Good morning, and welcome to the Evercore Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Earnings Conference Call. Today's call is scheduled to last about one hour, including remarks by Evercore management and a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the call over to Katy Haber. Managing Director of Investor Relations and ESG at Evercore. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today on Evercore's fourth quarter and full year 2023 financial results conference call. I'm Katy Haber, Evercore's Head of Investor Relations and ESG. Joining me on the call today is John Weinberg, our Chairman and CEO; and Tim LaLonde, our CFO. After our prepared remarks, we will open up the call for questions. Earlier today, we issued a press release announcing Evercore's fourth quarter and full year 2023 financial results. Our discussion of our results today is complementary to the press release, which is available on our website at evercore.com. This conference call is being webcast live in the For Investors section of our website and an archive of it will be available for 30 days, beginning approximately one hour after the conclusion of this call. During the course of this conference call, we may make a number of forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements that we make are subject to various risks and uncertainties, and there are a number of important factors that could cause actual outcomes to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Evercore's filings with the SEC, including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. I want to remind you that the company assumes no duty to update any forward-looking statements. In our presentation today, unless otherwise indicated, we will be discussing adjusted financial measures, which are non-GAAP measures that we believe are meaningful when evaluating the company's performance. For detailed disclosures on these measures and the GAAP reconciliations, you should refer to the financial data contained within our press release, which is posted on our website. We continue to believe that it is important to evaluate Evercore's performance on an annual basis. As we have noted previously, our results for any particular quarter are influenced by the timing of transaction closing. I will now turn the call over to John.

Thank you, Katy. Good morning everyone. 2023 was a year of significant investment for Evercore and the firm gained momentum, which had continued into 2024. Despite the challenging market environment, we've continued to strengthen our franchise by investing in and diversifying our business. We hired our largest class ever of Advisory Senior Managing Directors and we expanded our client relationships and coverage universe. Our competitive positioning and strategic focus provided us with the opportunity to hire this new group of exceptional talent and we expect to continue investing in our business in 2024. Over the past decade, we've broadened and deepened our capabilities which have significantly transformed the firm. Aside from being a market leader in the M&A business, which has always been core to what we do, we've invested heavily in virtually all of our businesses in which we've built real scale. This build-out has led to a significant diversification of our revenues. In fact, in 2023 more than a third of our revenues came from non-M&A sources. This growth has provided us with the ability to comprehensively service our clients in nearly all areas of investment banking, which has positioned us once again as the fourth largest investment bank globally based on Advisory Fees. We believe we are better positioned today than at any other point in our history. Today, our internal backlogs continue to strengthen. When coupled with a better market environment, and our current and ramping SMD base comprised of both external hires and internal promotes, we expect to see higher activity levels and an increase in our firm's productivity over time. We are now a month into the new year, and we're encouraged by what we see. Activity and confidence levels have continued to improve, building off momentum we saw towards the end of last…

Thank you John. Our fourth quarter results reflect further stabilization in the operating environment and an increase in activity levels for several areas of our business as well as some seasonality. In 2023, we generated over $2.4 billion in net revenues in one of the most challenging financial markets since the global financial crisis. As John mentioned, our diversified revenue streams have provided significant support and strong results in the last quarter, and throughout much of last year. We ended the year on a solid note, and we continue to see activity levels strengthen, particularly among larger situations. However, it is important to note from a timing perspective that many of these larger transactions are not expected to close until the latter part of this year and into the following year. The impact to financial results is not immediate, but will build and be recognized over time. I will now discuss our fourth quarter and full year financial results. For the fourth quarter of 2023, net revenues, operating income and EPS on a GAAP basis were $784 million, $118 million and $2.03 per share, respectively. For the full year, net revenues, operating income and EPS on a GAAP basis were $2.4 billion, $359 million and $6.37 per share, respectively. My comments from here will focus on non-GAAP metrics, which we believe are useful when evaluating our results. Our standard GAAP reporting and a reconciliation of GAAP to adjusted results can be found in our press release, which is on our website. Fourth quarter adjusted net revenues of $790 million declined 6% versus the fourth quarter of 2022. On a full year basis, adjusted net revenues of $2.4 billion declined 12% compared to last year. Fourth quarter adjusted operating income of $124 million decreased 43% compared to the fourth quarter of…

Thank you. We will now conduct the question-and-answer portion of the conference. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from James Yaro with Goldman Sachs.

