Good morning, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to FS KKR Capital Corp’s Fourth Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. Your lines will be in a listen-only mode during the remarks by FSK’s management. At the conclusion of the company's remarks, we will begin the question-and-answer session. At which time I will give you instructions on entering the queue. Please note that this conference is being recorded. At this time, Robert Paun, Head of Investor Relations will proceed with the instructions. Mr. Paun, you may begin.

Thank you. Good morning and welcome to FS KKR Capital Corp’s fourth quarter 2021 earnings conference call. Please note that FS KKR Capital Corp may be referred to as FSK, the fund or the company throughout the call. Today’s conference call is being recorded and an audio replay of the call will be available for 30 days. Replay information is included in a press release that FSK issued on February 28, 2022. In addition, FSK has posted on its website a presentation containing supplemental financial information with respect to its portfolio and financial performance for the quarter ended December 31, 2021. A link to today’s webcast and the presentation is available on the Investor Relations section of the company’s website under Events and Presentations. Please note that this call is the property of FSK. Any unauthorized rebroadcast of this call in any form is strictly prohibited. Today’s conference call includes forward-looking statements and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could affect FSK or the economy generally. We ask that you refer to FSK’s most recent filings with the SEC for important factors and risks that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from these statements. FSK does not undertake to update its forward-looking statements unless required to do so by law. In addition, this call will include certain non-GAAP financial measures. For such measures, reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures can be found in FSK’s fourth quarter earnings release that was filed with the SEC on February 28, 2022. Non-GAAP information should be considered supplemental in nature and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the related financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures may not be the same as similarly named measures reported by other companies. To obtain copies of the company’s latest SEC filings, please visit FSK’s website. Speaking on today’s call will be Michael Forman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Dan Pietrzak, Chief Investment Officer and Co-President; Brian Gerson, Co-President; and Steven Lilly, Chief Financial Officer. Also joining us on the phone are Co-Chief Operating Officers, Drew O’Toole and Ryan Wilson. I will now turn the call over to Michael.

Thank you, Robert, and good morning everyone. Welcome to FS KKR Capital Corp’s fourth quarter 2021 earnings conference call. From both an operational and a strategic perspective, 2021 was a momentous year for FSK and I am proud of what the team accomplished. During the year, we closed out a transformational merger of two publicly traded companies creating a single BDC with over $16 billion in assets. Our investment team originated over $80 million in new investments in 2021, which is our largest origination year since FS KKR became the advisor resulting in meaningful progress on the rotation of legacy assets. Our net asset value in increased 80.6% to 27.17% at year end 2021 as compared to 25.02% at yearend 2020. FSK paid $2.47 per share in dividends in 2021, equating to a 9.2% yield on our average net asset value and above our long term target yield of 9%. Finally, we continue to optimize our capital structure by issuing $1.65 billion of unsecured notes during 2021, an attractive blended coupon of 2.6% and closing on four amendments to approve the terms of various bilateral financing facilities. These activities contributed to a material decline in our weighted average cost of debt to approximately 3% at December 31, 2021, compared to 3.9% at December 31, 2022. In terms of fourth quarter results, we're pleased to conclude 2021 with another positive quarter, illustrating the strength and stability of the business. During the fourth quarter, our investment team originated approximately $2.1 billion of new investments. Our GAAP net investment income was $0.66 per share and our adjusted investment income was $0.65 per share, which was $0.04 above our public guidance of $0.61 per share at the end of the third quarter. From a liquidity perspective, we ended the quarter with approximately $2.6 billion…

Thanks, Michael. As we contemplate the state of the economy, our posture is that the current economic environment remains generally constructive for credit. However, like many of you, we can continue to assess potential macro risks associated with inflation, rising interest rates, supply chain dynamics, and the availability of labor, as well as impacts from the situation in the Ukraine. From a portfolio perspective, we have witnessed a return of spending by both businesses and consumers as pent up demand has started to flow through order pipelines and inventories are beginning to return to more normalized levels. That said, while we are quite pleased with portfolio company performance, inflationary and geopolitical pressures are beginning to tamper EBITDA growth rates. In order to mitigate risk, we continue to focus on portfolio diversification, having an origination funnel that is as deep and as broad as possible, underwriting long term sustainable cash flows with a bias toward larger companies, which possess at least some degree of pricing power and investing in other parts of the private credit market, including asset-based finance, which we believe provides quite attractive risk adjusted returns. Turning to FSK's investment activity. During the fourth quarter, we originated approximately $2.1 billion of investments. The investments in the quarter were spread across 14 new high quality companies and seven industries and included certain non-sponsored and asset based finance transactions. Of note, the average EBITDA of the corporate names was approximately $100 million and the average LTV was 43% reflecting our continued focus on the upper end of the middle market, as well as the broader acceptance of the private credit product to larger issuers. New investments during the quarter carried a weighted average yield of 7.5%. In the fourth quarter, approximately 50% of our originations came from opportunities and companies previously…

