Good day, everyone, and thank you for joining us to discuss Equity LifeStyle Properties' First Quarter 2024 Results. Our featured speakers today are Marguerite Nader, our President and CEO; Paul Seavey, our Executive Vice President and CFO; and Patrick Waite, our Executive Vice President and COO. In advance of today's call, management released earnings. Today's call will consist of opening remarks and a question-and-answer session with management relating to the company's earnings release. For those who would like to participate in the question-and-answer session, management asks that you limit yourself to two questions, so everybody would like to participate has ample opportunity. As a reminder this call is being recorded. Certain matters discussed today on this conference call may contain forward-looking statements in the meanings of the federal securities laws. Our forward-looking statements are subject to certain economic risk and uncertainty. The company assumes no obligation to update or supplement any statements that become untrue because of subsequent events. In addition during today's call, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures as defined by SEC Regulation G. Reconciliations of this non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP financial measures are included in our earnings release, our supplemental information and our historical SEC filings. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Marguerite Nader our President and CEO.

Good morning and thank you for joining us today. I am pleased to report the results for the first quarter of 2024. Quality of our cash flow, our in-demand locations, the lack of new supply and the strength of our balance sheet continues to allow us to report impressive results. In times of macroeconomic uncertainty, we continue to deliver strong revenue growth as well as expense control throughout our portfolio. Our core NOI for the quarter was strong with a 7.1% increase compared to last year supported by MH and RV rate growth and controlling expenses. Our results for the first quarter and our view for the continued strength for the remainder of 2024 support our guidance rates. Over a 10-year period of time, we have increased the dividend on average 14% compared to the REIT average of 5.5%. Our balance sheet is in great shape with an average term to maturity of nine years. 18% of our debt is fully amortizing and not subject to refinance risk and our debt maturity schedule through 2026 shows only 11% of our debt coming due compared to the REIT average of 29%. We have spent the last 30 years building a portfolio focused on high-quality coastal and Sunbelt retirement and vacation destinations. We are in locations where active adults want to be. Our customer base is seeking a place to escape from the cold winter and lead an active lifestyle in locations such as Florida, Arizona and California. We are in states where there is outsized growth in seniors and we appeal to the right demographic. The population of people aged 55 and older in the US is expected to grow 15% from now until 2039 with 10,000 baby boomers turning 65 each day for the near future. Our MH portfolio comprises…

Thank you, Marguerite. As we wind down the 2023, 2024 Sunbelt season and look forward to the 2024 summer season I will provide color on the Sunbelt season results and a view into the summer season including drivers of demand. Overall we continue to see consistent demand across each of our lifestyle property types reflecting the high quality of our property locations. I will start by highlighting our MH business. Over my 30 years in the industry my responsibilities have ranged from acquisitions to asset management to operations. And regardless of my area of focus the consistency of our high-quality MH portfolio has been a constant. MH properties operate year-round and seasonality is not a consideration. Our MH portfolio maintains high occupancy and each year approximately 10% of our resumes, turns over. This turnover results in an uninterrupted revenue stream for ELS, as a current homeowner sells their home to an incoming home buyer and the new resident pays market rent. Year-to-date, we have seen an average rent increase of 5.6% to renewing residents. Our resident base generally consists of retired individuals who are cash buyers. Due to the high homeowner base in our portfolio occupancy is resilient and the delinquency rate is very low, which is reflected in bad debt that is typically 40 to 45 basis points of revenue. This low level of delinquency has been consistent over the last 30 years in all economic cycles. Moving to the RV portfolio. The Sunbelt season runs from December to April peaking in February and demand is largely comprised of snowbirds from the Northern U.S. and Canada seeking out the temporary climate of Florida, California, Arizona and Texas. In Q1 annuals delivered steady occupancy and strong rate growth. Combined seasonal and transient increased in line with expectations supported by demand…

