Greetings ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Edwards Lifesciences Fourth Quarter 2007 Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr. David Erickson, Vice President, Investor Relations. Thank you Mr. Erickson, you may begin.

Welcome and thank you for joining us today. Just after the close of regular trading, we released our fourth quarter 2007 financial results. During our call today, we'll focus our prepared remarks on information that complements the material included in the press release and financial schedules, and then allocate the remaining time for Q&A. Our presenters on today's call are Mike Mussallem, Chairman and CEO; Tom Abate, CFO and Treasurer; and Carlyn Solomon, Corporate Vice President of Critical Care. Before I turn the call over to Mike, I'd like to remind you that during today's call, we will be making forward-looking statements that are based on estimates, assumptions and projections. These statements include, but aren't limited to sales, gross profit margin, net income, earnings per share, and free cash flow goals for 2008; the regulatory approval and sales of heart valve therapy products including Magna Mitral and Magna Ease; the competitive dynamics and market fundamentals of the heart valve market, the continued adoption and expected sales and product enhancements of the FloTrac system; the timing, progress and results of the PARTNER clinical trial; the market opportunity for transcatheter technologies; and the European launch and expected 2008 sales of the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Although we believe them to be reasonable, these statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or experiences to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Information concerning factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from those in the forward-looking statements may be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, and our other SEC filings which are available on our website at edwards.com. With that, I will turn the call over to Mike Mussallem. Mike?

Thank you, David. We are proud of what we have accomplished in 2007. We aggressively prioritized investments and sharpened our strategic focus on opportunities that provide greater growth potential. During the year, we sold the LifeStent and TMR product lines and exited a distribution products business in Japan. In addition, we acquired the CardioVations product line, which complements our growing focus on minimally invasive cardiac surgery procedures. We made significant progress in our innovative transcatheter valve program, including commencing enrollment in the PARTNER pivotal trial in the U.S. and receiving CE Mark for our SAPIEN valve which is growing rapidly in Europe. In 2007, we also substantially increased our transcatheter investment to drive the long-term value of this transformational opportunity. We also made investments to strengthen our quality and information systems for future growth and finished the year with strong momentum achieving 10% sales growth in the quarter. Now, turning to a detailed fourth quarter results, on a reported basis, total sales for the quarter grew 10.3% to $293 million and grew 9.7% on an underlying basis. Reported growth was aided by foreign exchange and negatively impacted by discontinued businesses. Before I begin reviewing our product line sales, Carlyn Solomon, our Corporate Vice President of Critical Care, will take you through the results for his business. As you can see from the numbers, Critical Care had a very strong year. This business is approaching 40% of our total sales and its growth and profitability have accelerated over the last few years. Following a review of our sales results and an update on the partner trial, Tom will discuss the financial results. And with that, I would like to introduce Carlyn Solomon. Carlyn?

Thank you, Mike. I'm pleased to have the opportunity to discuss the Critical Care business with you. For the fourth quarter, Critical Care reported $113 million in sales, up 20%, which included a $4.8 million contribution from FX. On an underlying basis, fourth quarter sales grew 14.4%, the strongest quarterly growth rate of the year. Sales of new products, led by FloTrac continued to be the biggest growth driver this quarter. In the quarter, we increased share gains of our world-leading pressure monitoring product. Our focus on operational excellence has led to a high-quality platform with the ability to respond to demand increases for these products. In addition, a sharp up-tick in year-end sales of hardware products boosted our growth. For the full year 2007, our underlying growth rate exceeded 10%, and beat our original sales guidance. This represents the third year in a row of accelerating sales and improvement in gross profit margins. In addition, we are pleased to have exceeded our goal of doubling FloTrac sales for the year. Our renewed focus on innovation in Critical Care has been a primary growth driver for the franchise. In the fourth quarter, we introduced FloTrac enhancements to the U.S. market which allow clinicians to more easily trend patient status. And in 2008, we plan to introduce additional product enhancements that will enable FloTrac to address an even wider range of patients. In 2007, we expanded sales of PreSep, our central venous oximetry catheter for early detection of sepsis. PreSep sales increased about $3 million, which included just one full quarter of reimbursement in the important Japanese market. Detection and treatment of sepsis remains a clinical challenge and PreSep is beginning to gain adoption. Our hemofiltration product line grew 13% on an underlying basis for 2007, and we expect continued strong performance in 2008. Pressure monitoring had a strong fourth quarter as we continue to gain share as a result of our focus on operational excellence. We are also benefiting from a change in clinical practice, which emphasizes reducing infection rate, resulting in increased sales of our close blood sampling systems. We expect this trend to continue for the foreseeable future. With the innovation of our new monitoring platforms, we have expanded our focus to include selling hardware and service in addition to disposables. In the past year, we have seen steady growth in capital sales. The fourth quarter was particularly strong as we replaced a number of old-generation hardware systems with our innovative new Vigilance II monitors. Improving our rate of innovation, improving operational performance, and changing our business models to sell hardware and service has allowed us to have increasing growth rates over the last three years. Given our success in 2007, we believe we will achieve another strong year of strong sales and profit growth in 2008. Now, I will turn the call back over to Mike.