Thanks Dan. As of December 31, 2021, our investment portfolio had a fair value of $16.1 billion consisting of 189 portfolio companies. This compares to a fair value of $15.8 billion and 190 portfolio companies as of September 30, 2021. At the end of the fourth quarter, our 10 largest portfolio companies represented approximately 19% of our portfolio, which is in line with the end of the third quarter. We continue to focus on senior secured investments as our portfolio consisted of 60.7% of first lean loans and 71.1% senior secured debt as of December 31. In addition, our joint venture represented 8.7% of the portfolio and our asset based finance investments represented 13.9% of the portfolio equating to an additional 22.6%, which is comprised predominantly of first lean loans or asset based financed investments, which we believe have meaningful principle protection, the weighted average yield on accruing debt investments was 8.4% as of December 31, 2021. As a reminder, the weighted average yield is adjusted to exclude the accretion associated with a merger with FSKR. Including the effects of the investment activity we experienced during the fourth quarter, as of December 31, 2021, approximately 86% of our yielding investment portfolio is now comprised of investments originated either by KKR credit or FS KKR advisor. This compares to 84% at the end of the third quarter of 2021 and 79% at December 31, 2020. As Dan mentioned earlier, we are proud of the progress we have made growing our run rate net investment income, and continuing to rotate our legacy assets. During the fourth quarter, excluding the impact of merger accounting, we experience net portfolio appreciation of $8 million. The total amount of realized and unrealized depreciation we experienced across the portfolio during the quarter was $104 million and our…

Thanks, Brian. During this portion of the call, I'll focus on our dividend policy, our financial results, our forward looking guidance and our balance sheet. In terms of our dividend policy, I'll make a few comments with the goal of clearing up what appears to be a bit of confusion with certain market participants. When we instituted our current dividend policy, almost two years ago, our goal was to provide investors with a 9% yield on our net asset value over a sustained period of time, with the understanding that due to normal fluctuations in a BDCs net asset value on a quarter to quarter basis, there would be quarters where our dividend yield would be either above or below an annual rate of 9% during a specific quarter. We also told the market that we believed a variable dividend policy would provide the best opportunity to share excess earnings with investors on a real time basis. Since the announcement of our current dividend policy, we have announced and paid eight quarterly dividends, all of which have been $0.60 per share or higher. Pursuant to our policy, the dividend levels have in certain quarters varied to allow us to pay out additional earnings on a real time basis. To avoid any confusion in the market, we believe it is appropriate for investors to think of $0.60 per share as a base quarterly dividend with additional payments in excess $0.60 per share as extra or supplemental. So using the fourth quarter, as an example, we reported $0.65 per share of adjusted net investment income. And our board has declared a first quarter 2022, $0.03 per share supplemental dividend in addition to the $0.60 per share base dividend for a dividend of $0.63 per share. Finally, as many of you have heard…

Thanks, Steven. I'll close by saying that we are continuing to take the appropriate steps to position us for long term success and we are pleased with how our investment portfolio is positioned. We have taken advantage of our scale experience management team, the KKR credit platform and our strong balance sheet to deliver attractive financial results for our shareholders. We have demonstrated our ability to originate and underwrite through various economic backdrops. Additionally, we've defined three key opportunities and have been executing on them to generate incremental net investment income, which we believe provides meaningful line of sight guidance for the coming quarters. FSK's outlook for 2022 and beyond is promising. We look forward to continuing to build on our current progress and as always, I'd like to thank our investors for their continued support. And with that operator, we would like to open the call for questions.

