Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to Q1 2025 8x8 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Kate Patterson, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone. Today's agenda will include a review of our results for the first quarter of fiscal 2025 results with Samuel Wilson, our Chief Executive Officer. Following our prepared remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. Before we get started, let me remind you that our discussion today includes forward-looking statements about our future financial performance, including investments in innovation and our focus on profitability and cash flow as well as statements regarding our business, products, and growth strategies. We caution you not to put undue reliance on these forward-looking statements as they involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to vary materially from forward-looking statements, as described in our risk factors in our reports filed with the SEC. Any forward-looking statements made on this call and in the presentation slides reflect our analysis as of today and we have no plans or obligation to update them. Certain financial measures that will be discussed on this call together with year-over-year comparisons in some cases were not prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or GAAP. A reconciliation of those non-GAAP measures to the closest comparable GAAP measure is provided in our earnings press release and earnings presentation slides, which are available on 8x8 Investor Relations website at investors.8x8.com. With that, I'll turn the call over to Samuel Wilson.

Good afternoon, everyone. I appreciate you joining us today as we discuss our results for the first quarter of fiscal 2025. I am pleased to report another solid quarter in which we delivered results within our guidance ranges for service revenue, total revenue, and non-GAAP operating margin. Cash flow for the quarter was better than anticipated at $18 million, bringing cash flow from operations for the trailing 12-month period to $71 million. We achieved these results even though the market has become incrementally more competitive if only from a marketing and messaging standpoint. For example, we saw NICE making marketing splash for the $5 UCaaS offering. These solutions are typically feature-light and unintegrated, but the announcements have served to disrupt and extend sales cycles in some cases. However, these competitors' actions have made us think about getting more creative to push our competitive advantage and drive awareness and adoption. Nothing to announce at this point, but with the advances we've made on our platform, there maybe opportunities to rock the boat a bit ourselves. In addition to delivering inline results again this quarter, we also achieved an important milestone in our stated objective to return value to shareholders by reducing debts with the repayment of our $225 million term loan with Francisco Partners earlier this week. We funded the prepayment with a new $200 million credit facility we announced in early July plus $28 million from our cash balances for principal plus accrued interest in fees. The new bank loan reduces our interest rate by approximately 360 basis points compared to our prior loan and was headlined by Wells Fargo Bank with participation by MUFG, First-Citizens Bank, the Silicon Valley Bank successor, Citibank, and City National Bank. The quality of the commercial banks involved and the favorable interest rate reflects…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Matt VanVliet from BTIG.

Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. I guess first as you talk about, seeing a little bit more sort of usage or consumption-based revenue growing forward, especially as you've integrated the CPaaS components into the other products, where do you feel like that's going to show up maybe most quickly and how is that developing in the sales pipeline to get more customers sort of using the product and then from that expanding the revenue base?

It's a great question, Matt. Thank you for asking it. So to start with, we launched two products thus far that are more contact center integrated focused. One is a one-way SMS WhatsApp-based system, so you can text or message out and then a two-way where if you want to use WhatsApp or messaging to go back and forth. Those are the first two products launched. So sort of CC-centric, enterprise-centric, and we're getting good pipeline. I think what's interesting is we launched those products as you know, really packaged products and we've actually seen an uptick also in customized CPaaS solutions. So it's allowing us to not only win CPaaS business in a package manner, but also customers are becoming aware of the products we offer even in a customized manner, API manner. This quarter we will launch a product that focuses on emergency notification really for like employees or constituents like if you're in a school district or those kinds of things. And that's kind of the big three that we're launching. And what we're seeing is, is a pretty healthy interest in these products, particularly as we see omni-channel and digital channels really become ever more important inside the contact center.

Very helpful. And then – sorry, go ahead.

I just want to address the second part of it. It's just usage in general, right. So usage is now like 10% to 12% of our revenue. It's definitely increasing and I just want to be clear, it's not just messaging usage, it's also we have voice, voice masking usage. We have ICA, the AI components are very usage-centric, so that's a kind of across the board.

