Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to the Dycom Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] And as a reminder, I'd like to let you know that the call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to our host, President and Chief Executive Officer, Steven Nielsen. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Tammy. Good morning, everyone. I would like thank you for attending this conference call to review our first quarter fiscal 2021 results. Going to slide two. During this call, we will be referring to a slide presentation, which can be found on our website's investor center main page. Relevant slides will be identified by number throughout our presentation. Today, we have on the call Drew DeFerrari, our Chief Financial Officer; and Ryan Urness, our General Counsel. Now, I will turn the call over to Ryan Urness.

Thank you, Steve. The statements made during this call may be forward-looking in nature and are provided pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include all comments reflecting our expectations, assumptions or beliefs about future events or performance that do not relate solely to historical periods. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially from our current projections, including those risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 2, 2020 and our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Steve?

Thanks, Ryan. As we refer to our results, please note that organic revenue is a non-GAAP measure that excludes revenues from storm restoration services. In our comments today and in the accompanying slides, we reference this and other non-GAAP measures. We refer you to the Quarterly Report section of our website for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to their corresponding GAAP measures. To begin, I want to express my sincere hope that everyone listening to this call as well as their families are healthy and safe. We are living in truly unprecedented times for our country and our world. During my 21 years as Dycom CEO, I've never witnessed anything like the dislocation we are experiencing as a country. The impacts of 9/11, the dot com crash and the Great Financial Recession pale in comparison to the speed and severity of the effects the COVID-19 pandemic is having on society and the nation's economy. Dycom first tangibly experienced the pandemic’s effects in our business during the week of March 15. Unlike calendar quarter reporting companies, almost half of our first quarter occurred after the pandemic became a reality. As Dycom came to grips with the pandemic, our people demonstrated real fortitude, as we make daily changes to the business. I could not be prouder of our employees. Field technicians served our customers 24/7, helping grow network capacity and maintaining networks whose functioning has never been more necessary for daily life. They work safely and unstintingly. In addition, during the quarter, we transitioned over 2,000 employees to work-from-home arrangements, while maintaining our financial closing deadlines and reporting calendar. Together, we made the hard calls necessary to adjust our operating plan to the pandemic environment. Now going to slide four. For employees, keeping them safe was our first priority. We quickly…

Thanks, Steve and good morning everyone. Going to slide nine. Contract revenues for Q1, 2021, were $814.3 million, which was above the high-end of our expectations despite a challenging economic backdrop. Organic revenue declined 1.8%, but we had solid growth from two of our top five customers. Adjusted EBITDA was $69.9 million or 8.6% of revenue. Gross margins were at 16.5% and were approximately 80 basis points above the high-end of our expectations for the quarter from improved operating performance at higher revenue levels. Adjusted G&A expense decreased 18 basis points compared to Q1, 2020. During the quarter, we took actions to reduce administrative costs responsive to the current economic conditions. Additionally, there was a reduction of performance based compensation compared to Q1, 2020. Non-GAAP adjusted income per share in Q1, 2021, was $0.36 per share. Excluded from this non-GAAP result was the impact of a goodwill impairment charge of $53.3 million for a reporting unit that provides installation services inside third-party premises. In response to the impact of COVID-19, certain customers have modified their protocols to increase the self-installation of customer premise equipment by their subscribers. This reporting unit generated less than 4% of annual revenue and did not incur losses in fiscal 2020. Now going to slide 10. Our balance sheet and financial position remain solid. Since Q3 of 2020, we have reduced net debt by $263.3 million. In Q1 of 2021, net debt was reduced by $86.9 million from solid free cash flow and by purchasing $167 million of principal amount of our convertible senior notes at a discount for $147 million. We ended the quarter with $643.9 million of cash and equivalents, and $675 million of outstanding borrowings on our revolving line of credit. These borrowings were made in March and deposited as cash balances on…

