Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Eldorado Gold Corporation Fourth Quarter and 2019 Year-end Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the conference over to Peter Lekich, Manager, Investor Relations. Go ahead, Mr. Lekich.

Thank you, Operator, and thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for taking the time to dial into our conference call today. With me in Vancouver this morning are George Burns, President and CEO; Phill Yee, Executive Vice President and CFO; Joe Dick, Executive Vice President and COO; Paul Skayman, Special Adviser to the COO; and Jason Cho, Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer. Our release yesterday details our 2019 fourth quarter and year-end financial and operating results. This should be read in conjunction with our fourth quarter and year-end financial statements and management's discussion and analysis, both of which are available on our website. They have also been filed on SEDAR and EDGAR. All dollar figures discussed today are in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise stated. We will be speaking to the slides that accompany this webcast. You can download a copy of these slides from our website. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that any projections included in our discussion today are likely to involve risks, which are detailed in our 2018 AIF and in the cautionary note on Slide 1. I will now turn the call over to George.

Thanks, Peter, and good morning, everyone. It's fantastic to see the response to our release this morning. Here is the format for today's call. I'll give an overview of the highlights along with some comments, then I'll pass it over to Phil to go through the financials. Paul will follow by reviewing operational performance, and Joe will say a few words on 2020 plans. Then we'll open it up for questions. Before we get into things, I want to say a warm welcome to Joe, our new COO. Joe has been with us for a few months and has had the opportunity to spend some time at our sites. He joins us from Newmont, where he was SVP for Latin America. He also has experience with Barrick and Rio Tinto. Welcome, Joe. Moving on to the highlights on the next slide. It was another solid quarter for both operationally and financially. We produced a record 118,955 ounces of gold, our highest quarterly production in nearly 4 years. This was a result of increased production at Lamaque and Kisladag. Consolidated annual gold production came in on plan, and we ended the year with over 395,000 ounces, our highest total production in three years. Cash operating cost remained steady. Looking back, 2019 was a pivotal year in Eldorado's 25-year history. We put our first Canadian mine into commercial production, we restructured the balance sheet and reduced our total debt by $100 million, and we received long-awaited permits in Greece. On top of these accomplishments, our cornerstone asset, Kisladag, is now back on track. We are confident that the results of recent test support and extended mine life of 15 years. I'm proud of the benefit that will come to local communities and the Greeks. Kisladag will once again provide long-term value for…

Thank you, George. Good morning, everyone. Starting on Slide 4, we provided an overview of Eldorado Gold's financial results for the fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2019. Eldorado generated $191.9 million in total metal revenue in the fourth quarter. This includes $176.1 million in gold revenue and is an increase of 107% over the comparative quarter in 2018. The increase resulted from higher gold sales volumes of 118,900 ounces versus 58,860 in Q4 of 2018 and a higher realized average gold price in the fourth quarter of $1,475 an ounce versus $1,245 per ounce in Q4 of 2018. For the full year 2019, Eldorado generated total metal revenue of $617.8 million, of which $530.9 million was gold revenue. This represents a 35% increase over 2018 and also resulted from higher gold sales volumes and a higher average gold price in 2019. Net earnings to shareholders in the fourth quarter was $91.2 million or $0.57 per share compared to a net loss to shareholders of $218.2 million or $1.38 loss per share in the fourth quarter of 2018. Net earnings in the fourth quarter reflect an impairment reversal of $85.2 million or $68.2 million net of deferred tax for the Kisladag leach pad and related assets, reflecting the Kisladag mine life extension to 15 years. There was also an increase in depreciation in the fourth quarter, in line with increased sales volumes. Net loss in the fourth quarter of 2018 included an impairment adjustment of $330.2 million or $247.7 million net of deferred tax, which is related to Olympias. For the full year 2019, net earnings to shareholders was $80.6 million or $0.51 per share, reflecting essentially the same drivers as outlined for the fourth quarter. This represents a significant improvement over the full year 2018 net loss of…

Thanks, Bill. I'd like to echo George's comments and welcome Joe onboard as well. Here's a quick summary of our quarterly and year-to-date operating results. As George mentioned, we produced 118,955 ounces of gold in the quarter, a cash operating cost of $621 per ounce sold. And all-in sustaining costs of $1,110 per ounce sold. This was more or less in line with expectations. Similarly, production for the year was also in line with expectations. We produced 395,331 ounces at a cash cost of $608 per ounce, an all-in sustaining cost of $1,034 per ounce. This was our highest total production rates in 3 years. Looking forward, our 2020 production is expected to grow approximately 35%. Forecasting annual production of between 520,000 and 550,000 ounces of gold at cash cost of $550 to $600 per ounce and all-in sustaining cost of $850 to $950 per ounce in 2020. We expect lower all-in sustaining cost in 2019 actuals as production is expected to increase this year. That's it for me, a short section this time around. Over to Joe.

