Hello, and welcome to the Excelerate Energy Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Alex, and I'll be coordinating the call today. [Operator Instructions] I'll now hand it over to your host, Craig Hicks, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Welcome to Excelerate Energy's Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. Participating on the call today are Steven Kobos, Chief Executive Officer and Dana Armstrong, Chief Financial Officer. Also joining the call today are Oliver Simpson, Chief Commercial Officer and David Liner, Chief Operating Officer. Our third quarter 2024 earnings results press release and presentation were released yesterday afternoon and can be found on our website at ir.excelerateenergy.com. I would like to remind everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements on this call that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements, and we make no obligation to update or revise them. Today's remarks will also refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. We have provided a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures at the back of the presentation. With that, it is my pleasure to pass the call over to Steven Kobos.

Thank you, Craig. And to all of you on the call, good morning. I know that many of you are familiar with the Excelerate value proposition. But for those of you who are new to our story, I want to start today's call by simply stating who we are as a company. At Excelerate Energy, we are committed to being the global leader in FSRUs and downstream LNG infrastructure. Our aim is to leverage our unrivaled experience and help customers across the globe unlock access to abundant LNG supply. Q3 was a fantastic quarter for us. I am proud that we delivered another strong quarter of solid financial and operational performance. This resulted in adjusted EBITDA of $92 million. Our ability to deliver consistent results and generate strong cash flow is driven by the high quality of our core regas business. This business is underpinned by a contract portfolio that has about $4 billion in future revenue with a weighted remaining term of seven years. This is a real foundation. Our FSRU and terminals business gives us ample flexibility to invest in growth over the near, mid and long term. It's also why we are confident in our decision to more than double our quarterly dividend to $0.06 per share. Dana is going to speak more to the dividend increase during her remarks. I want to take this opportunity to thank each and every member of the Global Excelerate team. They work hard to ensure the energy needs of our customers are met every day. Quite frankly, that's why we obsess about operational excellence. We had a stellar quarter operationally with reliability in excess of 99.8% and 0 recordable safety incidents. These are impressive statistics considering our pool of over 700 seafarers who served on our vessels. During the quarter,…

Thanks, Steven, and good morning, everyone. As Steven said, we had a great third quarter and are pleased with our financial results. Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter was $92 million, up $3 million or up about 4% versus last quarter, primarily driven by lower operating costs across several regas projects and higher gas sales margins. Our maintenance CapEx spend this quarter was $4 million. Year-to-date through the third quarter, we spent roughly $35 million on maintenance CapEx. Most of our year-to-date maintenance CapEx spend was for upgrades for our Excelsior vessel in advance of the Germany regas project, along with various vessel equipment purchases to support the full fleet. In relation to next year's maintenance CapEx in the second half of 2025, two of our FSRUs will go into dry dock. Unlike the dry docks we incurred recently in Bangladesh, the cost for both of our 2025 dry docks will be capitalized to the balance sheet. From an income statement perspective, we'll incur an off-hire impact for the time that the vessels are in dry dock, which is expected to be between 40 to 50 days per vessel, inclusive of transit time. We'll share further information on the 2025 dry docks and other financial assumptions for 2025 when we release our financial guidance next February. At the end of the third quarter, our total debt, including finance leases, was $716 million, and we had $608 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand. Roughly all of the $350 million of revolver capacity was available for borrowings as of quarter end. With our robust free cash flow generated by our core regas business, our stellar balance sheet and the liquidity provided by our revolver, we have more than sufficient capacity to fund our near-term growth opportunities. Next, I'd like to…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question for today comes from Chris Robertson of Deutsche Bank.

Just wanted to clarify on the new supply agreement that was just signed here. Do you guys have -- I guess, have you secured supply for that agreement? And is there an agreed upon kind of spread or margin that we should be thinking about there? Just in terms of how to frame a medium-term agreement in terms of is that three years, five years, seven years? And what could that mean in terms of expected EBITDA generation?

Thanks, Chris. This is Steven. I'm going to turn that over to Oliver Simpson, our Chief Commercial Officer. I would just say that we're excited about this. One of the things that I like about this is, once again, as I mentioned, you're going to see us buying and selling LNG in the same index and using market knowledge, market access in places that are familiar to us. But I'd like to turn it to Oliver and seeing how much we're at liberty to elaborate.

