Thank you Cary. We filed our earnings release yesterday evening and plan to file our 10-Q no later than next Tuesday May 10. Today I would be covering the earnings release. The updated investor deck on our website also has additional financial analysis in comparison that should be helpful. I'll try to keep my comments brief this morning by reviewing the highlights in that repeating everything disclosed in our release. Our realized oil price for the first quarter of 2016 averaged $28.54 per BOE which was down 41% from the same period last year and down 27% from the previous quarter. That sharp decline in price along with lower sales volumes due to the planned offshore Gabon maintenance turnaround in February significantly reduced our Q1 revenue. The $19 million payment we received on March 14, 2016 from our Angola Block 5 partner consisted of three components. It reduced our accounts receivable by $8 million, we were able to recover $7.6 million which had been previously written off and finally we've included $3.2 million in interest. That benefit was partially offset by our accrual of $8.9 million associated with the rig demobilization and the remaining rig contract term costs. Those are all pre-tax numbers and were contributing factors that resulted in the net loss of $8 million or a $0.14 loss per diluted share on a GAAP book basis. In the first quarter, net production totaled 4,516 BOE per day. This was just below our guidance range of 4600 to 4800 BOE per day. As Cary discussed we lost an Abuma platform well that was producing 250 BOE per day net to us in March. This was a contributing factor to the lower Q1 volumes. However, we did in fact average approximately 4,800 BOE per day in April. Therefore, we do estimate that our net production for the full-year of 2016 is not changing and will be 3700 BOE to 4500 BOE per day as we guided during our last call. For the second quarter of 2016, we expect net production to range from 4300 BOE to 4700 BOE per day. Our production and cost guidance is detailed on Slide 20 in the updated investor deck on our website. Turning to expenses, total production expense for Q1 2016 was $11.3 million which includes $4.3 million related to workovers performed during the quarter. Excluding workovers, our production expense for the quarter was $7 million or $16.95 per BOE of sale compared to $8.5 million or $22.50 per BOE in Q1 for 2015 and $8.7 million or $18.78 per BOE in Q4 of 2015. The previous quarters exclude the costs that were incurred in the review of the Crude Sweetening Project that were expensed in 2015. The benefit of the cost cutting initiatives Cary discussed, were very evident in that significant year-over-year decrease. it is important to note we achieved these lower cost per BOE despite the lower volumes we reported for the quarter. For the second quarter of 2016, we expect our production cost per BOE to be in the range of $17 to $20 and we are leaving our full-year guidance unchanged. We don't anticipate additional work over costs this year. DD&A for Q1 2016 was $2.2 million or $5.81 per BOE, the compares favorably to the $5.9 million or $15.62 per BOE in Q1 of 2015 and $9.5 million or $20.56 per BOE in Q4 of 2015. Guidance for the full-year 2016 and Q2 is expected to be in a range of $5.80 to $6.50 per BOE. The lower rate in 2016 results the significant impairments we've recorded over the last two years. General and administrative expenses for Q1 of 2016 totaled $3 million compared to $4.9 million recorded in the same period a year ago and $3.3 million in Q4 of 2015. As Steve discussed, we've been successful in cutting cash compensation, reducing corporate staff headcount and lowering contract and third-party costs. Our 2016 full-year guidance for G&A expense remains unchanged and is expected to continue to be in the range of $12 million to $14 million with non-cash G&A totaling about $3 million of that total. We had a few other items on the income statement I would like to briefly discuss. The other operating expense of $8.9 million is the accrual of our net share of the maximum estimated expense associated with the big demobilization and the remaining rig contract term, which consisted of $2.1 million and $6.8 million respectively. We previously included the demobilization costs in our estimated 2016 capital expenditures but have since determined that that cost should we expect. As a result, we have decreased our estimated capital expenditures in 2016 to $1 million to $4 million from $3 million to $6 million we previously guided. There we no accrued capital expenditures in the first quarter and the amount in our 2016 budget is primarily for maintenance CapEx as Steve mentioned earlier. You will note that there was a credit of about $450,000 on our income statement for G&A related to shareholder matters. This represents a reimbursement we are receiving from our insurer for cost related to activities of crude oil in May 2015. As I mentioned earlier, we recovered $7.6 million of bad debt and $3.2 million in interest with the $19 million payment received from our partner in Angola. Income tax expense for the first quarter of 2016 was $4.3 million compared to $3.4 million in Q1 of 2015 versus $4.2 million in Q4 of 2015. The increase in accrued income taxes was primarily due to $3 million of Angola tax that will not be paid until 2017. Turning to our balance sheet, unrestricted cash and cash equivalents totaled $24.2 million at March 31, 2016. This does not include the $15.8 million that is classified as non-current restricted cash on our balance sheet. $15 million of that total is related to the three wells joint commitment we have in Angola. In early March, we disclosed that, the borrowing base under our credit facility with the ISC had been lowered to $20.1 million effective December 31, 2015 primarily due to the declined oil prices. Previously were $65 million. At both year-end 2015 and Q1 we had $15 million drawn on that facility. As noted in yesterday's release we recently purchased put options indexed to Brent on approximately one third of our forecasted production for the period June 2016 to February 2017 at a full price of $40 per barrel, this will give us some downside protection if Brent falls below $40. As previously discussed, we collected $19 million from our Block 5 Angola partner which paid in for all amounts outstanding as of 12/31/15 plus interest. The receipt of those funds provided a significant boost to our liquidity when we needed it most, and better positions us to weather the depressed commodity cycles. With our capital investment in work over program completed our cost structure substantially reduced and the protection offered by derivative transaction we are in good position to improve our overall liquidity if oil prices on their current path. That's all for me, I'll turn the call back over to Steve.