Okay. Very helpful. And then as you look at the strength of the CPaaS business, especially in APAC, maybe help us understand that a little bit better. Is that a recovery on the macro side? Is it better productivity and efficiency on the sales force winning new deals and sort of getting back into growth mode there? It feels like that's been a little bit of a drag of over the last couple years, but now it sounds like it's a little more of a tailwind. So just help us understand the trends going on there?

Yes. Okay. So, first let me go – I'm going to take these in reverse order. It was a nice tailwind this last quarter and I'm really super proud of how that team performed. Okay, is it a macro recovery? Is it whatever? There's a little bit of macroness to it. I would say, if I had to break these apart, like 20% is macro-based, the carriers went through their normal price increase cycles and this year didn't jam us with massive price increases, so that was easier to digest and not disrupt the business overall. But really it's driven by the fact that we replaced the management team 18 months ago, two years ago. We've installed new leaders. We've completely redone the GTM – sorry, the go-to-market initiatives around adding enterprise business, not just sort of high volume next generation sort of startup business. And it's a whole host of things. The biggest reason though is just basic blocking and tackling business. Good leaders with an aligned organization taking a good product to market.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Catharine Trebnick from Rosenblatt Securities.

Hi. Hello. Thanks for taking my question. So you seem to have a really good quarter of 15, I think you said of the new logos were contact center. So on that piece of it, were those displacement and legacy systems, Sam, are they mostly – are they upgrades? Are they land and expand? Can you provide more detail around and give us some more context on those? Thanks.

Yes. So it was 15 of our top 20 deals for the quarter. It all involved contact center and we are seeing contact center as a greater percentage of mix in the pipeline. I think we say in the script, the pipeline is up substantially over the last two quarters. It is. I know for a fact it is. I just don't know what the exact number I said in the script. But it's up substantially and we're seeing this transition that we've made to a contact letter led CAC story starting to resonate and work in the marketplace. Now look, it's still early. We've got a substantial increase in pipeline that won't necessarily close this quarter ran or next quarter it takes us a year, some of the sales cycles on the bigger deals. But it's really working pretty clearly and the message is really resonating with prospects and customers. Most of it, I would say the 15 to 20, most of it was probably – it's probably 50/50 add-on new logo of that top 15. That's all new logo. So 15 of our top 20 new logo deals were all contact center based.

Okay. And were they displacement to legacy systems?

Oh, yes, sorry. Yes. Almost all are on-prem to cloud, so if you go back, right, and this is – maybe this will help investors and I know you're very aware of this Catharine, but so it's not just for your sake, it's for everybody's listening sake. So when we were – before the pandemic, there were three main drivers of our business from a macro perspective, digital transformation, end of life of existing on-prem systems and moving to new office space, new real estate space. And then we saw the pandemic and we saw a surge of business because of work from home. But post-pandemic, one of those three legs just doesn't really exist anymore. And that's that move to new office building. Everybody knows the vacancy rates in the commercial real estate space. That's really not a driver of the business. So it's really this digital transformation and as businesses want to digitally transform, IE messaging, bots, AI, data sets, data and analytics, all these kinds of things, they have to move to a cloud-based system. It just doesn't work with the on-prem systems very well.

All right. Thanks a lot, Sam.

Thanks, Catharine.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. Our next question comes from the line of Meta Marshall from Morgan Stanley.

Great. Thanks. Maybe just on the contact center side, just trends on kind of the Engage product or more of that enterprise product versus kind of the XCaaS or more traditional CCaaS product and if I miss that, apologies, but just kind of some helpful details around that. And then maybe on the second question, understanding kind of the nice impact to the quarter and just in terms of kind of sales cycles. But given that that product has kind of meaningfully lower reliability and feature sets, do you just feel like it's a matter of time to kind of inform customers or just how have you kind of been getting through that process? Thanks.

