Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Statoil’s First Earnings Presentation, both to the audience here in Oslo and to our audio and webcast audience. My name is Hilde Nafstad. I’m the Head of Investor Relations in Statoil. Before we start, let me say that there are no fire drills planned for today. In case the fire alarm goes off, you will need to exit through the two back doors on each side and gather toward the same side and gather outside. This morning, at 7:30 Central European Time, we announced the results for the first quarter of 2012. The press release and presentations for today’s event were distributed through the wires and through Oslo Stock Exchange. The quarterly reports and the presentations can, as usual, be downloaded from our website, statoil.com. I would ask you to kindly make special note of the information regarding forward-looking statements, which can be found on the last page on the presentation. Today’s program will start out with Statoil’s CFO, Torgrim Reitan, going through the earnings and the outlook for the company. As usual, the presentation will be followed by a Q&A session. Please note that questions can be posted by means of telephone only not directly from the web. The dial-in numbers for posing questions can be found on the website. It is now my privilege to introduce Chief Financial Officer, Torgrim Reitan.

Thank you, Hilde, and good afternoon to all of you here in Oslo; and good morning and good afternoon to all of you on the webcast following us there. So, it is a pleasure to present our results for the first quarter today. This is our best adjusted earnings ever, 11% production growth but that is as expected. We are continuing our exploration success and we keep on streamlining our portfolio for the longer term, so a strong quarter. But before I get started on production and financials, I want to start with a strategic progress. We made three new high-impact discoveries this quarter, Norway, Tanzania, and Brazil. Two out of these three are operated by Statoil and this means six high-impact wells over the last 12 months, so we will keep on drilling for more and I’ll get back to this later today. This weekend, we signed a strategic operational agreement with Rosneft. This is an important milestone in our Arctic exploration program. Also this, we will come back to later and we have the pleasure to have with us Tim Dodson, our Head of Exploration. So he will be available in the Q&A session and I’m sure he looks very much forward to tell you all about this. We continued to streamline our portfolio towards being a technology focused upstream E&P company. And in April, we accepted a cash offer for our shares in Statoil Fuel & Retail. Couche – Tard is a strong industrial buyer. They are offering an attractive price, a premium of 53%. So SFR will continue their strategic development under long term industrial ownership. And for us, it frees up capital, so we can put our money where our strategy is. The offer period will last until the 21st of May and we expect…

Thank you, Torgrim. For the Q&A session, Torgrim will be joined by the Executive Vice President for Exploration, Tim Dodson, who will be able to expand on the cooperation agreement with Rosneft for you. He will also be joined by the Senior Vice President for Accounting and Financial Compliance, Kåre Thomsen. We will take questions from the audience and over the telephone. So I will first ask the operator to explain the procedure for asking questions over the telephone. Operator please?

(Operator Instructions) Thank you.

Thank you. We will start out with questions from the audience here in Oslo. And Trond, you’re first. Can Trond have a microphone please? Trond Omdal – Arctic Securities: First congratulations on the very strong result. Of course a lot of it is also on high gas off-take. There seem to be some comment earlier by Helge that some volumes may be moved to 2013. Can you have some comments on your view at a very high level of the – your view on the gas market? And also of course you had a higher production permit for Troll. Can we assume that that will be, as expected, prolonged into the next gas year?

