Good day, everyone. And welcome to the EOG Resources First Quarter 2022 Earnings Results Conference Call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. At this time for opening remarks and introductions, I would like to turn the call over to the Chief Financial Officer of EOG Resources, Mr. Tim Driggers. Please go ahead, sir.

Good morning, and thanks for joining us. This conference call includes forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements have been outlined in the earnings release and EOG’s SEC filings. This conference call also contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. Definitions and reconciliations schedules for these non-GAAP measures can be found on the EOG’s website. This conference call also include estimated resource potential not necessarily calculated in accordance with the SEC’s reserve reporting guidelines. Participating on the call this morning are Ezra Yacob, Chief Executive Officer; Billy Helms, President and Chief Operating Officer; Ken Boedeker, EVP, Exploration & Production; Jeff Leitzell, EVP, Exploration & Production; Lance Terveen, Senior VP, Marketing; and David Streit, VP, Investor & Public Relations. Here’s Ezra.

Thanks Tim. Good morning, everyone. EOG’s cash return strategy demonstrates our commitment to deliver long-term shareholder value. Yesterday, we declared a second special dividend for the year of $1.80 per share following last quarter’s $1 per share. Combined with our peer-leading annualized regular dividend of $3 per share year-to-date, we have announced $3.4 billion in cash return to shareholders in 2022. EOG has a strong history of cash return. Since we began trading as an independent company in 1999, we have delivered a sustainable growing regular dividend. It has never been cut or suspended and its 23-year compound annual growth rate is 22%. Since the transition to premium drilling in 2016, our dividend compound annual growth rate has been even higher at 28% including doubling our dividend last year. Today, our regular dividend not only leads our E&P peer group. It is more than competitive across all sectors of the market. More recently, we have supplemented our regular dividend with significant special dividends, reflecting our commitment to both capital discipline and returning cash to shareholders. While we are proud of our cash return track record, we acknowledge shareholders desire for more transparency and predictability. To provide both, we recently formalized and yesterday announced our cash return commitment of returning a minimum of 60% of annual free cash flow. Going forward, our intention is to evaluate and pay the regular dividend and consider options for additional cash return every quarter. The addition of quantitative guidance to our cash return framework reflects our confidence in our business. The pandemic driven volatility in the oil and gas market is stabilizing. However, the macro environment continues to evolve with the war in Ukraine and other geopolitical events. We have proven to ourselves over the last several years that our business is resilient through the…

Thanks, Ezra. Our ability to refine our longstanding cash return framework by providing quantitative guidance is made possible by EOG’s outstanding operational and financial performance. In the first quarter, EOG earned $2.3 billion after adjusting items or $4 per share. We generated $2.3 billion of free cash flow. Capital expenditures of $1 billion were near the low end of the guidance range, while production volumes and total per unit cash operating costs finished better than targets. Our confidence is further bolstered because we finished the quarter in an incredibly strong financial position. Total debt on March 31 was $5.1 billion. This includes the current portion of debt of $1.25 billion, reflecting the bond matures in March 2023, that we intend to pay off with cash on hand. Cash on March 31 was $4 billion for a net debt of $1.1 billion. This yield’s a debt to total capitalization ratio of 4.8%. The $4 billion cash balance excludes $2.4 billion of collateral for hedges held by our counterparties. The amount of collateral fluctuates with oil and natural gas prices. These short-term timing differences in cash flows are not considered in our calculation of free cash flow and do not influence our decision on the timing or amount of cash return to shareholders. To that end, EOG has declared special dividends so far this year totaling $2.80 per share on top of the regular dividend of $3 per share on an annual basis, totaling $3.4 billion. Our objective in establishing our cash return guidance was to make it simple, yet dynamic so that it is easily communicated and understood while remaining suitable under a range of commodity price scenarios. The actual amount of cash return each year is a product of our long standing free cash flow priorities. These have not changed. The size of our regular dividend is now the largest of our E&P peers and the strength of our balance sheet supports our ability to return a large portion of free cash flow back to shareholders going forward under a range of scenarios. The $1.80 special dividend declared yesterday, along with $0.75 regular quarterly dividend demonstrate significant progress toward our commitment to returning at least 60% of our 2022 free cash flow to our shareholders. Subject to commodity prices, the amount of free cash flow available and the Board’s discretion, our intention is to return cash through special dividends or stock buybacks on a quarterly basis going forward. Here’s Billy.

