Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Cabot Microelectronics First Quarter Fiscal 2018 Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, today’s conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Trisha Tuntland, Director of Investor Relations at Cabot Microelectronics. Please go ahead.

Good morning. With me today are David Li, President and CEO; Scott Beamer, who joined us as our new CFO earlier this month; and Bill Johnson, who recently retired as CFO. This morning we reported results for our first quarter of fiscal 2018, which ended December 31, 2017. A copy of our earnings release is available in the Investor Relations section of our website, cabotcmp.com or by calling our Investor Relations office at 630-499-2600. A webcast of today’s conference call and the script of this morning’s prepared comments will also be available on our website shortly after this live conference call. Please remember that our discussions today may include forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. These risk factors are discussed in our SEC filings, including our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017. We assume no obligation to update any of this forward-looking information. Also, our prepared remarks this morning reference non-GAAP financial measures. Our earnings release includes a reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures. I will now turn the call over to David.

Thanks, Trisha. Good morning, everyone and thanks for joining us. Before we get started, I’d like to note that on December 12, we announced Bill Johnson’s retirement after nearly 15 years of service as our CFO and the appointment of Scott Beamer as our new CFO. I want to thank Bill for his many contributions to the company over the years and welcome Scott to his new role. Bill, we will definitely miss your leadership and I want to thank you for your service to the company. We all wish you the best in your future endeavors.

Thanks, Dave. It’s been my sincere pleasure to serve as CFO of Cabot Microelectronics. I’m very proud of what we’ve accomplished over the years and I look forward to the Company’s continued success in the future. In particular I have really enjoyed my interactions with all of our investors and analysts. I think Cabot Microelectronics is a great company and it’s been an honor to help tell our story. I look forward to working with Scott to assure a smooth and seamless transition.

Thanks, Bill. I’m delighted to introduce Scott who brings over 20 years of broad and deep experience in a range of business environments, most recently as the CFO at Stepan Company, a $1.8 billion publicly traded specialty chemicals company supplying materials to a variety of consumer and industrial end markets. I look forward to the leadership and expertise that you will bring to his new role. Scott will discuss our financial results later in the call. This morning we announced results for our first quarter of fiscal 2018 and we are excited about our continued strong execution and performance. We achieved another record level of quarterly revenue and very strong operating performance driven by the continued successful execution of our strategic initiatives and healthy semiconductor industry demand. We continued our momentum from last year in three key product areas: CMP slurries for polishing tungsten, dielectrics slurries, and CMP pads. During the quarter, we realize record revenue of $140 million approximately 14% higher than in the same quarter last year. Our gross profit margin was 52.9% of revenue, our highest level since 2002. Like most publicly traded U.S. companies, our net income was significantly impacted this quarter by the one-time effect of U.S. tax reform enacted in December, which resulted in a GAAP loss of $3.1 million or $0.12 per share. However, non-GAAP net income this quarter was a record $31 million and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share or $1.19 both excluding the one-time impact of tax reform as well as amortization expense related to our 2015 acquisition of NexPlanar. Non-GAAP net income increased by approximately 33% and non-GAAP earnings per share increased by approximately 29% compared to last year. In addition, we continued our strong cash flow generation trend with cash from operations of $31 million. Scott will provide more…