Okay, and thank you, Trond. We have a lot of flexibility in the gas machine and we intend to use that to earn more money and to us money is actually more important than counting barrels and so on. So if opportunities arise to move gas production in time, we will do that. But we have that flexibility as we go, so if price curve changes and so on we might elect to say, okay, we don’t want to produce, for instance, that much Troll this summer, let’s sell it forward into next summer if the prices are much better there. And we did that significantly in the summer of 2009, when gas prices was 20 pence per ton and the next summer was 40 pence per ton. So we turn it down and sold it forward and we gain 100% premium on that gas. And that brings me to a related issue and that is the importance of carving back flexibility because you know we hold a lot of flexibility in our portfolio on behalf of the long term customers. So we have taken back quite a bit of flexibility that we now use ourselves as a trading tool. We intend to use that going forward as well. When that is said, currently the prices in the U.K. are strong, 60 pence per ton around that and so that is strong prices in an historical context and we see actually a quite firm gas market in Europe going forward. We see LNG heading in other directions to Asia and we’re actually taking our own LNG from Snøhvit to Asia from time to time, South Korea and other places realizing significantly higher prices than in Europe as well. So I have quite an optimistic perspective on European supply of gas. When it comes to the uncertainty in the short term, it is very much dependent on how the market will develop, especially in the summer period, so that is something you can watch. Then on Troll permit, we have in place the full permit and you can expect that – I don’t expect there to be any changes in that going forward. Trond Omdal – Arctic Securities: I also have one question on the Rosneft deal. Of course, this is an enormously opportunity set, but can you also talk a little bit on your view on the risk on changes in physical conditions and whether you see any changes in that in the legal framework in Russia, and could you also, maybe that’s to Tim, there seems to be, on Rosneft, they published some yet to find estimates, seem to be 15 billion barrels and 65 Tcf for gas on that. So what kind of – is that based on how much seismic has been shot and there is also in the release Rosneft that says that Statoil should pay historic costs on these licenses are that major expenditures.

Okay. I’ll start with the tax and then, Tim, you continue. Country risk is something that we are facing, you across the portfolio. We have it actually in the U.K., we have it in Ireland, we have in the U.S., we have it in Angola in Brazil, in Venezuela, Algeria, Azerbaijan and of course in Russia. So this is part of running an oil and gas company. And government take is of course a key element to that country risk and predictability and in what you can believe in is very important. In Russia in particular, is quite special in these days. Politicians clearly signal improvements in the tax terms and also providing sufficient predictability to facilitate offshore developments and so on. So Russia is actually moving in another direction than quite a few other countries are doing currently. So we welcome that very much. And then it will be very important for us to have those frameworks in place before we make any investment decisions and so on. Currently, we have to live with some uncertainties, and for us it’s very important to be able to do that and then see too that things are coming together before we start investing and so on. But there are positive signals currently from Russian politicians and so on. And we all know that there is a large incentive in Russia to attract international capital and competence and making all of these resources happen. Tim?

Okay. Let me address the yet to find estimates from Rosneft first. I think it’s important to say these are very immature frontier exploration acreage, and by that, I mean all of the four licenses, not just the three in the Far East. Rosneft have studied these to a much greater degree than we have albeit on a pretty sparse database of 2D seismic of varying quality. So I think when we think about these resource estimates, we should liken them with the resource estimates for the rest of the Arctic, and that there is considerable uncertainty related to these estimates. Having said that, this acreage is so vast that if you were to prove up oil and gas in these acreage, you would basically open up not just a new play, but new basin with all the potential that that might imply. And so it’s very early stage. There are no wells drilled in any of these licenses. And in fact, the license with least data over it is the Perseevsky license in the Northern Barents Sea. When it comes to the – when it comes to the historic costs then they are limited. There is a small signature bonus which is paid by the equity holders to the Russian state. Otherwise, there is basically no license history there, so that there are – the historic costs are expected to be very limited in nature.

Do we have any further questions from the audience? Yes, please state your name and the company you represent as well. Espen Hennie – DNB Bank: Espen Hennie from DnB Bank. Regarding the cooperation agreement with Rosneft, I wonder if you could provide some details regarding timing and size of those potential asset deals including NCS assets.

Okay. I can at least speak on the Russian side. Then the commitments which we rented to are related to the exploration program. For the four licenses in question, we will have to drill a total of – a total minimum of six exploration wells. So that’s six for all of the four licenses, not six times four. That is the minimum commitment. In the case we make a discovery which we think is worth appraising, then we will also have to finance a limited amount of the appraisal program. In terms of timing, then the first well has to be drilled, I can’t remember which license it is but it’s one of the licenses in the Far East, by 2016. When it comes to the Perseevsky license in the Northern North Sea, then the first well has to be drilled by 2020. So these are very long-term licenses, much longer term than we’re used to. That’s actually good. It again gives us a lot of flexibility. It gives us a reasonable amount of time in order to acquire the necessary seismic data, to interpret that and then to be able to place the wells in an optimum position. So this six-well program will be spread over the period from 20016 until 2021. And then I guess sort of depending on success, then there will be an appraisal program following on from that. The license period is 30 years. These licenses were awarded, the ones, I guess, both in the Barents Sea and the ones in the Okhotsk. They were awarded on 29th of December 2011, so the licenses will run until 2041. And in terms of the assets on their side, I am not liberty to disclose names on that. But as you’ve seen, Rosneft has an opportunity to negotiate further equity interest in Statoil assets both in Norway and internationally and we will also be performing couple of joint technical studies, that’s also been communicated, on to Russian onshore assets. The one is the biggest greenfield in West Siberia. It’s not unlike Troll. It’s a huge gas cap with a very significant oil lake, and the other one is in the Stavropol area, down towards the Caucasus, and that’s a shale oil opportunity, not unlike a couple of the fields which we are exposed for onshore in the U.S.