Thank you, Carlyn. Reported sales for Heart Valve Therapy were $131 million for the fourth quarter, which included a $6.4 million contribution from foreign exchange. This represented a 9% growth rate over last year despite continued U.S. competitive pressure. For the full year 2007, growth in the U.S. was flat. We are focused on improving our performance in this region in 2008 by introducing new products, promoting minimally invasive valve procedures, and leveraging our recently expanded field sales organization. International markets led our sales growth as we continue to realize share gains from new product introductions. In Europe, our strong double-digit sales were driven by the expanded adoption of Magna Ease and Magna Mitral and with the launch of our SAPIEN valve in Europe, transcatheter heart valves contributed over $2 million. In Japan, the recent introduction of our PERIMOUNT Mitral valve helped drive double-digit sales growth and in emerging markets we also had strong double-digit growth. Overall, we believe that the heart valve market fundamentals remain unchanged. We estimate that global market growth averages about 3% to 5% annually, led mainly by unit growth. We believe that the U.S. growth was just below this range in 2007. On a global basis, the market continues to be driven by mechanical to tissue conversion and new product launches. Additionally, we believe that the launch of transcatheter valves in Europe will further stimulate market growth beginning in 2008. In Europe, we are pleased with the clinical performance of Magna mitral and continue to believe that this is also an important valve for U.S. patients. We are currently responding to FDA questions regarding preclinical bench testing and continue to work closely with regulators to further the approval process. We continue to anticipate a U.S. introduction in mid-year 2008. We are actively working to extend…

Thank you, Mike. In addition to the strong sales Mike and Carlyn already discussed, I am happy to say that our gross profit margin exceeded an all-time high, our earnings exceeded our expectations, and our free cash flow for the quarter was very strong. Reported earnings per diluted share for the fourth quarter were $0.27 compared to $0.34 last year. Excluding special items, our fourth quarter non-GAAP EPS was $0.56 compared to $0.55 last year. Our gross profit margin continued to improve in the fourth quarter, climbing to 66% compared to 63.3% for the same period last year. This improvement was driven primarily by a more profitable product mix. For the first quarter, our gross profit margin is expected to be slightly lower than the fourth quarter 2007 as a result of foreign exchange and our stent manufacturing agreement. For full year 2008, we continue to expect the gross profit margin improvement of 100 to 150 basis points over 2007. This improvement will build throughout the year as sales of new products continue to grow. For fourth quarter, SG&A expenses were $114 million or 39% of sales compared to $95 million last year. This increase was due to expected higher levels of spending for both SAPIEN valve launch in Europe and sales-related costs in the U.S., which we announced in July 2007, as well as a significant impact from foreign exchange. For 2008, we expect quarterly SG&A dollars to remain flat at our current levels. R&D investments in the quarter were $33.5 million or 11.4% of sales compared to $33 million last year. The increased level of spending was focused primarily on our transcatheter valve and Critical Care development effort. For 2008, we expect R&D as a percentage of sales to be approximately 11.5%. Net interest expense of $400,000 was…

Thanks, Tom. In summary, I believe Edwards is very well positioned for a strong 2008, which will be highlighted by a number of new product launches and progress on our pioneering transcatheter heart valve program. Additionally, we are very excited to be launching our SAPIEN transcatheter heart valve in Europe and anticipate its increasing contribution to sales throughout the year. We are going to remain focused on achieving our previously stated financial goals, which include generating total sales dollars between $1.16 billion and $1.21 billion, increasing our gross profit margin by 100 to 150 basis points, and generating free cash flow of $155 million to $165 million. Finally, for full year 2008, we estimate that diluted EPS will be between $2.32 and $2.40. And with that, I'll turn the call back over to David.