[Operator instructions] Your first question comes from John Hecht with Jefferies. Your line is open

Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my question and congratulations on achieving a lot of the goals you set forth and the Analyst Day just a few months back. First question, you guys talked about this, but I'm wondering if you can, maybe give a little bit of details if you've done any internal analysis on what inflation does to any particular component of the portfolio. And then in addition to that, maybe distinguish what rising rates would do, but with both those, thinking of like EBITDA coverage ratios and things of that nature.

Yeah. John, good morning. I'm happy to take that and maybe we'll start with the inflation sort of part of it. Obviously we've been, focused on that for the last several quarters. I think we've seen across the portfolio, whether it's wage inflation, whether it's relation to commodities, whether it's supply chain issues, whether it's kind of freight costs, so I think we're seeing that in the portfolio. I think the good news is we have been focused on companies in the upper end of the middle market. We think those companies have pricing power. They're able to, they've been able to push those price increases through and we've also seen really good, let's just call financial performance on the revenue side of things, which is sort of offsetting this right. So, and I think, all that being said and I said this in my prepared comments, we're probably starting to see EBITDA growth rates reduce across the portfolio, but we still think this is a good environment for credit. I think on the rate point, I put that in maybe sort of two pieces, right. I think as it relates to the portfolio, I don't think we have a lot of worries in terms of rate increases. Rates have been low for a long time. Almost all these loans have floors. I think our interest coverage across the portfolio is in excess of 2.5 times. So that today, and even if rates popped 150, so the 200 basis points, that number's still in excess of two times. So I think on the portfolio side we feel pretty good. Obviously the investors here can benefit from a floating rate book, like the rest of the market that will be, we'll call some lag between where we are with the floors and where we are, with having sort of floating rates or the debt. So I think, but over an extended period of time, if rates do go up as much as we do believe, the portfolio will benefit from those rising rates.

Okay. That's very helpful. Thanks. And then just second question, a little bit higher level is how do you guys think about the mix of the pipeline given their rate in a kind of the forward rate environment, outlook what happens to refi activity versus new deal activity? Is there any change in sponsored versus unsponsored type of activity from your perspective?

Yeah. Well, I mean, maybe a couple different points in there, I think from an origination perspective, our goal has just been to make the, the funnel as big as possible. Right? I think we looked at over 1600 deals last year. That's in excess of two times where we would've been three plus years ago. A lot of that is just to how we've grown the team, both on the sponsor and the non-sponsored side. I think that's -- that, I think we're a little bit mindful. That activity could be a bit more muted on, on the M&A side. Obviously that's both to do with rates, but what's been going on in Ukraine as well. And I think with, with what we are expecting in rates, I think if something did come in the door from an origination perspective that was fixed rate, we'd probably push back pretty hard to convert that into floating. Because we'd rather sort of have that sort of tailwind behind us, but I when you put all that together, I think 2021 was a really active year. I think we would've always forecasted '22 to be a bit more muted. That said the team's been busy thus far this year.

Wonderful. Thanks very much.

Thank you, John.

Your next question comes from Bryce Rowe with Hovde.

Thanks. Good morning was, was hoping Dan to maybe ask you about kind of competition in the market. You highlighted a seven and a half percent, weighted average yield on the new investments in the fourth quarter and kind was curious how that might have trended over the -- over the last couple months January and February. And then I know it's early relative to the Russia Ukraine situation, but any kind of early data points in terms of how markets might have changed, relative to that? I know that's, that's a, tough one, but just figured I'd figured I'd ask.