Do we have any – yes, please. Kim Evjenth – ABG: This is Kim Evjenth, ABG. Just a quick question on the jurisdiction of any conflicts arising from the Rosneft agreement, where would that take place and what are the mechanisms?

I don’t know the specific answer to that. As I say we will – we have now entered into a strategic cooperation agreement. There will be joint ventures established for each of the different assets both in Russia and outside of Russia. We expect that to take some eight to nine months. I think we are targeting a signing date for all these detailed agreements in March in 2013 and that will be – equate to the period which ExxonMobil have used to finalize all the detailed agreements on the Kara Sea deal.

Do we have any further questions here in Oslo? No? I actually can’t see any questions on my screen. Operator, do you have any questions? Yes, actually now I can see Brendan Warn from Jefferies. Please go ahead, Brendan. Brendan Warn – Jefferies: Yes, thanks Hilde, it’s Brendan Warn from Jefferies, I think you will have more questions, the questions weren’t registering. Look, firstly actually to Torgrim, just, I think appreciate your comments on the European gas market, but I was wondering if you can actually give us some more insight into any of your longer term sort of gas contract negotiations. I know it’s a regular question you get, but I appreciate that there is a number of gas contracts up for renewal this year. Just any sort of call it push for breakage or linkages with the oil? And then benefiting from having exploration – your exploration team there, just in terms of your farm-in to Ghana just what in terms of discovered resource have you farmed in on and what sort of activity in the near to medium term are you looking for, Tim?

Okay, thank you, Brendan. On the long term gas contracts, change is happening. On the continental Europe, the structures in the gas markets is changing. So we are in the middle of a transition as I see it and we actually very welcome a change in the market dynamics. So the long term contracts with our gas customers have served us well for 30 years. We have renegotiated with them every third year, so what we are discussing currently is something that we are used to discuss. In 2009, when the financial crisis hit the first time, we said to our customers, okay let’s renegotiate now and then we don’t talk to each other in three years and that’s three years ago. So 2012 is a year where we are in discussions with a lot of customers. So the key points to take away from what’s going on. We are selling – we are selling energy security and we are selling flexibility. We are willing to make changes to the long term contracts and put more spot indexation into the contracts, but we’re not selling a spot product and so on. So what is very important when we do that is to carve back flexibility from the contracts and also having access to the liquid hubs so these contracts can be served in the liquid market as any other contracts and so on. And that flexibility is extremely valuable to us. Currently we hold capacity both in the transportation systems and in the production systems for the customers to nominate on a daily basis between 40% and 110% of the contract value. When we put spot indexations into contracts, we take back that flexibility and then we trade it and then we pick the best prices and then we decide…

Okay, maybe I should just take the Ghana question. It was related to the resource potential. What I can say on that is that we’ve committed to drill at least one well. That well is drilling already and progressing very well and we are – that well will be testing a new play, it’s a high impact well in a proven hydrocarbon province. So that I guess if you wanted to add to the list on the wells to watch, then that more than likely will also be the one that we will know the result of by the end of the second quarter as it looks at the moment. Brendan Warn – Jefferies: So can you just expand on the comment of it being a new play in Ghana, I appreciate it.

No, I can’t – I don’t want to disclose that because if this works then I would like to exploit it further. Brendan Warn – Jefferies: Okay, fair comment. All right, thanks, Tim, thanks, Torgrim.

