased and non-accrual loans were flat at $134 million linked quarter. On a linked quarter basis, net loans declined slightly. During the first quarter of 2014, we believe that winter weather tempered demand for new loans during the first two months of the quarter. And because of those conditions, we elected to defer the start of two planned loan promotions. We launched those loan promotions during March, but too late to positively impact the first quarter. We’re pleased to see an uptake in the loan pipeline late in the quarter and we will remain focused on achieving quality loan growth for the remainder of 2014. Specific tactics we’re pursuing include the addition of commercial [lending] talent in areas we believe present good growth prospects like Virginia and Maryland along with further promotional efforts. Of course the rate of loan growth will be somewhat dependent on the pace of economic expansion. With respect to our residential mortgage operations, the severe weather, as well as higher interest rates, impacted origination activity and related sales gains for…

Thanks, Phil and good morning to everyone on the call. Unless I note otherwise, quarterly comparisons will be with the fourth quarter of 2013. As Phil noted, earnings per diluted share this quarter were $0.22 per share on net income of $42 million. While earnings remained consistent with the prior period, we saw a notable improvement in expense levels, offset by decreases in net interest income and noninterest income. The provisions for credit losses remained unchanged. Net interest income decreased by $3.4 million or 2.5%, driven by two fewer days of interest to accruals during the quarter and to a lesser extent by slightly lower average earning asset balances. Average earning assets were down $78 million or 0.5%. Average investment securities declined $36 million or 1.4%, while the remaining drop in average earning assets was due to a slight decrease in average loans of $30 million or 0.2%. Average yield on interest earning assets decreased by one basis point, while the average cost of interest bearing liabilities, increased one basis point. The average yield on new loans originated during the first quarter, was approximately 10 basis points lower than on loans originated in the fourth quarter. While average core deposits were up 5.9% in comparison to the first quarter of 2013 and ending deposits were up slightly in comparison to the fourth quarter of 2013, we did see a seasonal decrease in municipal accounts causing a 1.5% linked quarter drop in average deposit balances. This decline was principally in demand deposit accounts. Net interest margin of 3.47% exceeded the estimate we provided last quarter, which was 3.42% to 3.46% by one basis point. This favorable variance reflected higher than expected interest recoveries on non-accrual loans, cash flows on securities and loan fees. For the second quarter of 2014, we are…

(Operator instructions). We’ll go first to Bob Ramsey of FBR. Bob Ramsey – FBR & Co.: The expenses, as you all have talked a lot about, obviously looked really good this quarter. I'm just trying to sort of think about the run forward. I know you gave a range of $111 million to $115 million. Could you just help me think about if we start this quarter at $109 million and change and $2 million comes out of that from the efficiency initiatives next quarter, how do you get from $107.5 million into that range you've given? Is it incentive comp that gets filled back in? And I can't remember, is this the quarter where you will have equity awards to retirement eligible employees or what takes us from that $107 million level to the guided range?

Bob Ramsey – FBR & Co.: Wasn't there also $1 million of implementation cost, though, that should go away next quarter?

Bob Ramsey – FBR & Co.: Okay. And is next quarter the quarter that you all have the comp for retirement eligible employee impacts? And could you also maybe tell me how much was the drop in incentive comp, first quarter versus fourth?

Bob, this is Phil. From fourth quarter to first quarter is $2.5 million on the incentive comp. And as far as the options, we have changed that program somewhat so that that initial increase in expense won’t happen going forward. But that area will have an impact on expenses this year. It gets complicated, but we did change the program. So they are issued in the second quarter. They used to be in the third quarter. So we have – we actually have – we’ll have a one quarter of expense from last year and this year. That will happen in the second quarter. So that expense in the second quarter will be about $250,000 more than it will be then in the quarters following it. Bob Ramsey – FBR & Co.: Okay. That’s helpful. I guess I’ll shift gears a little bit and ask some more questions then I’ll hop back out of the queue, but could you – I know last year or last quarter you guys had talked about loan growth expectations for the year of being around 5%. Obviously balances were down this quarter. Is 5% still what you guys are targeting for the full year?

You know, Bob, I think we gave a range of 3% to 7% and that is still the range that we would give today. Bob Ramsey – FBR & Co.: Given the first quarter, is your bias towards the lower end of that range or still full range?

Yes. At this point it would still be full range.

And our next question comes from Casey Haire of Jefferies. Casey Haire – Jefferies & Company: A couple of questions, I guess, on the NIM. Phil, your commentary about NIM nearing an inflection point obviously is a good sign. But at the same time it sounds as if there’s a couple of promotions that are on the comp that might hurt the asset yields which held up pretty nicely this quarter. I’m just trying to figure out what’s giving you that confidence in the NIM stability outlook? Is it positive makeshifts? Just some thoughts there will be helpful.