Thanks Drew. Moving to slide 12. Within a challenged economy, we experienced firm end market activity and capitalized on our significant strengths. First and foremost, we maintained strong customer presence throughout our markets. Second, our extensive market presence has allowed us to be at the forefront of evolving industry opportunities. Fiber deployments enabling new wireless technologies are underway in many regions of the country. Wireless construction activity in support of expanded coverage and capacity continue to grow through the deployment of enhanced macro cells and new small cells. In fact, we have recently completed or begun work associated with several thousand 5G small cell sites across 13 states. Telephone companies are deploying fiber-to-the-home to enable one gigabit high speed connections. Cable operators are deploying fiber to small and medium businesses and enterprises. A portion of these deployments are in anticipation of the customer sales process. Fiber deep deployments to expand capacity are underway. Dramatically increased fees to consumers are being provisioned and consumer data usage is growing dramatically. Customers are consolidating supply chains, creating opportunities for market share growth and increasing the long-term value of our maintenance and operations business. In addition, we are increasingly providing integrated planning, engineering and design, procurement and construction and maintenance services for wired and converged wireless wireline networks. As our nation and industry contend with the COVID-19 pandemic, we remain encouraged that our major customers are committed to multiyear capital spending initiatives. And we are confident in our strategies, the prospects for our company, the capabilities of our dedicated employees and the experience of our management team as we navigate challenging times. Now, Tammy, we will open the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] And we do have a question coming from the line of Sean Eastman with KeyBanc. Please go ahead.

Hi, gentlemen. Thanks for taking my questions. I hope everybody is well on your end. I just wanted to start on the decision not to provide guidance. Overall, I understand the uncertainty. But it just seems like disruption is pretty limited here near-term, and demand trends are stable. So, I'm just trying to get a little more color on where the big unknown is, and what visibility is like around order flow near-term?

So, Sean, look, we had a good quarter. The trends are stable into May. We're confident in the business to date, but we have all of our major customers who are not providing guidance to their investors. And we just weren't comfortable or presumptuous to get in front of that approach from the customers. Clearly, there is always different approaches to providing guidance in uncertain times. But first and foremost is your current period performance, and that was good.

Got it. All right. So, really nice improvement on the cash generation last two quarters here. Just wondering if you could help us with expectations around conversion of free cash flow from EBITDA this year, maybe relative to Dycom's normalized trend? And -- or whether there is some moving parts we should be considering as we move to the rest of the fiscal year here?

Well, clearly, we had DSOs come in. We re-normed a number of our vendor relationships to get more in line with what I call industry benchmarks. We continue to work hard to tightening our collections process, manage CapEx and manage working capital more broadly. And so, we were pleased with the reduction in net debt. We were pleased with the reduction in leverage. And we expect those to continue, once again, given the uncertainties of the environment that we're operating in.

Got it. And I'm going to sneak one last one in. So, the CapEx flex down is pretty notable. I'm just curious whether that should be an indication to us on where revenue is trending, just in terms of capital intensity. And whether a component of that CapEx is sort of being deferred into fiscal 2022. Just how to think about that?

So, we have always had an aggressive replacement cycle where depending on the residual value of the equipment, we can sell it earlier than most people do in the industry, because we've seen good returns. In a way, it's the, arbitrage, the discounts we get when we buy equipment new to what it's worth in the aftermarket. And typically, in periods of uncertainty, we're able to extend the useful life of the equipment with a modest if any increase in our maintenance costs. And once again, in periods of uncertainty, we're just managing the cash. Clearly, we had good revenue performance in this quarter. And we don't see any impediments based on our capital plan to continuing to grow the business when it makes sense.

Got it. I appreciate the time. Thanks.

And our next question comes from the line of Noelle Dilts with Stifel. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. Good morning.

Good morning, Noelle.

Thanks. So, for my first question I was hoping you could give us a little bit more detail on the large customer program that you have discussed in the past. You've talked about moving from Phase 1, which has been a little bit more challenged into Phase 2. Curious, if the timing there that you've kind of previously communicated has changed at all? And you also mentioned a reprioritization of that large customer program, maybe if you could clarify a little bit what that means, that would be helpful?