In order to allow everyone a chance to ask a question, we ask that you limit your questions. If you have any additional questions, please re-enter the queue and we'll answer as many as we can during the call. Operator, we are ready to take questions, please. Question And Answer

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now be conducting the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is coming from Rick Wise with Bear Stearns.

Hi guys, it's James filling in for Rick. I had a quick question on guidance. Mike, I am taking your 8% to 10% heart valve growth number for 2008, and then I look at the... and I apply that to your $515 million that you had this year and I get somewhere in the $560 million to $570 million range. And I am wondering what I am missing or maybe I am missing something that to get you to that $570 million to $590 million you guided for?

Yes, I don't know that you're missing anything, James. Again --

Using... the 8% to 10% we referred to was with underlying growth rate, and when you look at the dollars, that includes the foreign exchange impact. Does that answer your question?

So you're saying it doesn't include foreign exchange, the 8% to 10%

Correct.

Okay. That clears it up. Thanks.

With foreign exchange, I think it puts it more in 10% to 15% range. If you do a straight calculation, I think it's 11% to 15%.

Okay, appreciate it. And then one other quick question. I know in 2007 you sold LifeStent. Just looking ahead at the portfolio as it exists today, just wondering if you are comfortable with the way things are positioned going forward with the PARTNER trial and SAPIEN not coming in U.S. likely till '10 or '11. Just wanted to get your thoughts.

Yes, we are very comfortable with where we are positioned today, and as we indicated at the time of selling the LifeStent product line, what it does, it gives us additional flexibility of the P&L that we still have available to us for other investments that we haven't yet named.

Okay, I appreciate it.

Our next question is coming from Kristen Stewart with Credit Suisse.

Hi, good afternoon, good quarter. I just wanted to ask on the enrollment for the SAPIEN trial with PARTNER. It looks like you were looking for around 90 by the end of the year. You are at 130 now. How are things going relative to your expectations? It seems that everything still seems to be moving on track. Any change to your expectations in terms of when these trials may likely complete enrollment, particularly the Medicorm [ph]?

Yes, thanks Kristin. Actually, I think things are really going just the way that we had anticipated they would when we talked about it at the Investor Conference. So, we continue to be right on track for what we had indicated. So, recall that our goals are to complete enrollment at Cohort B by the end of 2008 and Cohort A goes into Q3 2009. We are very pleased that we have the Ascendra approval, which will accelerate enrollment in the trial and that one is... you have to really kick in, that's just working its way through the IRBs right now.

Okay. Was that just conditional approval or was that a full on approval to Evista of late stage [ph]?

I think FDA will call it a conditional approval, but none of the conditions are really meaningful. We just have to get this through the IRBs and we will be able to start.

Okay. Perfect. Thanks. I will get back in the queue.

Thanks, Kristin.

Our next question is coming from Amit Bhalla with Citigroup. Please state your question.

Hi, thanks for taking the questions. Two quick ones on SAPIEN in the quarter, can you just give us an idea of if there was any channel fill and how many procedures were done in Europe? And then secondly on repair, can you give us an idea of what your expectations for 2008 growth rates are and maybe quantify the level of pricing pressure that the market is facing for the mature products? Thanks.

Sure. First of all, you asked a question about SAPIEN sales and channel fill, most of the sales... we said that we had more than $2 million worth of sales, most of that sales really is on a shelf, Amt, it's not like there is $2 million worth of valves that were used in the quarter. The usage in the quarter is still relatively low. And I think this will continue to be the case here early on. And as it relates to the repair market, we'd say typically the repair market will grow in high single-digits. We would expect that to be the case. We don't feel any particular pricing pressure in this market. We see certainly more competition, especially in this more matured degenerative segment, which is why we are excited about launching Physio II, which will be really the biggest innovation that will happen in the degenerative segment in probably a decade.

Okay. Thank you.

Our next question is coming from Larry Biegelsen with Wachovia Securities.

Hi everyone. Thanks for taking my questions. Mike, I am not sure you said how many centers in Europe are trained today and how many... and what your goal is by the end of the year?

