Paul Pittman
Analyst · Janney. Please go ahead
Thank you, Luca. So, several different points I want to cover in this morning's call. First, there will be some discussion of the market generally; our performance specifically. And then, we're going to spend a few moments discussing the ongoing litigation that the company’s involved in. So, first, turning to land values. We did see the USDA Land Values Survey come out a couple of days ago. It was in fact last Thursday. We did a press release related to the fair value adjustment that is a part of our Preferred Series B. I direct you to that press release for the specifics. The punchline is that Farmland values on a nationwide basis were essentially flat year-over-year 2019 to 2020. For our particular 16-state, 17-state portfolio at the time we issued the preferred, we are slightly up. So that would be what one would expect to see, given what's going on in the farm economy that were largely flat in the last few years. Just to refresh your memory, we've been in the neighborhood of 1% to 2% growth per annum in land values, so this year is a little bit behind that. My own view is, with all the economic stimulus that's occurring, we will see Farmland values begin to appreciate due to the expectation of inflation. But we'll know for sure a year from now. Looking at performance of tenants and how those things are going. As far as the primary grains, crop prices are low by last five-year historical standards, but yields are likely to be very, very high. I think it will turn out to be an okay year, when you balance those things. Farmers continue to face some level of financial stress, because they – it's been now five-plus years since they had a really good year in terms of profitability. Turning to the specialty crops, hitting kind of the four or five major crop types that we have in our specialty portfolio. Almond pricing is lower than the prior year, but the yields are the same or better. Pistachios, similar or slightly lower price and the crop is similar to the prior year. Walnuts the price is down, but the crops are pretty strong and again, similar or slightly better than past years. In citrus, the prices and the crops were strong for the citrus harvest this year. And for wine grapes, as many of you may know, the prices are actually terrible. It's a historic low in many cases for some of the wine grape varieties and the crop is pretty good. So I say that and I cover it because it relates to our – to the crop shares that we may get later in the year. I think this will turn out to be a fair year from the performance of our specialty portfolio but certainly not a great year, due to the couple of the commodities having a very, very difficult price environment. When you look at effect of COVID on the company, I use this statistic not because it is by any means a perfect statistic but it's the one we used last quarter and it gives a quick representation of whether we're feeling the effect of COVID in the portfolio. We – our cash collections are about 98%, of where they were at this time last year. I would say that's essentially the same as last year. The way that statistic works and the timing of when exactly when various payments come in, in 98%, 102%, it's all in the zone of the same as prior years. That is consistent with what we feel. We are an industry, where COVID is not a significant factor but the general – the other general issues affecting agriculture do affect our tenants in our portfolio but COVID in particular just not that big a factor. If we go forward in terms of what the strategy of the company will continue to be in the future quarters, it will continue to gradually sell assets and repurchase our stock and preferred. We will continue to do that, as I've said in the past, until such time, as we feel like our stock price more accurately represents net asset value. Now turning to the litigation. The biggest single event for the company in this quarter was the advancement in what we have historically called the Rota Fortunae lawsuit, related to the short and distort attack that was put against the company in the summer of 2018. What has occurred is that there was a release of the name of the person who wrote the article. The court required Quinton Mathews, that's who wrote Rota Fortunae is to release his name. And we were allowed to depose Mr. Mathews and to get some additional discovery. What has come from that is really the following, but let me preface it by first saying, as we have always said: We have no problem with people taking short positions on our stock, if they happen to disagree with our point of view with regard to any important factor affecting agriculture or the ownership of land agriculture or things like that. Legitimate traders do disagree with our outlook for commodity prices, for rents, for land values. And if that's your perspective, feel free to short our stock. But we do believe that illegal market manipulation is a different matter. It has the opposite effect of fair and open price discovery. That is really why I am supportive of legitimate short trading. In this particular case based on our initial review of discovery, we now believe that the record clearly supports our position that the companies and its shareholders were the victim of an illegal market manipulation scheme in July of 2018. This led to a 40% decline in the stock and led to litigation by class action attorneys against the company. As I said a few moments ago, we have identified Rota Fortunae, as Quinton Mathews and we have also identified additional parties, who we believe worked with Mathews to profit from big short bets timed with the attack. We have amended our complaint to add the following parties. We believe those co-conspirators to be: Sabrepoint Management LP; and George Baxter and Donald Marchiony, who are employees of Sabrepoint. We continue to believe their conduct was illegal and we will continue to pursue those responsible for a full recovery for the company and its shareholders. Mr. Mathews is not some sort of market visionary on a quest to uncover improper behavior at companies. Rather, he is a low-budget hired gun tasked with writing a defamatory article to assist in a short and distort scheme. Based on the e-mail discovery that we have received, our complaint alleges that Sabrepoint brought the idea to Mr. Mathews and assisted Mathews, regarding the drafting of the posting. While Mr. Mathews has attempted to remain anonymous for nearly two years of pending litigation, the court after denying Mathews' motion to dismiss said, he can no longer remain behind the First Amendment right to anonymity. There is a well-known playbook for short and distort schemes and we believe Mathews and his co-conspirators played it to a T. They have done this before to other companies and they will do it again unless we or some other victim holds them accountable. This pattern of behavior should upset all legitimate market participants whether on the long side or the short side and should eventually attract the attention of law enforcement entities. With that, I will turn it back over to you Luca for some additional comments.