Yes. I'll add a couple of other thoughts in there. I mean, traditionally -- well, two things, one, pull up that that Google satellite photo, and what you'll see is what Dan mentioned earlier, that's a lot of population density, right, where we are, going to the South, going to the West. But as you start to go North, up by -- up towards Kenosha, what you see is a lot of more farmland. And so from a density -- population density point of view, the density is where we are. Historically, what you'll see is casinos will do well, if you have quality, or distance, closeness on your side. And in this case, we'll have both. And so we feel pretty good for both of those reasons. The other thing I would maybe point out as well is if you're on a cusp city, where's Alex again, he lives in Wilmette. Our Head of Development lives over in the Chicago land area. But a lot of those cities that are there around Evanston and whatnot, you are, from a mileage point of view, probably a little bit closer to the Rivers Casino. But if you pull up a Google Map, what you'll see is a lot of yellow and red on the pads going towards downtown and a lot of people in that area, I think we're going to be predisposed to not want to travel towards downtown. And will end up spending a minute, maybe five minutes more, perhaps even less, actually, with traffic going our way instead. And so if you were to include some of those people that are on the cusp, I think that, that additional population will largely offset any impact that you'll get from that Kenosha tribe. So we still feel very, very good.