Thank you. Next question goes to Jason Kenney from Santander. Please go ahead Jason. Jason Kenney – Santander: ...question, so I was wondering if you had a net reserves estimate for the Brazil pre-salt find – I noticed you mentioned reserves for the other two high impact finds in your commentary. Secondly on what could be a potentially significant excess cash flow, I wonder if you could just rank again the possible options for this going forward with the special dividends or share buyback or simply maintaining a higher cash balance on the balance sheet. And then finally, if you could give me some guidance on the exploration charge found, certainly a lot lower in the first quarter than I was anticipating. I wondered how it might pan out for the rest of the year.

All right. Tim, I suggest you start on the Brazil question, and I’ll take the rest?

Okay. Torgrim actually told you what we can tell you at this point in time. The only thing we’ve said that this is most definitely a high impact discovery, greater than 250 million barrels. As yet, we are not in a position to disclose the more specific numbers than that. But as Torgrim also alluded to, we have a very significant, both gross and net hydrocarbon column on Pão. So, I’m afraid you’ll have to be patient on that one.

Okay. Then on the cash flow, it is a strong cash flow. We have a net debt of 15%. By year end, I expect it to end around 13%. If the Statoil Fuel and Retail transaction goes ahead, the net debt at year end is expected to be reduced by another around 4 percentage points by year end. So, it is strengthening the balance sheet further. And as I said, to us it’s extremely important to run with a solid balance sheet. A good company or a great company must be able to take long term decisions and strategic decisions even if the weather is poor, even if uncertainty increases and oil prices drops and so on. So we will carry out our strategy even if the weather becomes worse. And to be honest on that note, we use quite a bit of resources and energy to understand what’s going on around us and to be honest it is very hard to estimate where it ends. A lot of the experts that we use it was the same, they didn’t see what was coming in 2008 but were perfectly able to explain it afterwards. So my conclusion is the best that I can do or we can do is actually to be prepared. That is what we can do, and very much about that is to run with a solid balance sheet and significant liquidity on our hands. When it comes the share buyback, we are asking the general meeting next week for a mandate on that like we have done for many years. So that is for us to have the rule books in place if that is found appropriate to use, but no decisions to use the share buyback program has been made at all. This is just to have the rule books in place. So that’s on the cash flow. Then on the exploration charge, so that is low in this quarter due to exploration success. The guiding we have given is that you should expect two-thirds of the exploration activity to be expensed in general terms but with significant exploration success I mean that expensing will be less and more will be capitalized. But I have no reason to change that assumption going forward unless you, Tim, here and now can promise that everything that you do will still be a success. Brendan Warn – Jefferies: Okay, many thanks.

Thank you. Your next question comes from James Milligan from Olivetree Securities. Please go ahead, James. Jim Milligan – Olivetree Securities: Yes, first of all congratulations on a great quarter. I have a quick question on Marcellus volumes and pricing. Given that Cove Point has received LNG export authorization, can you use your existing relationship with Dominion to access better prices?

Okay, thank you. So for those of you, I mean, Dominion is operating the Cove Point plant in Virginia, that’s a re-gas facility for importing LNG to the U.S. Very little gas is going in that direction. We hold capacity related to Snøhvit. And then we also have some capacity on Cove Point expansion. We are not using that terminal currently. We are rerouting the ships typically to Asia to take better prices. So we appreciate $18 per MMBtu better than $2. So that is good money, it’s actually shipping it the other direction. We have a good and long-lasting relationship with Dominion, working very constructively together. They are evaluating to make investments there to make it a liquefaction plant to export LNG instead of importing LNG. So this is something that we follow closely. But you know, it takes quite a bit of investments to do something like that. You need to believe in a spread of gas prices around $4 per MMBtu over 20 years to justify an investment like that. There are several initiatives in the U.S. currently in that respect, and we are following the development closely. You touched upon Marcellus in that respect and our Marcellus asset is producing well, close to 50,000 barrels a day currently. And as you know, it’s in an area we know with low breakeven prices and all of that. We are adjusting production together with Chesapeake taking down the rig count somewhat, so Chesapeake is acting as we like. And then there is, of course, the important issue related to Marcellus gas, and that is to take care of your gas. I know I can keep on going for a couple of hours because I’ve run through this earlier, but it’s extremely important to take care of your gas and we have entered into transportation capacity to Canada and Toronto, so currently our Marcellus gas from October will go in that direction to a different price than actually around Marcellus. All right. Jim Milligan – Olivetree Securities: Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jason Gammel from Macquarie. Please go ahead Jason. Jason Gammel – Macquarie: Yes, thank you very much. I noted the progress you made in your Bakken production, I was just curious if you could share the rig count you have been running in the Bakken to achieve these higher levels of production and whether you are seeing any inflation on the cost side of things? And then also if you could just address the type of pricing differential you are receiving there relative to either Brent or WTI and what sort of transportation arrangements that you have in place in the Bakken?