Yes, Larry, thanks for the question. You know what, we had a lot of internal discussion on this one. Unfortunately when you start discussing training centers, that gets to be sort of murky because there are several levels of training and even when your dumb being trained that doesn't mean that you necessarily have been proctored and through your number of cases. I think the whole thing can be sort of confusing to the audience. And so what we have done is gone through how many centers have actually ordered. And so that was the number that I gave, which was 30 centers of order. We have more centers than that at... during some stage of training, but again it gets sort of murky depending on where you draw that line. Does that make sense?

Did I hear you say that there is more than 30 centers in Europe in some stage of being trained today?

Yes. That's correct.

Okay. My second question is, Tom, maybe you can just walk us through the change in the first quarter '08 guidance from I think $0.51 to $0.53 to $0.47 to $0.51?

Larry, I don't know that there is any change in the first quarter guidance. I think as a matter of fact, what Tom presented is pretty much exactly what we laid out at the Investor Conference in December, if you go back to what was presented there.

Okay, then what I have is wrong, I am sorry. I thought what you laid out for the first quarter was $0.51 to $0.53, and what you are laying out on the call today is $0.47 to $0.51. Is that my mistake?

No, I don't think so. I think you may have interpolated that off of the bar chart maybe.

Okay.

I don'tknow --

We have never given previous guidance for it.

I don't remember giving a number, Larry.

Okay. Thanks guys.

Our next question is coming from Paul Choi with Merrill Lynch. Please state your question.

Thank you. If we could maybe just go back to Critical Care for a moment, and I will give it to either Mike or Carlyn, in terms of the out-performance here in the quarter. Are you seeing a up-tick in terms of disposable consumption on the FloTrac or is it more hardware sales that was the driver in the quarter here?

Thanks for the question, Paul, this is Carlyn. We actually saw strong sales in both areas. So we did see an up-tick in the hardware sales, but we saw very strong sales of FloTrac, strong sales of our pressure monitoring as we continue to take share as well there, and then our PreSep catheter also had a very good quarter. So it's kind of good quarter all the way around.

Great. And then with respect to the hemofiltration business, which also seems to have picked up a bit and on the hardware side as well, are you seeing increased interest in terms of capital purchases, in terms of the buying cycle or would you call this a one-timer?

The hemofiltration business is one that actually has been growing, it slowed down a little bit in 2007 for us. We slowed down to about a 13% growth rate, still very strong. We anticipate that we will have a very good year in 2008. So it actually wasn't a pickup and, of course, that includes the sale of hardware and there is no significant bump-up against prior years and also includes sales of disposables and solutions around the world. We did extend in hemofiltration some of our geographical reach this last year and continue to anticipate doing that.

Okay, thanks, I'll jump back in queue.

Our next question is coming from Sara Michelmore with Cowen and Company. Please state your question.

Yes, thank you. Mike, you mentioned that you have... were making some progress over in Europe getting some reimbursement for SAPIEN. I was wondering if you could elaborate on exactly what was going on there. I know that it was not your expectation to have a formal reimbursement there, but can you give us some specifics on what the exact progress is and why you are added, maybe comment on where the funding is coming for the initial product sales here for SAPIEN. I don't think that we or you had expected it to be a constraint in the near-term, but I was wondering if you could just give us a little color where the hospitals are getting the money to buy the valve. Thanks.

Okay. I will be happy to give you a little bit here, Sara, but you might find this a little bit disappointing because I won't give you extraordinary detail because to some extent we feel like this has competitive relevance. But I can tell you that we are focused in the major countries. We have made progress in France, in Italy, in Germany, and that we're able to get reimbursed in those centers very consistently with what we anticipated being reimbursed, and we don't... and even though, as you correctly pointed out, we don't have formal reimbursement in place. We are able to work within those systems such that we feel confident that we will be able to achieve our more than $20 million in 2008. But it is a... there are... it is a pretty complex process, as you might imagine, and I think we are really getting the [multiple speakers]

Mike, it's fair to say it's a combination of sources. I think in some countries it's regional, in some cases it's the hospital itself and then others it goes to the national level.

Okay. But it sounds like you are happy with the progress you are making.

Correct.

Okay. And then secondly, as you get into this launch, I know that procedural success is something that's very important for you guys to track. Can you just remind us how exactly are you tracking the procedural success here? And is there a way that you have thought about communicating that to us or updating us on the experience over in Europe? Thanks.