The spread between the new production and what’s running off in our loan portfolio continues to narrow. We expect that to continue to narrow. Now, this whole pricing scenario for us has been -- I think we talked a little about it last quarter. It’s a real tough balance to be -- to have rates that are competitive, that will help you grow, but not rates too low that it’s going to impact your margin to a large degree. So, we talked about it last quarter. We are going to get more aggressive with some promotional programs, but probably not to the same extent that we had first quarter last year. So again first quarter of 2013 I think our rates were probably at the low end of our competitors. By the end of the year we had migrated to the high end and where we want to get is back in the middle to a level that will allow us to grow but not have the same negative impact on margin that we’ve experienced in the past. And it is far from an exact science, Casey. Casey Haire – Jefferies & Company: Understood.

This is Pat, Casey. Also if you think about just the recovery of the numerator in the NIM fraction as we go into the second quarter, we are bound to see -- likely to see the actual dollars of net interest income rise at a rate that will likely be higher than the rate which the denominator does. So we’ve got a recovery in day account and all that. So I think it’s reasonable to expect at least in the quarter on quarter basis that we’ll see dollar increases that will be -- that will give us some further stability on the ratio. Casey Haire – Jefferies & Company: Okay, understood. Switching gears to the fee side, obviously weather kind of slowed you down this quarter on the service charges and mortgage banking. I'm just curious, I know it's tough, but any ballpark estimate as to how much weather slowed down those line items?

Mortgage obviously was a big area. So mortgages impacted seasonally anyway from the winter. I think it was this year it impacted even more in that normally you are not starting new homes in January and February, but when it’s 15 degrees and there’s a foot of snow in the ground, no one is out looking at existing homes to buy either. How much that recovers, I can’t give you real feel right now, but we do believe mortgage is going to recover at a pretty good pace. As far as fees deposit related, other fees, again first quarter tends to be lower and I think it was further -- they were further impacted by this quarter from the weather because we were closed. Just January and February -- it was a unique winner in that every year we get some weather related events. They tend to be more in Pennsylvania than anywhere else. This year we had weather related events in every area that we operate in. So one day our Pennsylvania operation would be closed. The next week we’d have a day off in New Jersey and then Maryland in Virginia would get hit and it just seemed like we were never had the whole operation open, but that’s stretching a little. We do expect a recovery. I have a hard time putting an exact number on it. Casey Haire – Jefferies & Company: Understood. And just last one for me on the capital management front. I know you guys have been pretty quiet on the M&A front, but you did get the buyback done. Just wondering what we can expect for the balance of the year as it relates to capital management.

I think we also indicated last quarter that M&A activity in 2014 we see as highly unlikely. So we continue to build out a lot of infrastructure. That eliminates that from what the way to use our capital. We still believe we have excess capital. So, that will be deployed in the form of funding growth. So part of it will depend on how we start growing and how quickly we start growing. We would like to increase dividends as earnings increase and given all those things, we would look at share repurchases.

Our next question comes from Frank Schiraldi of Sandler O'Neill. Frank Schiraldi – Sandler O'Neill & Partners: Just a couple of questions. First on the -- loan deposit ratio fell a little bit on a linked quarter. It’s been sort of hovering around 100%. It fell right to 100% and I know others have keyed in on that ratio. I’m just wondering if that in any way has perhaps constrained long growth and how you think about that ratio.

Frank Schiraldi – Sandler O'Neill & Partners: Okay. So are you saying, Phil, that you think that will probably continue to hover around this 100% as you have similar deposit growth to match the loan growth?

Frank, if you look back over a quarterly run rate, it tends to bump up one or two percentage points, and then drop back down to 99% or 100%, then it’ll go up and it really is driven on the back of the public funds seasonality as they ebb and flow. Frank Schiraldi – Sandler O'Neill & Partners: Okay. And then staying on expenses, I don't know if we can do this, but as you look out maybe further than 2Q, Phil, you sort of mentioned, I believe, that there was $250,000 of expense in 2Q that would fall off in future quarters. By the same token, are there other outside services, perhaps consulting fees, that you're sort of thinking could fall off as we approach the back half of the year?

Frank Schiraldi – Sandler O'Neill & Partners: Okay. So maybe the range you gave in 2Q is probably a decent run rate through the remainder of the year as you see it today?

We’ll go next to Chris McGratty of KBW Mike Pareto – Keefe, Bruyette & Woods: This is Mike Pareto stepping in for Chris.

Mike Pareto – Keefe, Bruyette & Woods: Good, thanks. Phil, on the conference circuit in February, you made a passing comment about your hopes for revenue growth in 2014 and I believe the comment was along the lines of X mortgage. You guys were hopeful that you can grow your revenues year-over-year this year. Are you guys still after Q1 results and seeing your pipelines right now, is that still kind of the hope and the target for you guys?

Mike Pareto – Keefe, Bruyette & Woods: Okay, thanks. And then maybe, are there any -- following some of the branch closures in some of your markets outside of PA and just after seeing this quarter, are there any updates on how you guys are thinking of performance on some of your other markets, New Jersey, Maryland?

Mike Pareto – Keefe, Bruyette & Woods: Okay. Are you guys seeing any difference in commercial pipelines by region or anything like that, or is it pretty strong across the footprint?

The next question comes from David Darst of Guggenheim Partners. David Darst – Guggenheim Securities LLC: Phil, as you talk about the promotional activities, let me look at kind of where your growth was last year. A lot of it came around the home equity category in addition to residential and commercial real estate. Is that kind of the similar promotional activity you're doing this year, or is there something different you're doing, as you noted hiring some people in Maryland and Virginia?