Thanks, Paul, and good morning, everyone. It's a pleasure to be part of the Eldorado team, especially at such an exciting time in our business. I'm going to Slide 6, we'll get a look at our 5-year outlook. Full year production figures remain the same for 2020, as what you saw in January 2019. And as we've talked before, production will decrease in 2021 as we mine lower grade at Kisladag. What I want to highlight is our sustained annual gold production beyond 2020. This is a sizable improvement over what you saw last year. In addition to the mine life extension at Kisladag, we are forecasting a step-up in production at Lamaque to 150,000 ounces per year through accelerated development. This does require an expansion to the existing permit for triangle underground extraction rates. We are also forecasting an increase in production from Olympias, and we'll discuss that a bit further later in this call. Post-2020, we are now forecasting an annual average of over 450,000 ounces of gold per year from our base operations, and our key development projects provide potential growth to this production profile. Over to Kisladag on Slide 7. The headline at Kisladag is an average of 160,000 ounces of gold per year for 15 years. The project is self-funding and reestablishes Kisladag as a cornerstone of our company. As you may remember, the company announced in January 2019 that would suspend work on the mill in favor of resuming mining, crushing and heap leaching. The company also announced that would continue test work on deeper material at Kisladag to see how it responded to longer leach cycles with the aim of extending mine life. Later in 2019, the company announced that given the test work to date, it did expect to extend the mine…

Thanks, Joe. Before wrapping up, I want to take a moment to thank our global teams for their collaboration and drive in 2019, particularly the Kisladag team for putting the mine back on track and Lamaque team for an excellent first year. Together, we achieved multiple significant milestones, making it a pivotal year for Eldorado. I'm very proud that we delivered our highest annual production in 3 years, while maintaining steady operating costs. We expect this positive momentum to continue with 2020 production forecasted to grow to between 520,000 and 550,000 ounces. The expected increased cash flow will give us options to invest in our growth projects and pay down our debt. We will continue to put safety, sustainability and governance at the core of our business as we seek ever better ways to operate. Thank you, everyone. I will now turn it over to the operator for questions.

[Operator Instructions]. The first question comes from Mike Parkin with National Bank.

With the Olympias expansion study coming out, should we be looking for that largely to be the addition of the ball mill that you've spoken to in the past?

Yes, that's correct. There's some subtle changes elsewhere in the plant, but the major changes that addition of a ball mill.

So are we still thinking on CapEx somewhere around like $20 million, $25 million?

Yes, a little bit more than that, Mike, but not significant.

Okay. Where do you see OpEx per tonne on an overall basis, kind of trending as whatever percent drop from where it's kind of been or however you want to kind of communicate it with that expansion?

I see that we've been looking in the plus 30% improvements in OpEx roughly and perhaps more.

I guess, you've got a double whammy. You're increasing your lead and zinc as well. So that makes a big difference to cash operating costs, yes.

Okay. And then with Kisladag, can you just give us an update on the fleet there? Is it owner operated? And if it is, what's the condition of it? Now that you're looking at such a massive mine life extension there, will there be a need to replace the fleet in the next few years?

The fleet is owner operated, and we don't see a need to replace the fleet. The Cat trucks will run to about 150,000 hours. And the Hitachi is somewhere just shy of 100,000.

Okay. And then just the last one for me. Now that you've got such a long sustainable 0.5 million ounce production base. Does that change your thoughts towards Skouries in terms of a need for third parties now that you're you've got longevity within the asset base that's producing?

No, our strategy remains unchanged. Step one is to finalize an agreement with the Greek state on investor protections and permits first for the Skouries, dry stack tailings, redesign and then to work on financing. And our primary strategy is to find a partner in -- two significant reasons for that, one is funding, we view it strategically, the right path forward for Eldorado to have a partner to fund remaining capital to have Skouries brought into commercial production. And second, just portfolio management of risk. So that strategy remains unchanged.

Congrats on the life of mine update for Kisladag. That's great.

Thanks, Mike.

Thanks, Mike.

The next question comes from Kerry Smith with Haywood Securities.

Joe or Paul, do you need any incremental permits for the Kisladag new mine plant?

No, we don't, Kerry. The plan still fits within the footprint of the original expansion area. So all good in terms of what we're planning to do from a permit standpoint.

Okay. And then you still need to relocate the crushing infrastructure because it will fall in the pit though, right?

No, we don't. The north side actually doesn't move. So there's a little bit of infrastructure, yards associated with sort of mobile equipment, et cetera. But the crusher will stay where it is and most of the offices, et cetera, stay where they are as well.

Okay, okay. And just to follow-up on Mike's question, and no new gear needed for that plan, we'll just be rebuilding the equipment as time goes on, and it will last for the life of the project then?

Yes, that's correct.

Okay. And for Olympias, the -- I think the current -- I'm not sure -- I know the current plan was 420,000 tonnes a year, but I'm not sure what the permit was for? Do you need a permit there to go to 650,000 tonnes a year?

Yes, we will need a permit to increase to that level. We're currently authorized at 440,000.

Okay, okay, okay. And -- so is that a permit that -- is that an amendment? Or is that something that you think would take a long time to actually achieve?

Well, it's an amendment to the existing permit. And it's -- our production ramp-up is consistent with our expectations on permitting there.

