Simon Ho
Chief Financial Officer
All right. Daphne, thank you very much for your questions. I'll take them one by one. The first question is about the credit cost and provisioning levels and why they were so low. Yes, there were write-backs in the third quarter, because of the better than expected credit risk experience as we have been highlighting throughout the commentary earlier. So, there were write-back during the quarter. Particularly for the guarantee credit loss the figure of RMB 327 million included in that was a write-back of roughly RMB 690 million, okay? And this write-back is for loans outstanding prior to the second quarter, okay? With regards to your second question about the profitability and sort of the unit economics, as we have said, our transition to lower lending rates have been ahead of expectations. Delinquency rates are improving faster than expected. Funding cost continues to decline and we are growing our loan volume. Because of these favorable trends, we expect our take rate in the fourth quarter to decline only slightly compared to the third quarter. Our take rate was 3.9% in the third quarter. And Q4, we think will mostly -- the take rate will mostly come-in in the range of perhaps between 3.5% to 3.9%. Now going forward, we expect the take rate to stabilize or even improve from this level as we continue to optimize our credit quality and drive down credit cost, okay? Now, as a side note, as we have shifted to better quality borrowers, there has also been an increase in fees from customer referrals. These borrowers don't meet our new standards to our new standards and these have been referred to other platforms. Such referral fees, in the third quarter, amounted to about RMB 90 million and these are completely free of credit risks. So, we will continue to continuously work to improve profitability, and there is room for efficiency gains as long as volume expands and we work to optimize costs. And we are confident of delivering healthy and sustainable profitability. So, I hope that helps address your question on the profitability outlook. And your final question on sort of government – the regulatory outlook, I think – look, I think we can make a few comments. I think clearly – I think government regulations regulators recognizes the value that fintech companies bring to the table, such as in online customer acquisition and servicing, data, technology and in risk management. And I think this has been consistent in all the comments that have come out. And the fintech industry complements and benefits the traditional banks, expands access to credit increases efficiency. I think this is all very positive. I think – personally, I think the recent rules in micro-lending, co-lending seems to be primarily aimed at some of the larger companies. And this does not impact us, as we do not rely on this co-lending model. And as you know, the loan facilitation model that we primarily rely on has been recognized in the CBIRC's online lending rules for commercial banks, which was officially released only recently in July. And I think more stringent requirements and moves to prevent monopolization, should be positive for proven companies with a strong track record like us. On the one hand, it raises the entry barriers for smaller players. And on the other hand, it should limit competition from the major – the larger major Internet companies. So in the long run, I think, this will encourage healthy and sustainable development for the industry. And I hope, this helps to answer your questions, Daphne.