Hello, everybody and welcome to the EQT Second Quarter 2021 Quarterly Results Conference Call. My name is Sam and I will be coordinating your call today. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand you over to your host, Andrew Breese, Director of Investor Relations to begin. Andrew, please go ahead.

Good morning and thank you everyone for joining today’s conference call. With me today are Toby Rice, President and Chief Executive Officer and David Khani, Chief Financial Officer. A replay for today’s call will be available on our website for a 7-day period beginning this evening. In a moment, Toby and David will present the prepared remarks then we will open up the line for a question-and-answer session. On our website, we have posted an updated investor presentation and we may have referenced certain slides during today’s discussion. I’d like to remind you that today’s call may also contain forward-looking statements. Actual results and future events could materially differ from those forward-looking statements because of factors described in our second quarter 2021 earnings release, our investor presentation, in the Risk Factors section of our 2020 Form 10-K and in subsequent filings we make with the SEC. We do not undertake any duty to update forward-looking statements. Today’s call may also contain non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our second quarter earnings release and our most recent investor presentation for important disclosures regarding such measures, including reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP financial measure. Thank you. And with that, I will turn it over to Toby.

Thanks, Andrew and good morning, everyone. Before we recap the quarter, I would like to touch on the recently completed Alta acquisition, which was overwhelmingly approved by our shareholders. The accretive benefits of this acquisition are compelling. It bolsters our free cash flow per share trajectory, meaningfully reduces our leverage profile, adds substantial high-margin inventory and accelerates our timeline to both reach investment grade metrics and deliver on our shareholder return initiatives. Now, stepping back to the details of the deal and the integration process. We closed the deal on July 21 for an adjusted aggregate purchase price at closing of $1 billion in cash and approximately 98.8 million shares being issued directly to Alta’s equity holders. As a reminder, no Alta equity holder receives more than 5% of our common stock in the transaction. The key assets acquired include 300,000 net Marcellus acres, largely held by production, approximately 1 Bcf a day of high-margin net production, approximately 300 miles of Midstream gathering systems, a 100-mile freshwater system and an attractive FT portfolio to premium demand markets. On the Alta assets, we expect to utilize 1 operated rig and frac crew, and in combination with our non-operated development activity, we will execute a maintenance program on the assets going forward. For the remainder of 2021, we expect the Alta assets to increase total sales volumes by 155 to 175 Bcfe, contribute approximately $300 million to $325 million to adjusted EBITDA, require capital expenditures of between $100 million to $125 million, and finally, add approximately $150 million to $170 million in free cash flow. On the integration front, our proven framework is designed to provide high confidence, transparency, speed and best practice identification as we fully integrate the Alta assets into our portfolio. Of the over 800 integration actions that were…

Thanks, Toby and good morning, everyone. I’d like to briefly touch on our second quarter results before moving on to some other strategic updates. Sales volumes for the second quarter were 421 Bcfe in line with our guidance range. Our adjusted operating revenues for the quarter were $997 million and our total per unit operating costs were $1.33 per Mcfe. During the second quarter of 2021, NYMEX prices for the second half of 2021, full year ‘22 and 2023 rose by $0.86, $0.53 and $0.27 respectively. Although this price movement is positive for EQT and aligns with our bullish staff sentiment, the rapid increase in oil pricing resulted in a $1.3 billion loss on the mark-to-market of our forward derivative position. This non-cash accounting treatment has no impact on our financial positioning, business operations and/or free cash flow projections that Toby just provided. Our second quarter capital expenditures were $246 million, approximately $20 million below the bottom end of our guidance range. This was primarily driven by operational timing and efforts to optimize the relationship between capital deployment, production delivery and maximizing free cash flow. Our PA Marcellus well cost performance continues to meet or exceed expectations with year-to-date costs averaging below our $675 per foot target. We are executing our West Virginia operations as planned and have high confidence in our ability to deliver well costs at or below our $7.75 per foot West Virginia target. During July, we placed into service a 50-mile section of our West Virginia mixed-use water system ahead of our schedule and under budget. This system is expected to further enhance development efficiencies, reduce environmental impacts and improve lease operating expenses moving forward. To wrap up our second quarter financial results, we delivered adjusted operating cash flow of $397 million, ultimately resulting in a…

