Welcome to Evolent Health's Earnings Conference Call for the Fourth Quarter and Year ended December 31, 2021. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. Your hosts for the call today from Evolent Health are Seth Blackley, Chief Executive Officer; and John Johnson, Chief Financial Officer. This call will be archived and available later this evening and for the next week via the webcast on the company's website in the section entitled Investor Relations. I will now hand the call to Seth Frank, Evolent's Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and good afternoon. This conference call will contain forward-looking statements within the U.S. federal laws. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual Evolent Health results to differ materially from historical experience or present expectations. A description of some of the risks and uncertainties can be found in the company's reports that are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including cautionary statements, including our current and periodic filings. For additional information on the company's results and outlook, please refer to its fourth quarter press release issued earlier today. Finally, as a reminder, reconciliations of non-GAAP measures discussed during today's call to the most direct comparable GAAP measures are available in the summary presentation available in the company's Investor Relations section of our website or in the company's press release issued today and posted on the Investor Relations section of the company's website, ir.evolenthealth.com, and the Form 8-K filed by the company with the SEC earlier today. During management's presentation and discussion, we will reference certain GAAP and non-GAAP figures and metrics that can be found in our earnings release as well as a summary presentation available on the Events section of Evolent's IR website, ir.evolenthealth.com. And now I'll hand the call over to Evolent's CEO, Seth Blackley.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining the call. Today, I'll summarize the results for the fourth quarter and full year 2021 as well as the outlook for 2022, then I'll turn to an update of our 3 primary investment themes of strong organic growth, expanding margins and optimal capital deployment. And I'll wrap up with the macro industry environment update. John will provide a detailed dive on the Q4 numbers, our 2022 outlook and medium-term revenue and margin targets. As always, we'll close by taking your questions. Turning to the key financial results for the fourth quarter of 2021 ending December 31, 2021, Evolent Health total revenue was $248.4 million. Revenue, excluding divested assets, was $245.9 million, reflecting a 39.7% year-over-year revenue growth rate. Adjusted EBITDA for Q4 was $24.3 million compared to our Q4 outlook of a range of $14 million to $18 million. During the fourth quarter, we closed the acquisition of Vital Decisions, which contributed approximately $5 million of Q4 revenue and approximately $1 million of Q4 adjusted EBITDA, consistent with expectations. Underlying our strong performance is the year-over-year growth in lives under management, the key volume component of Evolent's revenue. As of December 31, 2021, Evolent's services covered 20 million lives with 1.6 million managed within Evolent Health Services and 18.4 million lives in our Clinical Solutions segment. Lives in our Clinical Solutions segments are composed of 1.5 million lives managed under our risk-based performance suite through New Century Health and Evolent Care Partners. And as of the end of December, we supported an additional 16.9 million lives through New Century Health's Technology and Services platform, inclusive of the Vital Decisions acquisition. For perspective, Evolent's contracted solutions currently cover approximately 6% of the U.S. population. For the full year 2021, we ended the year…

Thanks, Seth, and good evening, everyone. Overall, we're very pleased with our achievements relative to our 2021 financial goals, exceeding the high end of our initial and updated ranges for both our revenue and adjusted EBITDA targets and consistently delivering on all 3 of our strategic goals: strong organic growth, expanding margins and efficient capital allocation. We came into 2021 with a strong visibility to exceeding our mid-teens organic growth target. After adding 10 new partnerships as well as driving strong same-store sales growth throughout the year, we further exceeded expectations, achieving 37% growth for $891 million of revenue, excluding divested assets, compared to $652 million in 2020. On the bottom line, we ended 2021 with total adjusted EBITDA of $66.3 million or 7.3% of revenue, 210 basis points ahead of the midpoint of our initial 2021 guidance. Our strong margin expansion across 2021, the result of accelerated cost-reduction efforts as well as the rapid maturation of some of our newer clinical partnerships, puts us ahead of schedule coming into 2022. This profitability expansion, combined with a continued disciplined approach to investment in capitalized software development, further allowed us to expand our operating cash flow during the year, delever our balance sheet and continue to bolster our cash reserves for future strategic investments. We ended the year with $215.6 million of available cash and net leverage of 1.1x our trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA, down 2.1 turns from where we began the year. Now turning to our consolidated fourth quarter results. Total revenue of $248.4 million in the quarter represents an increase of 0.7% year-over-year. More importantly, revenue less divested assets of $245.9 million increased 39.7% from $176 million in the prior year due to growth from new partner additions as well as same-store sales growth. Adjusted EBITDA grew to $24.3…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question will come from Ryan Daniels of William Blair.