So, Noelle, we really don't have anything to add to what we talked about in February in terms of our expectation around -- moving through the initial portions of that large customer program. So, nothing real noteworthy there. In terms of the reprioritization of a large customer program, it was for a portion of the work that the customer reprioritized. And so, when we evaluated the realizability of the backlog, it's more uncertain, and so we reduce that. It's not of concern to us.

Okay. Thank you. That's helpful. And then just in terms of your employee count and your headcount, could you talk about how much of that -- the reduction was permanent versus temporary? How you are thinking about ramping the workforce back up when the work comes back, any thoughts there on kind of how to manage through these changes?

Sure. So, if you look at the headcount reduction of, call it, just north of 900 employees sequentially, about a third of those were non-revenue producing positions. We've had a number of efficiency initiatives underway. We took a hard look given the uncertainty of what we needed on the G&A side and other non-revenue producing positions, and we made some hard calls. And so, we were able to reduce those folks in a period of uncertainty. On the revenue producing side, so roughly the other two-thirds, a good portion of those relate to what I'll call our short cycle businesses where they are almost exclusively performed in-house and where seasonally, we typically have lots of trainees at this -- during this quarter. And when we looked at the activity of those short cycle businesses being depressed, we released a number of folks that were in training. The work appears to have bottomed in those short cycle businesses towards the end of April. We'll bring them back as we need them. But we made the adjustment, because we didn't have the business at the time that they were in training.

Thanks. That makes sense.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Alex Rygiel with B. Riley. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Steve.

Good morning, Alex.

Steve, your backlog was down due to a customer reprioritizing a large program? Is this the in-house customer premise work shift?

No. It was really -- as I just said on the answer to Noelle, it was really just a shifting in priorities. And so, when we looked at the realizability of the backlog, we took a -- we made an adjustment. It doesn't mean the work has been canceled. It just means from a backlog perspective, we needed to be more conservative given the reprioritization.

And can you quantify the negative impact in revenue and EBITDA from COVID in the first quarter?

So, I think the impacts were generally limited to the short cycle business and it was pretty insignificant.

And how does your activity in May compare to April?

Again, as I told Noelle, in those -- and we don't have a lot of business that's short cycle. But in those short cycle businesses, it appears that activity bottomed kind of somewhere in weeks of April 18 to April 25 and it's up slightly coming into May.

Thank you.

And the rest of the business was unaffected material -- in any significant way.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brent Thielman with D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks. Good morning, guys.

Good morning, Brent.

Hey, Steve, I know you guys aren't providing a sales outlook. I know there's a lot of factors in play there. But it does look like you guys feel pretty good that you're stabilizing the margins with this quarter and sort of the commentary around the second quarter. Is that fair?

Yeah. I think, if you look back at the guidance we provided in February as a whole, we feel for the July quarter, we're comfortable with that. But we're not providing any detailed guidance given the factors we've talked about with earlier questions.

Okay. And I guess, bigger picture, I mean a lot of excitement here this year Sprint/T-Mobile kind of merger -- merge addition enters the foray. Can you talk about, are discussions progressing with any of those customers? Do you expect those to become customers or bigger customers for you? Maybe anything that's happening behind the scenes that might give us some flavor what's ramping up here?

Well, look, we are clearly aware of the programs. We are having some discussions, I would say just generally in wireless, it represented about 10.5% of this quarter's revenue. So, kind of on a run rate basis, approaching $350 million in revenue. We had good growth with AT&T. And so, I think, we feel good about our opportunities there. I think, it's taking some time to develop. There has been some industry commentary about that, but we're still confident overall in the wireless business.

Okay. Maybe one quick one too. Just on the progress on cash flow and DSOs. I know you guys have been kind of targeting this 90s level. Do you think you can get there this year versus maybe have to wait in F 2021, which I think we talked about last quarter?