Thanks, Dave. As the RSG topic highlights, we see growing opportunities to connect value creation with ESG accretion. Our comprehensive ESG report published in June provides a detailed review of how we approach sustainable value creation and a key area for us is differentiation. So before we close, I’d like to highlight the emission targets that we announced in June, which we believe are truly differentiating in the industry. First, we established the targets to achieve net zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions by or before 2025. This is an important commitment and one that we have high confidence in meeting or exceeding. Second, we plan to reduce our production segment Scope 1 GHG emissions intensity by 70% to a level below 160 metric tons CO2 per Bcfe by or before 2025. And finally, we plan to reduce our production segment Scope 1 methane emissions intensity by 65%, below 0.02% by or before 2025. These targets are meaningful first steps and we will continue to push ourselves as we aim to be the operator of choice for all of our stakeholders. We are a value-driven organization that operates with vision and purpose. And to conclude today’s call I’d like to point you to Slide 5 of our investor presentation, which highlights our unique investment opportunity to our shareholders. In short, we are a differentiated energy investment opportunity. Starting with scale, we are the largest producer of natural gas in the United States. This is important not only because we are responsible for providing the U.S. and other countries globally with low cost, low emissions natural gas, but because when done correctly, scale affords us the chance to operate more efficiently. Second, we have a robust free cash flow profile, most notably driven by contractually locked in declining gathering…

My apologies, I was muted. [Operator Instructions] First question comes from Nitin Kumar from Wells Fargo. Nitin, your line is now open. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good morning gentlemen. And thanks for taking my question. I guess I will start first with hedging, which is I think a little bit on everybody’s mind. David, you talked about the benefits of hedging a little bit, but if you could give us a little bit more insight, there was almost a doubling up of your swaps at prices that are still quite a bit below strip. I know you mentioned some floating rate hedges, but that increase wasn’t as much. So, could you talk a little bit about why did you choose to hedge at the levels you did and the instruments that you used to do that?

Yes. This is Toby. So, I can walk through the hedging and thought process behind it. So, you will see we have added approximately 650 Bcf of swaps. And if you take the Alta volumes that we inherited, that was about 150 Bcf. So, you got about 500 Bcf that we are really thinking through what’s the best way to get our hedges and meet our strategic goals that allow us to strengthen our balance sheet, reach our leverage targets and be able to start returning capital to shareholders. We have a view that we take when we make these decisions, and our view was closer to $3. I think when you look at the swaps that we did for that period, it was closer to $3, which aligned with our view. But the question is, why not collars. The use of swaps really solidifies the free cash flow from those hedges, which has the effect of improving our floor, very helpful with the rating agencies to underwrite the free cash flow that we have to assist in us regaining our investment-grade balance sheet. The next question is, well, why not just do puts, and we looked at that. And at that price, at around $3 NYMEX, to put a put in place, the premium would be anywhere from $0.25 to $0.45. So, to put a put in place and give exposure to upside, you are really taking a view that gas prices will be $3.35 and $3.40. That was not in line with our view at the time. We did not account for the weather events there. But that was the thought process behind the decision that we made on the hedging.

Great. That’s really helpful, Toby. And I guess the follow-up and you alluded to this in your prepared remarks just now, shareholder cash return. So, I know you said fourth quarter ‘21 earnings, but any thoughts on the form of that? Are you leaning towards dividends, variable dividends, buybacks? There are different ways. And I just want to also – Part B would be, you talked about consolidation and scale, how compatible are your goals to be a consolidator with meaningful cash return, if you can address that as well.