Yes, that's a good question, Sara. We are hyper focused on procedural success, and we really look at all aspects of procedural success when we measure ourselves. Probably the easiest one that people like to go to as some sort of an indicator is what 30-day mortality looks like associated with this group. And given that, this is a high-risk group of patients. You wouldn't expect them to do very well, and we like to find ourselves keeping that numbers 10% or less. We find there is a learning curve that's associated with that and we work pretty hard to make sure the new centers that come up are already well down the learning curve as they start up. I think you will see it routinely presented at upcoming surgeon meetings and cardiology meetings, it's so topical. I think it's the easy way to keep track of how that's going.

Okay. Thanks very much.

Sure.

Our next question is coming from Jason Mills with Canaccord Adams.

Thanks. Congratulations on a good quarter. Mike, starting with Critical Care, I was wondering if you could help us out with the gaining of quarterly revenue for 2008, and the reason we are doing this is we start sort of at the end of the year in fourth quarter and looking forward a year from now when you report your fourth quarter, are we going to be talking about the difficult comp, that is this fourth quarter, and therefore perhaps we should start now by modeling the fourth quarter of next year to reflect that difficult comp; therefore the first three quarters of the year which show growth rates significantly higher than the fourth quarter, you see where I'm going at. I just like to make sure that we are on the same page in the Critical Care side. I think it behooves you and us.

Yes, that's great Jason. And let me make an introductory comment and since we've got an expert here with us, I'll let Carlyn provide a little color. Yes, indeed in the fourth quarter this year we saw some things here that may not be reproducible next year, particularly this up-tick in hardware sales. As we've changed out some of our older monitors into Vigilance II monitors, we've had a pretty good bump here towards the end of the year that may not be replicated in the end. But I'll let Carlyn comment on what we think that the trend will look like during the course of '08.

Yes. So Jason, Carlyn here. When you look at this business we feel like and have guided to this being an 8% to 10% growth business for 2008. And you're going to see relatively flat growth rates on an underlying basis as we kind of go throughout the year with a dip in Q4, so there is some dip there.

Okay. So relatively flat, meaning at that 8% to 10% range and then dipping below that range in the fourth quarter.

In terms of growth rate. It will be our highest sales quarter, but the growth rate won't look out...

It will follow a very similar seasonality, but as you expected and we stated fourth quarter was a big number this year.

Right. When you said relatively flat, I just didn't want anyone to think that, that meant zero, right, flat growth so. Right. So, and then secondly, on the Magna mitral side, obviously a sewer subject for the company given that -- we've kind of been expecting this for a while. So I guess, from what we are hearing Mike, you are not the only one here that, that's seen a delay when you are having exposure to a PMA or PMA supplement, vis-à-vis turnover at the FDA and frankly seemingly fewer people to deal with things at the FDA. I guess my first question is, is it the same reviewer now that you had two years ago or even a year ago, if you could help us out sort of with some of the logistical information? And also what could be the variance in potential timelines of approval understanding you've been bitten by this question before? But are we talking about a wide variance, in other words, a question such that you could receive approval tomorrow or third quarter, it's that wide?

Yes. Well let's start from the top, good questions. First of all, yes there have been changes at the FDA. There has been some more reviewers, I think it's probably changed two or three times since the approval a couple of years ago. So yes, it is some new people although there are some consistencies associated with this. And I almost hesitate to get in the business of predicting FDA approvals, just because it is so tough to do. I can tell you, what we built into our plans was a mid year approval which gives us... would give us bump in our sales rate and we give a growth rate in the U.S. of 0% to 2%, given the competitive nature of the U.S. market in 2008. Well, I think it sort of takes into account that range out being a little earlier or later or not in the year. Could it be a wide range? I'd have to say yes based on our past experience. It could be a wide range. I really find it difficult to nail this down with a great level of precision.

Fair enough. Thanks Mike.

Our next question is coming Glenn Reicin with Morgan Stanley.

Good evening, folks.

Hi, Glenn.

A couple of follow-ups here. I didn't hear the actual FloTrac sales for the quarter or for the year, if you could help us out there? And the same thing with PreSep, you gave us a sales increase, but you didn't really give us context as to how big that business is?