Yes. Okay. So let me cover Engage first and then I'll cover the UC sort of messaging strength and those kinds of things. So first on, UC, we're getting a lot of very positive feedback. The product is still in beta. I suspect it'll be in beta for a while. It is a true new product line for the company. So this isn't a UC version and this isn't a CC version. I mean, you can kind of call it a hybrid between the two. But I'd be really unfair to it. It's a new product, it's a new product line, it's built mobile first. And so we're really in that stage. We've got it in customer's hands. They're using it. We're really excited on the first feedback we're getting so far, but it is a long way to go. In terms of contact center in general, we are definitely seeing more momentum with our contact center-based product. And I think we say in the script or we've said in the past, for contact centers above 250 seats, the growth is very substantial for us as a company. And I want to let investors know, I mean, I like throwing out lots of numbers. But I'd like to let them know for a second just the qualitative. We are going head to head with competitors three years ago or four years ago, we wouldn't have had a chance with. We're going to head to head with competitors who you guys all know and we're winning deals that historically we just wouldn't win. And we're winning because of our TPaaS, our technology partner Ecosystem. We're winning because of our investment in the single platform. We're winning because more customers want to buy UC and CC together on that single platform. So…

Great. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of David Unger from Wells Fargo.

Hey. Thanks for taking our questions. So yes, just to take it back at the high level, so I mean a lot has clearly happened from our seat since earning season kicked off for software, the political side, the economic side. So I'm wondering if you could describe the customer engagement activity level over the last month and any particular near-term catalyst that can support decision making to accelerate? Thanks.

That's going to be a tough one. So first, remember I'm a NAT. I'm a $725 million a year software company. So I'm always very reluctant to speak about this multibillion dollar industry. I feel like I'm a little over my skis, so just FYI on that. And also I should say thank you to Wells Fargo. You led our financing round, you did all your wonderful due diligence and you came back and you led the round of letting us borrow money. So thank you to you guys for that. Okay, in terms of the last month, what do I see? I do see a little bit more cautiousness around some deals. We're still getting them signed, just a little bit more cautiousness, a double, triple check, those kinds of things. And in terms of acceleration, I mean the big thing is digital transformation, right. If you're really looking, and I want to take this up a level and really talk about business outcome, and I'll use an example. You're a hospital. Your most precious asset is your doctor's time. If a patient doesn't show up to a doctor's appointment, you don't get to charge them and so or her. And so having every doctor fully utilized is a key metric for you running your business. When we deploy things like Proactive Outreach to notify patients and remind them that their appointment is tomorrow, press one to confirm, press two, if you want to talk to an agent to change your appointment, these kinds of things, it moves the needle. And what we need to do a better job of as a company, and I think we are starting to do that at 8x8, is educate customers on the potential for them to reduce the cost to serve, improve customer satisfaction, improve their retention rates or renewal rates, improve their ARPU, those kinds of things in deploying our products and we're seeing it, we're bringing those integrated products together. And I think that's actually what's going to accelerate the business next month, the next six months, the next year is really going in. And the easiest way for me to demonstrate this to you, the investment community is Remote Fix, right? We invented Remote Fix for field service companies and we see 30%, 40% reduction in the number of truck rolls after they deploy Remote Fix. And Remote Fix is our contact center plus our UC plus SMS messaging, plus video, one-way video, uplift capabilities in the contact center, all those things combined. And that can save field service companies tens of thousands of dollars per month. They don't mind paying us a little bit to give them that capabilities. So it's definitely that's what's going to drive the industry the whole, hey, you have an on-prem solution, it's being EOL or you're moving to a new building. Those legs just aren't as strong as they were in the past.

Thanks, Sam. And just one more, if can just follow-up. So we just talked about ARPU, and sorry if I missed this. But can we just talk through some of the ARPU trends you're seeing in CCaaS given the competitive dynamics going on in the landscape? Thank you.

