Franklin Street Properties Corp. (FSP) Q4 2011 Earnings Report, Transcript and Summary

Good morning and welcome to the Franklin Street Properties' Fourth Quarter and Year End 2011 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Scott Carter, General Counsel. Mr. Carter, the floor is yours, sir.

Thanks, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining this call. With me this morning are George Carter, our Chief Executive Officer; and John Demeritt, our Chief Financial Officer. Before I turn the call over to John, I must read the following statement. Please note that various remarks that we may make about future expectations, plans and prospects for the company may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Safe Harbor provisions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including those discussed in the Risk Factors section of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which is now on file with the SEC. In addition, these forward-looking statements represent the company's expectations only as of today, February 22, 2012. While the company may elect to update these forward-looking statements, it specifically disclaims any obligation to do so. Any forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing the company's estimates or views as of any date subsequent to today. At times during this call, we may refer to funds from operations or FFO. A reconciliation of FFO to GAAP net income is contained in yesterday's press release, which is available in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.franklinstreetproperties.com. Now I'll turn the call over to John. John?

Thank you, Scott, and welcome to our earnings call. We're going to be talking with you about our fourth quarter and year-end results and we'll start with a short overview. Afterward, George Carter, our CEO, will further discuss 2011 in FSP. I'm going to be brief, then we'll be referring to our earnings release, the supplemental package and the 10-K that were filed last night. As of year end, we had cash of $23.8 million and $151 million in availability on our line of credit, giving us about $175 million in liquidity. At 12/31, we had $449 million in unsecured debt and our total market cap was about $1.3 billion. We only have unsecured debt on our balance sheet, and our total debt to total market cap ratio was 35.2% at December 31. This leverage ratio continues to provide an attractive loan to value for our lenders and affords our shareholders a significant and more conservative equity investment in our real estate. On the income statement, we measure our performance with some key drivers, which we've talked about before, and include FFO and gains on sales of assets, as well as the total of those 2 combined. FFO for the fourth quarter of 2011 was up about $1 million compared to our fourth quarter last year. We acquired a property on September 30 and another one on October 6. So there was a meaningful contribution from both of them during Q4. We also had the benefit of new leases signed over the last few months over leases that had expired. Also included in the fourth quarter were termination fees of about $325,000, but we also had about $379,000 in restructuring charges related to the activities with the investment bank. FFO for the full year was $4.3 million ahead of 2010, which is about $0.03 per share for an increase. During 2011, we acquired 5 properties and we did sell 2. We also increased occupancy about 3.1% during 2011 to end the year at 88.7% leased. These were factors in the increase in FFO this year compared to last. As far as GOS is concerned, a gain on sale of assets, we sold 2 properties this year. We had a total gain on sale of about $29.1 million or $0.27 per share and didn't sell any properties in 2010. When combined with FFO, our total profits therefore were $93.1 million or $1.14 per share this year compared to $0.84 in 2010. So that's a brief overview of our financial performance. The earnings release, supplemental and 10-K filing go into a lot more detail about our results, and we could also take more questions at the end if you want to discuss things further. So this concludes financial highlights. And at this point, our CEO, George Carter, will tell you more about FSP, the results and where we are. Thanks for listening. George?

Thank you, John. Welcome to Franklin Street Properties' fourth quarter and full year 2011 earnings call. I will follow my written remarks and our earnings release last night, trying to put a little more detail and a perspective to them in this call. For the fourth quarter of 2011, FSP's profits as represented by FFO totaled approximately $18.5 million or $0.22 per share, an increase of approximately $2.1 million or $0.02 per share compared to the third quarter of 2011. For the full year 2011, FSP's profits as represented by FFO totaled approximately $71.2 million or $0.87 per share, an increase of approximately $4.3 million or $0.03 per share compared to full year 2010. For the full year 2011, FSP's profits as represented by FFO+GOS, that's gain on sale, totaled approximately $93.1 million or $1.14 per share, an increase of approximately $26.2 million or $0.30 per share compared to full year 2010. On a fully diluted per share basis, FFO increased by about 3.8% in 2011, while profits as measured by FFO plus gains on property sales or GOS increased by about 36%. In the past, we repeatedly referred to 2010 as our humpier and commented that we anticipated that 2011 would be the first year of profit increases since the economic downturn in 2008, and so it proved to be. The one caveat to the 2011 forecast of a turn up in profits was that the economy would not sidetrack us by experiencing another significant downturn or double-dip. In fact, the U.S. economy did experience sort of a midyear stall that clearly slowed down FSP, as well as many other owners of commercial real estate. However, lately, many metrics are looking better for the general economy and a true double-dip appears to have been averted at least for the…