Glenn, this is Carlyn. So, for the year, for FloTrac we did in fact double our sales. We said that we've slightly overachieved the last year the $15 million and we more than doubled that, but really just a little bit. On the PreSep level, for the year we approached $10 million in sales.

Okay, and when you say more than double, is that like more than $33 million for FloTrac?

You are right in the ballpark.

Okay. And then I am just trying to understand the SG&A progression for the year. It sounds to me just based on the guidance that your actual spending in SG&A in dollars will be very high in the first quarter moderating as the year progresses, and I guess on an absolute dollar basis be the highest in the fourth quarter. Is that a good way of looking at it?

No, actually I didn't do a great job of communicating Glenn. What I am trying to depict is a very flat SG&A next year in terms of dollars.

So, what does that mean, like in the one?

And what I said as a mark as fourth quarter spending. So we reported I think 114 this quarter, saying it should be very flat next year with that. One of the drivers there is that investment in Europe is going to be probably heavier, we are getting in the training and making sure that we are getting up the heavy start there. And so, then the natural growth sort of flattens out, it sort of offsets that. And we end up at a relatively flat spending level throughout the year.

That just leaves to a very back half revenue in terms of EPS growth?

Exactly.

Okay.

Yes, the thing that's interesting about it, Glenn, is not back half driven because of some sort of sales spike. Right, actually, the sales are not very different between first half and second half. It's just that the comparisons change between the step up in spending in the second half of '07.

The seasonality of sales is pretty much as we saw in 2007. There is a also margin improvement going on Glenn that sort of also contributes much less than the expenses, but expenses are the biggest piece.

Okay. All right, I think I got it. Thanks.

Our next question is coming from Mike Weinstein with JP Morgan.

Thank you, good afternoon guys. Let me start, just want to clarify first what you call the sharp uptick in that year end hardware product sales that helped the growth. You wanted to pick up some of that as being non-recurring, Mike. Is that like $2 million to $3 million as non-recurring or how should we think about that?

Yes, I think that's reasonable to think about it that way. I would say we always see some sort of an uptick. It seems as though hospitals sometimes use their budgets at year end to buy some hardware. It seemed like it was exaggerated this year probably because there were a number of hospitals that were replacing their old monitors with new Vigilance II monitors, but that was probably the key driver.

Okay. That is $2 billion to $3 billion, I don't want to put words in your mouth. Is that roughly the right range?

I'll leave it to Carlyn here.

Yes, you are in the right neighborhood maybe a little bit higher.

Okay.

But you are right neighborhood.

Mike, I would say it's in the neighborhood of three to four.

Okay, that's fine. Then wanted to talk about the base valve business, but it's kind of do math on your comments about currency and the safety and contribution in Europe, just that your base valve business organically was growing 1.5% to 2% that type of range. And if I do the math on your guidance for 2008, your valve business did imply a range of growth of 2% to 6% ex-safety and ex-currency?

That math is about right.

Whichis taking the base valve business growth next year organically... this year in '08?

What we projected for 2008 is this base valve business would grow around 4% to 6%. And that's a combination of the U.S. projected to be low because of competitive activity and outside U.S. being at double digits. And so that's at a higher rate, but an average after this year, but probably not very far off the fourth quarter.

And that's 4% to 6% --

Without currency, Mike.

Yes, 4% to 6% without currency, but if you are saying 570 to 590 you are saying north of 20 million for safety and would say that currency benefited from the valve business is half the overall company's currency benefit for the year. It would seem like the range is maybe just a little bit skewed or and my math wrong here? We can walk through it later. Is that... but you are saying 4% to 6% growth --

It's an underlying growth.

Underlying growth, and your thoughts on the timing of that growth first half versus second half given Magna mitral and some of the other products?

I think, yes, the growth rate is going to step up. And one of the drivers of that is... somewhat of it is mitral Magna but THV is probably even given more substantial driver of the growth rate of mitral valve. So, mitral valve growth rate is... does step up a little bit as it goes through the areas. I would say there is sequential improvement but the biggest driver is probably THV.

Okay, and last question Mike. As you mentioned the increase in the competition in the U.S. valve market, what are you seeing from a pricing standpoint from these competitors particularly one of the newer competitors? We keep hearing reports of being more aggressive in pricing which can be disruptive, so curious to hear what you are hearing.