Thanks, Dave and hello everyone. I’m honored to join the leadership team of Cabot Microelectronics and look forward to building upon the very strong foundation that already exists within the company. We have a tremendous opportunity for continued growth given the strength of our business and the industry in which we operate. Revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 was a record $140 million, which represents an approximately 14% increase from the same quarter last year. This increase reflects the continued successful execution of our strategic initiatives and continued strong global semiconductor industry demand that we have seen over the last seven quarters. Drilling into revenue by product area, tungsten slurries accounted for 45% of total quarterly revenue. Revenue in this area was up 14% compared to the same quarter last year and we achieved record revenue of $63 million in the current quarter. Our tungsten growth was driven by strong demand from both memory and logic applications, including 3D memory and FinFET, we expect this key product area will continue to drive profitable growth for our company. Dielectric slurries representing the second key product area provided 23% of our revenue for this quarter with sales up 8% from the same quarter a year ago. We look forward to winning more business in this area with our higher performing, lower cost and higher profitability products. Sales of polishing pads, our third key product area represented 13% of our total revenue for the quarter and increased 16% compared to the same quarter last year. This product area achieved record revenue during the quarter. Sales of slurries for polishing metals other than tungsten, including copper, aluminum and barrier, represented 12% of our total revenue and increased 4% from the same quarter last year. Finally, quarterly revenue from our Engineered Surface Finishes…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Duffy Fischer of Barclays. Your line is now open.

Good morning, Duffy.

Good morning. Just a question, you’ve touched on a little bit but with revenue up so strongly, walk us through why R&D in sales and marketing would have been down quarter-over-quarter and then G&A within that was up pretty large. Was there a shift in something that last year was kind of R&D you’re selling and this year is in G&A? Can you just walk us through kind of the dynamics where 3 of them – or 2 are down and 2 are up and then is that can extrapolate through the rest of the year?

Yes, Duffy. This is Scott. Good question. I think as you think about the P&L, we’ve had a number of reclasses and some moving parts within each of the buckets so I think the best way to look at that for the quarter is to focus on the total operating expenses. And as we think about those expenses, at the December quarter last year, we’re $33.5 million going to $36.9 million this time with the primary item being the cost related to the CFO transition, of which the majority of that is related to cash and non-cash items for the longer-term items that were related to bill’s performance over a long period of time with the company. So it’s going to be – it’s difficult to look at those buckets, good question. But if we focus on the total, we can drill it down for that item.

Okay, fair enough. And then just – I guess, in general, can you talk about what raw materials are doing year-over-year and expectations there? And then a specific question around the one deal you have with your former parent Cabot. When that deal rolls off in 2019, once it resets, should we think about being significantly different economics? Or is where the market at today, fairly in line with where that contract is?

So I’ll take at least the first part here Duffy, in our Roz are favorable year-over-year. I think in the prior quarter, we talked about Roz being higher based on previous contract prices and those were working the way through our balance sheet and ultimately through the P&L. So that is behind us now from an impact perspective in the total quarter. The largest raw material that we have are the abrasive products that you mentioned where we have a buying agreement with the former parent company, which – Dave, if you have a comment about 2019 beyond that.

Yes, I think we just going – looking beyond, I think we’ve been very effective to control our raw material cost, and we would expect that to continue to be the case going forward. Our – you referenced the former parent, that’s one of the particle suppliers we currently use. There are several others as well. So I wouldn’t want to put a number out there beyond 2019, but you would expect continued strong management of the supply chain as we’ve demonstrated in the past.

Great, thank you.

Thank you, Duffy. We’ll take our next question please.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Mike Harrison of Seaport Global Securities. Your line is now open.

Good morning, Mike.

Hi, good morning, and congrats Bill on your retirement, and welcome aboard, Scott.

Thank you, Mike.

Wanted to ask about the memory side of the business, one of your customers, who recently gave you an award, mentioned on their earnings calls that they expect DRAM shipment growth of 20% and NAND and shipment growth in the mid-40s. Just wondering if you could comment on this 2018 outlook as it compares to your own expectations for the memory side of the business.

Yes, thanks, Michael. We continue to see memory as a really important driver of growth for us. As we’ve mentioned, that transition especially on the NAND side, going from 2D to 3D, is really still on the relatively early stages. So you mentioned SK Hynix, who we received their highest supplier honor this past quarter, really important customer of ours. And if you look at that overall conversion, we’re still about – we would estimate or based on what’s out there today, only about 1/3 of the 2D NAND today from a wafer start basis has been converted to 3D. So still a lot of runway to go. And I also saw their comments about the kind of continued strong demand in DRAM and continued expended strong demand in NAND. So that’s a really important part of the business for us, of course, that transaction is really key as well because there’s a doubling of CMP steps and so – and most of those are tungsten and dielectrics. One thing I’d comment also is, when they talk about some of the growth rates, memory, of course, is really sensitive to the pricing, so when they talk about what their expectations for growth are, some of those are intermixed with what they expect ASPs to do as well. But overall, we see a really strong memory growth environment that was also the consensus that ISS that memory is going to drive the unit growth in 2018 and that should position us really well for continued growth in that area as well.