Kudos on a very strong year and outlook. Seth, maybe I'll start with one for you. Can you talk a little bit more about the up-sell to Molina maybe as a case study just in regards to any learnings on the up-sell process and how that could translate into similar growth opportunities into other accounts in the future?

Yes, happy to, Ryan. So just in general, the way that things work with a situation like that or some of our other relationships is that we have 2 vectors for growth, right? One is if we already have the Technology and Services suite in place, which is the lower PMPM, we have an opportunity to talk to those markets where we're already live, already have their data, about the opportunity to convert that opportunity into the full Performance suite, which obviously has much higher PMPMs, as we've talked about, and ultimately has, I think, better savings for our partner of the payer but also higher margin for us over time. So that's one vector. The second vector is around just new geographies, right? So we already have a relationship with a couple of states. We have a relationship with corporate. They're willing to introduce this to the other states, and there's an opportunity to go do that. And obviously, with Molina, we've had a little bit of both in this announcement. And I think what's interesting, which we try to continue to talk about, Ryan, is that we've got within our top handful of customers 40 million lives. And if you think about a $35 PMPM on those 40 million lives, obviously, that's $15 billion plus, higher than $15 billion of opportunity, and that would be kind of a fuller penetration opportunity. But we are methodically looking at whether it's with the relationship you mentioned or any of our others with those 40 million lives, those kinds of opportunities. And so we'll see, I think, more of those over time, and it's a great tailwind to our growth in addition to obviously adding new logos.

Yes. And the reason I ask, I mean, it's a great case study, and the data point you just mentioned is such a large opportunity for you. What, especially when you have the relationship on the technology side and have the data and can kind of validate the potential savings, what tends to be, if anything, the roadblock to moving to the Performance suite?

Yes. It's -- look, I think we do have good track record. It is all about creating value, to your point. We have to prove the value. We have to prove we're a good partner. We have to do what we say we're going to do and execute. So we've had a good track record of doing that. From there, it really is about 2 things. One is sort of dynamics within that organization, how much pressure are they feeling if it's an organization that wants to drive savings. Or secondly, how good of a job can we do at proving that we can help drive incremental savings or opportunities. And the barriers on the second one really is just about -- the first one is sort of market-driven. The second one would be really around proving the actuarial case around the savings. And it takes a little bit of time to do that, but we feel very confident in the fact that the value proposition is typically there. And so we see lots of opportunity like this.

And then one for John. As you move more of the business to the Performance suite and just based on the new contracts you've sold, do you envision a larger percentage of your revenue coming from Performance-based fees in 2022 relative to past years?

Ryan, it's a good question. On the whole, if you look over a number of years here, we have had an increase in our overall revenue moving towards the Performance suite. So the short answer is yes. I think we do expect that here in '22. Two things that I'd just point out on that. One is obviously significant opportunity on the top line. And two, while it takes, as you know, a couple of years maybe to get to full run rate, the opportunity for dollar PMPM EBITDA on those performance fee contracts is among the highest in our portfolio of products. So we really like that opportunity.

Great. And then one last one, Seth, for you. I ask this every few quarters. But I'm curious, if you look at the pipeline, if you're seeing any inflections in demand for different products or different end markets, whether it's Medicare, Medicaid, commercial. Just kind of what are you seeing as you look in the pipeline on a go-forward basis? Sorry, I got something caught in my throat.

No problem. It's the time of year. Ryan, we do see, I'd say, an inflection in the pipeline over the last really year or 2. And it really, I think, is across all 3 solutions right now. We've had really good success across all 3. I'd say, if I wanted to point out particular places of inflection, where we can guarantee our results through our Performance suite, whether that's in New Century or with our newly announced Evolent Care Partners relationship, I think those are particularly interested in the marketplace. And within that group of solutions, we've seen, I would say, cardiology and oncology as high-cost specialties and nowend of life as places where the payer risk-bearing provider community are looking for ways to drive down cost. If we can guarantee it and do it a way better for members, higher quality, there's a lot of demand for that.