[Operator Instructions] The first question we have will come from Thomas Hackett of Capital Investment Counsel.

Did the FSP receive a one-time benefit on the 50 South Tenth Street financing that was recorded in 2011 sometime in the fourth quarter? And will there be some ongoing benefit from that loan over and above the cost of your funds?

Yes. Tom, this is John Demeritt. It was part of the loan. We received the 1% commitment fee upfront that we received in cash, which is about $762,000. The accounting rules have us amortized that into income over the period of time we have the loan. So it's not in our fourth quarter numbers to any degree we might have amortized 2 days of that fee into 2011. And we have a 50 basis point, approximately, exit fee at the end of this loan that we will get when that loan is repaid. So that's about 1.5% above the stated rate of about 6.5%. So on a 2-year loan, I'd say the return is about 7.25% if you want to look at how it affects us in 2012 and beyond.

All right. Secondly, you're now 32% leveraged. George talks about buying more properties. Do you expect to increase that leverage by borrowing more money going forward above the 32% that you currently have?

Well, actually 35.2%, the way I had it calculated. But maybe George might want to talk about acquisitions and leverage.

Yes. Tom, I think we could definitely go up and leverage for a short period of time -- again, for longer periods of time. I think our leverage will stay modest and I think it will stay in the 20% to 30% area over longer periods of time. But there may be short-term opportunities that our leverage could spike up to the 40% plus level. I don't see it any higher than that.

The next question we have comes from John Guinee of Stifel, Nicolaus.

John Guinee here. Let me drill down a little bit more on the 50 South Tenth Street. First, the big picture appears to me that your loans to affiliates now represents a little over 10% of total enterprise value. Is that a correct number?

I don't know how you calculate total enterprise value, John, but it's certainly a substantial amount.

But basically, your equity cap plus your debt comes out to about $1.3 billion and your loan to affiliates is about $140 million. So you're a little over 10%. What do you see happening there? Is that a max out? Or do you see that increasing?

This is George, John. Our loans to affiliates are just on a property-by-property basis. They are wonderful investments for us. They match short term with the shorter nature of our line. Most of them, other than 50 South Tenth Street, are real loan-to-value type loans. They're much better than -- much better risk rewarded adjusted for timeframes than any place else we can get our return. We know these properties intimately. And on a property-by-property basis, if the entities that own those properties require financing, we would consider them at any time. At the present time, we don't have any additional plans to make loans, but additional loans could be in the future if they make sense for FSP.

So on 50 South Tenth Street, just drilling down a little bit, it looks like there was a $76 million BofA loan, $70 million worth of equity syndication proceeds, $146 million, about $292 a foot. The BofA loan matured. What was your options with BofA to rebalance that loan, pay it down a little bit or extend it with BofA? And then what other things that you look at on this particular asset?