Yes. Okay. That's a great question. So first off, my average revenue per customer, I'll do it that way instead of my average revenue per user. And the reason is, I think the average revenue per user in the industry is being, I was going to say the word manipulated, but I'm sure if anybody's listening they'd be upset with that word is being – it doesn't tell the full story. So if you look at 8x8 average revenue per customer, it's up on a year-over-year basis. It's up on a quarter-over-quarter basis. And so that's where we're seeing that multi-product, the higher valued contact center seats, those kinds of things working. Now, what you can get though is per seat items can get a little wonky because – I'll say something that's maybe a little contrary to everybody else. But I don't want you to blow it out of proportion is we do have some instances where people buy less seats because they're buying the bots. Now, I would say in a lot of cases they buy the same number of seats and the bots because they want more productivity and other things. But we do have some cases. And when you do that, it actually skews your average revenue per user because you're dividing by a smaller denominator. And so I think average revenue per customer is a way better metric and that's the one that we are seeing trending up. What I think with the subpar products is really, it just elongates the sales cycle. And if I just take a step back and this is – just take this for the $0.02 that it's worth because I'm not the world's most visionary guy. I do think you're going to see a trend over time, over the next five years. In our industry where usage and consumption-based pricing will become ever more common, I dare say that five years from now per seat pricing may actually almost become extinct. Because I think more and more software is being sold on that consumption-based model. It was pioneered really by the hyperscalers, GPC, Azure and Amazon, but it's even floating into our industry. And then, so I think some of those ARPU metrics are going to be less relevant to the average revenue per customer metrics. So just my $0.02 on that.

Appreciate it. Thank you, Sam.

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Taz Kouljagi from Wedbush.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Two questions. Sam, you are very positive on the number of new customers was signing with multiple products. Can you remind us what's the average penetration of the average, I guess, number of products customers have and what's the upside, like what's the upper limit there? How many products does one customer have if you look at the upper limit?

Okay. So right now, our average – it's a great question. I haven't actually calculated it out. But I can tell you it'd be somewhere between one and two. So a vast majority of our customers are UC customers still. XCaaS is in the 40% of our total revenue. But in terms of our customer base, it's going to be a very small percentage because of the big delta between contact center seats and UC seats. And so it's going to be at one to two. We have hundreds of customers probably getting closer to thousands of customers sitting at three, four, and five products. Now, actually we have thousands of customers at three, four, and five products now. And the upside potential, I'll tell you, I've done a back of the envelope, so please don't quote me on this. But if we were to get sort of some basic benchmark type of numbers in terms of penetration and looking just at five products, not the nine products we sell today, it's an incremental $100 million to $150 million plus in revenue per year.

Got it. Just a follow-up, Fuze migration, can you remind us how much of the base has already moved? And then when customers move from Fuze to 8x8, is there an uplift in pricing or are they paying the same price?

Okay. So glad somebody asked because I wanted to put more details out. So Taz, I owe you. Next time I see you, I'll buy you a coffee. So when we bought Fuze, it was about 20%, rough and tough of our revenue base. Today, it's about a little less than 8% of the revenue comes from Fuze. And that number is steadily declining as we migrate customers over. And what we've – the decision we've made now that we're sort of got the whole migration or the upgrade process down really want to accelerate that. It doesn't make sense to keep this two platforms running in perpetuity. It was never the intention of ours. And so we're really accelerating those moves and you know, I would say the goal is to hopefully get it done in the next year or two to get everybody's disposition and then it'll take some while to completely move them, deploy them and shut down the old legacy platform. But a little less than 8% of our overall revenues come from Fuze customers today.

And then when customers migrate, is there – do they pay more or does [indiscernible]

Okay. So typically they do not pay more. We charge them the same price. But it opens up the door to cross selling. So the problem with the Fuze base is I really can't cross sell them much. And what I mean by that is I don't have like an integrated Fuze plus 8x8 contact center. I have 8x8 plus UC plus 8x8 contact center. As I have the bots and Proactive Outreach, workforce management, PCI compliance, all those products, right? And so once we move them, it opens the door to cross sell.