The next question comes from Anne Samuel of JPMorgan.

Congrats on the terrific results. My question was a little bit more on your longer-term revenue target. You did 36% growth this year when you back out the divestitures. You're expecting to see north of 20% organic growth next year. Is it fair to think that maybe you can continue on a trajectory a little bit north of that mid-teens in the future?

Yes, Anne, it's a great question. And when we get a fair bit, we obviously have been trending well above. We're not changing the target right now on the mid-teens, but we have been beating it, and we want to continue to set numbers and expectations that we can exceed. And we're focused on doing that each and every year. And for Ryan's question, it's just a fantastic end market that we're selling into. And great products with great traction. So we feel really good about continuing to do well on the revenue side.

That's great. And then I was wondering if maybe we can get a little bit more color on the new partnerships around lives and expected PMPM?

Anne, I'll take that. This is John. The -- so on -- I'll start with Blue Cross. That was the one that we referenced in the JPMorgan presentation back in January. You expect that to be north of $50 million in revenue here, about 10,000 members. On Bright Health, about 330 incremental [1,000] 35.02 members, so 350 total. And PMPMs there will vary based on the markets and specific scope and line of business for serving a number of different markets with them. We think in the range between 7 and 11. And on Molina, they're expecting, as those migrations happen over the course of this year, but up to the Performance suite and then going live in Nevada and Ohio, that will be an addition of north of 500,000 members to the Performance suite at New Century ramping over the course of the year.

That's really helpful. And maybe if I could just sneak in one more. I was hoping you could provide any color on the Cook County RFP that's up for renewal.

Yes, in Cook County, we continue to expect the decision sometime later in Q1, could be the last few days of February, it could be in March. We feel very good about where we stand relative to the process and excited to get that outcome back and expect it pretty soon.

The next question comes from Charles Rhyee of Cowen.

Congrats on the results. Maybe first, I just wanted to ask a little bit about the Blue Cross Blue Shield North Carolina contract here. And maybe talk about when we think about Performance suite offering, I mean, I assume that's what you're already doing with your partners in Evolent Care Partners. Are there any differences here? Or is that just a new part of -- a new member within the Evolent Care Partners? Anything structurally that's different serving North Carolina?

Yes, Charles, great question. So it is very similar to what we're doing with Evolent Care Partners on the Pathways to Success side and some more, frankly, than what we've been doing for a while in North Carolina. What's different is that the nature of the arrangement with the private payer in this case is structured as an aligned capitation style arrangement, does give us some incremental controls on the cost side, which we think allow us to drive incremental value and the way that the revenue recognition and, again, the margin dollar opportunities are, I think, are obviously higher. But the fundamental work that we're doing is a little different around the edges because of some of those incremental controls that we have, but it is pretty similar. It's one of the reasons we feel very confident about our ability to drive the performance here both because we know that these specific members have been in the state for a long time and because it's very similar to the scope of work that we have been doing for a period of time. But for those reasons, it is a little different than our traditional ECP arrangement.

Okay. That's helpful. And maybe to follow up, I think Ryan was asking -- kind of alluded to a little bit earlier, right? Vital Decisions, those lives are sitting in the tech and services suite. Obviously, you're taking risk on the oncology and cardiology. Is it possible to take risk for end-of-life care? Or is that kind of unique in the way that kind of care is delivered for you to be able to do so?

Yes. I mean it's a good question, too. The way we think about that is to use the Vital Decisions' capability with our Performance suite lives within New Century, right? So we already are in the Performance suite situation and deploying Vital there against cardiology and oncology, where about 70% of end-of-life cost sit to begin with. And so that's the way we think about it. For a host of reasons, we are not contemplating sort of taking risk directly just on end of life, although that could be an opportunity one day. What we're really focused on is the true integration into New Century around cardiology and oncology.

Okay. That's great. And then maybe one last question on the guidance. Obviously, strong revenue outlook. Can you give us any more segment-level revenue guidance as we think between Clinical Solutions versus Health Services? Like where would more of the growth would you expect be coming from? It sounds like because of Performance suite with Molina, maybe more of the growth we should expect Clinical Solutions side?

Charles, historically, over the last couple of years, the majority of our growth has come from the clinical side. As we look at '22, it's pretty balanced, given the strength of growth across the business.

Okay. And would that be the same on EBITDA as well?