So speaking of memory pricing, my understanding is that there are some declines actually happening in some of the memory markets for pricing. And just curious, in that kind of environment, how would you expect CCMP’s pricing to hold up?

Right. So we’ve gone through many, many cycles as part of the industry, and the memory pricing from our customers is something that really, for us, when I think there’s – what we’ve seen historically is when there’s pressure on memory pricing, it’s really not as profound of an impact on materials. But they may pull in CapEx, so it may impact the equipment side a lot more. What happens with the material side is they have those really significant investments in place with their fabs, and they just continue to run them. So from a material side although the CapEx or equipment side may be peaking, we see the material side is still a lot of upside going forward and not as affected by memory pricing at the end markets.

All right. And then may be a question for Scott just – you mentioned some of the capital deployment plans that – those haven’t changed, but obviously, you bring some additional perspective, shall we say on M&A. Your thoughts may be on the M&A pipeline and kind of the strategy going forward for CCMP.

Well, Mike, we benefited here from a great history of cash and operating performance. So we do sit here in a position of strength today in terms of where we’re coming from and opportunities for the future. I think as we outline our deployment of capital priorities going forward, they continue to be as they’ve been in the past with spending on organic growth to drive the business, paying dividends, which we’ve recently initiated and we have continued to do, M&A and then share repurchases as a fourth. We won’t comment a lot about the M&A pipeline, but we’re very cognizant about where we sit from a capital deployment perspective, where we sit with the balance sheet today. We’re going to continue to look at M&A that is going to leverage our core capabilities and then also it needs to be actionable, of course. So there’s a lot of activity going on. We’re working very hard. We would hope at some point to be able to speak about some of those things, but we’re going to continue with the cash deployment that has been a strength, I think, in terms of staying disciplined in the past, but we’re also interested in using our capital strength to help drive the future of the company.

All right. Thanks very much.

Thank you, Mike for your questions. We’ll take our next caller please.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Edwin Mok of Needham & Company. Your line is now open.

Good morning, Edwin.

Hi everyone, this is actually Arthur on for Edwin, and thanks for taking our questions.

Hi, Arthur.

Hi, Trisha.

Hi.

So the first question is just on the dielectrics business. I saw that was up 8.4% year-over-year, which is lower than average year-over-year growth rate of about 20% you saw in fiscal 2017. So obviously, you have with the strong growth in 2017, you should have tougher comps going into fiscal 2018. So should we think of this as a new normal growth rate? Or do you think we can return back to this double-digit percentage growth rate as you did in fiscal 2017?

Right. So Arthur, first, just for context, we’re coming off a record quarter for dielectrics last quarter, and we still saw year-over-year growth. So quarter-to-quarter, there’s going to be some volatility, but we’re really excited. We’re, obviously, about just the execution of our strategy. And just to remind, we’re really trying to transform that portfolio. So we’ve introduced really two new families of products: one, is ceria-based and one is colloidal silica-based. Both of them offer better cost of ownership, better performance, a better defectivity. In some cases, we’re replacing ourselves. In some places, we’re replacing incumbents, so we’ve seen a lot of really encouraging growth in that area. And so – and part of that strategy, of course, is also to improve our profitability and that product area as well. So we encouraged by the progress. I think quarter-to-quarter, you could see some volatility but overall, good trajectory for this product line.