Thanks, Tim. We’ve had a great start to the year. Our first quarter volume, capital expenditure and total per unit cash operating cost performance exceeded our forecasted targets. We’re also pleased with our progress to-date, offsetting inflation and managing well cost. Our drilling teams continue to reduce drilling days and generate consistent performance improvements. Use of self-sourced downhole tools as well as minimizing downtime and mud losses remain areas of focus to improve performance. For example, drilling times in our Eagle Ford oil play continue to improve, decreasing 28% in the last five years. The average well is now drilled in less than five days. On the completion side, we have increased the amount of treated lateral per day by about 10% over the last year, as we further deploy the super zipper technique. We are now using this technique on more than half of the wells completed in the company and expect to increase its use further as we progress through the year. In addition, our self-sourced sand program is providing a tremendous advantage that we expect to further offset additional inflation throughout the year. When we establish our plan at the beginning of the year, we knew the unusually tight supply constraints initially sparked by the economic recovery from the pandemic would present a unique challenge. Taking these headwinds into account, this year’s plan was devised with known efficiency improvements that would maintain well cost flat with last year. While we have since seen increased steel and fuel prices directly associated with the war in Ukraine, we are confident we can still deliver on the CapEx and volume targets in our original plan. Rather than accept inflation as a given, our employees remain proactive. We have a track record of lowering cost and developing efficiencies through periods of…

Thanks, Billy. A year and a half ago, we announced a major new natural gas discovery in South Texas. We named Dorado. It’s a dry gas play with 21 Tcf of resource potential net EOG across stacked pays in the Austin Chalk and Eagle Ford formations. Our break even cost in Dorado is less than $1.25 per Mcf, which we believe represents the lowest cost of supply of natural gas in the United States. Dorado was the most recent double premium play to emerge from our organic exploration program. We began technical work on Dorado back in 2016, captured a large acreage position in the core of the play as a first mover during 2017 and 2018 and drill test wells in late 2018 and 2019. After pausing during the downturn in 2020, we moved Dorado into active development last year and completed 11 net wells. This year, we anticipate completing 30 net wells, nearly tripling activity. Since last year, we have doubled our production rate out of Dorado producing 140 million cubic feet per day in the first quarter of 2022. We are leveraging our proprietary knowledge built from prior plays to move quickly down the cost curve as we increase activity at a pace that allows us to incorporate learnings and savings. We completed seven net wells during the first quarter of 2022, while keeping well cost flat compared to similar designs in the first quarter of last year successfully offsetting inflation. Since our first well was drilled in 2018, we have reduced well cost over 35% and our approaching our target well cost faster than we anticipated. In addition, well performance is improving. Productivity from recent wells is significantly beating our initial forecast, refined completion techniques, and a focus on targeting have increased our performance projections on…

Thanks Ken. I’d like to note the following important takeaways from the call today. First, formalizing our cash return strategy demonstrates our commitment to our free cash flow priorities that along with high return discipline reinvestment offers significant long-term shareholder value. Second, EOG is realizing another tremendous year of improvement. We are set to deliver outstanding returns while demonstrating capital discipline within an inflationary environment, delivering on both volumes and capital as announced at the beginning of 2022. Third, our most recent organic exploration announcement Dorado has positioned us with over 20 Tcf of low cost natural gas with access to multiple markets. Our progress in Dorado is on pace to make this North America’s lowest cost of supply. Thanks for listening. Now, we’ll go to Q&A.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from the line of Doug Leggate with Bank of America. Doug, your line is open.

Well, thank you. Good morning, everybody. And Ezra I think I speak for everybody in saying we’re delighted to see the framework you’ve introduced for cash returns. I do have a question around this, however, and it is – I’m just curious what’s changed to move you in that direction? And I wonder if I could ask you to – you’re obviously talking about percentage in free cash flow. So I wonder if you could frame some similar parameters around how you think about reinvestment rates or the planning assumptions that go around that so we can get some kind of idea as to what free cash flow ultimately looks like versus the level of spending if you see my point.