Thanks, Patrick, and good morning, everyone. I will review our first quarter 2024 results and provide an overview of our second quarter and full year 2024 guidance. First quarter normalized FFO was $0.78 per share, in line with our guidance. Strong core portfolio performance generated 7.1% growth in the quarter, also in line with our expectations. FFO was $0.86 per share and includes $14.8 million of insurance recovery revenue that has been deducted from normalized FFO. Core community-based rental income increased 6.4% for the quarter compared to 2023, primarily as a result of noticed increases to renewing residents and market rent paid by new residents after resident turnover. We increased homeowners by 123 sites in the quarter. Rental homes currently represent 3.1% of our MH occupancy. First quarter core, resort, and marina-based rental income increased 5.8% compared to 2023. Rent growth from annuals in the first quarter was 8%. As a reminder, 2024 is a leap year which results in an additional day of revenue allocated to the first quarter, resulting in higher rate growth than we expect in the subsequent quarters of 2024. Our first quarter rent from core RV Seasonal and Transient generally performed in line with expectations. Seasonal rent increased 2.4% and Transient rent increased 1.4% compared to first quarter 2023. For the first quarter, the net contribution from our membership business, which consists of annual subscription and upgrade sales revenues offset by sales and marketing expenses, was $14.9 million, an increase of 3% compared to the prior year. The net deferral impact for the quarter was $3.2 million. Subscription revenues increased 2.7% as a result of rate increases effective for 2024. During the quarter, we sold just over 800 upgrades. Our average upgrade sale price increased 4% with the percentage of sales attributed to our adventure…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Josh Dennerlein with Bank of America.

Yes, guys. Thanks for the time. I just wanted to dig into the guidance update a little bit. It looks like you lowered your RV and Marina revenue range midpoint by 40 basis points. I'm assuming, there's a corresponding like drop in expenses. Is that all transient related? Or is it somewhat Marina? I guess how do you think about the mix here?

Yes. I think Josh, maybe it'll help if I just walk through the process. So just when we think about our budget and reforecast process for seasonal and transient rent overall, I'll start by framing the timing and the composition of those revenue streams. During the first quarter, we earned approximately 50% of our anticipated full year seasonal rent and almost 20% of our full year transient rent. And then by the end of the second quarter, we've earned almost two-thirds of our anticipated full year seasonal rent and close to 45% of our full year transient. The last thing on that is just in the third quarter we earned almost 40% of our transient rent. So we've talked often about the impact of weather on those variable rental income streams both seasonal and transient, particularly considering the short booking window for the transient customers. I mentioned on the call in January that when we prepared our 2024 budget, we focused on reservation pacing at that time for rent that we anticipated earning in the first quarter. And we had expectations for modest rates of growth in subsequent quarters. We're pleased with our first quarter results for seasonal and transient, particularly to seasonal, which as I mentioned represents half of the seasonal ramp we expect in the year. Our guidance update for the second quarter and full year employs the same methodology we use for the budget. We focused on reservation pacing for rent. We anticipate earnings in the second quarter and we didn't assume any change to our original budget assumptions for the third and fourth quarters. Our current view on second quarter reservation pacing reflects some softness mainly, as a result of weather in April. And I think Patrick, can provide a little bit more color on that.

Yes. During the first half of April, precipitation was significantly above average in California, the Midwest and the Northeast, but especially so in California where the RV portfolio experienced precipitation around 300% of average. California has experienced more precipitation in the first half of April, than in the entirety of April last year. So that's been a headwind to the business. Some markets in the Midwest and the Northeast, have also experienced above-average rainfall by about 200%. I'd also point out that, the relatively cool and wet Sunbelt season in Florida, and the relatively mild winter in the Northern US, resulted to a difficult year-over-year comparison regarding seasonal guests, extending from Q1 into Q2. So these are seasonals that are down for the winter season extending their reservations into April. The winter of 2023 was very cold in those extensions were pretty robust, just with respect to the current period of headwinds again, really weather related. Q – Josh Dennerlein: Okay. I appreciate that color. And then maybe just on the Thousand Trails membership. It looks like it dipped in the quarter. Just curious, just what's driving that? Is this just like normal seasonality? Or any kind of color would be helpful?