Okay, thank you. So we have stepped up the rig counts. When we acquired it, I think it was 12 rigs that were operating there, currently 16 rigs are working for us. It’s actually progressing very well, good results so far. When it comes to costs, it is developing fairly okay. We see that suppliers actually would like to work with a company like Statoil, due to that we take a long-term perspective and the predictability for a long period in that relationship. So we are able to attract high quality counterparties and that is very much appreciated. When it comes to price differentials that is the case currently and we expect that to continue for a while still and that was also the assumption we used when we acquired the assets. And then the key is of course to look for transportation solutions and we are looking for opportunities to use rail or train transportation of crude from Bakken and on to the Cushing area. So there are initiatives going on to do that as well. So that is ongoing. So producing well, differential, yes, we expect that to be in place for a while, but we’re dealing with it. Jason Gammel – Macquarie: Great. Can I just ask one quick follow-up, is there any word on when or if you will be taking over any operatorship in the Eagle Ford acreage?

Operatorships in Eagle Ford, yeah? We have – that is together with Talisman and we plan to take over operatorship of half of that in next year. Jason Gammel – Macquarie: Thank you.

Thank you. Next question from Oswald Clint, Sanford Bernstein please. Oswald Clint – Sanford Bernstein: Yes, thank you very much. I would like to just ask a question on your improved oil recovery activities in the quarter, you mentioned the relatively low decline rate. Can you give us what that number was and how that compares to the first quarter of last year to get a comparison, thank you? And also just you mentioned your Kilchurn well coming up sub-salt Gulf of Mexico, Tim, is there any read across from yesterday’s Kakuna well with Nexen? Thank you. And Torgrim sorry, just one final one on Iraq, a couple of steps to start exiting Iraq, can you say what those steps are and will there be any signs or cost implications of coming out of Iraq? Thank you.

All right, increased oil recovery and decline rates. So we see the declines developing as expected. We estimate it to be around 5% on an annual basis and that has been so for many years and it is still the case. There will be fluctuations from quarter-to-quarter on increased oil recovery, but we are monitoring very closely the long-term trends on this one. So we don’t see any reason to change that guiding, however, we see a very positive contribution from increased oil recovery. And you know, those projects are typically very profitable to realize as well. So a lot of effort is put into that. Before you start on Kilchurn, Tim, on Iraq, exiting Iraq, so that is progressing as planned and we see that that is progressing well. When you comment on specific issues there, I am not ready to comment on that.

Okay. I think your question was related to two wells in the Gulf of Mexico, Statoil operated Kilchurn and the comment I have on that is, is progressing and more or less according to plan. And as Torgrim indicated, we expect to finalize that well during the second quarter. When it comes to Kakuna, then the operator Nexen have announced that as a dry well today. So that means that our share of the well costs will have to be expensed in the second quarter. Oswald Clint – Sanford Bernstein: Okay. That’s great. Thank you.

Thank you. We’ll take the next question from Haythem Rashed from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead, Haythem? Haythem Rashed – Morgan Stanley: Thank you, Hilde and good afternoon all, and thank you for taking my questions. I have three quick questions, if I may. Firstly, just on – going back to the costs in Q1, which I understand in some part was impacted by higher royalties. Can you give us any color or indication as to how we should see these costs progress through the rest of 2012? I mean, is it likely to be sort of linear in line with production increases or is there some volatility here that we should sort of bear in mind? Secondly just on Johan Sverdrup, just an update there would be very helpful, particularly with regards to the appraisal program. Lundin have sort of indicated in past releases that they are unlikely to provide any updates or estimates until later on in the year, but just wondered from your side what the sort of latest plan was there and when you will be ready to perhaps provide an update to the market? And then finally just on rig availability, just wanted to clarify with some of the upcoming wells you have, particularly Peregrino South and some of the appraisal work on Johan Sverdrup, what the rig availability was. Do you have those rigs in place or is that something that is still yet to be sort of completed? Thank you.