Yes, Doug. I sure do. So let me start with the – what is now, why now, and simply we feel that this is the right time for our business to come out with the additional guidance. We’ve got the regular dividend increase to be competitive with the broad market. We’ve got the balance sheets in a very strong position. And we’re basically emerging stronger from the downturn and confident that we can deliver this minimum amount of cash return going forward. It’s consistent with our long-term free cash flow priorities. So it’s not really a change in strategy. In fact, in 2021, we returned about 49% of free cash flow and we paid off a $750 million bond. So when you combine those that was about 60%. And so it’s a range internally we’ve discussed and the announcement really just provides a bit of transparency. Now on the second part of your question with regards to how do you think about, how are we thinking about the reinvestment growth and to get to free cash flow. One thing, one reason we have given this guidance as a minimum of 60% return on free cash flow is because it’s a guide that can be consistent and long term in nature through the cycle, like how we manage the business basing the guide off of a free cash flow, puts us in what we feel is the best overall position to create shareholder value through the cycle. So nothing’s really changed in the reinvestment strategy. It’s first, always based on returns and our ability to get better each year. There’s – as we’ve said in the past, there’s no reason to invest in growth if you’re not generating high returns and you’re not doing it with an ability to improve the underlying business year after year. And what that means is, not chasing free cash flow, just because of high prices, if you’re investing in something that’s eroding the business long term. So you can take today, for example we could increase activity today into these high prices, but in the inflationary environment that’s going to erode our capital efficiency. And then the second piece that we’ve talked about as far as reinvestment our growth is based on the macro environment and market fundamentals. Does the market really need the barrels? What’s supporting the global supply and demand fundamentals? Ultimately, investing in premium and double premium as you know, has made a somewhat price agnostic basing those decisions on $40 oil and 2.50 natural gas. And so it’s really the capital discipline comes down to what can we do? And are we investing in a pace where each of our assets can get better year after year and ultimately improve the overall returns and company profile?

I appreciate the answer, Ezra. As I said, we all welcome by what you’ve done. So thank you for that. My follow-up is hopefully a quick one. So some years ago, you guys pivoted away from natural gas, Dorado, obviously, the exception today. But you also took a light off of a lot of your legacy gas assets. The world has obviously changed. So I’m just wondering within the company, is there any effort or I guess, initiative to pivot back to some of those legacies – some of the legacy gas assets that are obviously still in your portfolio in light of what’s going on as it relates to LNG expansion longer-term. I leave it there. Thank you.

Yes, Doug. As you said, the world’s changed a lot and the company’s changed quite a bit. The biggest thing for us is that introduction of the premium and now double premium reinvestment hurdle rates. So all of our gas assets now are judged and it’s $2.50, flat natural gas price for the life of the well, and that really high grades our reinvestment opportunities into any of our assets, but especially the natural gas ones as we’re talking about right now. Ultimately what we see with Dorado is that we’ve captured a very significant resource geographically in the best spot. We think onshore U.S. with access to multiple markets. And we’re very excited about being able to focus in on really that asset that we have. We think it’s going to be the premier asset in North American natural gas.

[Crushing] (ph) for sure. Thanks for taking my question. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Charles Meade with Johnson Rice. Charles, your line is open.

Good morning, Ezra, and to the whole EOG team there. Ezra, kind of picking up on the point you just made. I’m curious does - I get that you evaluate all your projects at 40 and 2.50, and that services the best oil projects and best gas projects. But is there any concern or discussion inside EOG that maybe evaluating projects that something so far below the strip is actually giving you a suboptimal relative ranking across oil and gas assets?

Yes, Charles. The way we look at it is we’ve been fortunate. We’ve been in unconventional North American exploration here for nearly two decades honestly, and what that’s allowed us to do is put together a multi basin portfolio of what we think is really the deepest and highest quality asset inventory. When we switched to premium, it was really taking a long-term look at that $40 price, $2.50 natural gas price to not only help the immediate returns, the rate of return, the IRRs upfront, but really thinking about longer term through the cycles. What does it mean to really build a company where based on a commodity price, you can still be successful and create value through the cycles. Ratcheting that up to double premium in 2020 was really a reflection of our ability to have grown our premium inventory three and a half times through organic exploration since 2016. So actually I think the focus on double premium drilling and that reinvestment hurdle rate actually provides us with an optimal way to rank our assets.

Okay, thank you for that insight. And perhaps going back to Dorado, I caught during the prepared comments that I think that the two-year cum is 80% higher than your 2018 case and part of that is longer laterals. And I think that the base was the kind the 2018 case was 9,000 foot lateral. So is, am I making, am I in the right ballpark to thinking that if 80% higher, two year cum, some of that’s longer laterals, so we’re looking at maybe 40% or 50% higher productivity per lateral foot in the Dorado play versus the earlier case?