Good morning, and thanks for taking my question. So if I look at completed revenue this quarter versus the Dealogic, the magnitude that's not explained by the Dealogic did reach a fairly large magnitude in the fourth quarter. So maybe you could just speak to which of the non-M&A Advisory businesses performed so well in the quarter and then the sustainability of these? And then specifically, just on the restructuring backdrop, obviously, financing and financial conditions have improved towards the year-end and into January. So how should we think about the ability for restructuring to remain at an elevated level into 2024?

Sure. So let me start with the Dealogic question. And so that -- the way they calculate that is they look at deal announcements and then they have an algorithm that estimates revenue. And so there's two areas for potential discrepancy. One is, to the extent, the algorithm differs from the actual revenue. And that's, of course, going to happen in almost every case, although I know they're hoping for a portfolio effect where across a large number of transactions that's relatively close, but it's not always as you've seen. Second thing is it doesn't pick up our capital advisory business. And so the capital advisory business, of course, includes PCA and PFG and real estate capital advisory as well. And those businesses really had a very strong year and a particularly strong quarter. And that would perhaps have widened any normal discrepancy you might have seen.

Let me pick up because the question on restructuring business. The restructuring business had a very good year last year and bookings going into 2024 are quite strong also. We actually feel very good about our prospects going forward. The business is really diversified. It's liability management and also we've built out our creditor business as well as our strong traditional debtor business. So generally, we think that, that business will continue its momentum. It's one of the businesses that we think will have strength going into the year and through the year.

Our next question will come from Jim Mitchell with Seaport Global.

Hey, good morning. Just maybe a question on the headcount and investments. You guys -- it was a heavy investment year but if you look at net headcount growth, I think it was sort of on the SMD side, mid-single digits, total head count 4%. So how do we think about the implication for productivity? And how are you thinking about net hiring in 2024? Thanks.

Well, our -- the way we think about hiring is that we are looking at all the areas where we think we have strategic imperatives, and we move into that. We have a very strong pipeline going in with respect to hiring. We will make decisions as we go. We are also trying very hard to make sure that we are being responsible about headcount. And so we're really making sure that we manage people coming in and also there are some that are leaving in the process. I think the best way to think about our head count is that we're going to actually grow where we think it's actually going to be productive for the firm, and we are definitely in the market, and we're going to continue to be responsible in managing our numbers going forward. We clearly are trying to make sure that we grow commensurate with our opportunity.

Our next question will come from Ryan Kenny with Morgan Stanley.

Hey, thanks, good morning. So just want to clarify on the comp ratio comments when you said that you expect to continue to improve on the comp ratio. Was that against the 67.6% number for the full year or against the 70.8% number for the fourth quarter? And any thoughts on where you want that ratio to head towards this year? Thanks.

Yeah, sure thanks, Ryan. The short answer is both. I think the 70.8% fourth quarter number was unusually high, and that was due to some extent to the back-end loading on the arrival of our new SMDs. With respect to the 67.6%, we're absolutely striving to improve on that. And as we all know, there are a number of factors that feed into what the comp ratio is, most important of all is the revenue environment. So certainly, to the extent that the landscape, we think, is improving. And hopefully, our revenues, along with that, we would expect to see some improvement there.

Our next question will come from Steven Chubak with Wolfe Research.

Thanks, good morning. Wanted to start-off with just a question on the election, how that's impacting willingness for both strategics and sponsors to transact? And maybe just more broadly what are some of the biggest potential risks that could derail the M&A recovery and 2024 whether geopolitical, election or macro in terms of what you're hearing from C-Suite?

