Andrew F. Jacobs
Analyst · KBW
Thank you, Kelly. Good morning, and my welcome as well to the third quarter 2012 earnings call. As usual, I'm joined by Robert Spears, our Portfolio Manager; and Phil Reinsch, our CFO, both of whom will be available for questions after some of my brief opening remarks. Operating results for the quarter. Net income totaled $40 million or $0.35 per diluted common share. Net interest margins for the quarter decreased to $43.6 million as a result of a 20 basis point decline in financing spreads on mortgage investment portfolio, 230 basis point. And I just want to point out here, the financing spread as presented, this is a non-GAAP measure based solely on the portfolio. This is different than the presentation in the past, which has been more focused on what the GAAP requirement was, which -- and previously included other interest-bearing assets and liabilities in the yield calculations which kind of threw that number off. So this is more of a pure number associated with our core portfolio. And I think you'll find a new schedule. It's on Page 10 of our press release. And then we also have on Page 10, the reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP. So I think I've covered my SEC requirements there. Anyway, portfolio yields averaged 1.86%, representing an 18 basis point decline from the second quarter. Yields were negatively impacted primarily by higher investment premium amortization, resulting from higher level of mortgage prepayments, which averaged 18.7% CPR in the third quarter compared to 15.9% than the previous quarter. The yields were influenced by prices paid on more recent purchases over the recent -- with the run-up in prices for mortgages in the recent past. And the yields also reflect declines in the weighted average coupons on the company's portfolio, of our ARM loans which we're resetting to the current indexes which we continue to expect will have some impact going forward that will be mitigated. Interest rates on our repo borrowings, including the effects of our swap agreements, averaged 56 basis points in the third quarter, which were 2 basis points higher than they were in the second quarter, which is reflecting just generally higher, slightly higher repo borrowing rates. And our operating cost and the way we define it as a percent of our long term investment capital, which is our long-term capital, declined 88 basis points during the quarter from 106 basis points during the previous quarter. As a result, there's continued growth in the long-term investment capital, as well as lower compensation-related accruals. Regarding the portfolio acquisitions during the third quarter averaged $1.2 billion, which more than offset the runoff during the period, which was $777 million. And overall, our investment portfolio increased to $14.3 billion. I want to point out that 58% of this portfolio is still invested in the shorter duration ARM securities. Those are basically securities that will reset in rate within the next 18 months. As I mentioned earlier, the portfolio runoff increased 2.8% CPR to 18.7%, which reflects the lower prevailing mortgage interest rates available, as well as some seasonal patterns. Mortgage rates will continue declining with the consequence of the QE3, and which is the Fed working to treat -- to get mortgage interest rates lower. The -- I think there are certain characteristics in our portfolio that lessen, we believe, the risk of experiencing sharply higher interest rates, one of the reasons because of the current reset portion is such a significant part. So -- and then I think that's one of the primary fundamental differences between our portfolio and most of our peers. As of the end of the quarter, our overall portfolio was backed by mortgage loans requiring homeowners to make mortgage payments on a relatively low 3.37% coupon. That's generally below what the longer end, the 30-year fixed rate-type product is in this world. And of this, of our portfolio, 56% was originated prior to 2009. So with the more seasoned portfolio, you have it in there the issues associated with credit issues, loan-to-value ratios because these people were in their houses more and during the crisis versus after and with better underwriting after the crisis occurred. So we think that the homeowners are somewhat locked out of the opportunities to prepay as fluently as they had in the past, over the last decade. So we think that -- I think we -- mortgage prepayments, they're going to be higher to some extent because of the implications of what the Fed is trying to do, but we think that they'll be manageable from -- for our purposes with our portfolio, we think we have good attributes that will cause that to be reality. Borrowing costs have remained largely in check. We have seen some increases. And as we move in the year, towards year-end, borrowing costs on repo are still elevated from where they were in previous quarters this year. But all in all, it's still a very positive market there. There's availability of repo, and we really don't see any concerns, but the issue is just whether you're having to pay a little bit more today with just banking system. It costs you a basis point or 2. That adds up. But all in all, the key is that there's availability, and we don't see any concerns or cracks with that part of the market. As I mentioned earlier, our long-term investment capital, we actually -- it grew during the quarter to -- up $83 million quarter-over-quarter to where our investment capital is now $1.66 billion. A lot of that is -- the improvement is higher pricing levels for our portfolio with a little bit of accretive capital raising during the period. Our leverage at the end of the quarter had declined slightly to 7.96, our long-term capital. And the net duration gap of our portfolio was about 2.5 months. Our book value which I think is across the board in the REIT space is a positive for everybody. Our book value per common share increased 65 basis points. We ended the quarter at $13.88. Most of the improvement was increasing value to portfolio. Offset slightly with a little -- our swap book. But I'm just going to open it up for questions here in a second, but I just want to say a word about the recent passing of Mike Farrell, who was CEO at Annaly. Mike was a leader in the mortgage REIT industry, and was the person I think most responsible for the growth and acceptance of the mortgage REIT model. And I just wanted to say thank you to Mike, and we'll miss your leadership and our sympathies go out to his family and coworkers. So with that, I'll open it up for questions.