I think we continue to make progress whether we get there this fiscal year or not, we'll be moving in the right direction.

Okay. That's great. Thank you, guys.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Jennifer Fritzsche with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you for taking the questions. Two, if I may. Just this morning, CenturyLink, which I think saw the most growth of any of your customers, announced an initiative to put out an additional 400,000 homes with gigabit speed. Is -- I guess, maybe I'll ask, does that surprise you? Do you expect them to continue to lean in here and be offensive in their fiber push? And then secondly on cable, I noticed you had a new contract from Charter. Charter has not appeared in your top five customer list. Is that something we could expect to see them come in a more offensive and aggressive way? Thank you.

So, with respect to CenturyLink, Jennifer, we've been actively participating with them in their fiber-to-the-home initiative now for probably going back to 2015/2016. We weren't surprised in the list of markets that were identified. We are encouraged that they feel good about the program and believe that it's successful. And so, we're happy with the progress we made with them. As you identified, we grew kind of 40%-plus organically year-over-year. And then with respect to Charter, those are not new contracts. Those are contracts we have in place and have active work under. I think, in general, what I would say about cable, as clearly, they had a great subscriber addition quarter. The work-from-home and the amount of video conferencing and other bandwidth intensive applications that have been exposed or increased by the pandemic, I think that's over time going to be supportive of continued expansion of capacity in cable networks and all networks, in general.

Steve, if I may, can I just add on to that last point on cable. From what I've read, it seems like the uplink is really being challenged here for Zoom and Microsoft Teams, et cetera. Is that something that can be helped through a more fiber deep architecture from cable?

Sure. So, there's a number of ways that cable can provision more upstream bandwidth, but the most basic is to reduce the number of subscribers that connect to an individual fiber at a node location and ergo, pushing fiber deeper certainly helps with that. On a shorter term basis, there can certainly be no splitting activity that I think one of our customers has talked about, and of which we've been very active in supporting those efforts.

Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And we do have a question from the line of Blake Hirschman with Stephens. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Good morning, guys.

Good morning, Blake.

Steve, it sounds like the short cycle pieces are really what saw any kind of impact. Can you kind frame up what percentage of the overall mix would fall under that short cycle definition?

Well, let's have Drew give the split between cable, telco and locating. And I think we can frame our answer that way.

Okay. Yeah.

Okay. Good morning, Blake. So, telco was at 72.1%, cable was 17.1%, facility locating was at 6.5% and electrical and other was at 4.3%.

So, Blake, typically the short cycle businesses that we're referring to are really around the locating and the cable installation business. And as you can tell, between our disclosures, they're less than 10%. That doesn't mean they stopped. They just had slower activity, so a minor impact.

Okay. Got it. Great. And then on AT, it looks like your -- those payable went up a bit. That's obviously not a bad thing at all. Just trying to get a sense for how much of that might be more kind of timing versus sustainable kind of as we look forward?

Go ahead, Drew.

Yeah. As Steve mentioned, Blake, just around the payables, we looked at vendors and re-normed where the payment terms are on those more in line with what Steve referred to as industry standard. So, that's something that we've spent time on during the quarter, and we'll continue to look at that.

Got it. That sounds great. I'll hop back in queue. Thanks.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Alan Mitrani with Sylvan Lake Asset Management. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you. Just a couple of quick ones. Steve, can you talk about how work-from-home for -- I'm assuming a lot of your employees did work-from-home this past quarter. But how technology and work-from-home is going to change the business over the next year or two? Or maybe just talk about some of the software packages you've put in, or is it not? And this is just going to be a standard normal outdoor business the same way it's always been for 20 years?