Okay. Thanks for that color Dave. Next question is just on China. I think you – in your prepared remarks, you said China was up 34% year-over-year, which is up from 26% year-over-year in the last quarter. David, can you provide some more color on the activity level you are seeing in China and kind of what you are expecting in that region in fiscal 2018?

Sure. So obviously, I spent quite a bit of time there. And China continues to be a really exciting area for us. We’ve always had a very strong position on the slurry side. We, of course, have our partnership on the pad side with KFMI, which is just starting. We did realize revenue in this fiscal year from the early collaboration in pads. I would say also, just to qualify, some of the revenue from China was also due to strong QED, so that could be lumpy quarter-to-quarter. But overall, what we see is continued strong investment in just the China government, investing in the semiconductor supply chain and we see a strong growth trajectory in the future as well. So we look forward to growing with China. It’s a really important region for us, and we feel like we are really well positioned.

Thanks, David. Just a last question for me, maybe for you, Scott, in your prepared remarks, you talked about how March quarter IC’s consumable is a trend was better than seasonal. And TSMC had guided down 8.3% for the March quarter. Just want to see what are the puts and takes in your March quarter IC consumables trend? Is it mostly strong growth in memory that’s offsetting the TSMC decline?

Yes, it is unusual that we – that we’ve said flat to slightly higher for Q2 revenue, that’s historically, revenue has been down about 4% on average over a number of years. I think fundamentally, the business has changed. There’s more structural factors in the marketplace now to uplift our demand as we think about memory, logic, artificial intelligence, automobiles and the – and all of the items that go into that in terms of connectivity. So structurally, there’s less seasonality and less seasonality throughout the year with our business.

Got it. Thanks very much for questions guys, congrats on the great quarter.

Thanks.

Thank you, Arthur for your questions. We’ll take our next caller please.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Chris Kapsch of Loop Capital. Your line is now open.

Good morning, Chris.

Yes, good morning. Can you hear me?

Yes, we can. Thank you.

Hey, Scott congratulations on the new roll. Look forward to working with you. Just quickly on the gross margin performance. Two things, one, did QED move the needle at all during this quarter? And, secondly, I know it’s early in the fiscal year, but given the strong performance, given the strong outlook for the memory end market and therefore, your tungsten slurry, high-margin tungsten slurry business, any thoughts on may be lifting the gross margin guidance for the year at this juncture?

QED is really not much of a factor with its low percentage of our revenue right now, Chris, so that’s not really part of the story. And it’s a relevant question that you ask about what we’ve delivered this quarter in terms of even GAAP gross profit but then keeping our projection for the rest of the fiscal year, where it was at 50% to 52%. And I think you could just think of that in terms of its early in the year. I think you said those words as part of your question. It’s early in the year, so we’re going to continue with the guidance that we had. On margin, there is a little bit of a seasonality effect because of our Q1 being the – the December quarter. As we go into March, we do pick up some extra costs with merit increases and some equity grants and things like that. So there is a seasonality impact to the margin percentage and the margin metric. And with it being early on in the year, we’re continuing to be comfortable with the guidance that we had.

Yes, and Chris, just add longer term, we put out there that our expectation is to expand margins. I think we’re pleased with our performance so far, what we’ve demonstrated not far from satisfied. But what we see is if you look at those three key product areas, tungsten, as you mentioned, is above our corporate gross margin. We see a really strong future for growth there. Dielectrics is we’re transforming that product area should also be positive from a margin standpoint. And then pads, pads is our strong growing area for us. Very excited about that, but it is a headwind versus our corporate gross margin, obviously positive for gross margin dollars. So there’s also some mix in there that will affect overall company gross as you know.

Yes, that’s helpful. Thank you for the extra color. And then just a follow-up on the dielectric business and I get the longer-term growth there and displacing some matured technologies. The growth there just curious, as you mentioned winning market share versus more commoditized I guess competitive offerings as well as cannibalizing your own lower margin dielectric business. Can – is it – the performance of those new dielectric slurries, it is balanced? Is it – or is the growth more pronounced from cannibalization vis-à-vis market share gains? Can you break that out?