I think you'll continue to see EBITDA profiles be somewhat similar to where they've been in the last couple of years in terms of EBITDA margins by segment.

The next question comes from Matthew Shea of Piper Sandler.

Congratulations on another strong quarter. I wanted to touch on Molina again. Encouraging to see the up-sell motion, but was particularly surprised with the full suite deploying in Nevada. As you continue to penetrate Molina and potentially some of these other payers that you've proven out the value proposition with, do you expect that you could launch in new geographies with the Performance suite from day 1? Or do you still expect kind of an up-sell motion from tech-enabled services to the full suite?

Yes, Matt, I think you're going to see some of both, is the short answer. We can do it either way. For the reasons we've mentioned in the past, sometimes the tech services way is an easier way to get started, particularly with, I think, a national plan because of the ability to scale very quickly and then come in behind in the ways that we might want to support select geographies. I think, in the case of a regional plan that's really trying to drive performance in a quick period of time, you also might see us go live straight with the Performance suite. So could go either way. And again, we like to have both options because it gives us flexibility based on the needs of our customers.

Got it. And then circling back to Cook County. Curious on the PCG consulting partnership, if that was all -- at all related to winning the RFP. And if so or if not, I would love to just hear more about that relationship and the plans that you have for it.

Yes. Look, we're very excited about the PCG relationship. It's really all about our corporate commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion and also about making sure that, from a supplier diversity perspective, as we think about our operations around the country, we're meeting the needs and objectives of our clients and our partners. And so really, it's all about that. It's part of a very long-standing commitment we've had in that space inside of Evolent and outside, and we're going to keep the foot on the gas pedal for a host of reasons on the DE&I, ESG side of our work. And so this will be one of many things that I think you'll see across the year.

The next question comes from David Larsen of BTIG.

Congratulations on a very good quarter. Can you talk a little bit more about the arrangement that you have, I think, in North Carolina? It sounds to me like it's a large primary care group. And are you bearing risk with that primary care arrangement? It sounds like you've actually created a virtual primary care solution. Is that correct or not? And then was that -- did you say that was the first one of its kind on a large scale? Any color there would be helpful.

Sure, David. Yes. So we are partnered up with actually a handful of groups in North Carolina, the primary care groups. Yes, with Evolent Care Partners, our model is to work with the payer community or with CMS to take and manage a population, the total cost for that population. And the Pathways to Success program, we’re at net revenue because it's more of a gain share model. This is more of a capitation model. So yes, absolutely, there's risk included in it. We feel really confident about the margin profile. Similar to other Performance suite opportunities, right, where the PMPM or margin profile in year 1, we have very high confidence on what that's going to look like and how it will ramp in years 2 or 3, which again has been the main driver of the acceleration of EBITDA that we've had at the company over the last couple of years, and this just snaps right into that same framework, in the same model. So we're very comfortable with it. It is a capitation model. We see a really interesting opportunity in North Carolina to expand what we've already started with here, but we also see opportunities to do this in other geographies under the same Evolent Care Partners model.

Great. That's very helpful. And then just one more quick follow-up. There are some primary care entities in the market that have been facing some challenges related to their Medicare Advantage margins either from higher claims costs related to Medicare members being impacted by COVID and having longer hospital stays or perhaps some premium pressure in MA in some areas. Can you maybe talk about what you're seeing there, if anything? And how do you guard yourself against that type of a thing impacting your risk-sharing side?

Yes. Yes, so look, our model is a bit different than sort of the some of the other primary care models. Ours is more of a capital-light model, right? This is a network of physicians that we put together. We don't employ them. And we have close to a decade of experience doing this. And it's pretty similar to what we've been doing for the last decade. A couple of years ago, we evolved a little bit in terms of how we set it up economically, but it's the same thing we've been doing for a long time. And we have a long track record and a lot of confidence in what we're doing. And I think the short answer is, no, we're not seeing a spike in claims costs or issues associated with our populations. And some of that may be due to a different model, different geographies, et cetera. But no, we're not seeing that. We had really good results last year in the core Evolent Care Partners business, as we talked about recently and having the same results over the past months as well. So we feel good about it. I feel like there's a lot of upside to grow it.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Seth Blackley for any closing remarks.

Thanks for everybody's time. We look forward to connecting on the road or virtually. Have a good night.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation, and you may now disconnect.