Earnings Labs

FRP Holdings, Inc. (FRPH)

Q1 2016 Earnings Call· Wed, Feb 3, 2016

$21.61

+0.75%

Key Takeaways · AI generated
AI summary not yet generated for this transcript. Generation in progress for older transcripts; check back soon, or browse the full transcript below.

Same-Day

+1.92%

1 Week

-1.60%

1 Month

+7.63%

vs S&P

+2.77%

Transcript

Operator

Operator

Excuse me, everyone, we now have Tom Baker, CEO of FRP Holdings Incorporated in conference. Please be aware that each of your line is in a listen-only mode. At the conclusion of Mr. Baker’s presentation, we will open the floor for questions and at that time instructions will be given as to the procedure to be followed if you you'd like to ask a question. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Mr. Tom Baker. Sir, you may now begin.

Tom Baker

Management

Good afternoon to you all. As mentioned, I am Tom Baker, CEO of FRP Holdings. With me are John Baker, our Chairman; John Milton, our CFO; David deVilliers, our President; and John Klopfenstein, our Treasurer and CAO. Before we get into our results, let me caution you that any statements made on this call that relate to the future or by their nature subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. Additional information regarding these and others risks and uncertainties may be found on the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2016 were $8,823,000, which is an increase of $521,000 or 6.3% versus last year's first quarter. Income from continuing operations for this year's first quarter was $7,473,000 or $0.76 per share versus $1,131,000 or $0.12 per share in last year’s first quarter. This year’s first quarter benefited from a gain on land sale of $6,286,000 plus income of $3 million from the settlement of an environmental claim. These two events contributed $0.57 per share to income from continuing operations to this year's first quarter. The land sale was Phase II of our Windlass Run residential property and was another good example of our team executing our strategy of turning non-income-producing assets into income-producing assets. This also highlights our ability to find property and entitle it such that we can create shareholder value. Now I'll turn the call over to David deVilliers to discuss first quarter operating results in our three operating segments. David?

David deVilliers

Management

Thank you, Tom, and good day to those on the call with us this afternoon. I will now take you through our results for the first quarter of fiscal 2016. As Tom had stated previously, we had positive results from all three of our business segments. The real performer in this quarter was the Mining and Royalty segment. Due to an increase in tons mined, revenues were up in this year's first quarter by a healthy 23.4% or $315,000 to $1,659,000. We periodically analyze the amount of corporate management company time spent on each of our three business segments. In the most recent analysis, it was determined that less time was being spent on the Mining and Royalty segment versus prior years when we were working on mining related transactions such as the Lake Louisa acquisition and the spin-off. So as a result, we reduced the allocation of corporate management company expenses for this quarter and reallocated some $263,000 to our other two business segments. The increase in tons mined combined with the reallocation of corporate management company expenses resulted in operating profits of $1,470,000 which is an increase of 66.7% or $558,000 over the same quarter last year. We believe that volumes will continue to increase at our locations for the foreseeable future as construction activity in Florida and Georgia improves and Vulcan maintains it shift or most of their production at our property in Virginia. Relative to your Asset Management segment, rental revenues for our building platform for the first quarter was $6,915,000, up 2.3% over last year's first quarter due mostly to an increase at occupied square feet. Operating profit for this quarter was $3,010,000 down $76,000 or 2.5% due mainly to the reallocation of those corporate and management company expenses from the Mining and Royalty segment…

Tom Baker

Management

Thank you, David that was a good report. As David mentioned all three segments of our business showed improvement and we feel are positioned well for the remainder of fiscal 2016. Our Riverfront project in D.C. is on track for completion in the fall of 2016 as David mentioned. We’ve just entered into a joint venture agreement with a partner in Baltimore to develop the balance of our Windlass Business Park and we’ve begun negotiations with our current partner on Phase II of Dock 79. We have a number of opportunities in front of us to continue add value to the Company and we’re working on them and we are excited about what the balance of 2016 holds for us. We’re glad to entertain your questions at this time.

Operator

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Looks like we do have one question from Craig Bibb with CJS Securities.