Sure, Josh. And certainly there is some seasonality to that. At the end of the quarter, we had -- I think 119,000 members. Those members are made up of really both dues paying members and then the free trial members. And the drivers of the decrease, is a reduction in free trials and a reduction in the sales activity. At the property level, really you see a lot of that happening in the first quarter in other years. I think there's a few things to focus on regarding the membership line. If you go back kind of to the beginning when we started operating the Thousand Trails properties, which I think was in 2008, you'll see some years where there's been a drop in a member count. But even with that decrease in those various times, we've really been able to grow the dues revenue base meaningfully, through rate increases and additional product offerings. And so, I think you'll continue to see us do that. Q – Josh Dennerlein: Thanks for the color.

Thanks, Josh.

Our next question will come from the line of Jamie Feldman with Wells Fargo. Q – Jamie Feldman: Great. Thanks. And good morning.

Good morning, Jamie. Q – Jamie Feldman: Hi. So I guess just to start, I just want to follow up on the insurance renewal of 9%. Can you talk about the assumption that was originally embedded in your guidance? And then also, how much the full year decrease in property expense growth -- operating expense growth results of the lower insurance premium than expected? And are there other areas on the expense line where you're seeing more relief, than you expected in your initial numbers?

Yes. I think generally Jamie, we're pleased with the 9% premium increase on renewal. I'd say, that in terms of the other line items, we saw in the first quarter, a reduction in our repairs and maintenance that was in-place savings on R&M. We did have portion of that was timing related and we've included that in the reforecast going forward but there was a meaningful savings compared to our budget that we consider permanent in R&M.

Okay. And then on the insurance side how did the 9% compared to your initial guidance?

It was favorable.

Yes, as we all know that. I mean can you ballpark it? I think a lot of people were thinking like 20% to 30%. Will you that high or maybe not?

We didn't have an assumption as high as 30% in our budget no.

Okay. All right. And then I guess second question is just I know you guys have said in the past not a ton happening on the distressed acquisition front. But maybe if you could provide an update as we're kind of further into the cycle and the banks seem to be working through more loans. Is anything starting to look more promising or interesting to you that we might be able to get your hands on?

Sure. We continue to have discussions with owners but really the overall market has been slow as you point out. There's really little distress in the market as far as owners of our assets. The owners have generally been conservative over the years with their balance sheet and they have really the luxury of taking the time to transact. I think it's a good idea, Jamie, to think about a longer-term perspective on how we've grown as a company from 41 properties 30 years ago to 450 properties today the acquisition -- that acquisition environment has been episodic. And I think there's been a few times in our history where we've had a very low level of acquisition volume followed by a year of outsized growth. So, we really work on planting the seeds for that growth over the years and then are ready to act when it makes sense for us.

Okay. I mean are you foreshadowing that it could get better soon? Or just we know just the flag that you keep working on it?

Yes, I mean I think that we continue to be in conversations with owners. And to the extent we have closings, we'll certainly let everyone know as soon as we have information to talk about.

Do you think there's opportunities to get involved in the capital stack like debt investments? Or do you think anything you do would be straight equity?

No, I mean we have looked at it in the past certainly a debt structure where we have the ability to own the asset at some point. Also we've looked at management along those same lines. So, we have looked at things over the years and continue to look at unique structures that could make sense for us.

Okay. All right. Thank you.

Thanks Jamie.

Our next question will come from the line of Eric Wolfe with Citi.