All right, Haythem. Thank you. I’ll take the cost and Tim on Johan Sverdrup and rig availabilities and so on. So you should expect quite a bit of the costs to be a function of production, as such, but also prices. I mean the royalty is very much driven by prices. So that is something you should take with you. When it comes to whether this is linear or not, I think it’s too hard for me to say that, but I think it’s fair to say that when it comes to the international segment we tend to have costs from time to time that is not directly linked to the operation, like we had in the last quarter related to Angola and Nigeria where we sort of make – put aside accounting wise for claims from authorities and so on. And that will impact the cost picture. There are none of that in this quarter, but you should expect from time-to-time there to be some elements within the international segments. So when it comes to the underlying units of production costs as such, you should expect that to, going forward, to continue to increase slightly more or less on according to inflation. That is what you should expect and of course linked to production. And you should also expect us to be a first quartile company when it comes to unit of production costs. We were that in 2001, we are still that and we aim to maintain in such a position going forward as well.

Okay, on the Johan Sverdrup question, then our plan for going forward is we have agreed to at least another four wells, four further appraisal wells, in fact one of those will be an exploration well. Three of those wells will be drilled in the Statoil operated license, the PL 265. One of those wells will be to test what was previously the Aldous North segment. So that has the potential to prove up new or additional resources. The two others are appraisal wells in order to reduce the uncertainty in the resource estimates which we have for 265 and in order to gain important and relevant information for choice of our development concept and then Lundin plan – have approval for one more appraisal well in PL 501. That is how it stands at the moment and for us it makes sense to complete this program before we provide a new resource update. When it comes to rig availability, we have secured rigs for the appraisal program, the three wells in the Johan Sverdrup license, we also secured a rig for the Peregrino South appraisal. Haythem Rashed – Morgan Stanley: Great, thanks very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Blake Fernandez from Howard Weil. Go ahead please, Blake. Blake Fernandez – Howard Weil: Actually guys, most of my questions have been answered. The only one I wanted to go back to Ghana if I could, I was just curious if you could disclose the price tag that you paid in order to enter that position?

Blake, can you help me with repeating that question? Blake Fernandez – Howard Weil: Sure. I’m just curious if you can disclose what you paid in order to enter Ghana, was there any kind of financial transaction associated with that?

All right, Tim, please?

Yes, a fairly simple agreement, it’s a promote on the well costs. I’m not at liberty to share the magnitude on that. Blake Fernandez – Howard Weil: Okay, thank you very much.

Our next question comes from Hootan Yazhari from Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead, Hootan. Hootan Yazhari – Merrill Lynch: Hi there. I just wanted to refer back to some tax disputes or the like that you had on agreements with Angola and Nigeria which weighed on your D&P international results in Q4. Are these continuing to weigh or has there been a resolution there and what should we expect going forward on that front? And then the second question I had was regarding Tanzania, obviously the next well coming forward there. Can you give us some guidance in terms of at what stage you would look at making this a standalone development, i.e., not necessarily having to cooperate with your partners or your peers across, i.e., BG and Ophir and whether that’s what you are aiming for right now or are discussions with BG and Ophir progressing well there? Thank you.

All right. Thank you. I have with me Kåre Thomsen. So Kåre, can you address the Angola, Nigeria question? Kåre Thomsen: Yeah. We had in the fourth quarter we made provision based on updated assessments and we have continued based on the same principles also in the first quarter to make the necessary provisions and the accounts as such reflect our best view also for the first quarter but as you have noticed there were no bumps or jumps in the accounts as such, so it’s more like reflecting the quarter as such.

Okay. Then in Tanzania, as Torgrim alluded to, we are now drilling our second exploration well on the independent structure called Lavani. Our goal is to prove up sufficient volumes to be able to support standalone development based on our own resources and in terms of guiding then we expect that we will need to prove up something like 8 TCF to 10 TCF of gas in order to support an onshore-based LNG development solution. We are currently looking into other options for more rig capacity towards the end of 2012, 2013, so that we are in the position to drill up additional targets. And to that question then, yes we have addressed additional targets so that we think the block has the potential to produce or to the resource base which we need for a standalone development. Hootan Yazhari – Merrill Lynch: Understood. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Before we go to that what I can see as the last question on my list, maybe the operator could remind the audience the procedure for asking questions.