No, that's all, that's all fair. I think in terms of, of competition, I mean, for sure there's been a fair a fair amount or a lot of money raised for private credit. I think that said where we've positioned ourselves in end of the middle market while there are definitely players there. I think there's less players there than there are in, in kind of the smaller side. So while we've seen competition for sure I think it's a lot of it's the, the same players. And I think that competition is somewhat muted by the fact of probably the acceptance that we've seen of the private credit products. More and more borrowers, more and more sponsors want to use it. You've seen, I think the markets dub them, these mega unit tranches. We've seen a fair amount of those, we either, or letter participated in 13 deals that were more than a billion dollars. So I think when you have that acceptance coupled with just how much money's been raised for middle market private equity. I think the, almost the supply of deals is, is kind of out weighing the demand there. So that's been positive. That said like, I, like I did mention, I think we would expected '22 to be a bit slower, like you had in '21, some deals that were just pushed from COVID or maybe some certain companies that outperformed during COVID and there was a transaction for the owner of that business to do. I think it's probably a little bit early to your point in terms of what happens on with what we're seeing with Russia and Ukraine. I think, I think on the trans product, which is most, probably the most prevalent product for where we're playing, where others are playing, you probably saw in 2021, yields are spreads reduced, let's call it 50 to 75 basis points. I think your regular way deal was on average Lior[ph] plus let's say 600, that range was probably 550 to 650. I think you've seen that let's call it sort of bottom out. I think you'll probably see a trend back the other way with syndicated markets become softer, which I think they probably do on the back of what we're seeing in Europe you'll see that sort of bleed into the illiquid and private credit market. It just takes a little bit of time.

Okay, All right. I'll, I'll jump back in Q1, appreciate the answer.

All right. Thank you.

Your next question comes from Ryan Lynch with KBW.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. I just had two, the first one. Would you guys mention that sound United entered an agreement to be bought sometime the second or first half of 2022? I was just curious, you guys currently have your equity investment market about $77.5 million. I think you guys said there would be upside if it were exited proposed price. What would that mean for an exit value of, of signing United?

Yeah, good morning, Ryan. They did sign a deal in the middle of this month. We wanted to make sure we noted it inside our prepared remarks. if you recall, this is a, a high end speaker business. We did convert our existing position to equity during the darker days of COVID. We did inject new dollars into the Company alongside the sponsor to allow them to do a, an M&A transaction that we think was, was fairly creative. The, the company's done really well. Their products are great. The, the deal is signed. It's just subject to customary conditions, but I think in, in our estimates, we'd expect sort of upside and excess of $50 million on that position in Q1.

Okay. So $50 million upside on one where you have currently marked?

Yes.

Okay. That that's helpful. And then just the other one I had, I noticed that tour rack, it looked like you guys sold down, some of your position in there, the cost went down pretty meaningfully. In the quarter, I just curious what was going on with that sell down number one and then kind of a side second part question two, that is just; with the increase in mortgage rates. And, I guess reasons broadly with that business? Have you seen any materials slow-down in kind of the velocity of deals and activity? I would just think that the higher rates may slow-down kind of the business activity; so just to update on that business as well, in addition to why that position was confused in the quarter?

Yeah, not happy to do that, I think the position was sold down into the joint venture as we continue to grow the JV. So it didn't leave the system. there's no other party in that deal. I think it's a, an important point. It's a good pickup, but it was just sold down to the joint venture. I think the Company continues to do extremely well. Volumes have I think actually picked up a bit during the course of '21, obviously the, their, their core or main product is bridge lending. A lot of the slow-down there was material inside of 2020 on the back of COVID. And there was also a fair amount of delays. I think the Company did an excellent job kind of navigating that. So their volumes exceeded budgets in '21, I would expect the same in '22.

Okay. Thanks for the color and tour. Again, I appreciate the clarification on where that investement went. Appreciate the time today.

Thank you, Ryan.

Thank you. Your next question comes from Casey Alexander with Compass Point

Hi morning, and, and this may be a little off-topic, but I noted that KKR invested in and purchased a different ABL[ph] lender during Q1. Does that ABL lender have a place in the BDC and if so, how does it compliment the other ABL investments that the BDCs made?

Yeah. And, good morning, Casey, are you talking about merchants?

Yes.

Yeah. So, just to clarify, merchants looks, from a product perspective, when I think about ABL, that's usually inventory and receivables merchants and another bridge lending sort of platform on the real estate side. that's just an asset class that we continue to, like going back to sort of Ryan's question merchants is a business that's been around for like 50 plus years. We had a really good relationship with the management team. They've actually been known to, to act for some time. So we had a little bit of a, of an angle there, and it was a part of the, the country from a geographical perspective. We didn't have a lot of exposure, so that, that does have a place side of FSK and you will see that and as on a go forward basis.

Right. Great. Thank you. That's my only question. I appreciate it.

All right. Thank you.