Yes. So, we are going to take a balanced and flexible approach with our capital allocation or return of capital strategy. And I am looking forward to putting that out in the fourth quarter. As far as consolidation and how we think about allocating capital and performing, strapping any consolidation opportunities we see with our footprint. One thing is very clear, if you look at our track record, we have always been very disciplined in our consolidation efforts. I think the track record we laid with Chevron and Alta support that. And it’s even more important for us at even more disciplined and only do deals that are going to be really accretive on a NAV per share and free cash flow per share basis. The deleveraging nature obviously is helpful. But we are sitting with a really good place with our balance sheet right now. So, I think when we have the ability now to start returning capital to shareholders just enhances the importance of continuing to be disciplined on the consolidation front.

Yes. And then I will just add that, we have – yes, we have $1.4 billion of free cash flow next year. We will figure out what percentage. But we have ability to do a big percentage of return to shareholders next year.

Thanks David.

You’re welcome.

Our next question comes from Josh Silverstein from Wolfe Research. Josh, your line is open. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thanks. Good morning guys. I was going to go right on the same topic as well. You mentioned the $1.4 billion of free cash flow. I imagine you probably want to pay the $570 million of maturities for next year as well. But what’s the other limiting – what were the limiting factors to how much you could return? Do you want to make your balance sheet 1.5x levered and then we can kind of think about the return profile from there or is there some other limiting factors to what you guys made about to return back to us?

Yes. So, we will be able to retire the ‘22 debt this year. So, I think you can look at the free cash flow next year really about how much debt, incremental debt do we want to retire and how much shareholder-friendly we want to do. And I think we will set a specific target, but we don’t need to get to any specific target in any 1 year. We can do a glide path.

Got it. Okay. And then just as far as the longer term strategy that you guys outlined in there, it’s pretty clear early talent here that there is no plans for growth going forward. I just wanted to see if that was the case and you guys are just going to be holding maintenance volumes roughly flat for the next 3 years or 4 years or so?

Yes. Consistent with what we have seen in the past and when we get the question, what would it take for EQT to grow, we have consistently said, it would require a strip that’s got some length to it probably 2 years to 3 years out at a gas price that’s north of $3. And that situation is still there today. And even if we did see the opportunity, if that opportunity presents itself, it would still be very modest, zero, low to single-digit growth, less than 5%. And for us, that’s really just taking the throttle or taking the brakes off the operations team to run a little bit. So, it wouldn’t be – it would be a very natural a couple of percent increase. I think it’s an interesting situation that a lot of people in the industry are looking at right now. And while you do see a short-term price signal, which is encouraging, and people can look at adding activity levels to maybe get a little bit better return on an incremental small amount of dollars. And I think that people know how that plays out when you chase shorter term price signals. And I think you compare that versus the long-term value opportunity is getting our assets valued at a gas price that’s north of $3, when you compare the short-term gains you can get from accelerated activity or compared to the alternative, we will choose the alternative. And we think that we have been encouraged to see others in the industry remain disciplined, because I think they recognize the error that we are in and what’s the best way to return – or to return capital to shareholders and also maximize the value creation of our assets.

Thanks guys.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Neal Dingmann from Truist Security. Neal, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Neal, are you there?

Sorry about that, guys. First question, Toby, for you, just on the massive footprint you have, what’s your thought? I know you have – not a ton of areas, but the thought about maybe putting a little bit given what’s going on with NGLs? And are there some pads that you could tie in either this year or early next year and have a bit more NGL focus?

Yes. Neal, I think you hit it upfront. It’s – from a percentage basis, we are not really going to be able to move the needle just given our scale in the dry gas side of things. But the Chevron asset that we have does give us an opportunity to steer some activity to the wet side of our program.

Go ahead, Dave.