(Operator Instructions)

Thank you. Our next question comes from Michael Alsford from Citi. Please go ahead Michael. Michael Alsford – Citi: Good afternoon. Thanks Hilde. I have got two quick questions if I could. Just firstly, given that Tim’s on the line, on exploration plans for the Barents Sea, could you maybe give a follow up on the timing of – I guess follow on drilling after Skrugard and Havis and maybe a little bit more on the development plans, how they are progressing and I guess timing on those potential developments. And then just secondly on the just taxation guidance for international E&P, it seemed quite low in the quarter and I am just wondering if you could give a bit more color as to where we might see that charge going forward for the rest of 2012? Thanks.

All right. Thank you, Michael. So, Tim, if you can answer the Barents question and Kåre, on the international taxation?

Okay. If I take the Barents Sea first, I think I will have to refer you to more information on this, which is planned to be communicated on this week, on Thursday, in conjunction with the Energy Seminar in Bergen. Kåre Thomsen: The tax for the international segment, we have guided 50% to 55% tax rate for the adjusted earnings, and that guidance still remained for 2012. We expect the tax rate over time, after 2012, the average tax rate to come down more to the level we had in the past years, below 50%, but for 2012 it will be in this range. Between the quarters, we will see variances, and that depends on many factors. But in short, it’s the combination of – or the composition between what you can call high and low-tax regimes, which might vary over the quarters, we will also get some – now and then some one-off effects like we have in this quarter. We have won a tax case in Norway for a foreign subsidiary, which influenced the tax rate for this quarter, where you see that that’s down to 37%, exceptionally low. But this is not the trend. The expedition should be between 50% and 55%, but might vary between the quarters. Michael Alsford – Citi: That’s great. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Peter Hutton with RBC. Please go ahead, Peter. Peter Hutton – RBC: Hi, thanks. Yes, two quickies, first of all I mean you are talking about the flexibility on the gas volumes and selling into future summer. Can you just confirm whether there’s is any commitment this summer from arrangements made previously to serve the fix price as was pertaining in say a year ago. So what are the already contracted volumes for this summer in European gas? And the second one in Tanzania, in the Lavani field, can you just remind me is this targeting Cretaceous or Tertiary, how does that link with the Zafarani?

Okay, thank you Peter. On the gas side, our flexibility, the commitment we have to deliver that is towards the gas customers in a way. If we have sold in forward, not a commitment to deliver, you can source that in the markets if you like and so on. So in the trading organization, they do quite a bit of transaction in the forward markets but you can actually source the gas either through the markets or you can put your own gas behind there. So when it comes to the flexibility strategy, there are no commitments to deliver this summer, as such. That can be sold through the markets if you would like to do that. Yeah.

Okay. On Tanzania then the Lavani well is testing a Tertiary target with a very strong amplitude response. It looks very similar to the Zafarani, but the Zafarani is almost certainly Cretaceous. There is deeper potential on the Lavani, we won’t be able to test that with this well. The structure is segmented and the plan would then be given a discovery in the Tertiary interval, that we would come back and appraise that and drill to the deeper level with the next well. Peter Hutton – RBC: Okay. Thanks.

Next question comes from Nitin Sharma with JPMorgan. Please go ahead, Nitin. Nitin Sharma – JP Morgan: Afternoon. Two questions, please. There has been a strong momentum on the portfolio front, you mentioned streamlining of portfolio. Now that you have divested some significant chunks of assets businesses over the last few years, how should we be thinking about the agenda on asset divestment front? And second one in relation to North America, now that you’ve got a critical mass in North America, what are the next steps for you in unconventional space in that geography? You have already given an update on assets, but more from a portfolio angle, more growth/acquisition or focus on development now? Thanks.