Yes, what... we haven't seen the competitor especially the new competitors in the marketplace in a big way. So I am not sure that we could really layout a benchmark. We also hear occasional reports that the prices could be low. I can tell you as it relates to our pricing, but still we are not seeing pricing move in the U.S. It's been very consistent and we still don't think this... the valve market is becoming a price game.

Got you. Great, thank you.

All right.

Our next question is coming from Tim Lee with Caris & Company. Tim Lee - Caris & Company: Hi, thanks for taking the question. I know I am splitting hairs at this point, but in terms of SAPIEN, should we expect to see sales uptick here from these levels rather than the draw down on inventory here in Q1 '08, and how should we think about that?

Yes, I think you should expect to see sequential improvement in valve sales, Tim, every quarter. And again because just the nature of this when a new account starts they will do some sort of a stocking order. I am not indicating that every valve is going to get used, but definitely we're expecting sales to sequentially step up. Tim Lee - Caris & Company: And I know it's still very early days but I mean are there implants just still going into the high risk patients or are we seeing any of the average risk patients starting to get implanted with this device?

Yes, I would say we are going... our centers are going after high risk patients. We're really not steering this toward patients that otherwise are good candidates for surgery. Tim Lee - Caris & Company: Okay, thank you.

Sure.

Our next question is coming from Charles Chan [ph] with Goldman Sachs.

Thank you. Just an housekeeping item. First of all, FX is a nice contributor, positive contributor during the quarter on the top line. Could you remind us again how FX flows to the P&L and would you be able to help us understand what the benefit may have been on EPS from FX during the quarter?

Sure, I will be happy to. There was about 13.5 I want to say on the top line, little bit more than we originally expected. And we do have instruments in place to hedge the downside, which sometimes take away a bit of the benefit when things go your way. But in some rates the bottom line it's about $2 million, $2.5 million of benefit and a full year-over-year comparison.

Okay, great. That's very helpful. And you indicated that the inspection by the FDA is now complete, could you tell us what the next steps are going forward?

As it relates to what Charles?

As it relates to the warning letter situation you had before.

Well I think I look at that one and say that one is largely behind us. I mean obviously it's a situation where you need to stay in full compliance, but the issues that were found when they originally did their inspection back in 2006, and led to a warning letter in 2007 were reviewed in great detail when they were just recently in. And we got a very favorable report. So we really look at that one and saying that chapter is behind us. And although I am sure we are going to have a lot of interaction with FDA on many other compliance issues.

Perfect. Thanks for your help.

Thanks.

Our next question is coming from Ashim Anand with Natexis Bleichroeder.

Hi guys, thanks for taking my call and congrats on a nice quarter. Obviously the critical care did pretty well and you said that gross margins have improved on that segment. So I was wondering if you could tell us more about it.

So overall, we have a number of products that are exceeding the corporate gross margin rate. So FloTrac does that, PreSep does that, and then we have some products that are more of our legacy products that don't meet the corporate growth rate... corporate gross margin rate. So, we have seen over the years that our improvement in gross margin has equaled or outpaced the corporation's improvement in gross margin. And... but still today if you take everything into account, we are below, critical care is below the corporate gross margin rate.

And going forward how should we think about this?

We continue to look at a 100 to 200 basis point improvement every year that's the target I am given by Mike to go after. So that's what we continue to work on.

And nothing specific for the critical care you can tell going forward.

Do you mean specifically on a gross margin rate?

On for critical care segment.

I am sorry, I am not sure I understood the question, Ashim.

So, going forward we should expect gross margin improvements on critical care segments.

Yes. And from a broad perspective at Edwards we are continuing to indicate that we will have a 100 to 150 basis point improvement in 2008 and beyond for that matter, we've got a broad margin improvement effort that's been yielding a lot of results. Actually, as this manufacturing supply agreement sunsets, we are going to get a lift from that. And our new products are all operating at margins that are higher than our corporate average. So, we've got a lot of things that are lifting this up, but I'm pleased to say critical care, given the size of its business, whether it improves its margin, the way it has been over the last three years or so, and I think it will continue also as a contributor.

Okay. Thank you.

Our next question is coming from Kristen Stewart with Credit Suisse.

Hi, thanks for taking the call up. Tom, the tax rate that you have projected, I think it was 26%, does that include or exclude the R&D tax credit?