Thanks, Steven. Thanks, Chris. Yes, I think echoing what Steven said, I mean, we're excited about this transaction. It's a great add to our base business. I think it's fair to say it's a locked-in margin on the purchase and sale. In terms of the length of the deal, I think we said midterm. I think that's kind of where we have to leave it at it. Think about it as multiyear, I would say. But building on what Steven said, I think it's a great example of our ability to leverage on our base business and global footprint and deliver LNG to our customers. I think additionally, I'd also like to iterate the point that it also allows us on the shipping side to acquire an LNG carrier, which is something that we're quite excited about that's a carrier that we can use towards our pipeline and our growth of opportunities. So, it's great to see the synergies between our base business, growing on that and then leaning into our project pipeline.

I guess as a follow-up question, since you brought up the carrier, do you envision that carrier kind of being needed steady state to, I guess, service that contract? Or will there be seasonal opportunities for it to trade spot? Or I guess, how consistent will it be for use in your own portfolio versus any, I guess, sub-chartering opportunities?

I think for us, the -- we've shown in the past, we've had the ability to buy and sell some spot cargoes servicing some of the markets that we're in, again, on the point of service -- leading on our base business and leveraging that. So, I think this carrier, if we go down the route of purchasing an LNG carrier for this, we can use it for this, but we'll certainly look to optimize around our commercial business, spot charters and other deals as it makes sense.

Our next question comes from Jeremy Tonet from JPMorgan.

This is Noah Katz on for Jeremy. First, I want to touch on what you're seeing with other growth opportunities outside of FSRUs. Are you still focused on investing additional assets and vessels and infrastructure for onshore regasification efforts with potential smaller players maybe for more near-term earnings uplift?

Noah, this is Steven again. And yes, I think -- I hope we've made that clear. We certainly -- that was one of the reasons we brought one of the Vietnam opportunities to life. We want to say that we want to make sure the market understands, customers understand that while we think we're the leader in FSRUs, I certainly do more than think. I know we're the leader in FSRUs. But we want to be agnostic. If there are other means of getting LNG to people who need LNG, we will evaluate those. We will -- we want to be advancing those. We don't want to rely on one asset class to solve what is a pressing global need, and that is getting access to affordable LNG. So, I do -- we've tried to make that point. We are looking at things for that reason. And I hope that we will continue to progress in that effort.

Sounds good. And then as a follow-up, I see you maintained the growth CapEx guidance for the full year, but slightly lowered the maintenance CapEx guidance. You might have said already, but I guess just what went into the guidance decrease for the full year? And then if I can ask about what can you tell us about your initial thoughts into 2025 based on the trends you've seen thus far in the fourth quarter?

Noah, this is Dana. So, in regard to your first question on maintenance CapEx, it's just that we haven't spent quite as much on maintenance CapEx. Most of that spend year-to-date is for vessel upgrades, vessel equipment. We report CapEx right now on a cash basis. So, there's a little bit of lumpiness in how we spend that cash and the payments, the timing of the payment. So, we're just slightly short of where we thought we'd be. That will likely trail into 2025. So, your question on 2025, I assume it's in regard to maintenance CapEx. We're still running through those numbers, but we will have -- as we said on the call, we will have two dry docks next year. So, those obviously will be built into our maintenance CapEx next year. And we'll share more information on 2025 in February.

Our next question comes from Michael Scialla of Stevens.

Maybe just to follow up on the last question. Dana, I realize you haven't put the numbers out there yet, but can you say with those two dry docks and some of the CapEx billing -- maintenance CapEx billing into next year relative to 2024, would we think that 2025 would be up maintenance CapEx versus 2024?

Mike, yes, we expect it to be up. This year, we did have a dry dock, but as you probably are aware, that dry dock was not capitalized. It was not included in our maintenance CapEx because that was for our [Summit] vessel, that's on a boot structure. So, next year, in the second half of the year, we do expect our maintenance CapEx will go up because of the two capitalized dry docks. And we're not sharing which vessels those are and the specific timing right now because we're still working through those details with our counterparties, but we should have more to share in February.

Very good. And you've obviously got some good visibility on growth in 2026 with the new FSRU and you've given us a look at some of the longer-term projects with Alaska and Vietnam. Anything between here and there between here and mid-2026, I guess, that you can point to that will serve as growth drivers?

Mike, this is Steven. I'm going to turn this one over to Oliver. But I would say we are certainly looking at things that could have an impact. It's obviously going to be binary if those make or don't make, but you should be aware that we aren't just looking at 2026 and beyond in terms of opportunity set. But Oliver, why don't you see if you can give Mike any more color?