To date, we don't think that there is really anything regarding the election that is putting a damper on people's willingness or interest in strategic dialogues and doing deals. We think that, in effect, in the past, elections haven't really had a major impact. We don't know what's going to happen this year. Obviously, it's a different year, and it's certainly a different election as it is every election. But we don't really see anything right now with respect to the election. The really big concern is actually more than anything else geopolitical. Obviously, there could be economic impacts also if the economy somehow backs up. But I think the thing that people would classify as the biggest risk going into this market right now is the geopolitical risk, which I think is heightened in many respects. I think most people would actually agree with that. And I think that's the thing that we're all watching.

Thank you. Next, we have Brennan Hawken with UBS.

Hi guys, this is Ben Rubin filling in for Brennan. Congrats on a strong close to the year. My question is related to the incremental hires from last year. So the 11 Advisory SMDs that you've added, what is the best way to think about the incremental operating leverage from your successful recruiting campaign last year? And how should we think about the corresponding impact of revenue growth as a result of those hires as well as the increase in your baseline comp as a result? So for example, if Advisory revenue is up x percent, what type of impact to comp growth could we expect as a result? Thank you.

Well, let me take the first part of the question, and I'll let Tim take the second. The people we've hired, we're really excited about. And in some cases, they're already hitting the ground running and revenues coming in as a result of their presence inside the firm. For the most part, you should think of people coming in, in the ramp. And usually, it takes between year and half to two years for a full ramp-up. Some of the people that we've brought in, as I said, are not going to take nearly that long. But I think you should think about it as a consistent ramping of these talented people coming in. And so the revenue growth will happen. As you also know, this business is somewhat lumpy. You bring in a couple of big deals and then there's a little bit of time between the next couple of deals. And so I think that for the most part, what you should be looking at is the consistent addition of talented people. And over time, that should lead to build in our revenue base. In terms of revenue per banker, that all very much depends on really the market itself and how busy and how active the market is our levels of revenue per banker go up materially as the revenue goes up in the aggregate.

Sure. And I can just expand on that a little bit by putting a few numbers around it. One would be if you look at our Advisory partner headcount, and you compare it to 2021, which was our peak revenue year, you would see the Advisory partner headcount has increased almost 20% and that's a reflection of a potential increase in productive capacity. If you were to go back three years to 2020, you would have seen our Advisory partner headcount has increased about 27%. And so that's, we think, good news for us when the market returns to more normal activity levels. Beyond that, I would point out that while we were doing those 11 partner headcount adds this year, our overall headcount firm wide was up 3.7%, which is by historical standards for us, a relatively modest amount. And both of those statistics speak a little bit to productivity. We look at productivity two ways. One is on a revenue per partner basis, and another is on a revenue per banker basis, both of which ultimately impact margins throughout a cycle. And so, we think what we've done there is hopefully in the process of rigorously managing our headcount, increased productivity as we head into, hopefully, a more favorable environment. If you look at the partner revenue statistics productivity, what you would see is generally across the cycle, you would see those ranging anywhere from ballpark $15 million or $16 million per Advisory partner head on the lower end to the low 20s. 2021 was an outlier, was north of $25 million per partner head. But generally, in a good market, they peak somewhere in the low 20s for us per partner head. And so we feel like we're well positioned for when the market returns.

[Operator Instructions] And our next question will come from Devin Ryan with JMP Securities.

Okay, thanks so much. Good morning John and Tim. I just want to dig in a little bit on the strategic versus sponsor dynamic. In 2023, sponsor announcements were down about 40% year-over-year. That was the slowest year since 2013. Corporates from our data were roughly flat year-over-year. And so I know Evercore does quite well with corporates and perhaps corporates are having a moment with sponsors being a little bit out of the market. But just wanted to get a little sense from you around whether a sponsor recovery is necessary for kind of a broader recovery for Evercore. Are you seeing that right now or can you continue to do quite well with corporates, which may be, as I mentioned, seem to be behaving better in this backdrop? Thanks.