So this is our view from 10,000 feet and it's -- again, we have to be a little careful here in that 50 South Tenth Street Corp. is a public reporting company and so it's under all the rule, Reg FD, and all that sort of stuff. So I'm going to trying to give you, again, a little bit higher view of this, but it's not much different, I think, than many other people find themselves in today with office buildings. We bought and syndicated this building 2006, 2007, and took out a fairly high loan to value at that time, about 60%, of which -- again, for FSP, particularly back in that time would have been of extremely high leverage. We didn't really have much of any high leverage back then. So here's a single property, you took out a 60% loan to value. It was a 5-year loan with BofA, a 5-year loan interest only, and lo and behold, you go through this downturn. The property is just a magnificent piece of real estate, performed beautifully over the time frame, all this 98% or better occupied during the time frame. It pays big dividends to the 50 South Tenth Street shareholders. But as you got to the maturity of the BofA loan, the -- again, with the downturn, we talked to BofA. 50 South Tenth Street talked to BofA to see if they would be interested extending the loan. And like most lenders, they said, "Well, now the loan to value has potentially changed to where we wouldn't want to extend the loan for that amount." And on the 50 South Tenth, there was a specific issue which affected that loan to value and that was at about half of the square footage of that property as leased…

So of the 30 lenders, the average loan was $76.2 million and the average interest rate was 6.5% plus fees?

That's correct.

Yes.

And so what you're telling me is someone is willing to lend $152 a foot on a low rise building in the Minneapolis CBD, that may go to 50% leased in about 24 months, and that same lender is willing to write a check or have an accordion feature of the loan of $30 million, which gets you up to $212 a foot in the Minneapolis CBD?

Yes. The $76.2 million was the loan amount that 50 South Tenth Street commissioned the survey for, which again is about $152 a square foot, which is a fantastic price for a CBD building in Minneapolis. The $30 million revolver, again, is only used if in fact you get a lease extension or new tenants in the property. In other words, it's only used if you're going to extend the rent period. So that's a different sort of pile of money, but it's in the same loan as a revolver on top of the $76.2 million. But the answer to your question is yes.

In this day and age, a lender was willing to spend $76 million, $152 a foot. So why didn't -- why would FSP make this loan? You're not really in the lending business. You're in the equity investment business.

No, John. We're in the lending business, too. We're in the real estate business and we do a lot of different types of real estate business. We've been making loans for a lot of years. It's part of our income. This is a wonderful real estate investment. We are willing to make this. We wanted to make this, because we think it's one of the best risk reward adjusted investments we've ever made. We have been managing this property for 5 years. We really believe that we will be able to recoup all of our loan, a fantastic interest rate on a short-term loan, and that the future value of their property will give tons of flexibility in terms of financing out with a more traditional third party, long-term loan or an outright property sale. This property is located in really one of the best locations in the whole Minneapolis CBD. It's right on Nicolet Mall, which is not a mall the way you think about it. It's a street. And it's the only building that is connected directly by skyway to Target's world corporate headquarters. And most of the other tenants in the building -- Target is the tenant that has the 50% position on the building. And again, Target's headquarters is right next door. Target's flagship retail store is actually part of our building. We don't own that store. It's separately bidded. But if you know Bentonville, Arkansas with Walmart or any of these big retailers, the vendors who want to sell their goods to Target to carry in their stores want to be as close as they can to Target. And so the rest of the space is basically leased to vendors. And vendors are all over Minneapolis, and they have a great desire to be in that property. So even if Target were not to extend, we feel very, very confident that vendors would come in there quickly and efficiently and make good value of their property and their loan. In fact, Target has made a real commitment to downtown. They actually purchased the land and older building right across the street. And again, with all of our discussions with Target with their purchase of the Canadian outlet, I believe it's called the Zellers. If you look at their plans for employee growth, it's significant. And we believe their commitment is to downtown. We believe this property figures into their commitment. And it is that knowledge -- it is that unique proprietary knowledge that you can only gain by owning and managing a property for the time that we've owned and managed it, that gives us the insight into the value of this loan, which we just think is extraordinary. We think it's one of the best investments we've ever made.

And Oracle or Target's lease expires 3/31/2014, your loan expires 12/31/2013?

Right.

Your loan matures 98 days before the lease expires?

Right.

So, I guess, the intent is that you have new lease recast?

That's the intent.

And if you don't have a new lease recast, what's the building worth relative to your $76 million loan?

I think a whole bunch more.

Half leased, no cash flow?