Well, for us Kristin, it excludes it technically, but the difference is not significant. I would say, you are down to not all that meaningful of a number.

Okay. And any update on the Singapore manufacturing, where that stands and to what extent we'll start to see that come online throughout the year?

Yes, I would say, that continues to go where it... what we are in right now is the validation of our processes. So that facility is in place, we are validating processes. We are looking forward to just continuing to ramp that up over time. It's going just the way we planned that we're very pleased with the way that's going.

Okay. And you had mentioned like, I think in your prepared remarks that you did not see any pushback on the price for the safety in product. You are still holding around €15,000 to €20,000 --

Yes, that's correct. Remember, when we did our modeling, we sort of said that we expected pricing to fall in that €15,000 to €22,000 range, where €22,000 is our list price, and it's turned out just that way so far.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Our next question is coming from Amit Bhalla with Citigroup.

Hi two quick follow-ups. Can you give us a quick update on MONARC, and also give us an update on the next steps and timelines for the Cook and CoreValv litigation? Thanks.

Okay. Thanks. Yes, first on MONARC, nothing has changed since the last time we gave you an update on that which was at the investor conference, which is we are doing follow-up on the approximately 60 patients that are part of the Evolution I trial to get really deep into all aspects of how their valves are performing here as we watch them on a longer term basis. I would say it will be complete without evaluation by the third quarter of this year at which time we will make a decision either to roll into Evolution II or take some other sort of strategy. As it relates to your other question here was about the recent announcement from Cook that they launched litigation in Germany. On that one we have not yet seen the complaints, although we have seen the patent. We continue to be very positive and confident in our IP portfolio, and I don't have an idea of what the timing would be on that. As it relates to the litigation against CoreValve in Germany, we are thinking that it's probable that there is a third quarter of 2008 action.

Thank you.

You're welcome.

Our next question is coming from Glenn Reicin with Morgan Stanley.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question again. I'm just looking at the last chart in your press release where you are giving us underlying growth rates, and couldn't help but think what you were saying about pricing on valves. So if you look at 5.7% underlying growth for the quarter and then we take out the contribution from SAPIEN which is about a point and a half, you got roughly 4.2%, 4.3% underlying growth. What's the unit growth?

What's the unit growth in that, for us or for the market?

No, for you guys.

I think the unit growth is probably very similar to that number. I'd say it's very close. There is really no change in pricing that's very substantial.

Even with mix?

Well, you know what; I'll tell you one thing that has happened. Because we have our growth outside the U.S. where pricing is a little lower than inside the U.S., we probably have higher unit growth now that I reflect on it, Glenn. We probably have higher unit growth from that, just because of the difference between pricing inside the U.S. and outside the U.S.

You used to give us Magna penetration. I assume that hasn't changed much than in this past quarter?

Yes, it's petty similar, right. We are saying Magna, you're saying as percentage of total Edwards' valve sales?

Yes.

Yes, it runs in the high 50 some percent like...

In the aortic position.

Right, in the aortic position 57%, something like that, 58%.

Okay, and then you take two-thirds of that and that's total, Magna as a percentage of your total business?

Okay, what that was is Magna as a percent of our sales in the aortic position.

Okay.

Globally.

And then you figure two-thirds are aortic, one-third would be mitral?

Yes, but again you have to make the distinction between repair and replacement in the mitral side. So, don't forget to do that.

Okay, got it. Thank you.

Sure.

Sure. All right. There was one correction I wanted to do in my opening remarks I made a statement in regards to R&D spending in 2006, and I think I stated $33 million, which was the same number as '07 instead it was actually $30 million for 2006. So, in 2007 was a $3.5 million increase in R&D.

All right. Well, thanks everybody for your continued interest in Edwards. Tom, David and I will welcome any additional questions by telephone, and with that, back to you David.

Thank you for joining us on today's call. Reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP numbers mentioned during this call which include underlying growth rates and amounts adjusted for special items are included in today's press release and can also be found in the Investor Relations section of our website at edwards.com. If you missed any portion of today's call, a telephonic replay will be available for 72 hours. To access this, please dial 877-660-6853 or 201-612-7415 and use account number 2995 and passcode 270419. I'll repeat those numbers 877-660-6853 or 201-612-7415, the account number is 2995, passcode 270419. Finally, an audio replay will be archived on the Investor Relations section of our website. Thank you very much.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.