Sure, Devin. We believe that the full recovery of the market is going to require that sponsors really start to engage. We see a warming up of the sponsors but as you said, in 2023, it was slow. And we think 2024, we think there will be -- as there will be on the strategic side, we think there will be a ramp. We have gotten ourselves off to a very good start on the strategic side. We've done some very strong strategic type transactions and frankly, inside the firm, the dialogues are very good. The backlogs are building. I think that the sponsors may be delayed, but we really do believe they will begin to start kicking in. There's a lot of pressure at the sponsor level to start doing some activity. LPs want capital back. There's just a whole series of flows that need to happen. So we think it will happen. We believe that we will get off to a decent start on strategics. We think that there will be satisfactory activity to really keep us busy and productive. I think though, the sponsor side is going to be important for the overall market. As you may know, or I'm sure you do, 30% and 45% of our revenues come from sponsor-related activities. That is private capital advisory type activities as well as the M&A side. So it clearly is important to us as I think it is to many firms.

Our next question will come from Mike Brown with KBW.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. On restructuring, you had mentioned that you feel good about the restructuring and the liability management activity. If we take a step back, what do you think this cycle will look like, I think, over a multiyear horizon? And with central banks looking like they're going to shift to easing. It looks like the opportunity set is maybe a little softer than we thought three months ago or six months ago. So it would be just great to get some more color on how you think this activity could progress over the coming years and how you think the revenue potential could compare to 2023? Thank you.

As we've looked at how we're looking at the year ahead, we actually think that it's going to be quite a strong year in restructuring. Granted, if rates come down, there will be less distress in the system. Having said that, rates are still pretty high. The maturity walls are out there in 2024 and 2025. And we see a lot of activity, not necessarily in bankruptcies, although there will be bankruptcies, and there will be some larger bankruptcies, but in the activity of liability management and helping companies to structure themselves to grow. And increasingly, we are getting involved in the general course of helping people think through their balance sheet and their liabilities. And so, as we look at what we're expecting for our restructuring business, it's actually going to be quite a healthy year. And we think that, that will extend itself in the future also. We really feel quite positive about how the market is being defined by our group and really their impact.

Right. The only thing I would add to that is if you put this in historical context, years ago, it used to be that the restructuring M&A cycle was kind of feast for one famine for the other. It feels like in more recent years, what we've really seen is that restructuring has an opportunity to perform reasonably strongly throughout the cycle. And I think the points John raised about higher rates, we're still in the higher rate environment. So a lot of companies put on a lot of debt at very low interest rates that were variable and are now experiencing higher rates or alternatively having to refinance at higher rates and so even in an economic environment, which is reasonable in a capital raising and deal environment, which is reasonable, we could still have a very solid restructuring environment for some period of time.

Our next question will come from James Yaro with Goldman Sachs.

Thanks a lot for taking my follow-up. So I think it's very constructive that 40% of your MDs are promoted internally. And I also thought it was true that you gave the 1.5 to two years ramp for MDs hired externally. Maybe you could just talk about the differences in the ramp between those that are promoted internally versus hired externally.

Well, I think that the ones who are promoted internally take a little bit longer to really get to the high productivity level because quite frankly and obviously, they're growing and they're learning. A lot of times, with what we're looking for in the lateral sense and people coming in laterally, they're already really at the height of their powers. They come in with a fully developed client base. And in many cases, they have transactions, which they've been talking about and dreaming about and really pushing for quite some time. And so it takes longer and I think hard to really put a number as to how much longer, but I think it's safe to say that the 1.5 to two years is really a, maybe, conservative for the people coming laterally and probably about right for the people who are ramping -- who have been promoted from within.

Right. And in addition to that I think if we were to open our books to the public, what you would see is a very healthy proportion of our highest producing partners are actually people who have been promoted internally. And I think that speaks a little bit to two things. One is the strengthening of our franchise, so they've got a better calling card than they might have had five or 10 years ago. And the second is, I think an improved ability over time to develop our people into productive partners.

One of the most important parts of really growing the firm is to create a culture of aspiration and to really allow people to think that they have real opportunity to grow. And so hiring from within, promoting from within, growing our people is really a critical part of what the culture of Evercore is and should be. In addition, creating an environment where people who do come in laterally have a great opportunity to grow and really find their way and fulfill themselves is also a very important part. So it all ties in culturally.

Alright and we do have another question from Steven Chubak with Wolfe Research.