Yes, Charles. This is Ken. We haven’t really given out a number on how much higher the productivity is. If we look back to those 2018 wells, they were shorter laterals in the 6,000 to 7,000 foot range. We’ve now have some extended laterals even past our original 9,000 foot range that we thought we’d get. And those things both the improved performance and the lower cost have really driven that finding cost down to almost the $0.40 target that we’re showing on Slide 11 there.

Yes. But no, you don’t care to offer any comments on the productivity per lateral foot, I guess, and that’s fine. Thank you.

I guess Charles, just what I would say is, it is – our wells are beating our type curves that we have and those type curves do have a fairly low decline over the first several months of production. So we are seeing them beating our type curves. And if you look at it, we’ve really only drilled 30 of our 1,250 wells in that place. So we’re continuing to learn.

Thank you, Ken.

Our next question comes from Arun Jayaram with J.P. Morgan. Your line is open.

Yes. Good morning. My first question is just on the supply chain, you guys are holding the line on CapEx. A number of your peers have raised CapEx expectations. So I was wondering if you could comment what’s unique about the way you’re managing the supply chain to give you confidence on delivering the $4.5 billion CapEx budget, and do some of these supply chain headwinds we’re seeing within the industry. How does that influence your thoughts about 2023 given shortages of OFS equipment labor and just broader – just challenges on things like OCTG?

Yes, Arun. This is Billy. Let me start by providing maybe an overview of how we’re managing the year’s capital program. Then I’d like to get Jeff to add some color and then I’ll circle back to 2023. Let me first start by saying that we kind of look at each year the same way. As you know, we would – I would tend to bucket this in maybe three or four different areas. One, we self source a lot of materials that insulates this from a lot of the supply chain issues, we also do a lot of innovation in efficiency gains. The third bucket might be the pace of the adoption of these new efficiencies across the company. And then may be finally flexibility with our multi-basin approach. So just to elaborate on that a little bit more, at the beginning of the year, we constructed our plant, certainly recognizing the inflation we saw from the recovery of post-COVID. And we were confident in looking at that, we could offset inflation and maintain flat well cost. What we didn’t anticipate was the war in Ukraine and that additional pressure and increased inflation we saw in commodities such as fuel and steel, but we’re still working to offset this additional inflation through our efficiencies and new innovations. These improvements in efficiency gains are certainly happening, largely in the areas where we have the most activities such as Delaware basin and Eagle Ford. But I would also say that the pace of the adoption of these new technologies, the rapid adoption of the super zipper technology across the company is happening faster than we expected. So we also have the advantage of being in multiple basins. So that gives us a lot of flexibility to shift activity between areas. So we’re very comfortable that we can maintain our plan, delivering our original volumes and within our stated CapEx goals, we laid out the start of the year. So with that, maybe I’ll turn it over to Jeff to give you some more details.

Yes, good morning, Arun. This is Jeff Leitzell. So as Billy stated, our ability to counter these inflationary pressures and some of the supply chain constraints that you talked about, it’s really just a huge credit to our team’s operational execution, their innovative culture and really continuing to improve on the efficiencies. So just to give you a little bit of color and some examples, start off with our drilling operations, our teams continue to increase their efficiencies and that’s primarily with EOG’s in-house motor program and our proprietary bit cutter development, which we can kind of design both of these uniquely around all the formations we drill in each of our plays. And our Eagle Ford operations, they’re just a perfect example of this. We’ve increased the drilled footage per day by over 17% this year. And this is one of our more mature plays that we’ve been drilling in for 13 years. So really to EOG, no matter how far along we are in development, there’s always improvements that can be made. And then on the same topic there with the Eagle Ford, they’ve just done an outstanding job of reducing their drilling fluid costs also, even as diesel prices have risen and that’s primary base in those fluids. We’ve done this by optimizing the density and the additives and the drilling fluid in each area, really to try to reduce those fluid losses, which has resulted in a per barrel savings of about 20% so far in 2022. And then just a couple more basic examples in completions, our field team, they continue to see really good improvements there and they’ve increased their overall completed lateral per foot per day by 10% compared to 2021 for the total company. And as we’ve talked about in the past,…