Sure. I think, Alan, as we said in our comments, we moved over 2,000 people -- I think, it was actually north of 2,400 people to working offsite or work-from-home. We're going to be very thoughtful and not in a hurry to come back onsite, because we found good productivity. We think generally employees like it, and we think it's been good for the business. So, clearly, the investments we made around moving applications to the cloud, making sure that we were ready with sufficient capacity. To move those offsite, I think, was good investments over the last several years. We suspect that we're not the only company thinking that way. And so, we think there are going to be more demands on residential networks where actually what's traditionally been in facility or in office activity goes to the edge of the network on the residential side. So, we think that's good. I think the other trend that I think is just emerging and probably will accelerate over time is all numbers of industries thinking about how they deal with social distancing and using 5G networks everything from warehousing to logistics to manufacturing. I just think there's going to be substantial new applications developed that take advantage of 5G technology and fiber deeper into the networks. And I like the comment one of our customers made that even in this period of slow time, people will pay their phone bills, their cellular or wireless bills when they're skipping rent payments and mortgages, right? So, it says how important the networks that we work on are to the country.

Great. Thank you. And then, can you talk about the competitive dynamic as it relates to 5G? We haven't really seen them in -- there's no 5G handsets, so nobody is really doing anything with 5G. Do you think the work-from-home dynamic, the fact that everybody needs cable or connectivity will push people to invest even faster may be through an infrastructure bill if it comes through? Or do you think that the delay in handsets that might come out from a 5G or people buying anything might delay any sort of consumer application for it? Because I am just wondering why some of your customers might not -- either might accelerate or decide to pull-off the gas in terms of spending CapEx for the next year or so.

Yeah. I mean, certainly, on the capacity side, right, they've all highlighted that they're investing to create capacity. I think, in terms of 5G, Alan, there's lots of preparatory work that has to be done, that's well underway. We're working on thousands of sites across 13 states. So, we think it's real. I think if anything, particularly on the industrial side and on the residential side that all of the changes in the economy only will reinforce the trends around deployment. I think, the other thing that we highlighted in our comments is I think when you look at work-from-home, telemedicine, distance learning, all of the things that we've rolled out rapidly as a country to contend with the pandemic, access is absolutely crucial to all those applications. And so, we're hopeful that that's reflected in future infrastructure bills. Certainly, we've done lots of rural telecom deployments over a long period of time, but we did lots coming out of the last recession that were funded in part by federal dollars. And so -- and I think that's something we're paying close attention to.

Okay. And then lastly, if I can. The sequential drop in backlog, it's your biggest in a long time. Is there something that you pulled out of backlog, or is it just people didn't release some of the work? Can you just remind us, or what you think in terms of what that reflects?

So, Alan, as we said earlier, roughly a third of the decline was this revaluation of this reprioritization of the backlog, wasn’t canceled, but it was reprioritized. And so on a probability basis, we just marked that down. The rest of the business had normal burn. And in fact subsequent to the end of the quarter, we had a pretty substantial renewal in our small cell business with a key customer. We've renewed some other business. And so, we are not concerned about that trend.

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Adam Thalhimer with Thompson Davis. Please go ahead.

Hey, good morning, Steve.

Hey, good morning, Adam.

Just curious what's the impact of, I guess, the virus on short-term trends from the standpoint of -- I mean, is there almost a fair amount of emergency work as customers struggle to keep up?

Yeah. Look, I wouldn't call it emergency work. I think, our customers networks are performing well. A number of them have provided lots of disclosure about the rapid growth. I think, what I would say is, it's as if a year or year and a half worth of normal network growth got accelerated into a two-week period or a three-week period. And so, I think the networks have done well. That being said, we've had a fair amount of activity in different geographies across the country to create some capacity to backfill that acceleration of the growth.

Doesn't that make you -- it's got to make you feel more confident about, yes, your customers -- they are economically sensitive and they can cut CapEx if they get nervous about the economy if their cash flow gets impacted. But I got to think that the importance of networks in this time kind of insulates you a little bit?