No. David, I would say that the promotional … specifically the promotional activity is very similar to last year and it would in the home equity space and then CRE and C&I. David Darst – Guggenheim Securities LLC: Okay. Then as you're looking at Virginia, are you building out, maybe to franchise in northern Virginia or are you actually doing some things to maybe rejuvenate the Tidewater region?

So we’ve also been able to add four lenders in the Virginia market in the last 90 days to 120 days and they have been actually spread across the state, but a little more in the Tidewater region. David Darst – Guggenheim Securities LLC: Okay. And then with the CD growth you had this quarter, it looks like you're trying to extend the duration of your CDs. Should that rate be the floor and maybe grow as you try and manage the inflection point of the margin this year?

Hi David, it’s Pat. Yeah, I think the CD growth that we are seeing is probably more a reflection of us working to just get back in the market with more -- a broader range of competitive products on the funding side. We, like most banks haven’t been able to turn away money for the last four or five years. And as the belief of rates going up increases, it’s something that we just want to be prepared for. It’s one of our top priorities and has been for a couple of quarters now. So it’s probably more a reflection of that change than actual asset and liability management. David Darst – Guggenheim Securities LLC: Okay, got it. So, all of it together has been more proactive.

Yes. David Darst – Guggenheim Securities LLC: And then getting back to the buyback, so should we kind of assume you’re maybe done for now and then if the loan growth doesn't materialize, then you would revisit the buyback later in the year and then if it does, you're probably done for the year?

We evaluate that all the time, David and both management and board regularly look at our capital positions and in context to a lot of different things. But we still think we have excess capital and we will look throughout the year at ways to deploy that. So growth will have an impact I think on how much or when or if in fact we do buy back additional shares. David Darst – Guggenheim Securities LLC: Okay. Would any of it be dependent on feedback from your DFAS submission later this year?

We work closely with our regulators and we have submitted our DFAS. So I would anticipate that they certainly would look at that submission and I can’t imagine that it won’t be part of the analysis that they do when they look at our overall capital position.

We’ll go next to Mathew Kelley with Sterne, Agee. Mathew Kelley – Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc.: What was the average yield on the commercial loan originations during the quarter?

So the new originations, a yield decrease actually decreased 10 basis points I believe from 385 to 375. Mathew Kelley – Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc.: Got you, okay. And then just getting back to your deposit service charges, down 8% year over year, how much of that do you think was due to the weather, just on interchange and swipe volumes on the consumer side?

Part of it, Matt, is changing consumer behaviors, particularly in the overdraft category. And then part of it I think was because of lower activity. But I would say there was at least as much reduction resulting from the overdraft category as there was in the others. Mathew Kelley – Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc.: Okay, got you. And then from the fourth quarter to the first quarter, was there any changes in your deposit pricing and all? I know on your website you’ve got like a 60-month promotional type thing, trying to get in some longer-term CD money. Any success in bringing that in, in any of the products that you changed pricing on during the first quarter?

(Operator instructions). We’ll go next to Jason O'Donnell with Merion Capital Group. Jason O'Donnell – Merion Capital Group: Just following up on Bob's question earlier on expenses, given the higher guidance on OpEx of a $111 million to $115 million for the second quarter, should we be assuming comp and benefits expense somewhere in the neighborhood of $62 million for the second quarter? Is that a good guesstimate at this point?

Jason O'Donnell – Merion Capital Group: Okay, fair enough. That makes sense. And then in terms of the margin trajectory, in the guidance you provided a 3.42% to 3.46% for the second quarter. Does that assume a resumption of the loan yield compression going forward? And if so, do you expect to see that bottom, all else equal in terms of rates?

Jason O'Donnell – Merion Capital Group: Okay, and then at what point do you expect to see that stabilize? Is that later this year, the back half of the year? Do you guys have any sense -- all else equal, where do you expect to see that bottom?

We’ll go next to Blair Brantley of BB&T Capital Markets. Blair Brantley - BB&T Capital Markets: I had a follow-up question just on the capital planning. What is your comfort level from a total payout perspective? Obviously, last year was almost 100% and you're at a pretty good pace for this year with the buyback and just the dividends you have in place. Is there any commentary you could add to that?

Blair Brantley - BB&T Capital Markets: Okay. And then on a different note, with credit costs, they've been pretty flat over the last -- from Q4 to Q1. How do you think about credit costs in the near future, given the trends that you're seeing with problem asset balances and loss content and things like that?

We’ll go next to Bob Ramsey of FBR. Bob Ramsey – FBR & Co.: Thanks for taking the follow-up. I was actually going to ask about credit and provision, given that your charge-offs are probably at the lowest level they've been at since the crisis. I know you just said you don't expect a lot of change in provision. I think in the past you said to expect over time the allowance-to-loan ratio could trend closer to peers, at maybe 125%. I'm just curious if that is still how you're thinking about the allowance level bigger picture?

And with no further questions in queue, I would like to turn the conference back over to Phil Wenger for any additional or closing remarks.