No, I was just going to say it’s probably more for next year than…

Okay. And then just, Toby, on M&A, still on opportunities, your – I guess your strategy on M&A has been a bit different than others we have seen in the past. I mean given the huge sort of, as you said, the acreage now that you control, will that continue to be part of – you kind of alluded to this earlier. But other than just sort of continuing to acquire this, would the plan be continued to not only acquire, but continue to have just kind of a slow, steady, meaning that I kind of look at the Chevron deal, look at the Alta deal, certainly didn’t add any rigs there. Could you just talk about not only potentially doing more M&A, but your thought about when you would acquire something is the thought just to continue very much on the maintenance on anything you would do?

Yes. Neal, I mean our strategy coming in here was to fix EQT, solidify the balance sheet and grow free cash flow per share. In the past, consolidation was a great tool for us to grow free cash flow per share and also deleverage the business to get our balance sheet to where it’s at today. But now we are in a position where with the balance sheet where it’s at and now having the ability to start beginning returning capital to shareholders, we now have another way that we can increase our free cash flow per share, whether that’s through doing share buybacks. So, we are certainly going to weigh this new tool that we have in the mix and finding out the best way that we can grow our free cash flow per share.

Agree. And if I could sneak one last one in. Toby, for you, or Dave, do you just think on the hedges that folks are now? It seems like with the reaction today, was it the Alta hedge is rolling off? It just feels like some investors are not fully understanding the hedge program. Maybe Dave, if you could just expand on that one last time. I know you talked about the sort of collars you have in there, but I am still getting a lot of questions on that. I just don’t think people fully understand between what you put on and what the Alta has rolling off?

Right. So, we basically inherited we will call it between 7% and 10% of our hedges that Alta had in place. They were at a hedge price. I am going to average between ‘21 and ‘22, about 2.60. We then added a call all to hedges to protect the returns of that transaction of about another, I will call it, 6%. We added hedges at about 3.50 in 2021 at 2.80 in 2022. And then we added an incremental wedge of hedges between ‘21 and ‘22 that Toby talked about that had a $3 number on it. And there was a piece of that which were collars. So, the Alta pieces were the protection of – for the transaction and the inherited piece, and the incremental piece that we added to go towards our price view was that $3 piece, of which a portion of it is in collars, if that helps.

Very helpful. Thank you, guys.

You’re welcome.

Our next question comes from David Deckelbaum from Cowen. David, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

David, are you there?

I think, David, may have just disregard his question. So, we will go with Holly Stewart. Holly, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Good morning gentlemen. Maybe, Dave, I will start with you, just thinking about the acquisition integration and how that impacts the investment-grade rating. I presume that you are in close contact with the rating agencies and you are getting very close. So, maybe my first question on that is just how – what are your thoughts on just how the timing has changed there? And then maybe the second question around that, how do you incorporate the sort of return of capital strategy into that conversation?

Yes. So, I would say the – there is probably two events that impacted the timing. One has been the acquisition, and we got the upgrades just the other day. So, now we are sitting at one notch away. So, the acquisition probably helped to accelerate the transition back to investment-grade by, let’s call it, maybe six months or so. So, the second event is really the commodity price move and how it’s moved and up. And I think now the rating agencies are on kind of taking through what should the commodity price be. And so that will obviously have a big impact on timing as well. So, I think we can think about investment-grade as probably a 2022 event, whether it’s the beginning or the middle.

And then the second part on return of capital and how the rating agencies are thinking about that?

Yes. So, the agencies would like us to continue to pay down debt. I think that’s important. I think so we will integrate that into our return on capital strategy. I think now with the fact that we have a multi-year view. We will call it well over $1 billion a year of free cash flow, approaching $1.5 billion. We can create a strategy that retires debt over time and as well as provide shareholder returns. And we can accomplish both having investment grade, having a strong balance sheet and then also returning cash to shareholders.

Okay, great. And then, Toby, I know in your prepared remarks within the release, you mentioned no real cost acceleration in the second quarter. I mean what are you all seeing, I guess, here currently in terms of in fleet and then as you think about kind of the ‘22 element? How do you see that playing off?