Yeah. I think, as always and we said this in our comment, right, we view is what we work on these networks that our customers provide as essential in the fullest sense for the country. And I think that's been more evident over the last two months than maybe it has been in several years, right? So, I think this is -- it's absolutely crucial. I think they will continue to invest. You just have to be aware that in the economy that's had some short-term challenges that there maybe some effects on their behavior. But intermediate, long-term, I think this makes all of the drivers of our business ever clearer and stronger.

Okay. Can you talk about the decision to pull in the converts now and then how that impacts quarterly D&A and interest expense going forward?

All right. Drew, why don't you take the D&A and interest expense?

Yeah. So, just on the interest side of it, Adam, the converts, there's two elements to it. One of those we add back, which is a non-cash amortization and then there's the coupon, which is at 0.75 and where the senior credit facility is now and where LIBOR is at a low rate, it's certainly attractive debt currently and there's capacity within the facility to repurchase those notes. And so, we anticipate using cash on hand to do that.

Yeah. I think, in terms of -- I mean, the way we think about the repurchase at the tender offer is that investors have other opportunities in the marketplace to invest capital that maybe more attractive than holding this convert to maturity and to the extent that we could provide liquidity for them at the right return for us. It just was a proactive way to manage the capital structure.

Okay. I guess, I was hoping Drew would make it easy for us and give us some targets for Q2 on D&A and interest expense.

Well, we'll see how many of the notes come in, and then we'll consider helping folks out when that's done.

Okay. Understood. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jon Lopez with Vertical Group. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Thanks so much.

Good morning Jon.

Good morning. I just want a couple -- sorry -- I have a couple just quick ones on the backlog stuff, just to clarify to make sure I am clear on the moving pieces. So, the first thing, was there anything explicit or specific related to just lower on time installation activity? Is that specific contributor here in any way?

So, Jon, I'm not sure I followed the question. I mean, we certainly had less in home activity. That was not a primary driver of the change in the backlog. But certainly, as all of our -- most of our customers have identified, their customers are not particularly comfortable understandably with having folks come into their homes. And so, there's been an impact on that business.

Okay. Understood. But in that context, if I just look -- and I don't know whether your comment was quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year -- but you have kind of $870 million down from prior quarter. Just to be clear, you are saying that there wasn't a specific portion of that where in home just gets removed?

No, because we continue to have some levels of activity. It's at reduced levels. A thirds or a little better of that was this reprioritization dynamic, which is not of concern to us. The rest of it was ordinary course. And we've talked about this, Jon, before. Our backlog is an estimate using a number of methodologies that are consistent over a long period of time. It correlates over the intermediate and long-term with revenue. But in quarter-to-quarter, it's not all that meaningful. I mean, have we gotten the renewal in three days earlier than we did, it would have been a different number on the -- based on the small cell activity.

No. That's understood. Yeah. That's understood. Thank you. The second, just to come back to that -- to the re-measurement part. I think, what I hear you saying here is that activity likely resurfaces, and I know you don't want to put a timeframe on it. But I mean, is it fair to say that that likely be re-becomes backlog for lack of a better term and like calendar 2021 or at some point?

Well, it hasn’t been cancelled. It was reprioritized. And it was reprioritized with enough uncertainty that we just didn't feel comfortable not making some adjustment to the backlog. But it's not -- it was not a material driver to the overall company. It's just something that we had to do in the ordinary course based on new information.

Got you. Sorry, the last part on this. It sounds as though any of these changes, they don't really seem like they're having much of an impact on your view of what working capital improvement can look like as we get to the back half of the calendar year. Is that a fair assessment? And I guess, maybe my question that would spit off that is maybe like why? If you are having this re-measurement now like, why would that have no impact on your cash flow capabilities in the back half of the year?

So, Jon, I'm not sure I follow. With respect to the backlog, it's an estimate. It's different than our view in terms of working capital. I mean, the working capital is going to be a function of the revenue levels, the EBITDA margin and then the way we manage accounts receivable and payables. And we think that we will continue to de-lever the business through the balance of the year based on those factors.

