Alejandro Giraldo
Analyst · Santander
Thanks, Pedro. Please, let's turn to the next slide. Our total revenues rose 3.4% in the second quarter of 2013 when compared with the same period of 2012, mainly due to higher sales volume of crude oil, which offset the fall of 6.2% in the average sales price. This decrease is explained by the weakening of the international price benchmarks, Brent and Maya, as well as by the higher share of heavy crude oil in our basket. Additionally, we booked revenues from exports to India and to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, which were in-transit at the end of the first quarter. Now let's turn to the next slide to review the main financial results in the same quarter of 2013. Our operational income decreased between the second quarter of 2012 and the same period of 2013 due to a moderate growth in our revenues compared with the increase in the sales cost. In spite of this situation, EBITDA and EBITDA margin were at similar levels as in the second quarter of 2012. It's important to emphasize that starting this quarter, the EBITDA is estimated based on net income according to the standards of the SEC. The lower net income drove the lower returns on assets and equity. However, they are still very competitive when compared to the average of the oil and gas industry. Now let's turn to the next slide to review in detail the P&L statement of Ecopetrol. As previously mentioned, our revenues grew 3.4% due to the following reasons: first, the higher sales volumes sold; and second, the positive effect of the exchange rate devaluation on exports, which offset the lower average sales price in the second quarter of this year. Regarding costs, variable costs rose by 15%, mainly due to the implementation of a new profit scheme in the Transportation segment, and the higher crop [ph] volumes of diluent and heavy crude. Starting 2013, we are paying higher tariffs in the main pipelines due to the new profit business model. However, such costs will be offset by the future dividends from Cenit. Also, we had higher cost of amortization and depletion in the second quarter of this year due to higher capitalizations and production in Rubiales, Chichimene and Quifa fields. On the other hand, fixed costs also rose 20% due to the following: first, higher contacted services of greater subsoil activity, mainly from the commerciality of the Cajua and Nare fields, water volumes management and higher bottom sediments and water cut, primarily at the Rubiales and Quifa fields; second, the rise in lease, technology and surveillance contracted services yields; third, maintenance on the transportation infrastructure, as part of the integrity program launched in 2012 and which will last until year 2016; and well workovers at the Chichimene and Castilla fields; fourth, the charge coming from the recent tax reform starting January of this year by which the value-added tax paid on the production of gasoline, diesel and asphalt, is no longer deductible and is now booked as a higher cost. Regarding the operating expenses, there was an increase mainly due to a lower recognition of income coming from previous quarters when compared with the same quarter of 2012. Operating income amounted to COP 4.9 trillion in the second quarter of this year, equivalent to an operating margin of 32%. The nonoperating result recorded a gain of COP 225 billion, mainly due to the following: first, the profit from the divestment of El Difícil, Guarimena and the Entrerríos fields, coming from the portfolio optimization initiative; second, improved results of subsidiaries accounted under the equity method, which went from a loss of COP 33 billion in the second quarter of 2012 to a profit of COP 280 billion in the second quarter of this year. Those gains offset the loss in portfolio investments during the second quarter of 2013 due to the adverse global financial market conditions. The increase in income tax expenditure in the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same quarter of 2012 is mainly due to the adjustment made in the second quarter of this year to recognize the 6 months rate of CREE tax created by the tax reform of 2012. As a result of this adjustment, the tax provision was registered at 37% in the second quarter of this year. However, the effective tax rate of the first half of 2013 is 35%. Finally, the net income amounted to COP 3.3 trillion, equivalent to a net margin of 21%. EBITDA was COP 7.3 trillion, equivalent to an EBITDA margin of 48%. Let's go now to the next slide to see more detail on the key initiatives addressed to optimize the cost of operations. Our main initiatives to control the costs are the following: in E&P, with the building of a power transmission line to the Rubiales and Quifa fields, the optimization of fluids disposal and the higher reliability and efficiency of subsoil and facility maintenance, we forecast the lifting cost by year end will range between $10.68 and $10.85 per barrel equivalent, compared to a cost of $11.53 in 2012. In refining and petrochemicals, we plan to keep advancing our strategies to optimize the cost of chemicals and catalysts with maintenance reliability and providing efficient industrial services. With these initiatives, we estimate the refining costs in 2013 to be in the range between $6.33 and $6.69 per barrel compared to $6.03 per barrel reported in 2012. On the next slide, we present Ecopetrol's cash flow and balance sheet as of June 30, 2013. The initial cash balance of the second quarter was COP 8.6 trillion. Internal cash generation and other sources added COP 16.8 trillion that funded the operation, the CapEx and the payment of dividends in a single installment to minority shareholders, as well as the first installment of ordinary dividends to the Colombian government. The ending balance of cash and cash investments was COP 4.2 trillion. Ecopetrol signed a new loan agreement for COP 1.84 trillion, of which COP 1.55 trillion were used for liability management, prepaying a syndicated loan disbursed back in 2009. With this new loan, we extended the term in 5 years and reduced the interest rate by 1.5%. Additionally, we raised COP 284 billion for financing this year's investment plan. Despite this transaction, the indebtedness during this period remained low, with a 12 months debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 0.22x. Additionally, during the second quarter of this year, S&P rose Ecopetrol's credit rating in foreign currency from BBB- to BBB. On the next slide, we have an overview of the financial results of the corporate group. Revenues of the corporate group amounted to COP 17.6 trillion, with a net income of COP 3.4 trillion. EBITDA was COP 7.5 trillion and the EBITDA margin was 43%. In the second quarter of 2013, the Transportation segment subsidiaries outperformed even that of Ocensa and Oleoducto de Colombia operated as a profit center for the entire second quarter. Reficar had a lower loss, while results of E&P companies were lower, mainly due to Ecopetrol's global energy losses and the decreased net income of Hocol. The higher revenues without eliminations came from Reficar with COP 1.9 trillion, followed by Cenit with COP 636 billion. The higher EBITDA, net of noncontrolling interest, came from Ocensa with COP 423 billion, followed by Cenit with COP 397 billion. The higher net income came from Ocensa with COP 370 billion, Cenit with COP 289 billion and Equion with COP 190 billion. On the other hand, the bigger losses were reported by Ecopetrol Oleo e Gas do Brasil with COP 112 billion, Ecopetrol America with COP 84 billion, and Reficar with COP 46 billion. Now I will turn the presentation back to Mr. Gutierrez who will comment on the milestones in the internal consolidation and the corporate social responsibility.