Got it. Very helpful. Thanks, Sam.

Thanks, Taz.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Funk from Bank of America.

Yes. Great, Sam. Thank you for the question. One more on Fuze, if I could. Sam, you mentioned that you adjusted the guidance for 2025 to account for potential churn from the acceleration of the upgrade program. But what is the expense you're still bearing from Fuze? I mean, presumably you're paying for some data center space and support and other factors. What would I put the normal gross cost or cost of service on that revenue percentage? The 8% you gave us today to kind of get to the cost of that? Or what is that number?

No, the cost would be less, right. I mean, so Fuze has been – and I just – everything we talked about on the call, Fuze has been an absolute home run in my mind. It allowed us to innovate. It gave us the 21 Scrum Teams. When we originally acquired them, we said we were acquiring them for innovation. And so we use that innovation to roll out all these products that we're talking about, the things that are taking off, the things that are growing in the 40%, 50% range, all those kinds of things. At the same time, we stripped a lot of costs out. And so the cost to service that platform is not massive. It's not – I could wing a number and I probably shouldn't, but it's not – it's single-digit millions of dollars.

Okay. So it's not 10 million, 15 million on that.

No, it's not that. What it is though is it's a distraction, right. So it's a distraction and it's a distraction we need to put behind us, right. So I can redeploy assets away from maintaining it. I've got to maintain security compliance on it and all those kinds of things. It's just to the point now it's a distraction and we should get them over on our better fitter platform. It's kind of a – it's a Toyota Camry with 125,000 miles on it, it's time to buy a new car.

Makes sense. And then one more on the macro. We've heard some mixed commentary this quarter from other companies about having to offer more incentives, more discounting, more free months to entice those customers over the finish line, especially SMB. Are you seeing the same thing in the competitive environment where you are for the SMB customers?

Well, I don't think it – to be clear, I don't think it's enticed the customers. I think this is industry self-inflicted gunshot wounds, right? You've got small startup companies that are last raised their round of capital in 2020 at valuations at $2.5 billion, $3 billion that are desperate. You've got bigger companies in – that are single product that are desperately trying to get traction with new products that they haven't invested in and aren't very good. And so I think all that incentive stuff and free month stuff is whatever is, that's just us fighting each other. It has nothing to do with incenting the customer, the customer's just laughing all the way to the bank.

And you mentioned NICE. Thank you for mentioning that. What is your sense of customer overlap with NICE? I would've assumed it was relatively low and you wouldn't see them that much. Customers now both would think about switching to the NICE voice product. Do you have a sense of the overlap?

Well, okay. So let's remember that there's a certain company in Belmont, California that starts with an R and ends with Central that has resold NICE for years, right. And so when I say NICE, I also sort of take it in the context of inside of their go-to-market partner. And then number two is, I think your statement is very accurate, circa two years ago, three years ago. But we've invested a lot in our contact center. And as I mentioned earlier, like we can hold our own, we can hold our own. Now that doesn't mean I'm – there are places that NICE is better than we are. And I think there is places that we are better than NICE. Great company by the way. I respect them tremendously. They've done wonders for our industry. But the UC stuff I think was definitely not aimed at us. The things that they did was very much aimed at that GTM relationship with a certain vendor because that certain vendor has suddenly decided they want to do – they want to go in a different direction. That's why the fine print and everything else.

Okay. Thank you, Sam. I hope Kevin is feeling better as well.

I'm sure he is listening to this call and then I hope he goes back to sleep.

Thank you. At this time, I would now like to turn the conference back over to Sam Wilson for closing remarks.

Thank you, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. Lastly, I just want to thank our partners, our customers, our investors, and our employees. Tomorrow is August 8th is 8x8 day. So we've asked our employees to take some time off and go volunteering tomorrow. And we've got a big number of events for our customers tomorrow. So happy 8x8 day, August 8th. And with that, we look forward to seeing everybody back in about 90 days for our next earnings call. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.