Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Fortuna Silver Mines' First Quarter 2019 Financial and Operational Results Call. [Operator Instructions] At this time, it's my pleasure to turn the floor over to Mr. Carlos Baca, Investor Relations Manager. Sir, the floor is yours.

Thank you, Tom. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I would like to welcome you to Fortuna Silver Mines and to our financial and operational results call for the first quarter of 2019. Today, we will be using a webcast presentation which will be controlled by us. To download the presentation, please go to our website at www.fortunasilver.com. Click on the Investors tab, then click on the Financials sub-tab and under Q1 2019, click on Earnings Call Webcast link. Jorge Alberto Ganoza, President, CEO, and Director; and Luis Dario Ganoza, CFO will be hosting the call. Before I turn over the call to Jorge, I would like to indicate that this earnings call contains forward-looking information that is based on the company's current expectations, estimates, and beliefs. This forward-looking information is subject to a number of risks, uncertainties, and other factors. Actual results could differ materially from a conclusion, forecast, or projection in the forward-looking information. Certain material factors or assumptions were applied in drawing a conclusion or making a forecast or projection as reflected in the forward-looking information. Additional information about the material factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the conclusion, forecast, or projection in the forward-looking information and the material factors or assumptions that were applied in drawing a conclusion or making a forecast or projection as reflected in the forward-looking information is contained in the company's Annual Information Form and MD&A which are publicly available on SEDAR. The company assumes no obligation to update such forward-looking information in the future except as required by law. I would now like to turn the call over to Jorge Alberto Ganoza, President, CEO and Co-Founder of Fortuna.

Thank you, Carlos and good morning to all. I'll be presenting an introduction to the quarter results and progress on the Lindero Gold Mine construction in Argentina and then turn the call over to Luis who will take you through the financial statements. After that, we’ll open the call for questions. On Slide 4, today we show a solid track record of organic growth and profitability from our mines in Mexico and Peru which underpins our business, but investors' attention is focused now on our execution at Lindero. Lindero will be our third operating mine, and it’s a strategic asset to the company. This mine has reserves for 15 years of gold production and is accretive to the strong consolidated EBITDA margins of our business. Slide 5 please, under Q1 2019 highlights our adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter was $23.8 million representing our robust 40% margin over sales. Liquidity available stands at $193 million which includes our available credit lines while keeping a modest debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.7 at the end of the quarter. The main theme for us now until Q1 of next year is the successful completion of Lindero. As of the end of April, we have 47% advance towards completion, 97% of direct capital costs have been committed and remaining construction capital to completion is estimated at $115 million. Apart from the typical quarterly updates on construction news releases, we're producing a series of monthly videos that help us show our advance on a regular basis. The construction videos can be found on our website and I would like to encourage you to access the videos and follow our progress. On May 9, we were pleased to announce the publication of our 2018 sustainability report. This is our first sustainability report and was produced…

Thank you, Jorge. Slide 21, so again sales for the first quarter were $59 million, down 16% from 2018 due to lower metal prices and lower metal production when compared to the prior year. We reported net income of $2.2 million compared to $13.8 million in Q1 2018 and adjusted net income of $8.4 million compared to $13.2 million in Q1 of 2018, the reduction was driven mainly by lower sales. Our adjusted EBITDA was $23.8 million compared to $31.8 million recorded in 2018 and free cash flow from ongoing operations was $2.2 million compared to $16.8 million in 2018.Free cash flow in the quarter was affected by short-term movements in inventory and accounts receivable around of $7.1 million. At current metal prices, we expect free cash flow to be on average in the range of $8 million to $10 million per quarter. Next slide, please. So on slide 22, I am breaking down our sales performance for the quarter. We can see the highest impact came from lower silver and base metal prices and lower silver and gold sold. Less favorable treatment and refining charges in 2019 also had an impact on sales when compared to 2018. Slide 23, our comparative segmented results show a similar pattern at both operations mainly lower margins driven by lower prices and slightly higher costs in the case of San Jose. Cash cost of San Jose was $68.7 per ton, which was above the midpoint of our guidance for year but aligning with our budget for the first quarter. Cash flows at Caylloma was slightly below the range of our cost guidance for the year and is expected to increase closer to the midpoint of our guidance. Slide 24, G&A is slightly below Q1 2018 and in line with guidance provided in our year end call. Our effective tax rate for the quarter was affected by devaluation - by the devaluation of the argentine peso as 24 percentage points out of the 76% effective tax rate are explained by this factor alone. Next slide, Slide 25. So finally the - on slide 25 the evolution of our cash balance reflects the increase space of spending at Lindero. We close our quarter with $113 million in the cash and total liquidity of $193 million. Construction spending on Lindero in the quarter was $42.2 million or total spending on the construction as of the end of March was $165 million. This leaves the amount remaining to spend on the construction budget of $130 million as at the end of March and as 4K is closed at the end of April, this amount was $115 million. This amount exclude end of the 2018. So thank you and back to you Carlos.

Thank you, Luis. We would now like to turn the call over to any questions that you may have.

[Operator Instructions] We’ll take our first question from [indiscernible].

My question is about the Lindero depreciation and depletion for the first three years. So given the 20% increase in CapEx required for the project and accelerated depreciation schedule, how much are you expecting of depreciation and depletion for the first three years of the operation?

I mean, the depletion will take place - we're talking about financial depreciation and depletion. The depletion will take place over the life of mine, that is 13 -- 12, 13 years. So, I’m doing the quick math here as we speak that the $295 million CapEx over 13 years, that’s around 22 million a year of depreciation and depletion combined I would say in average per year. You mentioned accelerated depreciation, that would be a feature of tax depreciation. There is some of that that we expect to benefit from, but I am not sure if that was what you were referring to.