Yes, I think we’re seeing both. And we look at the pipeline, there’s really balanced across advanced and legacy, across the different segments, logic, memory and foundry. There is a distinction the memory producers seem to prefer a ceria-based solution. That’s more aggressive on dielectrics. The logic and foundry customers tend to prefer colloidal silica, so there is some segmentation by customer. And overall, what we’re doing there is taking innovation to a space that hasn’t seen a lot of innovation in the past and bringing some really innovative solutions to the market. So we’re able to really reduce the percent solids while providing better performance, in some cases, higher throughput, so really exciting area for us. And so we’re excited both on the legacy and advanced side and see a lot of runway. As you might have – as you might know, dielectrics is the largest portion of the CMP slurries market, so a lot of room to grow there.

Got it. And then one last one I guess, just on the pad business. I mean we're starting to bump into the law of bigger numbers I guess with the growth rate, decelerating a little bit from a function of the success and the growth of that business. But so just on the – what I’m curious is, are you – do you feel like you’re getting as many POR wins and as much momentum in that business commercially as you would have expected when you did the due diligence on the NexPlanar deal? And is there any evidence of any change in competitive behavior from the big gorilla in the room and the pad business, especially considering changes that – at that company? Thank you.

Yes, thanks. We’re always – it’s always going to be competitive out there. We’ve really been delighted with the growth we’ve seen, 17% this quarter year-over-year. We reaffirmed our expectation to grow the business over $100 million by 2019, which would be a 20% CAGR, so really healthy growth and continued growth from what we’ve seen at the start. What we’ve seen in terms of PORs is, sometimes a customer will bring this pad in for one application, really see the performance benefits as well as the cost of ownership benefits and then proliferate it to other portions of their CMP process. So we’re seeing both POR wins and just more proliferation within the same customer, which is exciting.

Thank you, Chris for your questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from Amanda Scarnati of Citi. Your line is now open.

Good morning, Amanda.

Good morning. Just a follow-up question on cash return and uses of cash and how, if at all, it’s been changed with the tax reform in the U.S. Are you looking to getting a little bit more aggressive in cash usage? Or still kind of building out that cash fund that you have?

Well, we are excited about the impact of U.S. tax reform, like most companies are. We have, as you know, 80% of our business is actually in Asia, so we have – and 60% of our cash today is in Asia, so – or is outside the U.S. So we have a little bit less of an impact in terms of ongoing tax rate, but a potentially greater impact in terms of less friction of moving cash across the world and back to the U.S. So fundamentally, the less friction, the ability to repatriate after paying the deemed repatriation tax or expensing that this quarter, that should assist ease of getting to cash in order to implement our cash priorities that we outlined.

Got it. In terms of China and growth with the Mainland China, the new fabs that are being built, do you expect to see any volume production happening this year, late in the year? Or do you expect to see more pilot productions this year with volume expected next year? And how that’s changed at all over the last couple of months?

Yes, we follow the same things you do, Amanda, which is to look at when the equipment sales are going in, that construction is being completed. So a lot of those new customers like YMCC and OTRAN [ph], they’re still not only finishing construction, but I think an important element to China’s growth, domestic customer growth is demonstrating that they can achieve technology and an acceptable yield, right? So we’re working closely with many of them. Most of the consensus would be that, that capacity comes online really starting second half of 2018 and that varies by customer. Of course, we’ve seen strong growth there already. So a lot of that – some of that’s coming from domestic customers that are already in production, like SMIC and Huali. Some of that’s coming from the international players like TSMC, Samsung, Hynix, who are continuing to ramp up their fabs, also Intel in Dalian, very active. So it’s not just the domestic customers, but also the international customers that are very active in China ramping up their facilities.

Great, thank you so much.

Thanks.

Thank you, Amanda. Those are all the questions we have this morning. Thank you for your time and your interest in Cabot Microelectronics. We look forward to talking with you again soon.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today’s conference. This does conclude the program, and you may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.