Hi, thanks so much for taking the follow-up. First, just on ECM. The performance, as you noted, was a bit challenged this year. I was hoping you could just speak to your outlook, whether you envisage a meaningful ramp in 2024 as the range of revenue outcomes just over the past few years has been incredibly wide. And any specific sectors that you anticipate will be more or less active?

We agree Steven that 2023 was disappointing. We actually see 2024 off to a reasonable start. We actually have a good book of business that's building. We've been in a few deals starting off the new year and we see it building. And so it's hard to really predict exactly where it's going to come out, but we think there's a real strengthening and we are quite optimistic that this will actually continue.

Thank you. We do have a follow-up from Jim Mitchell with Seaport Global.

Hey, good morning, thanks for the follow-up. Maybe just, Tim, any thoughts on the non-comp outlook for growth this year given the puts and takes of trying to be efficient versus the headcount growth?

Yeah, sure. And so I guess the way I think about it is -- and by the way, just for full clarity on the call, our non-comps increased from $365 million last year to $407 million this year, which is about 11%. As you heard in my comments, really due to two things, which were the reversal at last year's non-comp expense of about $12 million and the increase in normalization of travel and the two of those combined would have taken -- if you remove them, would have taken that 11-plus percent increase down to the 4% area. Where do I think we are for the outlook this year? I think there's a few things. One is we will probably see some continued normalization of travel. And so I would expect to see some additional increase there. We also are living in an environment where we've got a very data driven world. And of course, the data providers are able to have some influence on pricing power. And so there could be some modest increase there, some modest increase with respect to headcount as non-comps are highly correlated with headcount and a little bit of increase within relation to lease expense as we continue to grow the firm. What I would note, though, is if you look at our non-comps on a per head basis, what you would see is that they are up a little bit over last year, probably about 4%, but still below pre-COVID levels. And so I feel like on a per head basis, we've done a pretty good job of controlling those over these last four or five years.

Next, we have Devin Ryan with JMP Securities.

Hey, thanks for the follow-up. Just wanted to ask about the deal time lines and I heard the prepared remarks that they're still on the more elongated side. And so I just wanted to hear if that's been improving at all just with some of the improvements in tone and activity. So really, is that just kind of the typical dynamic here that as recovery occurs, the time lines are elongated, but inevitably will shrink? Or is there something else going on with this recovery or just in the broader kind of macro or M&A market that may continue to keep deals moving slower than they otherwise would in prior recoveries? Thanks.

I think that the time lines will continue to be elongated for the foreseeable future. Financing is something that is taking more time to really get that sorted out as companies go forward. There's always a concern at this point regarding the regulatory side and antitrust. And people are taking longer to really do that analysis. I think that honestly, the strategics are feeling tremendous urgency to run to the finish. So I think it's going to take some time. I think the elongated process will continue. I don't see it really accelerating into a deal frenzy for quite some time. And I think what we ought to -- we all ought to actually expect is that it will continue to be in a slightly elongated way for the foreseeable future.

Right. One aspect, though, that it is at least modestly favorable is that one of the elements of the elongated closing time in 2022 and 2023, was a very challenged capital raising environment. And we do see some improvement there and would hope that, that might be helpful as we move forward.

Our next question will come from Ryan Kenny with Morgan Stanley.

Thanks for taking the follow-up. So one of the big macro changes that's happened since last quarter's call is the amount of rate cuts expected this year. Can you help us understand how CEOs and Boards are thinking through potential rate cuts? Are companies waiting at all to get more clarity on the size and pace of rate cuts to put transactions through? Or is there more momentum to get things through the finish line now that the forward curve has come down?

I think those deals where they are far along and the strategy makes sense, I don't think people are going to wait for rates. I think people are going to move forward. I do think that as rate cuts start to kick in, people will look at them and certainly appreciate that rates are going to go lower and that the markets will maybe become even more liquid, but I don't think there's going to be any deals that are actually in process. They're going to be sitting and waiting for the rate cut that may be coming next.

All right. Thank you. This does conclude the question-and-answer portion of today's call. So I'd like to turn the floor back over to our speakers for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you all for joining us today. We really appreciate it.

This concludes today’s Evercore fourth quarter and full year 2023 earnings conference call. You may now disconnect.