Craig Bibb

Analyst

Hi, guys that was a great quarter and you’re moving along and turning non-income into income. On the mining segment, there has been 29% increase in tons mined, how much of that is kind of same-store versus jus the shift for bulkhead in the Virginia mine?

Tom Baker

Management

Most of that increase was actually same-store, the shift in Virginia wasn't as significant as we hoped it will be in the future which is a good news, it was mostly just same-store growth. But quite a bit of it actually at our Newbury cement plant.

Craig Bibb

Analyst

That’s tremendous. How much then if there is more to go in Virginia, much more could that pop up?

Tom Baker

Management

I would hate to hazard to guess I'm not sure exactly what their timetable is, I thought it was going to be a little quicker than it actually has been I thought we would have seen some other and we have not, so I don't know exactly when they’re going to get over, they haven't communicated with them here in the last 60 days or so.

Craig Bibb

Analyst

Okay. And could you give us, I'm still relatively new to the story, can you give us A background on the remediation settlement?

John Milton

Analyst

Sure, this is John Milton. What we did basically is worked out a settlement with our prior tenant to pay the $3 million and release them from any other claims that does not cover the full cost of estimated cost of remediation for all four phases, but it is -- it did cover the cost of the Phase 1 that we've incurred thus far in this project with a little left over. We will probably incur another expense when we commit fully to Phase II of a similar amount of about 1.8 million as a minimum item that we will book as an expense, whether it's this quarter or the next quarter when we make our final commitment on Phase II. We are also at the same time pursuing three other parties for recovery of the balance of the remediation cost from other -- three other parties.

Craig Bibb

Analyst

Okay. And the remediation cost that you've incurred or expensed so far is also about 1.8 million?

John Baker

Analyst

No, it's a little over, it's like 2 million to 2.1 million, we're still trying to finalize that exact amount.

Craig Bibb

Analyst

Great. I'll let someone else ask a question.

Operator

Operator

[Operator Instructions] And we do have another question from Myron Cohn with Stifel.

Myron Cohn

Analyst

Yes. Good afternoon. Very nice quarter. I don't understand why we need a joint partner in the Windlass Run?

John Baker

Analyst

Myron, I think the message is that that area has changed somewhat since we first acquired this property and the warehouse development there is slow. The one warehouse we've constructed, it took us quite a while to get it occupied. It is now 100% leased. This gentleman that we're partnering with in the meantime is a land neighbor and has developed because of the growth of residential properties in the area, he has grown the demand or seen the demand and built to it of these small office buildings and he presents to us the opportunity to convert that land into income producing property at a much faster rate than we could hope to expect if we kept it as industrial warehouse.

John Milton

Analyst

And Myron, also just as a -- one little tiny other piece of flavor as to why he is the guy that's kind of created this product, which is exciting to us. And he owns the frontage on our property too. So he also matches up well with us in terms of making our property as a joint venture, we think more valuable than it would have been bar ourselves.

Myron Cohn

Analyst

Okay. Thank you. Keep up the good work.

Operator

Operator

Our next question comes from Robert Henderson with Rutabaga Capital Management.

Robert Henderson

Analyst · Rutabaga Capital Management.

Good afternoon. Could you just give us a general sense of where Dock 79 stands now, because I haven't seen it, so can you just sort of describe how many stories it is now and what has to be done between now and the fall?

David deVilliers

Management

This is David deVilliers and basically we are -- the building is the topped out at nine floors. The windows, exterior windows and doors are all going in interior framing. So as it relates to percentage of completion, it's about 51%. So we're on schedule as I said on time. We'd love to begin the leasing effort in March and then final occupancy is scheduled for some time in the middle of September ‘16.

Robert Henderson

Analyst · Rutabaga Capital Management.

Excellent. Thank you very much.

Operator

Operator

[Operator Instructions] I'm showing no further questions in the queue at this time.

John Baker

Analyst

Well, thank you very much for your interest in the company. We look forward to updating you next quarter. Thanks.

David deVilliers

Management

Thank you.

Operator

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's teleconference. You may now disconnect.