Yes so the tax -- related tax depreciation?

Yes, on the tax side of things, there are incentives that will allow us to benefit from accelerated depreciation on fixed assets over, if I am not mistaken, over a three-year period for a significant portion of the construction spend. I'm not able to give you precise figures at this very moment, happy to share them outside of the call.

Okay thanks.

And we’ll take our next question from Chris Thompson with PI Financial.

Just a couple of quick questions, we'll start off with San Jose and then I just wanted to start the question on Lindero. So San Jose first of all, I did notice obviously an uptick in unit costs on the quarter. It currently looks like on the high side of guidance, do you expect these to remain there or can we see them retreating more to 2018 levels?

Chris thanks for the question. We expect to be within the range of guidance. We see nothing that suggests a trend away from our guidance, Chris.

Just on the grades, I know you did mention that they were a little lower than anticipated, well they beat our expectations, and it looks like they're tracking above guidance as well. So again similar sort of question, how should we be modeling the grades both gold and silver for the remainder of the year?

Grades were basically in line with our budget for the quarter. We show lower grades at San Jose compared to the previous quarter - sorry to the comparable quarter, Q1 2018 that leads to the drop in metal, in production against the comparable quarter as well. But 2018, in the start of 2018, we benefited from positive reconciliation and concentration of mining on high grade areas due to operational reasons, which lead us to mine above budget and plan in the start of the year. So that's why you see a drop quarter-to-quarter, quarter versus quarter in metal and that's led by grade, but our grades at this mine are tracking along plan. And I think something I can say about this mine is that - our ability to project grade and tonnage has always been very good due to the nature of the deposit, and we expect no deviations with respect to guidance and grade. We're seeing what we planned.

Just on exploration, maybe a little bit of an update on what's happening at San Jose?

At San Jose, we are preparing to - we do a cut for resources around midyear. So, we're tightening [ph] up our drilling, our focus - we have three, four rigs working on peripheral areas, and on the deep extension and to the south, I mean some areas in the north around the shell of existing resources. We have provided some results previously. We need to provide a market update on additional results, but we expect based on what we're seeing that we will have - be able to have - new resources coming that will help us deal with depletion, that's our expectation based on the drilling to-date. I cannot report any game changer this quarter or anything like this. I think San Jose is at a stage where our exploration is yielding resources that help us deal with depletion. So we're preparing to close our drilling for the first half of the year to consolidate the data that will go into resource estimations in the second half of the year, which support our budgeting and reserve exercise as well.

And then the final question, just Lindero here. You were talking about obviously the crusher being a critical path item. Maybe just can you outline the remaining critical path items for the project and sort of put it in context by way of timing?

Yes, all the eyes and efforts of the construction team are on the crushing and leach pad. We are pushing and working on our schedule to keep on track. We plan to start placing ore in October in the leach pad, so that will require the entire crushing system to be operational, that will require power, that will require leach pad to receive the ore that will require the stacking system, and when I talk about crushing, it is crushing and agglomeration system. So crushing and agglomeration, power, water, stackers [ph], leach pad. Out of all of those, the one that is on the critical path is the commissioning of the crushing and agglomeration. We have the stackers arriving on site as we speak. We already received about half of the stackers. Those are being -- started to being assembled, so no issues there. And the leach pad, as you’ve seen on the picture - all the earth works related to the leach pad and site preparations are concluded. We need to rollout geo membrane and then place over liner on top of that. So that work is ongoing and our plan calls for the completion of the leach pad and how it ready to receive ore in August. So that is running - with time in our schedule. Power we'll have power available from the 8 megawatt plant in June/July. So no issues there - you seen in the pictures there all the power stations are there, are installed. The secondary retention line - the secondary transmission power line is advancing well according to plan so no issues there. Water - our well field is 13 kilometers away from site. The wells are of course we're concluded early in the project and we're laying down the water pipeline. This…

[Operator Instructions] We’ll go next to Adrian Day, Adrian Day Asset Management.

My question is specifically on Caylloma and you gave us a breakdown of metals by production. Can you tell us how that compares with the comparable period of the comparable quarter and then also perhaps just discuss a little bit about the variability of metal production, specifically going forward how you see it?

All your question refers just to Caylloma and also correct. Caylloma - for Caylloma today zinc and lead are major components of value. So with respect to zinc and lead again the comparable quarter as we showed in the presentation, there is no significant or variance in terms of metal output for zinc and lead. Zinc production is up 2% compared against the Q1 2018 and our lead production is up 2% against Q1 2018.So and silver production is basically online as well with the Q1 2018.What has heat, Caylloma comparing against the previous comparable quarter is the large drop in the zinc and lead prices we seen compared to a year ago. Lead prices are down 19% and zinc prices are down 21%. But in terms of metal output the mine is running in well according to plan even though we are seeing also higher yielding sustaining cost that’s also explained by higher sustaining capital but it is basically a good execution of our budget in the quarter compared against last year. Last year we had a larger sustaining capital budget at Caylloma, it was about $16 million. This year sustaining capital or CapEx budget for Caylloma is about $13 million. So it’s a lower sustaining capital or investment budget for that mine but we had a much better execution of that budget in the start of the year compared to last year. So that’s also impacting our all in sustaining costs. The way to view the cost performance of the mine to better view the cost performance is on a cost per ton basis and on a cost per ton we are online with budget. And I also mentioned again the…

So the amount - of the relative of production of zinc, lead and then silver doesn't really change much?

No. The mining - we are operating at steady stake and we have provided guidance.

[Operator Instructions] Mr. Baca, there appears to be no further questions. At this time, I'll turn the call back over to you for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you, Tom. I would like to thanks everyone for listening to today's earnings call and we look forward to you joining us next quarter. Have a good day.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. We thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time and have a great day.