Orlando Berges
Analyst · Bank of America. Please go ahead
Good morning, everyone. As Aurelio made reference to net income for the quarter was $28.6 million, or $0.13 a share compared to $21 million last quarter. We breakdown the components, you can see that Corporation’s legacy core basis achieve the net income of $44.3 million, which mostly, it’s a result of reductions in the require provision for credit losses. Last quarter, we had a provision of $39 million as compared to $8 million this quarter. During the quarter, the improvement on macroeconomic projected variable to most portfolios except for the commercial real estate, as well as some changes in portfolio balances led to this reduction. The acquired Santander operation contributed $3.5 million of after tax net income. That excludes the Day 1 CECL adjustments, which I’ll touch upon. This results including back of the amortization of the fair value marks on all the assets and liabilities and the amortization of the resulting intangibles. For example, one of the other things that had impact we look at the investment portfolio, Santander had U.S. treasuries – launch U.S. treasuries portfolio that after marks resulted in a portfolio of yields only 15 basis points. Since then, we decided that to improve margin to sell this portfolio and reinvested in other securities according to our policies, which yield around 94 basis points, which will improve going forward some of the deals. On the other hand, amortization of some of the other discounts and intangibles result in $1 million improvement in net interest income from the combination of loan and deposit, our preliminary fair value adjustments that have been moved. We look at other – the other components of transactions, some large ones that were in the quarter. The first one would be the CECL, I made reference too. CECL requires that in the case of business combination, we set up an allowance for credit losses, on top on non-purchase credit deteriorated loans on top of or in addition to any kind of fair value measurements. This resulted in recognition of an allowance of almost $39 million for the quarter, in addition to those fair value marks. The non-purchase credit deteriorated portfolio, it’s about $1.7 billion after marks. During the quarter, we also decided to sell around $116 million of MBS that were experiencing significant prepayments. And that resulted in a gain of about $5.1 million from the transaction. And it’s being reinvested again in other instruments. Merger and restructuring costs, Aurelio mentioned, some of it. During the quarter, we had $10.4 million, which compared to $2.9 million in the last quarter, which was mostly legal, financial and financial consulting piece, as well as some conversion related costs, as we prepare for the conversion. So far, we have incurred about $25 million in expenses related to the transaction over the last few quarters. And during the fourth quarter, we expect to have some amounts associated with the voluntary separation program that Aurelio mentioned, as well as costs associated with branch and other consolidations, as we finalize the sessions on data those processes. Finally, the other large items is that we need up analysis completed analyze, so the DTA now, including the Santander operation and that we told that in the reversal of approximately $8 million of deferred tax asset, valuation allowance we had on books. Net interest income for the quarter was $148.7 million, which is $13.5 million higher than last quarter, $14 million of that was the Santander operation. On the other hand, the legacy by our FirstBank operation had a reduction of $500,000 and income as compared to last quarter. In here, reduction in rates obviously accelerated prepayments on the investment portfolio has been large higher proportion of cash and investment securities to total learning assets have resulted in a reduction in the name on FirstBank. Last quarter, we had 4.22% NIM that you saw in our prior release, that number it’s down to our 3.94% this quarter. Break it down some of the components is a commercial loan repricing with our 4 basis points of the reduction. But the – had much higher proportion of cash on investment securities, as well as the large prepayments and the alternative for reimbursement affected by 18 basis points more of that margin. Santander on a standalone was about – the margin was about 3.89% considering the purchase accounting adjustments and that combined with FirstBank ended up with a 3.93% margin that you see on the release. Non-interest income improved to $29.9 million, the $9 million – this $9 million increase includes $5 million in the gains on sales that I might reference to before of securities that I made reference to. We had $3.4 million increase in revenue for mortgage banking activities. Mostly or all of it, it’s related to sales of a residential mortgage. This quarter, we had a much active – much more active quarter on originations that what we had in the second quarter and ended up selling $98 million more in conforming paper that we did last quarter, resulting that revenue increase. Also the reopening of businesses as we have seen on the quarter, seen a much higher level of credit and debit card activity, which improved dining plus ATM, merchant fees and some of the other components that improve the income by our $2.8 million in the quarter. And then the improvement we had in deposit service fees associated with the Santander transaction that brought in $1.1 million of additional deposit fees to the operation. On the expense side, expenses were $107 million that includes $10.7 million in expenses for the Santander – where Santander operation and $96.8 million for the FirstBank legacy operation. This $96 million is $7 million higher than the $89 million, almost $90 million we had last quarter. As I mentioned, the merger and restructuring costs for the quarter were $10.4 million, which is $7.5 million higher than last quarter, basically created most of the increase. But on the quarter, we – if we exclude this FirstBank was $86.4 million of expenses. COVID related expenses were about $1 million this quarter, which is down about $2 million from last quarter, but other expenses obviously as we saw improvements in volume of transactions and improvement in fee, we also have higher expenses associated with that volume of business in those debit and credit card transactions. The allowance for credit losses increased significantly as of September 30, the allowance for loans and lease accounting was up $65 million to $385 million as compared to June. Mostly, it’s due to the initial allowance for credit losses require to the Santander operation. If we look at total allowance for credit losses, including on bonded commitments and debt securities, that’s up to $403 million. This quarter as I mentioned before, we recorded was $38.8 million in allowance for credit losses in total $37.5 million of that is related to loans. That builds up that allowance touched it with a portfolio. And in addition for PCD loans or purchase credit deteriorated specifically, we establish a 20 – almost $29 million allowance. We represent the fair value marks on this loan, which is requires that what is commonly referred to as [indiscernible] that the loans we presented growth and discount we presented in the allowance, those two combined were about $65 million. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses on loans, the total loans was 3.25% at September, slightly down from 3.40% we had at June, but a very significant coverage, if we consider that we added a large amount of portfolios that a large part of it is also a mark-to-market and fair value mark-to-market and has been discounted. On a non-GAAP basis, if we exclude the PPP loans, which don’t carry much reserve the ratio of the allowance to total loans was 3.38% as compared to 3.55% last quarter. Asset quality remained good in the quarter. Non-performings are down $10.5 million to $293 million most of the reduction happened on the OREO portfolio, which decreased $7.3 million, mostly sales, whether we’re completed in the quarter. Migrations to non-performing were higher this quarter as moratoriums expired, we start getting back to levels of more to the normal levels that we were seeing before. And we are in a position to continue to pursue some of the foreclosure processes that were put on hold for a couple of quarters, as we provided those moratoriums to customers. The inflows were $18.4 million this quarter, which is $10 million higher than last quarter. Capital ratios remain really strong. As you can see even with the impact of the acquisition, we still have Tier 1 ratio of 17%. The leverage ratio I think that’s important to mention, you see it’s about 13% for the quarter, but we only have Santander operation for one month in the quarter, so average assets were less. If we were to normalize and assume the full quarter of average assets, that ratio would be closer to 11% also with that, and that was – what we expect that it’s still very significant with the acquisition of $5 billion plus in assets in the quarter. With that, I will open the call for questions.