Yes, Arun, just to summarize maybe I know that’s a lot of detail for you but obviously, we’re very proud of the efforts of our employees to continue to fight against the rising well cost in this period of inflation. As we move into 2023, it’s really early to talk about specifics about next year, but let me just kind of give you an overall impression of how we think about going into any year. Certainly we have a long history of managing through inflation to maintain or lower well cost that gives us confidence to be able to meet our goals. And we have two fundamental things that we think about. One is our contracting strategy and how we approach that is for example, this year is just a reminder. We have about 50% of our well cost secured with contracts, with service providers that provide about 90% of our drilling fleet. And about 60% of our frac fleet locked up under existing contracts. Not all of those service contracts are set to expire at the end of this year. So we try to stagger those as we go through a year to make sure that we have some continuity going into the preceding year. And then the lastly would be, as Jeff mentioned there, innovation and efficiency improvements. So we are already confident. We’re seeing ideas that we can continue to push and explore to continue to reduce cost and offset inflation going into next year. So we’re always chasing those kind of things. I know that’s a lot of color, but it’s certainly something that we’re very proud of our employees and their efforts, and just want to make sure you fully understand it.

Yes, appreciate the detail, Billy. My follow up is – maybe for Ezra or Tim, you guys have now committed to a 60% minimum return of free cash flow kind of framework. I wanted to get your thoughts on the other 40% bucket and what the priorities are between the balance sheet additional cash return and the bolt-ons. I know last quarter, Tim did message EOG’s intention to build more cash on the balance sheet for countercyclical opportunities at other points in the cycle. So I wanted to – if you could give us some updated thoughts on that?

Yes, Arun. This is Ezra. I can start right there with where you left off, pardon me, let me say that. We’re just thrilled to be in a unique position here to be able to strengthen the balance sheet and return $2.4 billion to shareholders in the first half of 2022. But ultimately, with the remaining 40%, it comes back to the fact that we’re committed to delivering on our free cash flow priorities and doing the right thing at the right time to maximize long-term shareholder value. And it does include that balance sheet. And some of the things with the balance sheet we’ve discussed in the past is, to have cash available just for running the business for operations to have cash for the small bolt-on acquisitions. As you mentioned to have cash available for the $5 billion stock repurchase authorization, which we’ve said, we prefer to look at that as an opportunistic repurchase rather than something more programmatic. And then the last thing with regards to our balance sheet and cash on hand would also be our commitment there to retiring a bond, a $1.2 billion bond that’s coming due here in the first quarter of 2023. So really, as we started off with the guide of returning a minimum of 60% of free cash flow, it’s really not a change in strategy by any means. It’s just a to provide a little more transparency a little more clarity, we’ve heard some of our shareholders who have asked for a bit more transparency and clarity on the cash returns, and that’s really what the change in messaging is, but our strategy remains very consistent.

Great. Thanks, Ezra.

Our next question comes from the line of Jeanine Wai with Barclays. Jeanine, your line is open.

Hi, good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking our questions. Our first question, maybe if we can just hit back to Dorado, nice update on that. In the slides, you highlight potential export markets. Can you talk about how much midstream capacity EOG has currently or maybe what you see down the line in order to get Dorado gas to those sales points?

Yes. Jeanine, good morning. This is Lance. Yes. As you think about Dorado and takeaway there, we’re very well connected. I mean you can see that in Slide 11. Obviously, you can see the proximity to market. But as we talk about capacity, yes, we have sufficient capacity there, plenty of running room as we look forward and just really want to highlight too, as you think about the proximity to those markets especially the demand growth that’s expected to see in the potential that’s equally important. What we’re excited about is you think about the proximity, less than a 100 miles to get to the Agua Dulce market. And then the connectivity that we have even to get up into the [indiscernible] Houston Ship Channel market. And as you look forward on over the next five years, you have the potential to see an additional potential of like 5 Bcf a day of new demand growth. So the proximity, the connectivity that we have, and obviously as you’ve seen as evidence to our other plays, as we think about capacity, we’re always very forward-looking and making sure that we have enough ongoing capacity as we think about our program.

Okay, great. Thank you. And then maybe just following-up on Arun’s question. Ezra, we appreciate all the details you just provided about the cash build up there. And I guess just generally speaking, and I know it’s never the simple about back solving to a cash number, but is net cash or is that like a suboptimal place for the business or would you be perfectly fine with the balance sheet getting to that point? Thank you.

Yes, Jeanine. No, we don’t believe that’s a suboptimal place in an industry like ours, that’s proven to be cyclical in nature obviously. And at times very volatile even our current cash position, I’d say, the cash on hand is a percent of market cap, places us roughly in the upper half of the S&P 500. And we think that’s a fantastic position to be in, especially when you think about a cyclical industry like ours.