Yes. So, we spent a lot of time with the teams thinking about service costs and making sure that we have got the most accurate view baked into our well costs that obviously makes up our CapEx forecast for the future. Where we are seeing inflation is on things like steel, obviously, things like diesel. We have done some – one of the benefits of running a large-scale dependable program is that we can leverage our procurement team to acquire the materials we need in advance. So, that’s been a very helpful tool for us. The other thing we have seen is just not reducing our reliance on things like diesel. I mean the move to electrified frac equipment, in addition to ESG benefits, it takes us away from being large diesel consumers. That’s over 25 million gallons of diesel that we have not needed to consume as a result of that. So, operational efficiencies play into reducing service cost inflation as well. So, all of these numbers are sort of baked into what our costs are. But I do see that our costs will continue to stay at the level that we are at today. And then we have got the benefit of the teams continuing to ground the operational efficiencies, high grade the schedule with longer laterals. And those two things will historically, there have been a lot of to beat even in the face of service cost increases and I expect that to continue in the future.

That’s great. Thank you, guys.

You’re welcome.

Our next question comes from Arun Jayaram from JPMorgan Chase. Arun, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Good morning. I wanted to, first, to talk about your outlook for basis differentials. I know you are assuming a mid-year 2022 startup date for MVP. So first I was wanting to see if you could talk about what basis differential is embedded in your 2022 guide for the $1.4 billion of free cash flow? And how do you expect basis differentials to move in a post-MVP world?

Yes. So we – basis differentials are narrowing by about $0.20 year-over-year from 2021 to 2022. And so we see nice improvement, and we locked in a big chunk of that. And so – and when MVP comes online, we’re assuming, I’ll call it, a very conservative view of what the endpoint where MVP drops gas off. And we’re also assuming not a benefit in base, not a material benefit in basin. So there’ll probably be some movement there that will probably help make that – those numbers get better, but we’re not assuming that, if that helps.

Got it. So it sounds like, Dave, you’re assuming about a $0.20 year-over-year improvement in basis relative to 2021 actuals. Is that fair?

Right.

Okay, fair. Great. Toby, I was wondering if you could maybe elaborate on how the market for responsibly sourced gas is kind of developing. You talked about maybe a couple of marketing agreements where you’re getting some premium pricing. So wondering if you could maybe elaborate that and maybe touch upon some of the new venture investments that you plan to make and maybe a time line for that $75 million?

Yes. So first, on the market for RSG, it starts with demand. A lot of customers have reached out to us about this product. There is a lot of interest there. So that’s very encouraging. Two is, what that market going to translate to in price, and I’d say, in the single digits right now. But the real part that we’re looking for is to really establish the certification framework that really will help solidify exactly the product that people are buying. And what that will allow us to do is quantify the emissions reduction you’re getting by getting really low intensity, responsibly certified gas that will help define the price for our customers. And I think that, that will lend itself if you’re going to apply some type of carbon pricing to that to a more constructive price in a more realistic premium that’s actually based on data. So we’ve joined the OGMP 2.0 that is specifically designed to help assist in in creating that framework. And also the technology that we use to do the on-site monitoring, that will be part of it. As far as our new ventures is concerned, one of the things that we’re doing there that will facilitate our RSG efforts is by investing in our ESG initiative, which one of them is that $20 million to replace our pneumatic devices. That’s going to cut our emissions in half, and that’s going to take our – what is already a peer-leading emissions intensity rating and only make that better, which we will have the impact of allowing us to get more credit for the quality of the gas that we produce to customers. And so that’s sort of the holistic view on RSG and what we’re doing to position ourselves to benefit and promote that market.

Great. Thanks a lot.

Thank you. Our next question comes from John Abbott from Bank of America. John, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Good morning and thank you for taking our questions. Our first question is for you, David. Did a good job explaining the working capital draw during the quarter is mainly non-cash. Just sticking to 4Q, how should we think about the trajectory of working capital?