Yes. Thanks, Steven. Thanks, Mike. Yes, I think we see, obviously, 2026, we'll have the new build coming on. And obviously, as we've mentioned, we're working towards the conversion. So, I think the new build and conversions will work towards the kind of organic pipeline of projects we have. But in the near term, we continue to look at inorganic opportunities for growth that we see would add near-term value. I think there's a number of ongoing discussions. I think we're in a great financial position to act on something if the right thing comes up. So, we're looking at those, and we'll come back on those when we can.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Bobby Brooks of Northland Capital Markets.

So, I just wanted to ask on the LNG carrier to FSRU. I was just curious how quickly could you convert that LNG carrier to an FSRU? And could you maybe give us more detail as to what type of projects this converted FSRU would fit? I'm guessing it's probably a smaller project where it's more of a backup insurance policy for those customers' energy needs and it's probably in like environmentally, it's probably in a bay that's less -- doesn't experience crazy changes like Cook Inlet.

Bobby, this is David Liner. Yes, great question. So, we're excited about the conversion prospect. Indeed, that would probably be for a smaller project, one of the smaller projects that are in our pipeline. It's not necessarily only for those projects that would use it for an insurance policy. It could be for any reason. And we expect that to be a versatile project -- or excuse me, a versatile vessel that could go into -- it wouldn't just be Cook Inlet or environmentally sensitive areas. It could really go anywhere, but it would be targeted for those smaller send-out customers. By having that asset available to us in 2025 that Oliver spoke about, we get to start on those -- on the engineering for a conversion project, you can't do the conversion without the long lead items. You can't do the long lead items without engineering and you can't do the engineering without a vessel. And so, by getting our hands on a vessel, we're starting the clock that you spoke about, the time line to bring that vessel to market. You're starting the clock by getting your hands on that asset. So, in terms of total time line, last earnings call, we spoke about a new vessel that was on the order of three to three and a half years to bring that to market. Conversion is considerably less than that, notionally a year less than that, but it's very dependent on the specification also the donor vessel that you're going to use for that conversion. There's a lot of things that go into driving the time line on a conversion. So, don't feel comfortable until we have our hands on that asset and have fully flushed out the specification, don't feel comfortable speaking to the exact time line, but I hope that gives you a sense for roughly what to expect.

No, that's terrific color. I appreciate that. And so, maybe -- you kind of laid it out really well there that you have to get the vessel the full engineering before the long lead time items. So, would it be right for me to -- and then earlier in the call, you were talking about having an LNG carrier to deliver those midterm values. Am I right? Am I thinking about it the right way that you could buy -- you could get that LNG carrier for the FSRU conversion. And while you're doing the engineering and ordering those long lead time items, it could actually be delivering LNG volumes to your current infrastructure? Am I thinking about that right?

Yes, that's spot on. That's the beauty of this model is we get to trade that asset while we're preparing for the conversion. And so, you don't have to absorb months or even longer of downtime on an idle vessel while you do all that engineering work. Spot on.

Okay. Wow, that's really impressive. And then I don't want to take up too much time here, but I guess on the new build, am I right that discussions are already being had on where that new build will ultimately go? If you get it delivered in June of 2026, can we assume that by August or September of that year, that ship is then generating EBITDA? And then also, would I be right to assume the EBITDA generation from the new build would likely be kind of notably above what your current fleet generates in terms of like a per vessel generation?

Bobby, it's Oliver here. I'll take that one. I mean I think we're not going to go into the specifics of in commercial discussions. But I think what I'd say to try and shed some light is this FSRU, it's the only newbuild FSRU that's contracted without -- that was contracted without a long-term contract attached to it. So, I think it's a unique asset in the fleet. I think you look at the size of send that out, it's a fantastic asset for a project that needs that higher send out. So, we're very excited about bringing that asset into the fleet and the prospects for that. So, again, it's one of these things we'll come back when we can say more on specifics, but we're excited about having that asset come out in 2026 into our fleet.

At this time, we currently have no further questions. So, I'll hand back to Steven Kobos for any further remarks.

Again, I would like to thank everyone on the call for joining us today. I really appreciate the conversation. In summary, we are doing what we said we would do. This is an incredible company that is doing big things in markets all around the globe. That is why we are the industry leader in FSRUs and downstream LNG infrastructure. What you heard today is that we are driving near and midterm value creation. We have a rock-solid base business that generates sustainable earnings, and we are executing a disciplined capital allocation strategy to maximize value for you, our valued shareholders. With that, thanks very much for your time.

Thank you for joining today's call. You may now disconnect your lines.