Thank you.

Our next question is from Leo Mariani with KeyBanc. Leo, please go ahead with your question.

Hi guys, wanted to follow-up a little bit on the gas macro here, obviously, very topical these days. In the past, I know EOG has spoken about kind of a longer-term oil growth target kind of 8% to 10% per annum. Do you guys feel that at this point in time just giving the changes in the world that U.S. gas is really just going to be higher for longer and you think it would be appropriate to maybe do something similar on the gas side as well. And obviously you kind of talked about the accessibility of your gas to LNG markets down there as well. So just wanted to get a sense if you guys are actively working on perhaps expanding activity over the next few years of Dorado and trying to get that gas international markets.

Yes, Leo. This is Ezra. Let me maybe make a few comments and then Lance can follow-up on some more detailed LNG perspectives. In general, what I would say, from the macro perspective, I know this will sound a little bit repetitive, but we based our decisions on investment and gas. The same as we do on investment in oil, and that’s on the premium price deck. So for us, it really comes down to the first question is returns. How quickly can we invest in an asset and still generate high returns year-over-year, still continue to improve upon the asset. And what that means is lowering the finding and development cost every year and bringing, adding lower cost reserves to the base of our company. That’s how we drop the cost base of the company and basically expand the margins going forward. With regards to global supply and demand that comes in second, same as on the oil side. I wouldn’t say that we have an optimal level growth because obviously there’s associated gas, but then we’ve got these pure dry gas plays. So we look at them a little bit agnostically. Long-term, how we do feel, going out longer and thinking about the long-term global energy solution, we do feel the gas is going to play a significant role in that. And that’s why we’re very committed to the $2.50 price that we evaluate the reinvestment on, because we think that’s globally going to be a very competitive and compelling price to be able to base the investments on. Lance?

Yes, Ezra. Yes, Leo, good morning. Maybe just add a little bit more color too, as you think about just LNG and kind of LNG off-take, but I mean the – it’s an exciting time and it’s been excellent having some exposure, especially as you think about our JKM exposure and the first mover advantage that we have, because the pendulum like you’re saying – you’re seeing in the environment today, the pendulum the swinging, you’re seeing more of a demand pool. And so as we think about that, especially from a customer standpoint, I mean we’re very well-positioned. I mean the way we think about it, there’s really three important components of it. And one of them that’s critical is investment grade status and the pristine balance sheet that we have that absolutely puts us and differentiates us. And then as you think about the control that we have with our firm transportation, when we think about LNG off-take, it’s not just from Dorado, but we have firm off-take that can get us from each of our major plays. And then also when you think about supply flexibility too, I mean we have a lot of scale and a lot of flexibility. And so we’re excited about it. Obviously you saw the deal that we’ve done with Cheniere, that’s expanding and increasing our sale that we have there. We feel that that’s very strategic. That helped commercialize Stage 3, which were anticipating hopefully by the end of 2025, I think expected maybe an early 2026. All kind of in line with what we’ve been talking about for a long time. We’ve been working LNG since 2017 and entered into our first agreements in 2019, and then just recently expanded that again. So yes, we definitely have a constructive views. We think about LNG and all those components that I just talked about earlier, we feel puts us very advantage because we can transact quickly and we can move with scale because we have the supply flexibility as well.

Okay. That’s helpful. Definitely sounds like you guys are looking at more deals. Also just wanted to ask about the earlier targets that had put out kind of pre-Ukraine of flat well costs year-over-year. I’m certainly aware that you guys have efficiencies and you’re working really hard on this, but at this point, I mean if you think that’s still a realistic goal just given inflation. I think I heard you say that you got about 50% of the well cost locked up in 2022.

Yes. Leo, this is Billy Helms. Yes. We tried to address that certainly in the last answer we had, but I guess the bottom line is we’re very confident. We’re going to be able to keep our well cost flat this year and we’re going to work hard to do it next year. So it’s early to say what next year’s going to be, but we just have line of sight on so many improvements we can continue to make in our business to fundamentally offset inflation. So we’re very confident in this year’s CapEx and volume targets.

Okay. Appreciate it. Thanks.

Our next question is from Neal Dingmann with Truist Securities. Neal, please go ahead.

Yes. Thank you. My first question, as we’re maybe on exploration, I’m just wondering what would it take initial success maybe on a large acreage position such as what webcast or whatever for you to announce another plate or really just a broad question, what generally do you all like to see before publicly rolling out and talking about the next best opportunity you’ll have.