Yes. So the issues with working capital really are tied to the margins for our hedges. And as you think about as time rolls, those margins go away, as our credit improves, those margins go away. And then if prices go up, those margins can increase on what’s left. So those are the moving targets to think about. But I think I just know that I’ll call it by the end of the year, all that margin effectively will go away. And so you could think about just from a trend standpoint over the next 6 months, that margin will go away because effectively, the biggest part of that margin impact is really tied to 2021 hedges.

Alright. And for the second question, it’s on the topic of NGLs and also on hedging, which have already been discussed. But if not, NGLs don’t really sort of really move the needle for you that much, but you don’t provide a lot of disclosure on your NGL hedging position. And we do have an uplift in the NGL curve towards in the second half of the year. So can you just sort of discuss, relatively speaking, the – maybe while you may give specifics on contracts, but the amount of percentage of hedging on NGLs and whether or not you continue to hedge into 2022 on NGLs?

Yes. So we’re 75% hedged on 2021. We’re 0% hedged on 2022. A portion of those hedges that we have in plays for our NGLs are tied to our Chevron acquisition, just like we did with Alta, we added hedges in place. But we added only 2021 hedges. We didn’t add ‘22 or ‘23. So we have virtually wide open for ‘22 and ‘23 for NGL. Again, it’s about 5% of our production. It’s probably about, call it, 6% or 7% of our revenue.

And if I could possibly sneak in one more, I mean just given the upward move in the gas strip, what are – David, what are your latest thoughts about when you might pay cash taxes?

It will be several years before we pay cash taxes. And again, that is – will be a function – we have $1.4 billion of NOLs. And so that really will be a function of what commodity prices do. But right now, we have – we will call several years out before we pay cash taxes.

Thank you very much for taking our questions.

You are welcome.

Our next question comes from David Heikkinen from Pickering Energy Partners. David, your lien is now open. Please go ahead.

Good morning everybody. Just thinking about your Alta deal, I appreciate you providing the splits on the hedges for that so we can roll it into our look-back economics. Can you talk about how much of the increase in differential guidance was tied to the Alta assets or was it not or do they just have similar differentials to the rest of the portfolio?

No, David, it has – they are about $0.15 wider than our different – than our base in basin differentials. And so it did add a piece of that. And so – and I would say about half was from the acquisition, and half of it was from wider differentials that occurred within the basin because of probably because of TETCO being down.

Yes. It’s purely in our own look-backs on what you paid and what we thought. That’s helpful just to dial that in a little bit. So we will put the cost hedge in and a little wider differential kind of into the purchase adjustment. That’s awesome. That’s helpful.

Okay, great.

Our next question comes from David Deckelbaum from Cowen. David, your line is now open. Please go ahead.

Thanks guys. Can you hear me?

Yes.

Hello. Yes, alright. Perfect. Just curious on two things, one is on the Alta deal, the incremental CapEx that you guided to today for 2021, I know – I think, one, I just wanted to revisit that longer term outlook of just running one rig line on those assets. And two, is that capital higher than the original deal thoughts? Are you accelerating into the DUCs that you acquired with that or should we think this is apples-to-apples with the original purchase guidance?

It’s in line with what we put out for the original deal guidance. And just to remind you, the Alta transaction run that asset in maintenance mode is going to require around a couple of hundred thousand horizontal feet per year, declining to around 150,000 horizontal feet longer term. And we apply the well cost, at least underwrite that deal to translate to a CapEx.

Thanks, Toby. And then just – my only second question here is obviously just heading into some of the issues that you all are experiencing right now with basis, several of your peers as well with TETCO. Last year, things were much more dire because the cash prices were much lower. But I would presume that we’re not in the situation where we’re looking at sort of managing near-term production in terms of curtailments or shut-ins or moving volumes off of M2 or M3 at least through the end of the summer?