Right. Okay. No. That’s helpful. I guess, what I was just kind of driving at, it doesn’t seem like this change in backlog is really driving much of a change in your view of the business over the intermediate term? Maybe I could just simplify it that way.

I think that's exactly correct. That is correct.

Okay. All right. Great. Very good. Sorry, one last question here. And you have talked around this a little bit in response to other questions. But this is kind of the fifth or sixth quarter of year-on-year decline at one of your key cable customers. I guess, I am just wondering -- and again, you talked to this a little bit. But is that a vertical that you would expect to invert from kind of tailwind to headwind as we look out over the next 18, 24 months?

Well, look, I think we've talked about this before. We were encouraged that Comcast grew sequentially. We've talked about and they've talked about their increasing deployment of fiber deeper into their networks. I think there was some focus on dealing with near-term capacity. But they are clearly committed to pushing fiber deeper into the network. And we were encouraged that sequentially, the revenue went up as opposed to the declining trend that it had been on. So, I think, in general, we were pleased with where that business was.

Very good. Thanks for all the help. Sorry for the tortured questions.

Not a problem.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Neil Miller [ph], a private investigator. Please go ahead.

Hey, Steve. Hi.

Hey, Neil.

In your opening comments, you referenced latency. And I am kind of wondering whether that was a small micro cell commentary or a node splitting or a 5G overlay, or just kind of help with why the emphasis on latency?

Well, I think, Neil, latency standards are key to the 5G standard. And I think, latency, if you think about it is crucial to all of these deployments around whether it's video conferencing or industrial applications. I mean, the return cycle of the signal in the network is really important and becoming even more important as we think about autonomous vehicles and other future applications that need the network, they need a network that has a quick response time.

Great. Thanks.

Fritzsche, please go ahead, with Wells Fargo.

Hi, Steve. Just one more question. Depending on what you believe coming from Washington, it doesn't seem debatable that if there is a force stimulus, broadband is going to be a part of it. I know you saw some benefit in the last stimulus, which I believe was 2009. I mean, any thoughts there? I am not asking you to predict what's going on in Washington, but just would love your thoughts.

Sure. So, as you mentioned, Jennifer, in the 2009 stimulus, there was roughly $7 billion that was allocated to broadband, rural broadband deployments. And between the Dycom business at the time as well as the businesses that we acquired from others subsequent, if you put those together we did there sort of $600 million of that stimulus work. So, kind of an interesting number, almost 10% of what was in the bill eventually wound up as revenue to us. And so, clearly, as we said in our comments, if you think about distance learning and telemedicine and all the things that have become essential, I think it's a reasonable area to look towards as future investment in a stimulus. There's already the rural digital opportunities fund, which is underway. But I think, clearly, with the magnitude of the federal expenditures in the first stimulus bills, my guess is it would be bigger. If that were involved than it was 10, 12 years ago and I think that would be a good opportunity for us. No guarantees, but we have a broad rural presence across the country.

Thank you.

And we have a follow-up question with Alex Rygiel with B. Riley. Please go ahead.

Steve, how did your subcontractor workforce headcount change in the quarter? And can you also help us understand the cadence of completion of a large project for a particular customer?

So, Alex, this is always a backend loaded quarter seasonally until April was a good month. And so, our usage of subcontractors certainly increased month-to-month throughout the quarter. And we had plenty of availability there. So, we feel good about that. And that, as we said earlier, I think we were in the same place where we were three months ago in terms of our progress in working through that large customer program in the initial phase.

Thank you.

And Mr. Nielsen, there are no questions in the queue. [Operator Instructions]

Okay, Tammy. Thanks everybody for attending this call. We look forward to speaking to you again on our next earnings call the end of August. Hope everybody stays healthy and safe. Thank you.

[Technical Difficulty] for today. Thank you for your participation for [technical difficulty]. You may now disconnect.