Charles Levingston
Analyst · Piper Sandler & Co. Your line is open
Thank you, Jan. This was a good quarter in that the broader market and deposit volatility we experienced back in March has faded, and we were able to improve our funding mix. During the quarter, we continued our efforts to gather deposits organically. However, this quarter deposit growth came from time deposits, which were predominantly brokered. While our preference is for organic growth, our ability to turn out deposit funding is a plus. Additionally, we took the opportunity to use these deposits to reduce borrowings and improve the rate and maturity mix. To do this, we paid down FHLB borrowings by $777 million and drew on additional BTF borrowings for $500 million. This result -- this resulted in a net reduction in short-term borrowings of $277 million. The reason for the swap in borrowings is the BTFP had a 1-year term and a rate that was more attractive. The blended rate on our BTFP is now 5 -- 4.53% versus the FHLB of 5.34% as of June 30, 2023, for shorter-term funding. The broker deposits we added had terms of approximately 1.5 years at 4.84%. We also did see a decrease in average noninterest-bearing deposits. At quarter end, average non-interest-bearing deposits were 30% of deposits, down from 37% in the prior quarter. On the plus side, our loan-to-deposit ratio came down to 101% and uninsured deposits were down to 29.4%. As it relates to the income statement, net interest income was down $3.2 million, and the net interest margin for the second quarter of 2023 was 2.49%, down 28 basis points. The decreases were a result of the continued movement from noninterest-bearing deposits to time deposits and overall higher funding costs. As we mentioned last quarter, there is a lag in interest income from loans. As the Fed slows the pace of rate increases, the benefit from the variable rate loans resetting and from new loans at market rates will have more of an impact. Moving through the income statement. Our provisions for the ACL and unfunded commitments were reduced, as Jan mentioned. Non-interest income was a bright spot this quarter. We had income of $2.8 million from an SBIC we invested in about 10 years ago. And at the end of the first quarter, we entered into some swap agreements that generated additional fee income of $959,000 for the quarter. The SBIC income is more of an infrequent item that we don't expect to be a recurring source of income this year. Non-interest expense also showed improvement as the first quarter contains some seasonal compensation onetime expenses. In regards to the expenses, we have always prided ourselves on being highly efficient, and we aim to continue to operate in that man. Historically, our efficiency ratio has been in the 39% to 41% range. This past quarter, it was higher at 47.2%, but this still compares well to our proxy peers. However, we know we can do better and have undertaken an expense reduction effort to review all expenses throughout the bank, and we continue to make progress. In the second quarter, we closed two branches, one in D.C. and one in Northern Virginia. The annual pretax cost savings and rental expenses is -- was $408,000. And as the leases were expiring or near expiration, the associated unamortized costs included in the second quarter was relatively low at $240,000. This reduces our banking physical footprint to 13 locations in the Washington, D.C. market, supporting assets of $11 billion. Early in the third quarter, the company also implemented a reduction in force and a review of other noninterest expense items that are expected to generate savings of $2.4 million in the second half of 2023, plus an additional reduction of $5.8 million in 2024.