Yes, Neal. We like to have confidence in what we’re talking about and bringing out to the public and what that means for us these days and we’ve talked about it a little bit before is these days it’s not just a matter of trying to find oil or gas that has become relatively not too difficult. The challenge for us is to make sure that it’s additive to the quality of our inventory. Like I said earlier, we believe we’ve got the – really the highest quality and deepest inventory across a multi-basin portfolio as far as North American E&P companies go. And so trying to add to that, trying to add to the double premium rates of return program is challenging and what it takes is long – some longer-term production results, before we going back to Dorado and the Powder River Basin before we announced those basins to the public, we had some pretty significantly long production results to really make sure that we had captured what we had anticipated capturing. Last thing, we wanted to do is mislead anybody. And so especially looking at some of the new plays that we’re talking about with these hybrid reservoirs, these things are relatively new in nature to the industry. And so gathering some longer-term production results and appraisal wells to really define the extent to these plays is very important and critical before we’d be comfortable talking about them.

Got it and great details. And then my follow-up Ezra for you or Billy, just on OFS inflation and maybe logistics, you all continue a great job of mitigating even better than most OFS inflation. I’m just wondering on – when you look out remainder this year in the 2030 of things sort of stay like they are now. We’ve heard some issues of sand and different things in the Permian, maybe bring it up now Northern life in Wisconsin. Could you talk about – are you all – I guess, two questions. One, are you all locking in and continue to do sort of longer term whether that be on the sand, pipe or other side. And then number two, just wondering, would you – when you think about – would you have – if you have opportunities like you did like year or two ago about drill pipe, if those persist, I assume you’ll continue to go after and do some opportunities like that.

Yes. Neal, this is Billy. Certainly, it’s a very dynamic situation we’re dealing with here, but part of the reason we have so much confidence in being able to offset inflation, especially the inflation that the industry is seeing today really goes back to the involvement or engagement of our employees and how committed they are to achieving the goals that are set out. And you might – for example, talk about sand, especially sand in the Permian. And Jeff kind of went through some of this in detail earlier. The big overlying reason that we have so much confidence is we took ownership. We took control of that many, many years ago. I want to say about 15 years ago. And certainly through that taking ownership, we’ve learned a lot in the past and we continue to look for ways to reduce that cost. And lately, it’s been by getting sand closer to the wellhead. As we move to locate near wellhead, so kind of close to the end user sources of supply, and we can move closer and closer and continue to reduce our cost both on the cost of the sand itself, but also transportation to the wellhead. All the logistics that you see are diminished. We take trucks off the road. It’s just good many, many different ways. We also stay very engaged on the material side, tubulars and those kind of things. We work with meals really across the globe directly. We don’t really go through distributors per se. We work directly with the mills and that way we are able to establish the relationships and capture opportunities at the right time. So it’s just that further engagement in all aspects of our business that allows us to do that and the creativity of our employees that allows us that opportunity. So that’s why we still remain so confident.

Very good. Thank you, Billy, for the details.

Our next question comes from the line of Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead, Neil.

Thank you. Team, I have one micro question and then one macro question. The micro question is, as you think about your growth assets the Delaware, the PRB, and Dorado. How do you think about the relative capital allocation and how would you prioritize them based on returns and cost of supply?

Yes, Neil, this is Ezra. It’s great to have such high quality inventory across multiple basins. It makes our job with capital allocation and portfolio management, I’m exciting. The way we approach each of them is, looking at where they’re individually at in the life cycle play and basing off on returns. And so even though, the Eagle Ford in there, certainly not a growth asset anymore. But by right sizing that program last year, I think we highlighted this in February. Last year, we turned in the highest rate of return drilling program we ever had in that play. When you think about a play like the Eagle Ford, that’s really a trailblazing type of asset for the entire industry to see how to continue to make one of these resource plays, long life resource plays even better year after year after 12 or 13 years of drilling it. So when we think about the Delaware basin, the Powder River basin, and Dorado just at the high level, we would say the Delaware basin is kind of in the sweet spot, as far as drilling activity, our knowledge base, infrastructure. And the PRB and Dorado are a little bit behind that. We definitely slowed down, as Ken had mentioned, we paused drilling in Dorado during 2020, and we did the same in the Powder River basin. And so we’re early in the life on those plays and so the capital allocation of those two really progresses with the build out of infrastructure and at the pace of which we can incorporate our learnings and continue to make the wells better.