Okay. Thank you. First on the portfolio management perspective, we have worked diligently over the last 10 years to streamline the portfolio. Selling assets that we don’t consider core, like shipping activities, the Gassled, Statoil Fuel and Retail, we are in the process with, petrochemicals and so on. So you know we will continue with looking critically at our portfolio, if our money can make more uses of themselves other places in the portfolio, then where it sits currently. So that is something you should expect, a certain turnover in the portfolio going forward as well and then you know we use M&A and business development to acquire assets as we go on. We do that all the time. So for instance in 2011, we announced divestments or closed divestments of $10 billion and then we acquired assets for $5 billion. So this is a natural part of how we deal with portfolio management. So you should expect that to continue, going forward as well. Within North America and unconventionals, we are very satisfied with the three positions that we have in Marcellus gas, we have Eagle Ford liquids and then we have tight oil in Bakken and so on. And then of course we will always look for good opportunities to grow even further but we are quite comfortable with the positions that we have. You asked specifically about other geographies, when it comes to unconventional and I think it’s – there is a lot of opportunities around the world. What is special with the U.S. is that, you can actually buy things, you can actually transport your hydrocarbons and there is a trading market for it and there are users of the products and so on. So it’s in a very available market to grow that business. But there are interesting opportunities in other places as well. Nitin Sharma – JP Morgan: Thank you.

Thank you. We have two last questions. The first one comes from Rahim Karim with Barclays. Rahim Karim – Barclays: Hi, good afternoon gentlemen. First question was for, Tim, I think it was just a clarification. I think last time we met you talked about a testing deeper target on the Zafarani well. I was just wondering if you could make any comment on that front. And the second question was for Torgrim, just around taxes talk from the potential increases in the CO2 taxes the company might be facing offshore Norway. Just if you could give us any color on that and whether this would be impacting your – the way that you’re thinking or developing some of the fast track or projects that you are looking at?

Okay. Maybe I can say the Zafarani well, that you remember well. And in fact we did drill somewhat deeper on the Zafarani well, not because we saw a great lot of potential there but we wanted to check the stratigraphy below the main target and we didn’t prove up any additional reservoir deeper. As I just alluded to on the Lavani well, then there are indications that there could be hydrocarbons at both levels both in the Tertiary and the Cretaceous.

Okay. Thank you. And then on the CO2 taxes, so the offshore in Norway, the CO2 tax will increase from NOK180 per ton to NOK380 per ton. And as an operator, we emit 9 million tons. Our share of that is 5 million tons. So if you multiply 5 million tons by NOK200, I think you get to NOK1 billion. So that is the pre-tax cost related to that new legislation. Whether this will impact any developments going forward, it’s hard to say. It will on the margin reduce profitability of new projects and give incentives to invest in lower CO2 emissions as well. I don’t expect it to have a large impact on the development of the shelf going forward but it is an additional tax that we need to relate. Rahim Karim – Barclays: Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you. We will take the last question from Teodor Nilsen with Swedbank. Please go ahead, Teodor. Teodor Nilsen – Swedbank: Yeah, Hilde, good afternoon. Just first one question on the realized prices, it seems like the discount to the average Brent throughout the quarter has increased both for D&P Norway and D&P International for the past few quarters. And I guess that’s related to high portion of NGL. What should we expect in terms of the discount to the Brent price going forward? And second question is related to Marcellus, Torgrim you have already mentioned that you have reduced the rig count in Marcellus but still the production is increasing. What should we expect in terms of production growth from Marcellus over the next few quarters? Thank you.

All right. Thanks. When it comes to realized liquids price, it is the NGL part of it. That sort of explains that. So going forward you should follow NGL prices and look for the content of LNG into our liquid production. When it comes to Marcellus going forward and the rig count we had, let me see here, we had 36 rigs working in Marcellus by year-end that is now being reduced. So we are at 24 I think and then we should expect to be around 20 by year-end, maybe 18 by year-end. So this is according to how we should operate in the current price and price environment and that is all of the beauty of the assets, you can actually adjust your activity to the current price environment. So it’s actually important to drill to sort of keep land and keep the right to the land. When that is said, we have currently, let me see, 300 wells producing in Marcellus and then we have 400 wells waiting for completion and the gathering systems and those 400 wells are, as you know, extremely cheap to put into production. So that’s it there, so there is a quite bit of inventory of wells there, so you should expect production from Marcellus to continue to increase. Yeah, thank you. Teodor Nilsen – Swedbank: Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. That concludes our Q&A session and our event for today. The presentations and the Q&A sessions can be replayed from our website and in a few days you will also find a transcript available there. If you have any further questions, please don’t hesitate to contact the Investor Relations department. Thank you all very much for participating and have a good day.