Okay. Okay, great. And I guess on Olympias just you obviously struggling on the cost side there, have been. And I know this year, you've got the forecast for -- I think it was $800 to $900 an ounce for cash costs. I guess, last year, they were north of $1,200. So just in simple terms, what are you doing to get those costs lower?

So presently, as I mentioned, we are working on development cycle. We brought in a development contractor to help us pick up there. We are continuing to work on backfill cycle. And more volume in pace than CAFT style field. We're also doing a couple of kind of minor projects underground to help us with maintenance facilities and pumping facilities underground. And then really, the majority of it is likely to be non-technical and more sustained leadership and improvement of basic operations and operational standards. So it's pretty basic stuff.

Congratulations on the new mine plan.

Thanks, Kerry.

The next question comes from Tanya Jakusconek with Scotiabank.

Yes. Just wanted to circle back on Kisladag, if I could. Just wanted to ask, George, I think on the last conference call, we talked about the HPGR as part of the option for Kisladag. And we talked about the fact that you were kind of going through it in parallel, but you needed more time and likely have needed the end of 2020 to have more clarity. So I was a bit surprised to see that this is the option that we went with. Can you just talk about what changed over this period?

Sure, Tanya. So if you go back a year ago when we did the first round of HPGR test. Those tests didn't give us a lot of information, we basically overcrushed, had too many fines in the product, and we're unable to get solutions through the column. So it was -- those results weren't very positive. I think for us -- I mean, these HPGR tests require large samples. We were able to run multiple samples through multiple suppliers. We've done the leach test work, and we now know a range by which we can put energy into crushing and fracturing of the rock to optimize recovery. And what I would describe for you is the results came back very positive and consistent and what we have in our outlook and what you'll see in the upcoming technical study are solid consistent results. I'd also mention that there's still some upside remaining. We know we can push the circuit harder and create access to additional gold, and it's trying to find that optimum position between particle size and not pushing it too far, where you have a permeability issue. So I guess, what I'd tell you, the surprise was, with these new results, we're able to find that sweet spot to be in. And I think we've landed on a conservative case that we're confident we can deliver. And there is some upside to be able to push that circuit a bit harder and perhaps push that recovery slightly above the 56% we now have in our life of mine assumptions.

Okay. So just so I understand correctly, was it, George that you -- when we did the conference call in, I guess, it was November, when you were still looking at the test of like a year ago? And is it that you've done new testing from -- over the last quarter on the HPGR that gives you this comfort level?

Yes, those test results just came in into the new year, and those results were dramatically consistent and positive. So we didn't want to give the market a positive outlook till we have data to support it. And I would say, for myself, I was surprised it dramatically came back so positive. And when you look at it, we overcrushed a year ago. We now have data to support what others have in the industry seeing that this technology can actually improve fracturing and improve recovery in a leaching scenario.

Okay. So it was just a change of these results that you got from November to today?

Yes, dramatic change in the output of the test results.

Okay. And then maybe just moving on to just the permit that we need at Olympias. George, where are we in terms of the whole permitting aspect with Greece? I know that we were looking to want to have permits at several operations Perama Hill, just adjustments at Skouries on some of the permits and now Olympias, have we started the permitting process on all of these?

Yes, we're engaged with the Greek state on permitting strategy. And on our side, in various stages of engineering and design, and on the Greek state side, we're in agreement on the method and what's required to get these additional permits. So I would describe it as we're progressing down that line and expect to have good progress this year.

Okay. So you've kind of taken the approach of -- with the government of seeking permits on all of them at the same time?

Yes, they're all tracking at a different pace. I'd say the Skouries dry stack tailings ahead of the others from a progress perspective. But they're all moving in the direction to support the assumptions in our life of mine plans.

Okay. And then maybe just moving to Lamaque, if I could. I think on the call, I heard that going from 1,800 tonnes a day to 2,200, requires no additional capital, except for underground development. What amount of underground development will be required?

It's really more just a speed up of the planned development, Tanya. So it's not per se an extra capital, it would just be bringing that development forward. So you could look at it as if we're running 20% faster, we'll have 20% more development effectively.

Okay. And then, though, going to the 2,500 tonnes a day, though, I think that one would require the capital, I think, on the mine tour we had talked about, additional capital if we were to go to that level?

Yes, we're still focused on pre-feasibility study engineering in the second half of the year, and that will study the decline, the crusher conveyor, subsequent mill upgrades required to push us past 2,200 tonnes a day and eventually a long-term tailings solution that would be paced underground. So that work is continuing, and we'll have those results in the second half and determine next steps for Lamaque in terms of growth capital.

Okay. And again, we need two amendment of permits to go to 2,200, correct?

Yes. I mean, we filed the permit to expand the triangle production daily rates from 1,800 tonnes a day to 2,600 tonnes a day. That was filed in December. We've seen all of our permits at Lamaque come in timely as expected and foresee that around the middle of the year, well ahead of our needs.

[Operator Instructions]. This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. George Burns for any closing remarks.

Well, thank you, everybody. It's been a remarkable day for us. Look forward to catching up with you shortly on our Q1 results. Have a great day.

This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.