That makes a lot of sense. So the second is a big picture question, you guys have been doing a lot of work on the oil macro, and it’s obviously a very dynamic environment. But there are two questions associated with it. One is, what do you think the long-term implications of potentially structurally lower Russian production capacity will be for the U.S. producers and for global oil producers. And the second is, how are you thinking about exit to exit U.S. oil production this year? Given some of the constraints that you talked about earlier on the call?

Yes, Neil. I’ll start with the second one and reiterate our position on exit to exit U.S. oil hasn’t really changed since February, when you look at kind of the range of forecasts that are out there. We’re on the lower end is the way that we set it in February and that’s what we would stick to today. We think the supply chain constraints and the inflationary issues, the discipline that you’re seeing in North American E&P sector, we think that the U.S. exit to exit oil production growth is going to be on the lower end of most of the forecasts. Longer term with the structural implications for Russian capacity for U.S. and global and how that plays in. We’re watching that the same as everyone else. We have – it’s a volatile situation. There are things developing as we speak, including the sanctions that are being discussed. And how are those Russian barrels actually continuing to flow and how are they getting discounted and where are they showing up and what is that doing? Ultimately, I take a bigger step back and just say for the last few years, Neil, we’ve been pretty consistent with our model that chronic underinvestment and exploration in our industry is really going to lead to generally lower supply, under supplied for the global supply and demand market longer term. That’s why we continue to explore and we continue to explore for lower cost, higher return assets. And we think that really – as we’ve said in the past, there’s only a handful of North American E&P companies that have the asset quality, the size, the scale to compete on a global scale with that cost of supply. And on top of that, deliver the barrels with the lower environmental footprint. And in the future, those are the companies that the world’s going to want to fill in additional barrels. And especially, with our operational results in this first quarter, we think, we know – we feel that EOG is a leader of that group of North American E&Ps.

The under investment point is definitely playing out. We appreciate it, Ezra.

Thank you, Neil.

We have time for one more question today. And our next question comes from Paul Cheng with Scotiabank. Paul, your line is open.

Thank you. Good morning. Two quick question. One, I think you sort of follow-up to Neil’s question. So does the Russian invasion [indiscernible] change the way how you look at the global market and perhaps that your production outlook or development plan for the company? I think you’ve been saying that you guys will be ready to grow if you think that’s a need from the market. And you will be growing at maybe in the future 8% to 10% annual kind of growth rate on the maximum. So wondering if those kind of yield has been changed in any shape or form because of the recent events. The second question that you talk about Powder River basin. So what will it take for that development pace to accelerate.

Yes. Paul, this is Ezra. I think I can answer both of those questions almost in the same manner. When we came out with the 8% to 10% growth, which was maybe close to 20 months ago now. That was – and I think we said at that time, it’s dynamic, at that time that 8% to 10% model was reflective of what we could do to optimize near-term and long-term free cash flow with the current inventory and our current knowledge base. And as you can see, things continue to change for the better for us. We continue to drive down costs. We continue to drive forward each of our, let’s call them, emerging place with the Powder River basin and Dorado. And so when we talk about what’s a good growth rate going forward, it comes back to those two things that I started off the call with Doug with the first his optimizing our returns, investing at a pace where we can really create long-term shareholder value. And you do that through adding lower cost reserves to the base of the company. So driving down the cost base of the company, while also reinvesting so that you can turn your cash over quickly. Our wells this year, it’s strip price since we base it on a $40 investment. What that really translates to wells that pay out on average in two to three months right now on the strip price. So it’s a fantastic place to be, and it’s really strengthening the base of the business and the company going forward. With regards to the PRB, it falls under the same type of line. It all depends on how we build out our infrastructure in that basin and moving out of pace to be able to incorporate our learnings to drive down the well costs. Last quarter, I think we highlighted, we had dropped the Niobrara well cost pretty significantly over the past year 2021, which was just tremendous results. And as we continue to see progress like that, we feel more confident to go ahead and allocate more capital to that portfolio – to that basin.

Thank you.

That is all the time we have for questions today. So I’ll now have the call back to Mr. Yacob to conclude.

Yes. We’d like to thank everyone for participating on the call this morning. And thanks to our shareholders for your support. We especially want to recognize each of our employees for their commitment to excellence and on delivering such an outstanding start to the year for EOG.

Thank you everyone for joining our call today. This concludes our call. You may now disconnect your lines.