Your next question comes from Robert Dodd with Raymond James

Hi guys. Go. Congratulations on the quarter. Congratulations on getting sequential burn as we structured it back on a call. Couple questions on about credit. On the five new, non-small, right. I mean $60 million in total, but looking at the names, it looks to me, I think I've recognized for the five as having been on previous non-accruals, then we've structured back on a accrual and now back on non-accrual. So is there any -- is there anything else, is there anything else we should watch out for, or any concerns about how, how the workout process maybe has been in, in the past that, that some of these, again, small assets are back on, non-accrual after being restructured once before, or…

Yeah. Go ahead. No, and I'm happy to go through that and thanks for the, the words on sequential. The team did an excellent job there to generate the result that we did. I think, and just to put in bigger perspective, I think the outcome all sequential, and then the outcome that we're seeing on sound united. Quite frankly, is due to the strength of the team that we have. I think on the names that you sort of did mention there was sort of five, I think there's probably no common theme about them other than they're all originated kind of pre 2018 a handful of them did go back on accrual but there was very specific reasons why we ended up putting them on non-accrual during this quarter. As an example, NBG home was performing extremely well on the other side of COVID supply chain -- supply chain challenges were real there. Hence we felt appropriate to go back on non-accrual, and then we are looking at potentially sort of exits on, [indiscernible] which is a name quite frankly, it had a fair amount of green shoots COVID sort of impacted that pretty, pretty materially, but it's sort of timed exit. So some of those were sort of catalysts from there, but, but nothing really beyond that. And I think you're correct, it's, $62 million of fair market value. And I think we're pretty happy with the reduction that we've seen down to 1.9% on fair value from 37 quarter-over-quarter.

I appreciate that Pietrzak, thank you. On, global jet capital, I understand the, the, the, the restructure for the anti-layering provisions, et cetera. If I remember, I mean, it's, business jets rather than commercial which is tended to do, do quite well. I mean. I can you give us any color on where those are? I mean but business jets parked at Muscow airport? For example, which any, any risk of sanctions or anything to, its portfolio or, or is that just not a factor, right?

Yeah, it's a good question. I would put it in the, not a factor camp, right. They predominantly focused on and the U.S are very developed geographies. Not, that was not just from a historical risk perspective and, and view. I mean, our entire business here has been focused on places like the U.S and Western Europe. But they do use the capital markets to finance themselves that leads you to have a pretty vanilla[ph] book from a geographical perspective. I think you are correct. there have been tailwinds, no pun intended for the private jet or sort of business jet space. I think we've been quite proud of what the management team's been able to sort of do during this period. I think that the challenge in that business that we've talked about on sort of prior calls is just the competitive nature of the market. You look at their sort of top competitors. Most of those are, are, are banks or deposit taking institutions. It's been sort of harder for them to from a cost of funds perspective. So that's something we're pretty mindful about.

Okay. Understood. Thank you.

Thank you.

And your next question comes from Finian O'Shea with Wells Fargo.

Hey everyone. Good morning. Wanted to gather any thoughts you could provide on, the newer non-traded BDC market. The, the FS side is obviously a pioneer on that and major private credit platforms are, or racing to set these up and so forth. So, any color on how you view the opportunity for the advisor and the BDC platform?

Yeah. Good morning, Fin. I think couple of things, like number one, and I think we've said this on, on some prior calls, we have been focused on our existing platform and FSK, I think we're pretty pleased with what we've been able to accomplish during the course of this year. Michael laid out a bunch of things and his prepared remarks. I think the things that we've done on invest post investor day those three levers been pretty sort of happy with. And I think getting it down to one publicly traded name versus where we started at six effectively three years ago, that's been the most important thing all that being said, it's, we obviously are seeing sort of what's out there, it is something that we are considering, I think that we're sort of mindful about and I think we'll see how we take that forward in, in the coming months of the coming quarters. I think it is a little bit of a statement and I think in a good way about how private credit continues to be more expected or accepted in the investors of a community, because I think you're see seeing that on the deal volume perspective, but you're seeing from the investor side as well with, I think there's a continued sort of hunt for yield out there. So on our mind for sure. But like I said, have been really focused on making sure we're in a good spot on FSK.

Sure. That's helpful. Thanks so much.

Thanks.