Yes. So David, if you looked at what happened last year, you had lack of winter, you had high storage, you had a little bit of COVID impact and so – and then you had, we will call it, 1.5 Bcf per day or more of type outages. And so you had – as you headed into September, October – and then you also had about 2 Bcf per day of shut-ins that came online in October. So you had high storage, you had the pipes out and then you had producers come back online all hitting in we will call in that October, November time period. And so that created the recipe for basis widening really sharply. If you look this year and storage inside the basin is about 150Bs less year-over-year, call it, normal 900, 950 as you start the winter here. So we’re in much better storage position produced. There is really a lot less pulse shut-in of production going on. So you’re running kind of more at full capacity. And you do have the TECO outage, which was about 650, so we will call it about half to about third of what was out of time. So I think the setup is in a much better position if you have normal weather into the winter where you probably will not see any producers shut in the September, October time period. So I think it’s a much probably different setup.

Indeed. Just want to confirm that. Thanks, David.

You are welcome.

Our next question comes from Noel Park from Tuohy Brothers Investment Research. Noel, your line is now open. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, good morning.

Good morning.

Good morning.

I was wondering, now a couple that Alta is closed and you’re a couple of months even more familiar with it, I was wondering did you have any thoughts updated on in-basin gas opportunities now with your sort of combined portfolio?

Well, I think that the opportunities were known even before we picked up the Alta transaction. So I wouldn’t say our view has changed on any new opportunities coming on the horizon. I think one thing that has changed is our balance sheet has really strengthened. And the discipline that we had, the reason to do any M&A or consolidation to improve the leverage situation here at EQT, I think, is less of a desire there. So it really comes back to focus on what’s the best way for us to grow our free cash flow per share and also growing our NAV per share as well, which we have the ability to do that ourselves with our return of capital strategy that’s now been – we’ve accelerated our ability to get to that point. So our mentality on M&A is still going to be something that we look at. It’s part of our job is to make sure that we’re looking at every opportunity, but that discipline is only strengthened.

Got it. Thanks. And had on the holiday, a lot of good discussion about gas markets and what we might see going forward. The volatility we’ve seen last few months has all been on the upside. So I guess I’m not quite sure how to frame this, but on your price view and we talked about, of course, the back quotation in the curve, the expense of trying to weigh in put as far as the premiums being high. And do you – when you look at the curve, going into 2023, it’s back into the 2s, do you sort of think that the market is assuming that there is going to be sort of a delayed but significant rebound in rig count so that supply is go ease into considerably or do you think there is a sense that there is some sort of plateau ahead out there on the demand side? I’m just wondering as you talk about future scenarios just which you think is more likely?

Yes. I think for strip to be under $3, I think you have you take a view that people are going to break discipline and start adding production. This period of pricing right here is going to be really important to watch because you’ve got – this is – it’s easy to stay disciplined in a $2.70 strip. It’s another proposition when you’re looking at a $3 strip. But like I said before, I mean these are short-term pricing. And I think people understand how that’s going to end up and realize that the real value opportunities for us to bring some sustainability to gas supply and ultimately to a more sustainable price. And over the long-term, that will create more value. So I think the next 6 months will be important to watch and I think help show the discipline that this industry has. And I think after that, you’ll start to see the strip reflect what we think is a more constructive gas price long-term.

Great. Thanks a lot.

There are no further questions on the line. I would now like to hand back to Toby Rice for any closing remarks.

Yes. Thanks, everybody, for participating today. I think just stepping back and realizing the situation that we’ve been in that we’re in today. The gas markets are very strong. And I think we realize that the gas is in a $2 commodity, it’s more like a $3 commodity. And while that does present some headwinds with our hedge book, the fact is EQT is a stronger company today, and we’ve got a really bright future. We’ve got a really robust free cash flow profile and a really strong balance sheet. And that’s going to give us the tools needed to correct any market imbalances in the short-term and reward our shareholders for their patience. And we’re really excited to continue to deliver on that strategy. Thank you.

This concludes today’s call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.