If I look at your other income and ancillary services it's about 9% of your revenues. I know a lot of it is just utility income, but I was curious whether you're sort of implementing any new initiatives to grow the other piece of it because I would assume that the RV members and MH tenants might want things like bundled Internet or smart home equipment, but just curious if there's an opportunity to grow that side of the business more quickly?

I guess before Eric we talk about maybe some new initiatives which I would characterize as kind of modest in terms of generating incremental revenue. I would point to a couple of things. First, utility income as you said, we've continued to segregate utility charges from rents and build customers for those. We also have the impact of the real estate tax pass-throughs that you see driving some of that growth – excuse me, in 2024 compared to 2023. And then we do also have the business interruption insurance proceeds impacting that line item year-over-year. So –

Got it. Yes. I guess it takes so much conversation on some of the departments and is call it adding like 50 basis points revenue per year. But I guess it just doesn't sound like there's probably something that's going to be there. So I guess second question you mentioned the collection of property taxes. I was just curious how that is going so far? And if you could just share what you sort of baked into your forecast this year for that specifically?

Yes. So in terms of the recovery we have noticed those customers for the amount they have been paying it. So no issues with respect to that. And it was it represented about 95% of the increase that we realized in the MH portfolio the amount that we build back to the customers.

Got it. There's just a way for us to think about the aggregate amount that could it be other income right? I don't know if there's a deal like a $1 million number that's sort of embedded in there

Yes. It's a little bit tricky when you think about it quarter-to-quarter. But for the full year because of the timing of the leases and when those pass-throughs might start, but on a full year basis it's a couple of million dollars in recovery.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Eric.

Our next question will come from the line of Michael Goldsmith with UBS.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions.

Good morning, Michael.

Can you hear me?

We can hear you. Good morning

Good morning, guys. In the prepared remarks you talked a little bit about the reservation piece being similar to last year. Is that less encouraging than you're expecting at this point in the year? Or was the base case kind of in line with last year?

I think it's in line. I mean when we think about the reservation pacing that we used for seasonal and transient certainly the seasonal is tracking in line with reserve for almost 80% of that second quarter rent which is consistent. And I mean we talk often about the variability in the transient but the current pacing is in line with our expectations. No surprises there.

Got it. And then my second question relates to the last couple of years demand transient has been choppy, but I think what has been a pleasant surprise has been the ability to kind of match expenses to the choppiness in demand. So as you think about the outlook for this year what have been the learnings from managing payroll to transient demand? And are there already preparations in place to flex up or flex down payroll depending on how that piece of reservations plays out through the kind of peak transient year? Thanks.

There is a great deal of focus on matching the resources we have on site particularly with that transient customer flow to as an example, seasonal employees that are there to provide services and activities for those transient customers. And literally this morning I was talking to one of my SVPs about exactly that as we're moving through ramping up for the summer season. And what that plan looks like in the next couple of weekends.

Thank you very much.

Yes, Michael.

Our next question will come from the line of Keegan Carl with Wolfe Research.

Yes. Thanks for the time guys. Maybe first just your non-core portfolio outlook was increased. Just curious what's driving that?

Yes. Keegan, I mean, the non-core primarily it's the mix of performance. The non-core is a little bit tricky frankly, because of the business interruption proceeds and the restoration of the properties that were impacted by the hurricane. So there's a bit of an uptick just in terms of the return to normalized business operations.

Got it. And then bigger picture. If I take a look at your rental loan portfolio pretty material decline on a year-over-year basis and down over 100 units sequentially. I guess I'm just curious what's driving this and how we should think about this relative to the mix of home sales versus the potential for you to add homes that you don't sell to your rental portfolio this year?

Yes. Certainly, what's driving that activity is people buying the home. So they're either in the home and renting it and want to buy it or there is somebody else that is interested maybe inside of the community that wants to buy that home. So you've seen over the last few years a significant conversion of the rental homes to owned homes. And I think we've been very successful in reducing our rental program from a high of about 9% to down to now 3%. So I think that's really a function of the demand for our properties and for people wanting to enjoy that lifestyle.