I think a whole bunch more.

I need to go on record George. This feels like a really good deal for your single-asset REIT, but not at all to business you should be in.

Well, John, I don't think it's your job to tell us what business we should be in. We are in the real estate investment business. This is a great real estate investment. If you don't think so, that's your business. But our business is real estate investing, and this is one of the best investments we've ever made for our shareholders.

How many other publicly-traded office REITs are making 2-year bridge loans that mature 90 days before a building has the potential to go 50% occupied?

You know that better than I would.

I do. That's my issue.

The next question we have comes from Jeff Lau of Sidoti.

Just -- I guess, I'm going to backup and just more on a general perspective. How would you -- I guess, can you put in towards a little bit more of how you view the suburban office market in 2011? And how that's going to kind of compare to 2012? And how it's going to affect the company?

Jeff, well, in 2011, we generally saw in all of our markets, truly, what you would call a broad-based stabilization of both occupancies and in general, with rent levels. Now again, it varies from market to market somewhat, and it varies certainly from submarket to submarket somewhat. But broadly speaking, we think we've bottomed on at least the markets where our suburban offices are in. And I think probably suburban office in general has bottomed. Now depending on where your leases were originally written and when they expire, you could still have some rent roll down. We've had a lot of ours expire. We've had -- we've taken our biggest roll downs. And as you know, we don't have much lease roll or expiration coming in the next 3 years. So if you're in a stabilized market, which we are in, and we don't have a lot of lease rolled, then we have an opportunity, I think, for increased occupancy and somewhat increased rental rates in some of our markets, on some of the leases that are expiring, some will still roll down a bit. But I think the question for us and I think for every -- probably every suburban office out there is, what is the pace of climb out here? I mean, you're still almost 20% vacant nationwide in suburban office. And there's only one way that you climb out, and that's via employment growth and demand. And until you can get sort of general vacancy across the country down into that 10%, 12% level, it's hard to push rents at all. So I think looking forward for FSP, the FFO growth is really going to come primarily from increased occupancy rather than current leases that are rolling in terms of rental increase and, obviously, increased property investments that are accretive to our cost of capital. So looking at 2012 and believing that you'd probably still have a fairly sluggish climb out of the recession and fairly sluggish employment growth -- again, all those statistics have been somewhat better recently. You should look, I think, for occupancy increases at FSP and property investments at FSP to push the FFO or profit growth.

And would you say that the negotiations, I guess, on new leases -- are they easier in certain regions? Harder in certain regions at all? Or is it fairly similar?

No, it can vary quite a bit. I mean, there are markets. For example, one of the markets in Texas we're in is Houston, and the submarkets that we are in Houston in properties that we're in are actually fairly hot right now. I mean, Houston is energy driven and there's tightness in energy corridor, energy-related areas. You can go over to Dallas and other Texas market that we're in, and certain submarkets in Dallas actually are still very slow and very, very tough. So there is difference between cities, between submarkets. I mean, in Greater Dallas, if you go up to Far North Dallas, that market is actually really strong right now. If you go over to the Las Colinas market in Dallas, that market is still very weak. So within the same metroplex, you have huge difference in dynamics.

Okay, great. And what's -- last, I guess, in terms of financing availability out like their credit facility, what's left on it?

We have about $151 million left on the $600 million line that we have currently. And the banks have expressed their willingness to do some other types of debt transactions with us if we were interested in doing that.

When is the maturity date on that facility? Did you guys just recently charge to that? Or is it...

That one was with a 1-year extension option.

Is it 2014?

Yes, with a -- I think it has a -- and has a 1-year extension feature to it that we can take out another year to '15.

And at this time, we will go ahead and conclude the question and answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to George Carter for any closing remarks. Mr. Carter?

Well, just thanks, everyone, for tuning in to the earnings call. I look forward to speaking to you all in the next quarter.

And we thank you, sir, and to the rest of management for your time. The conference has now concluded. We thank you all for attending today's presentation. At this time, you may disconnect your lines. Thank you.