Sandip Rana
Analyst · Deutsche Bank
Thank you, Stefan. Good morning, everyone. As you will have seen from the press release issued yesterday, the company has reported another quarter of solid financial results. This continued the strong momentum that was built in fiscal 2016 and first quarter 2017. The portfolio continues to perform well. In addition, we continued to maintain our strong balance sheet which was further strengthened during the quarter with the exercise of the $75 Canadian warrants resulting in proceeds to the company of $475 million Canadian. The warrants were to expire in mid-June 2017, the proceeds added to our cash position and we ended the quarter with an excess of $600 million in cash and cash equivalents while continuing to be debt free. As you turn to slide three, the chart illustrates the gold equivalent ounces breakdown by commodity for second quarter 2017 compared to second quarter 2016. You can see that GEOs in total have increased by approximately 9% compared to last year. There have been slight increase in gold, PGM, other mineral GEOs while silver has remained fairly flat. To see further detail of the movement in GEOs from Q2 2016 to Q2 2017 and how the incremental GEOs were sourced, please turn to Slide four, as you can see from the chart the portfolio has performed well and it's not been very volatile as mentioned there was a slight decrease in silver GEOs has left silver ounces were delivered and sold from Antamina this quarter compared to a year ago, however this was expected with respect to the gold net profit interest royalties, GEOs were higher due to a strong recover from our Hemlo MPI, PGM assets have performed well with GEOs increasing due to slightly higher production year-over-year as well as higher palladium prices which impacts of the number of GEOs earned upon conversion. The largest increase year-over-year is from both assets and Candelaria in particular which delivered approximately 18,000 GEOs in the second quarter of 2017. Overall an increase year-over-year as GEOs increases from 112,787 to 122,541. As you turn to Slide 5 you will see two charts on the page .The first chart highlights the average price and precious metals revenue for each of the last five quarters. Second quarter of 2017 generated $150.3 million in precious metals revenue compared to $141.2 million a year ago. A 6.4% increase, this increase is due to both better overall performances at our assets as well as stronger palladium prices. On the bottom chart we have highlighted our increase in oil and gas net revenue and the oil price which has being less volatile recently. Oil and gas revenue has increased from $7.8 million a year ago to $9.6 million in Q2, 2017. On slide 6 you'll see the key financial results for the company for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2017. I will get into the specifics but what I would like to point out is that we have year-over-year increases for most of the financial metrics with new records being set for GEOs revenue adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income for the six month period. They increased as are the result of the stronger overall production at our assets as well as benefiting from certain commodity price increases in particular Palladium and oil. As you turn to slide 7, the geographic revenue profile continues to be lower risk with 82% of revenue from the Americas with Latin America being the largest contributor. one of our core goal is to build a diversified portfolio with a focus on precious metals. For second quarter of 2017 precious metals revenue was 92% of overall revenue with 71% being from gold's, 14% from silver and 7% from PGMs. We continue to stress the scalability of our business model and believe slide 8 highlight this. As you can see there has been a significant increase in revenue over the last six years, costs have also increased over this time frame but the largest cost component is the stream and other cost, stream cost will continue to increase as the company is delivered more stream ounces which we consider a positive. In Q2, 2017 the company sold approximately 84,000 screen GEOs. One item which I believe is important to highlight is the fixed cost. These are the cost, these are the company's corporate administration cost and as you can see they remain fairly constant each year regardless of changes in revenue. So further highlight the margin generation of our business model please turns to slide 9. Here you will see our internal all insisting the cost per ounce. The cost per ounce includes our cost of sales amounts plus corporate administration; taxes are not included. For Q2, 2017 the cost per ounce was $330 leaving a margin of $937 per ounce. The cost per ounce has increased in 2017 when compared to previous quarters. This is due to the Guadalupe stream as you will recall under the extreme agreement the company pays $800 per ounce for gold ounces delivered from Guadalupe versus the more common $400 per ounce. Regardless, we remain a high margin business. Slide 10 highlights the available capital for Franco-Nevada, when our working capital, marketable securities and credit facilities net of the $28 million remaining to fund the stack two transaction or total, the available capital is approximately $1.9 billion. As mentioned earlier the company did see a significant increase in pass-through in Q2 2017 due to the exercise of the warrants. And with respect to our credit facilities, none are drawn currently. Before I turn it over to the operator, I would like to confirm the guidance that was issued by the company. We are maintaining the GEO guidance range of 470,000 to 500,000 GEOs for 2017. However we expect gold equivalent ounce sales for 2017 to be at the higher end of that range as well we continue to maintain our $35 million to $45 million revenue range for oil and gas revenue for 2017. And with that, I would now like to turn it over to the operator, the management team is happy to take any questions you may have.