Got it. Thanks for the time guys.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Samir Khanal with Evercore ISI.

Hi. Good morning everyone. Hey, Marguerite, maybe expand on the property and casualty insurance renewals. I know it was up 9%. And I guess to a question earlier, I mean, it is less than what you were sort of maybe baking in. Maybe walk us through the process and conversations you had to maybe get sort of a lower increase in the premium, because it is surprising based on kind of what the peers have been sort of reporting. So maybe walk us through that process.

Sure. I think we have a pretty robust disclosure included in our filings about what makes up our insurance program. It's difficult to determine and see what others in the REIT space or in general have for coverage because there isn't as much detail. So I think we have a pretty detailed analysis of where we end up. And the process is really a buildup of a lot of time and effort focused on making sure the carriers appreciate our properties, understand what we have to offer at the property level. And then, of course, the experience and the claim experience is a big part of the discussions as we head over to London to have the discussions. And we had a very good year from a claims perspective. And that certainly helps us as we go into the discussions with the carriers.

Okay. Got it. And I guess my second question is around the transient business. I guess Paul or Patrick, what are you expecting for transient to be down this year? I mean, how much -- I know the combined number seasonal and transient because you can do the math and maybe that sort of flat to down, but I'm trying to understand if you were to break down seasonal and transient sort of what is that projection for this year? Thanks.

Yeah. I think Samir, as we think about those revenue streams and the volatility associated with them, we've adopted a practice over the last couple of years of combining for guidance purposes those two. And we think that the value in that is that it helps to kind of reduced to a degree some of the volatility that we see from quarter-to-quarter. So we don't have a transient number to quote independent of the seasonal.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of John Kim with BMO Capital Markets.

Good morning.

Good morning.

Just had one question on expansion sites. I know historically, you'd like to guide or deliver about 1000 per year. Last year, it was a little bit lower than that. But I was wondering if you could talk about the constraints to doing more as far as delivering expansion sites.

Yeah, sure. As you pointed out last year, we were just shy of 1,000 and that's been a goal of ours. But noting that there are going to be some timing constraints on any particular calendar year for the current year, we're expecting the number of sites to be developed in the neighborhood of 700 to 800. And one of the variables that get some pressure on the delivery time line is just the cadence of getting plans through approval, which can also frequently be a multistep process. You submit plans for development, you need to pull a permit to the extent that there are comments, you need to resubmit that is happening frequently and the time line for the review of each one of those submittals is also running along. We're finding that in particular in the higher activity markets where we're doing expansions. Florida has continued to see some pressure with respect to those approvals and working through those agencies that's in part due to continued build back from Ian in the state overall but also just the high level of construction activity initiative.

And do you think that's a structural headwind? In other words, are you going to be delivering in the number you said 700, 800 going forward? Or is it some -- is it just timing in the next year?

I would say it's probably largely timing. We'll work our way through those headwinds. I would expect those headwinds to subside. For perspective we have over 1,000 sites -- over 1,100 sites currently in construction. So the timing of completion and then getting a shovel in the ground on the pipeline those two things are going to play out over time. And I would expect we're going to be in the neighborhood of 1,000 sites on a run rate basis. But as evidenced by the current year there may be some headwinds from time-to-time.

And Patrick can you just remind us on the stabilized yields that you expect and how that's trended over time?

Yeah. They've been in the 8% to 10%, 7% to 10% range recently when we started really building our pipeline, those yields were higher single digits and low double digits. We've been able to continue to grow the top line revenue as we've been developing out these sites but there have been some pressures on construction costs. But I guess part of the good news is in recent quarters, the pressure on some of the construction activity has started to subside somewhat.

Got it. Thank you.

Sure.

Thanks, John.

Our next question will come from the line of Wes Golladay with Baird.