Your next question comes from Kenneth Lee with RBC Capital Markets.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Just one on the dividend policy in terms of thinking of the $0.60 per shares base dividend plus the access or, or supplemental dividend? Should, should we also view this as the, a as FSK achieving additional confidence and visibility in, into, into the sustainable earnings power? The portfolio has given all the, the range of achievements that they've achieved so far in terms of the, the growth lever on, on the NII side. Thanks.

Yeah. I'll let Steven sort of add to this. I mean, I appreciate the words. I think we have been happy with those, the start for those three levers that we sort of talked about that investor day more to do there, but I think a pretty sort of clear path. I think we've gotten some very good feedback in the market on the idea of, of the variable dividend policy. I think we also got some questions though about if the market was going to be perceived it, if we were at 64, Q1 63, the next quarter and sort of reading a fair amount into that. So I think we spent some time trying to figure out a way to make sure we're crisp and clear on sort of that base in the supplemental that Steven laid out. But I think that was the main focus to, to make sure just all the market participants were on the same page. But Steven, anything to add there?

No, Ken, appreciate your question. The only thing I would add is when we did come out with the policy about two years ago, then one of the things we were mindful of at that time was for BDCs that did have a base and supplemental structure with their dividends at that time. One of the issues that people talked about, that some of the services who track Companies dividends cetera would track only the base and not the supplemental. And so that was incumbent in our thinking of if we're renouncing just a number every quarter then and paying as much as we can with the overage of earnings and that would put us in a very good spot and, and the services would track it more accurately. As Dan alludes to there were certain people in the market who said, well, you, you're going up and down a little bit. And so is there a base? And we you talk to people and say, well, yeah, kind of think of it as 60. So it's, we just wanted to be sure people were clear on that. But it's really no, no more complicated than that, but appreciate the kind words. And we do think we're closing that line of sight, if you will, toward the balance of, of 2022 and pleased with the accomplishments since the investor day certainly.

Great. Very helpful there. And just one follow up, if I may just wondering if you could just comment on what you're seeing in terms of current opportunities within the asset based finance side? Thanks.

Yeah. I mean, happy to take that I think that continues to be an area that we find quite attractive. if you think about where we are sort of macro wise we're staring at some, noise and inflation sort of rising rates things that you can get essentially access to collateral access to early sort of front loaded sort of cash flows. I think we find those two things sort of quite attractive. I think it's a space where scales capital has not up and raised. we've got 35 investment professionals focused on that. Things like toric[ph], we have found really attractive. we did have a really a good result during 2021 with the sale of a single family rental platform called home partners of America. We have sort of pivoted and one of the, the new deals in the quarter was, was another platform that we're backing there called my community home. So I think you, you could couple that with outside of, of, of global jet, we've done some other things in the private sort of jet space. We've been active in, in certain sort of esoteric as assets like music IP, but I think the overall investing in environment for asset based finance remains quite a attractive. And like I said, not a lot of scaled capital or scaled players and we think we are and think we've got a, a nice competitive advantage there.

Gotcha. Great. Very helpful. Thanks again.

Thank you.

And your next question comes Melissa Wedel with JP Morgan.

Good morning. Appreciate you taking my questions today. Was looking at the pickup in portfolio yield quarter-over-quarter, and I'm curious how you sort of do the attribution on that increase. Is it, do you think it's, it was driven by some of that elevated activity and repayments I or is it sort of attributable to the reduction in non-accruals or what's the split between those?

Yeah, no. Good, good morning, Melissa. And fair question. I, I think the attribution's a little bit of a couple things, right? It's just the, the simple, so the summary of certain assets that got repay versus where some of the new assets came on and then certain of the assets that, that did move to non-accrual, some of them were sort of lower yielding versus some of those assets that went sort of back on accrual. So it was just the really the, the handful of those levers changed from the eight one to the eight four.

Okay. And could you remind us what the yield on the exited investments was during the quarter and that's it for me? Thanks,

Melissa. It's Steven, I think on the exited, it was around seven nine.

Got it. Thanks so much.

Sure.

Thank you. And this concludes our Q&A session. I will turn the call back to Dan Pietrzak for his final remarks.

Well, thank you everyone for spending time with us today. We are pleased with our 2021 results and believe we're well positioned going into 2022. If you do have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to reach out, have a good day.

And with that ladies and gentlemen, we concludes today's program. Thank you for your participation. And you may now disconnect.