Hey, guys. Good morning, everyone. What drove the decline in the seasonal sites? It looked like there was some 12,500 to 11,800. And do you think it stays at this level?

Yeah. I think the seasonal site count, essentially the adjustment reflects a change in occupancy across the seasonal footprint. It's primarily driven by locations in California and the South and represents the transient workers. We have traveling nurses and construction workers that stay in our properties for longer periods of time and qualify as seasonal. So that's the driver of that.

Okay. And then are you seeing any pushback on the price increases for your various Thousand Trails upgrade options? And do you notice any members moving up the tiers or more moving down?

With respect to the membership upgrades, we haven't seen any issues relative to the price of the product. I think the members are very excited to be able to upgrade and get the additional benefits. I think what you see is that during COVID, we had an outsized number of memberships upgraded. You're seeing that kind of go back down to a pre-COVID level.

Okay. Thanks for the time.

Thank you, Wes.

Our next question will come from the line of Anthony Hau with Truist Securities.

Hey, guys thanks for taking my question. Maybe it's a bit too early to tell, but have you guys seen are you seeing any benefits from the recent changes to the increase of the loan limits of title one manufactured housing?

I think a couple of things on that. A, it is early to tell Anthony. But, B, I would also just remind you that the vast majority over 95% of our customers are paying cash for the homes in our communities. So there's not tremendous reliance on financing in our portfolio.

I would think that will probably help your help you guys sell those homes right? Or just because I think some of those loans can go up to $195,000?

Right, right. And customers are coming and they're buying homes $100,000 plus homes in our communities and paying cash for them.

And that's consistent with our long history of our customers paying cash, which adds to just the ability at the property level for people to really feel ownership at the community.

Got you. And also, do you guys expect the membership to start growing again since RV shipments, is up 15% this year?

Certainly, having predictions for RV shipments to be up is a positive overall for our business, including the membership side.

Got you. Thanks guys.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of John Pawlowski with Green Street.

Thanks for the time. Paul, are the revenue declines for the seasonal and transient business over the balance of the year that's implied in your guidance solely driven by the rainy April and tough seasonal RV comp in 2Q? Or are there additional signs of price sensitivity popping up from customers?

The adjustment is limited to Q2 and is driven by the April activity that Patrick talked about.

Okay. And then I would love to just hear you guys talk through shifts in the transaction market. I know the volumes quiet right now. But very quickly we're looking at pretty deeply negative leverage here given the secured financing costs you alluded to. So, if you assume interest rates stay -- staying in a similar range right now, where would you expect, call it MH cap rates to settle out for ELS quality product in the coming quarters once we do see more transaction volume come in?

I think it's a little bit difficult to say, kind of where the cap rates will end up being in the future. But over the past 18 to 24 months, there have been very few deals. So it's difficult to say kind of pinpoint cap rates. I think you really need more robust market with many data points to be able to quote that. But what we have seen is continued demand and it's really still very high for our asset class. People want to own these properties. People don't want to get -- sell the property. So, there is a lot of demand for even new people coming into the space one-off owners are interested in buying. So, I think that we'll continue to see that -- those levels of demand. Certainly, where we're at in the debt markets are an important discussion. But as I kind of pointed out, I think earlier in this call, there's not a lot of leverage on these assets that we're interested in. So that discussion falls a little flat on the -- to the owners who haven't put their -- put a lot of debt on their property. So the movement in the rates isn't as big of a concern for them, but certainly is something that we look at. So, our acquisition department is very focused on continuing the conversations that we've had with the owners that we've had for a long time now, and we'll continue to do that. But we have seen times where there's not a lot of activity and then all of a sudden there's --you tend to see deals popping up. So, hopefully that is something that we'll see this year.

Okay. Thank you for the time.

Thank you, John.

Since we have no more questions on the line, at this time I would like to turn it back over to Marguerite Nader for closing comments.

Thank you for joining us today. We look forward to updating you on the second quarter call. Take care.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.